SLODAR Turbulence Profilers Richard Wilson, Tim Butterley, James Osborn Durham University, UK.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GLAO Workshop, Leiden; April 26 th 2005 Ground Layer Adaptive Optics, N. Hubin Ground Layer Adaptive Optics Status and strategy at ESO Norbert Hubin European.
Advertisements

Adaptive Optics1 John O’Byrne School of Physics University of Sydney.
Excellent daytime seeing at Dome Fuji on the Antarctic Plateau
Analysis of the frozen flow assumption using GeMS telemetry data Angela Cortés 1, Alexander Rudy 2, Benoit Neichel 3, Lisa Poyneer 4, Mark Ammons 4, Andres.
Super Seeing from the AAT Peter Gillingham 26 th March 2003.
Site testing at Dome C: recent results CONCORDIASTRO Project E. Aristidi, A. Agabi, E. Fossat, T. Travouillon, M. Azouit, J. Vernin, A. Ziad, F. Martin,
W AVEFRONT C HARACTERIZATION C AMPAIGN AT P ARANAL D ECEMBER 2007 Using DIMM-MASS-GSM-MOSP-LuSci & SCIDAR ESO/LUAN/IAC/CTIO Joint effort 1 FOROT-Sardenia.
May 2001Venice Workshop1 The Statistics of Isoplanatic Angle and Adaptive Optics Time Constant derived from DIMM data Marc Sarazin (1) and Andrei Tokovinine.
Turbulence and Seeing measurements at Dome C A collaboration UNSW, CTIO and the University of Nice.
ELT Stellar Populations Science Near IR photometry and spectroscopy of resolved stars in nearby galaxies provides a way to extract their entire star formation.
The Origin of Modern Astronomy Chapter 4:. Isaac Newton 1689.
Aug-Nov, 2008 IAG/USP (Keith Taylor) ‏ Instrumentation Concepts Ground-based Optical Telescopes Keith Taylor (IAG/USP) Aug-Nov, 2008 Aug-Sep, 2008 IAG-USP.
TMT.AOS.PRE DRF011 Turbulence and wind speed profiles for simulating TMT AO performance Tony Travouillon M. Schoeck, S. Els, R. Riddle, W. Skidmore,
Comparison of Eddy Covariance Results By Wendy Couch, Rob Aves and Larissa Reames.
NGAO Status R. Dekany January 31, Next Generation AO at Keck Nearing completion of 18 months System Design phase –Science requirements and initial.
Measuring Seeing, The Differential Image Motion Monitor (DIMM)
An Astronomer’s View of Optical Turbulence The characterization, understanding and use of an astronomical site of an astronomical site is a challenging.
Observations and simulations of the wind structure in the boundary layer around an isolated mountain during the MATERHORN field experiment Stephan F.J.
Cn2 profile measurement from Shack-Hartmann data
July 2001Zanjan, Iran1 Atmospheric Profilers Marc Sarazin (European Southern Observatory)
Application of a High-Pulse-Rate, Low-Pulse-Energy Doppler Lidar for Airborne Pollution Transport Measurement Mike Hardesty 1,4, Sara Tucker 4*,Guy Pearson.
A visible-light AO system for the 4.2 m SOAR telescope A. Tokovinin, B. Gregory, H. E. Schwarz, V. Terebizh, S. Thomas.
International Research Centre for Telecommunications and Radar High resolution 3D wind profiling using an S-band polarimetric FM-CW radar: dealiasing techniques.
1 Manal Chebbo, Alastair Basden, Richard Myers, Nazim Bharmal, Tim Morris, Thierry Fusco, Jean-Francois Sauvage Fast E2E simulation tools and calibration.
Adaptive Optics1 John O’Byrne School of Physics University of Sydney.
Viewing the Universe through distorted lenses: Adaptive optics in astronomy Steven Beckwith Space Telescope Science Institute & JHU.
© TAFE MECAT 2008 Chapter 6(b) Where & how we take measurements.
February 2013 Ground Layer Adaptive Optics (GLAO) Experiment on Mauna Kea Doug Toomey.
ASTR 3010 Lecture 18 Textbook N/A
Richard Rotunno National Center for Atmospheric Research, USA Dynamic Mesoscale Mountain Meteorology Lecture 2: Thermally Driven Circulations.
Vancouver, June Models of the ground layer and free atmosphere at some sites A. Tokovinin, CTIO Need for OTP “models”: Adaptive Optics!
Toward a mesoscale flux inversion in the 2005 CarboEurope Regional Experiment T.Lauvaux, C. Sarrat, F. Chevallier, P. Ciais, M. Uliasz, A. S. Denning,
Astronomical Seeing. The Project Students will be introduced to the concept of astronomical seeing and how it affects the quality of astronomical images.
SITE PARAMETERS RELEVANT FOR HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGING Marc Sarazin European Southern Observatory.
Meteorological Site Evaluation and Forecasting needs for the Southern African Large Telescope (SALT) D. A. Erasmus Certified Consulting Meteorologist and.
Adaptive Optics for Astronomy Kathy Cooksey. AO Basics Photons –Travel in straight lines Wavefront –Line perpendicular to all photons’ paths Atmospheric.
GLAO Workshop Leiden April 2005 Remko Stuik Leiden Observatory.
Infrasounds and Background Free Oscillations Naoki Kobayashi [1] T. Kusumi and N. Suda [2] [1] Tokyo Tech [2] Hiroshima Univ.
Meteorology meets Astronomy : open discussion 1.Usefullness of atmospheric mesoscale modelling for astrophysical applications - to forecast astrophysical.
Surface Layer SLODAR J. Osborn, R. Wilson and T. Butterley A prototype of a new SLODAR instrument has been developed at Durham CfAI and tested at the Paranal.
RIME A possible experiment for Advancing Antarctic Weather Prediction David H. Bromwich 1, John J. Cassano 1, Thomas R. Parish 2, Keith M. Hines 1 1 -
Institute for Atmospheric Science SCHOOL OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS Tethered Soundings & Profiling Cathryn Birch Ian Brooks.
C n 2 profile reconstruction with Shack-Hartmann slope and scintillation data: first on-sky results J. Voyez (1), C. Robert (1), J.-M. Conan (1), V. Michau.
ISTP 2003 September15-19, Airborne Measurement of Horizontal Wind and Moisture Transport Using Co-deployed Doppler and DIAL lidars Mike Hardesty,
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era François Wildi Observatoire de Genève Credit for most slides : Claire Max (UC Santa Cruz) Basics of AO.
Card 2. Option to use “Aerosol Plus” a parameter that characterizes the user defined aerosols and optical properties.
ASCOS ocean boundary layer measurements Anders Sirevaag Sara de la Rosa
More Examples About Gravity Stuff Answers 1. Find the value of g at an altitude of m above Earth’s surface. ReRe r g = G M e r2r m r =
Diffraction Limit What is the best angular resolution a telescope would achieve in idealised conditions? Circular aperture: θ min ≈ 1.22 λ/d For the HST:
Telescopes.
Use of radar data in the HIRLAM modelling consortium
Pyramid sensors for AO and co-phasing
SPHERE – SAXO Performance status
MASS-DIMM and SODAR at Cerro Pachon
  Robert Gibson1, Douglas Drob2 and David Norris1 1BBN Technologies
Adaptive optics Now: Soon: High angular resolution
MASS-DIMM – a turbulence monitor for Adaptive Optics
Ray Chambers Stephen Beare Scott Peak Mohammed Al-Kabani
What temporal averaging period is appropriate for MM5 verification?
Hyperspectral Wind Retrievals Dave Santek Chris Velden CIMSS Madison, Wisconsin 5th Workshop on Hyperspectral Science 8 June 2005.
Stefano Grassi WindEurope Summit
Speed and Velocity Chapter 9 Section 2.
WP12200: Instrumentation, measurements and modelling
Predicting the Weather
ECV definitions Mapping of ECV product with OSCAR variables
Statistics of turbulence profiles at Cerro Tololo
GLAS Cloud Statistics and Their Implications for a Hybrid Mission
Predicting the Weather
CRITICAL GAPS: OCEANS IN THE EARTH SYSTEM
Predicting the Weather
Presentation transcript:

