Problem: A rocket travels away from earth at constant speed v to planet Q. The trip takes 100 years, as measured on earth but only 25 years as measured.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Faster-Than-Light Paradoxes in Special Relativity
Advertisements

Special Relativistic Paradoxes PHYS 206 – Spring 2014.
O’ O X’ X Z’ Z 5. Consequences of the Lorentz transformation
Theory of Special Relativity
P1X*Dynamics & Relativity : Newton & Einstein Chris Parkes October 2005 Special Relativity Postulates Time Dilation Length Contraction Lorentz Transformation.
Derivation of Lorentz Transformations
SPECIAL RELATIVITY -Postulates of Special Relativity -Relativity of time –> time dilation -Relativity of length –> length contraction © 2005.
1 Length contraction Length measured differs from frame to frame – another consequence of relativistic effect Gedankan experiment again!
Homework #2 3-7 (10 points) 3-15 (20 points) L-4 (10 points) L-5 (30 points)
Principle of special relativity Their is inconsistency between EM and Newtonian mechanics, as discussed earlier Einstein proposed SR to restore the inconsistency.
Special Relativity & General Relativity
Chapter 37 Special Relativity. 37.2: The postulates: The Michelson-Morley experiment Validity of Maxwell’s equations.
Special Relativity. Topics Motion is Relative Michelson-Morley Experiment Postulates of the Special Theory of Relativity Simultaneity Spacetime Time Dilation.
Lecture 14 Space-time diagrams (cont) ASTR 340 Fall 2006 Dennis Papadopoulos.
Special Relativity Physics 1161: Lecture 35 Sections 29-1 – 29-6.
Quiz Question What is an “intertial” reference frame? A.One in which an object is observed to have no acceleration when no forces act on it. B.One in.
IB Physics – Relativity Relativity Lesson 2 1.Time dilation 2.Lorentz Factor 3.Proper time 4.Lorentz contraction 5.Proper length 6.Twin paradox and symmetric.
A lecture series on Relativity Theory and Quantum Mechanics The Relativistic Quantum World University of Maastricht, Sept 24 – Oct 15, 2014 Marcel Merk.
Page 1 Phys Baski Relativity I Topic #9: Special Relativity I Transformation of Variables between Reference Frames –Non-relativistic Galilean Transformation.
Special relativity.
1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #5 Wednesday, Jan. 29, 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Length Contraction Relativistic Velocity Addition The Twin Paradox Space-time.
Time Dilation We can illustrate the fact that observers in different inertial frames may measure different time intervals between a pair of events by considering.
Special Theory of Relativity Einstein pondered the question, “If I could ride a beam of light, what would I see?” Meaning, if a car moved at the speed.
Physics 2170 – Spring Special relativity Homework solutions are on CULearn Remember problem solving sessions.
Consequences of Lorentz Transformation. Bob’s reference frame: The distance measured by the spacecraft is shorter Sally’s reference frame: Sally Bob.
Physics 2170 – Spring Special relativity Homework solutions are on CULearn Remember problem solving sessions.
Physics Lecture 2 1/26/ Andrew Brandt Monday January 26, 2009 Dr. Andrew Brandt 1.Special Relativity 2.Galilean Transformations 3.Time.
Special Relativity I wonder, what would happen if I was travelling at the speed of light and looked in a mirror?
Monday, Feb. 9, 2015PHYS , Spring 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #6 Monday, Feb. 9, 2015 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Relativistic Velocity.
1 Relativity  H3: Relativistic kinematics  Time dilation  Length contraction.
Special Relativity Physics 102: Lecture 28 Make sure your grade book entries are correct.
1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #5 Wednesday, Sept. 11, 2013 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Time Dilation & Length Contraction Relativistic Velocity Addition Twin Paradox.
Derivation of Lorentz Transformations Use the fixed system K and the moving system K’ At t = 0 the origins and axes of both systems are coincident with.
1 1.Time Dilation 2.Length Contraction 3. Velocity transformation Einstein’s special relativity: consequences.
Consequences of Relativism SPH4U. Wind Back the Clock Two consequences of relativism discussed: To a stationary observer, time appears to slow down in.
Galileo’s Relativity: Text: The laws of mechanics are the same in all inertial reference frames. More general: The laws of mechanics are the same in all.
X’ =  (x – vt) y’ = y z’ = z t’ =  (t – vx/c 2 ) where   1/(1 - v 2 /c 2 ) 1/2 Lorentz Transformation Problem: A rocket is traveling in the positive.
Lecture 5: PHYS344 Homework #1 Due in class Wednesday, Sept 9 th Read Chapters 1 and 2 of Krane, Modern Physics Problems: Chapter 2: 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, 14,
Philosophy of Physics III Special Relativity. Special Relativity in two hours SR is conceptually hard, but mathematically easy. All you need is high school.
Causality in special relativity
RELATIVITY TOOLKIT Time Dilation:  t(v) = [1/(1 – v 2 /c 2 ) 1/2 ]  t(0) Length Contraction: d(v) = (1 – v 2 /c 2 ) 1/2 d(0) Change in Synchronization:
Administrative Details: PHYS 344
Special Relativity II Two-minute movie Quiz Breakdown of simultaneity
The Relativistic Quantum World
Special Relativity Physics 102: Lecture 28
Wacky Implications of Relativity
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #6
Lecture 4: PHYS 344 Homework #1 Due in class Wednesday, Sept 9th Read Chapters 1 and 2 of Krane, Modern Physics Problems: Chapter 2: 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, 14,
Important announcements
Problem: A rocket travels away from earth at constant speed v to planet Q. The trip takes 100 years, as measured on earth but only 25 years as measured.
Special Relativity.
General Physics (PHY 2140) Lecture 25 Modern Physics Relativity
Classical Physics “Inertial Reference Frame” (Section 5.2):
Lorentz Transformation
Lorentz Transformation
Einstein’s Relativity Part 2
Special Relativity Lecture 2 12/3/2018 Physics 222.
Physics 1161: Lecture 26 Special Relativity Sections 29-1 – 29-6.
Given eqns Also P4.
RELATIVITY III SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY
The Galilean Transformation
Twin Paradox Frank and Mary are twins. Mary travels on a spacecraft at high speed (0.8c) to a distant star (8 light-years away) and returns. Frank remains.
Aim: How do we explain the special theory of relativity?
Key Areas covered The speed of light in a vacuum is the same for all observers. The constancy of the speed of light led Einstein to postulate that measurements.
Special Relativity Chapter 1-Class3.
Physics 1161: PreLecture 26 Special Relativity 1.
Chapter 37 Special Relativity
Special Relativity Chapter 1-Class4.
Special Relativity Einstein messes with space and time
Time dilation recap: A rocket travels at 0.75c and covers a total distance of 15 light years. Answer the following questions, explaining your reasoning:
Presentation transcript:

Problem: A rocket travels away from earth at constant speed v to planet Q. The trip takes 100 years, as measured on earth but only 25 years as measured on the rocket. What is v? Solution: The rocket measures the proper time:  t rocket =  t proper = 25 y. Therefore  t earth = 100 y =  t rocket  =  t earth /  t rocket =100/25 = 4  v/c = Note that, as measured on earth, the distance from earth to Q must be  x earth = (0.968c) x 100 y  x earth = 96.8 lightyears However, the distance from earth to Q as measured in the rocket must be  x rocket = (0.968c) x 25 y  x rocket = 24.2 lightyears That is,  x rocket =  x earth / 

 x rocket =  x earth /  Note that the earth observer is at rest with respect to Q and the earth, so can take his/her time in measuring the distance between them; we say that the earth observer measures the “proper length”. So any other observer measures a smaller length:  x =  x proper /  or L = L proper /  Length Contraction (or Lorentz Contraction): The length of an object measured in a reference frame that is moving with respect to the object is less than the length measured in a frame which is at rest with respect to the object (the proper length, L P.) Proper time: the time interval between two events measured by the observer who sees them happening at the same location. Proper length: The length of an object (or distance between two points) measured by an observer who is at rest with respect to the object (or the two points). In general, the proper length and proper time are not measured by the same observer!

x’ =  (x – vt), t’ =  (t – vx/c 2 ), Measuring the length of a moving object (in the direction of its motion) is tricky, because you have to measure the front and back of it simultaneously. [This was not an issue for perpendicular directions.] Suppose the unprimed frame is the proper frame, in which the object is at rest. Then you can measure its ends at any times (not necessarily the same times): L p = x 2 -x 1. To measure L’ = x 2 ’ – x 1 ’ in the frame it which its moving, however, you need to do the measurements such that t 1 ’ = t 2 ’:  (t 2 –vx 2 /c 2 ) =  (t 1 –vx 1 /c 2 ) t 2 – t 1 = v/c 2 (x 2 -x 1 ) x 2 ’ – x 1 ’ =  [x 2 -x 1 – v(t 2 -t 1 )] x 2 ’ – x 1 ’ =  [(x 2 -x 1 ) (1 – v 2 /c 2 )] But (1 – v 2 /c 2 ) = 1/  2 x 2 ’ – x 1 ’ = (x 2 -x 1 ) /  Length Contraction: L’ = L P /  x 1 x 2 How does length contraction follow from Lorentz Transformation?   1/(1 – v 2 /c 2 ) 1/2