SLODAR Turbulence Profilers Richard Wilson, Tim Butterley, James Osborn Durham University, UK

SLODAR (SLOpe Detection And Ranging) Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor Observe double stars Recover C n 2 (h) from the time- averaged cross-covariance of the WFS data

 hh SLODAR Altitude Sampling  h  d/  d (WFS sub-aperture size)

hh Higher Altitude Total SLODAR Altitude Sampling: Ground-Layer profiling

SLODAR Turbulence Profile Sequence, Paranal

SLODAR: Turbulent Layer Velocities Movie shows the spatial cross- covariance with increasing time offset. Motion of peaks => layer velocity (with altitude). Altitude

SLODAR at ESO Paranal: Ground-Layer Characterization

SLODAR Turbulence Profile Sequence, Paranal

All quiet in the ‘gray zone’… Surface layer not resolved SLODAR Turbulence Profile Sequence: Paranal

SLODAR at Paranal Mean Ground-Layer Turbulence Profile Free-Atmosphere Total ~ 45% of optical turbulence within ~70m of the ground

SLODAR Cross-Verification Compare with MASS and DIMM Cannot use the same targets for SLODAR and MASS-DIMM * SLODAR -- DIMM SLODAR MASS-DIMM

SLODAR Cross-Verification: Total Seeing versus DIMM (Paranal) SLODAR DIMM

SLODAR Cross-Verification: Total Seeing versus DIMM (Paranal) Subtract 7x m 1/3 for the first 5m ??? Need ~5m resolution to confirm this …

SLODAR Cross-Verification: Free Atmosphere Seeing versus MASS (Paranal)

SLODAR-LOLAS at Mauna Kea: Ground-Layer Characterization Campaign

Ground-Layer Turbulence: Mauna Kea

SLODAR at SALT: Generalized Profiler - High Altitudes (~15km) Characterize SALT site for AO SLODAR Automation

Correlating surface layer turbulence speed with physical ground wind speed (Mauna Kea data, first try …) : Meteorology: Turbulence Wind Speed UT (hours) Physical Wind Speed (m/s) Turbulence Speed (m/s) Wind Speed

MM5 Model, C n 2 (h) and Wind Velocity Mauna Kea Weather Center Optical Turbulence Forecasting: Model Verification ? Wind Vw(h) C n 2 (h) ?