Last Class we did this time dilation problem: In the lab, stationary muons have a “proper” lifetime  proper = 2.2  s. Yet muons created when cosmic ray particles hit the top of our atmosphere can make it all the way to ground: since v L/c, where L  4.8 km; i.e.  > 16  s. How fast must a muon be traveling (with respect to an observer on earth) to have a lifetime of 17  s?  = 17  s =   proper =  (2.2  s)   = 17/2.2 = / (1-v 2 /c 2 ) 1/2 = 7.7  v/c = That was from the point of view of the observer on the ground. How does the muon ( or someone riding on its back) view the situation. In the muon’s rest frame, its lifetime is 2.2  s – how can it reach the ground? The muon observes the ground rushing toward it, and the top of the atmosphere rushing away from it, at v = 0.992c, so from his point of view, the separation of the ground and top of the atmosphere is L’/  = 4.8 km/7.7 = 623 m. Therefore, the time for the ground to reach the muon after it is created at the top of the atmosphere is 623m/0.992c  2.2  s – its lifetime So from the earth’s point of view, this is a time dilation problem. From the muon’s point of view, it is a length contraction problem!

Problem: The rest length of an alien space cruiser is 1500 m and it has a clock which ticks with a period of 0.27 s. The cruiser passes planet Tralfamadore at a speed of 2.5 x 10 8 m/s. What are the length of the cruiser and period of the clock as measured by a resident of Tralfamadore?

Problem: The rest length of an alien space cruiser is 1500 m and it has a clock which ticks with a period of 0.27 s. The cruiser passes the planet Tralfamadore at a speed of 2.5 x 10 8 m/s. What are the length of the cruiser and period of the clock as measured by a resident of Tralfamadore?  = 1/[1 – (v/c) 2 ] 1/2 = 1 / [1 – (2.5/3) 2 ] 1/2 = 1/.305 1/2 = 1.81 [Note that for this problem, the space cruiser observer measures both the proper length of his ship and the proper time of the clock.] The proper length = 1500 m, so the length measured on Tralfamadore is L(traf) = L p /  = 1500m/ 1.81 = 829 m (length contraction) The proper time period = 0.27s, so the time period measured in Tralfamadore is T(traf) =  T p = (1.81)(0.27s) = 0.49 s (time dilation) [As a result, an alien on the cruiser will measure less time for a trip than a Tralfamadorean at home on his planet: i.e. if the clock ticks N times during the trip, the cruiser observer measures the trip to last N*0.27s while the Tralfamadorean measures it to last N*0.49s.]

The most famous “paradox” about length contraction is the “pole-in-the-barn” paradox: Suppose Jack is running along at high speed carrying a long pole toward the open front door of a barn, which also has an open back door. Jill is sitting in the barn. Suppose that the proper length of the pole is larger than the proper length of the barn, but Jack’s speed is so great that Jill measures the Lorentz contracted length of the pole to be shorter than the length of the barn so that the pole can fit in the barn. When the pole is inside, she quickly (and simultaneously) closes both doors (but then quickly opens them again so that the moving pole doesn’t smash into the back door). front door back door But from Jack’s point of view, his pole did not contract but the barn did, so the pole could not fit in the barn! How could Jill have closed the doors around the pole? Answer: In Jack’s frame the doors were not closed and opened simultaneously!

It is convenient to plot what is happening in “space-time” graphs: x (m) ct (m) 45 o conventional to put x on horizontal axis and time on vertical axis; time is multiplied by c so both axes have same units (e.g. meters). Light ray traveling to +x direction from the origin 45 o Light ray traveling to –x from the origin Object traveling with v< c in + x direction from origin Object traveling with |v|<c from + x toward –x [Any object traveling with |v| 1.]

Let’s use the numbers in the text’s example: v = 0.75 c, so  = 1.51 proper lengths: L p (barn) = 10m, L p (pole) = 15m Then from Jill’s point of view (at rest in the barn), the pole has length L’(pole) = 15m/  = 9.9 m, and should just fit in the barn. Jill’s space-time graph of what’s happening: Doors 10 m apart at rest in Jill’s frame, so vertical. Front and back of pole each traveling at v; they are 9.9 meters apart in Jill’s view. Leading edge of pole at front door at t = 0 Close and open doors now

v = 0.75 c, so  = 1.51 proper lengths: L p (barn) = 10m, L p (pole) = 15m Then from Jack’s point of view (i.e. the pole’s frame), the barn has length L’(barn) = 10m/  = 6.6 m, so the pole cannot fit in the barn. Jack’s space-time graph of what’s happening: Doors 6.6 m apart at rest in Jack’s frame and moving toward -x at speed v. Front and back of pole 10 meters apart in Jack’s view and not moving, so vertical lines. Leading edge of pole at front door at t = 0

Jill’s view: Doors close and open at same time Jack’s view: Rear door closes and opens before front door closes and opens

x’ =  (x – vt) y’ = y z’ = z t’ =  (t – vx/c 2 ) Problem: Observer S’ is traveling at speed 0.8c in the +x direction with respect to S. S measures two supernova to occur at x 1 = 30 ly, t 1 = 20 y and x 2 = 40 ly, t 2 = 45 y. Where and when does S’ observe them?  = 1 / [( 1 – (v/c) 2 ] 1/2 = 1 / [ ] 1/2 = 1/0.36 1/2 = 1/0.6 = 1.67 x 1 ’ = 1.67 [(30 – (0.8) (20)] ly = ly [1 year = 1 light year / c] t 1 ’ = 1.67 [20 – (0.8)(30)] y = y x 2 ’ = 1.67 [40 – (0.8)(45)] ly = 6.67 ly t 2 ’ = 1.67 [ 45 – (0.8)(40)] y = y [The minus times for t 1 ’ means that in the S’ frame, the supernova occurred before S and S’ passed each other at x = x’= 0 and t = t’=0 (so S’ could have at that instant warned S to watch for it).]

Lorentz Transformation Consider x’ 2 + y’ 2 + z’ 2 – c 2 t’ 2 : x’ 2 + y’ 2 + z’ 2 – c 2 t’ 2 = y 2 + z 2 +  2 [(x 2 -2xvt+v 2 t 2 ) - (c 2 t 2 -2vxt + v 2 x 2 /c 2 )] = y 2 + z 2 +  2 [x 2 (1-v 2 /c 2 ) – c 2 t 2 (1 – v 2 /c 2 )] but (1 –v 2 /c 2 ) = 1/  2  x’ 2 + y’ 2 + z’ 2 – c 2 t’ 2 = x 2 + y 2 + z 2 – c 2 t 2 in all inertial frames i.e. frames moving at constant velocity

 x 2 + y 2 + z 2 – c 2 t 2 has same value in all inertial frames: it is “invariant” under a Lorentz Transformation. Analogous to a rotation in x-y-z space: the length of any vector doesn’t change if you rotate the axes: x’ 2 + y’ 2 + z’ 2 = x 2 + y 2 + z 2 e.g. in 2D: x’ = x cos  + y sin  y’ = -x sin  + y cos  r 2 = x 2 + y 2 = x’ 2 + y’ 2 The analog to the length of a vector in x-y-z space is an interval in space-time. An event is a point in space-time, (x,y,z,t). The “length of the interval” between this event and the origin (0,0,0,0) = [x 2 + y 2 + z 2 – c 2 t 2 ] 1/2. This interval is invariant – i.e. the same in all frames moving at constant velocity. So a Lorentz transformation is a “rotation in space- time”. [Unlike ordinary rotation, (ct) 2 has a minus sign.]

Notes: This assumes that the two frames are both at origin at t = t’ = 0. (If not, must change t  t - t 0, where t 0 is the time when the two origins coincided. v > 0 when S’ is moving in +x direction; v < 0 when S’ moving in –x direction. [Sign should be obvious from x’ equation.] Interval between two events:  x  x 2 -x 1,  y  y 2 -y 1,  z  z 2 -z 1,  t  t 2 –t 1 :  x’ =  (  x – v  t)  y’ =  y  z’ =  z  t’ =  (  t – v  x/c 2 ) Similarly for differentials:   d. Lorentz Transformation

Lorentz Trans. dx’ =  (dx – v dt) dy’ = dy dz’ = dz dt’ =  (dt – v dx/c 2 ) Galilean Trans. dx’ = dx – v dt dy’ = dy dz’ = dz dt’ = dt time dilation failure of simultaneity at a distance length contraction Suppose an object is moving in S frame: dr/dt = u What is its speed (du’/dt’) in S’ frame? Galileo: dx’dt’ = dx/dt –vdt/dt  u x ’ = u x – v, (and u y ’ = u y, u z ’ = u z ) Lorentz: dx’/dt’ = [  (dx – v dt)] / [  (dt-vdx/c 2 ] (  dt/dt)  u x ’ = (dx/dt - v dt/dt) / (dt/dt – v dx/dt / c 2 )] u x ’ = (u x – v)/ (1 – vu x /c 2 ) u y ’ = dy’/dt’ = dy/[  (dt –vdx/c 2 )] (  dt/dt) u y ’ = (1/  ) [ u y /(1-vu x /c 2 )] and u z ’ = (1/  ) [ u z /(1-vu x /c 2 )] Velocity Transformations