USE OF THE COMMUNICATION FUNCTION CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM WITH TODDLERS Ashley Hopkin & Dr. Mary Jo Cooley Hidecker Division of Communication Disorders The.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ABC Child Find Screening
Advertisements

Is Caregiver Depression Associated with Children’s ADHD Symptoms and Overall Functioning? Randi Scott SUMR Final Presentation August 07, 2008.
Pragmatic Language Therapy Activities for Older Adolescents and Adults Margaret D. Miller TIPS 4 Kids University of Missouri-Columbia INTRODUCTION High.
Assessment Considerations for Young Children with Cleft Palate Introduction CLEFT LIP AND/OR PALATE Cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) is the fourth most common.
Acknowledgments This study was funded in part by a grant from the National Institutes of Health-Institute on Deafness and other Communicative Disorders.
V v Motor Skills and Young Children with Autism Olivia Paradis & Megan MacDonald, PhD Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR COLLEGE OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND.
Discussion Future Research Although there was no statistical significance between prelinguistic and linguistic levels of communicative acts, canonical.
Marital Satisfaction and Family Functioning in Families with Toddlers: Evidence For a Single Construct? Phillip R. Sevigny, M. A. & Lynn Loutzenhiser,
Determinants of Participation and Play of Young Children with Cerebral Palsy: Results of the Move and PLAY Study L Chiarello 1, D Bartlett 2, S McCoy 3,
RESULTS INTRODUCTION Laurentian_University.svgLaurentian_University.svg‎ (SVG file, nominally 500 × 87 pixels, file size: 57 KB) Screening for Developmental.
Parents’ Overall Quality of Life is Negatively Affected by Having a Child with Feeding Problems Amy J. Majewski 1, Alisha M. Neu 1, Gustavo R. Medrano.
RESULTSINTRODUCTION Accuracy of Screening Tests for Autism Spectrum Disorder in Primary Care Settings Marjolaine M. Limbos 1, PhD & David P. Joyce 2, MD,
Understanding Transition from Early Intervention to Preschool An Overview for Families New Jersey Department of Education New Jersey Department of Health.
Evaluating a Research Report
The Overall Effect of Childhood Feeding Problems on Caregiver’s Quality of Life Amy J. Majewski 1, W. Hobart Davies 1, & Alan H. Silverman 2 University.
Rad kat B A Y C T H E R S Kayci
General and Feeding Specific Behavior Problems in a Community Sample of Children Amy J. Majewski, Kathryn S. Holman & W. Hobart Davies University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Classifying Typically- Developing Toddlers Using The Communication Function Classification System ASHLEY HOPKIN UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH ASSISTANT; MCNAIR.
Observing and Assessing Young Children
1 A Comparison of Motor Delays in Young Children: Autism Spectrum Disorder, Developmental Delay, and Developmental Concerns Beth Provost, Brian R. Lopez,
Research and Evaluation
Association of Body Mass Index (BMI) and Depression Severity
Purpose The purpose of Module 1 is to orient new staff to child outcomes measurement and the Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF).
Research Methods for Business Students
Documenting a Sufficient Family Functioning Assessment
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Attachment style and condom use across and within dating relationships
Healthy Eating Similarities and Differences
Reporting Assessment Information (Assessment Report/ITP)
Understanding the Alternate ACCESS for ELLs Individual Student Report
Mary Beth Bruder, Ph.D. Cristina Mogro-Wilson, Ph.D.
An evaluation of the online universal COPING parent programme:
CD1: Principles and Philosophies of Education
The effects of physical activity on third grade math scores
State University of New York at Geneseo
Sophie Landa, Dr. Jacqui Rodgers, Dr. Emma Honey & Dr
Chapter 14 Early Childhood Special Education
Family Paradigm Assessment Scale (F-PAS) Test-Retest Reliability
Wendy Wolfe, Forrest Files, & Shrinidhi Subramaniam
Action Research on Selective Mutisim and Social Anxiety
The effects of physical activity on third grade math scores
Week 12: Observation and Assessment
Participants & Procedure
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Introduction & Purpose
Chapter 10 Emotional, Social, and Behavioral Education Assessment
CHAPTER 6: Assessing Intelligence and Adaptive Behavior
CHAPTER 7: Developmental Assessment
ESE 315 Innovative Education-- snaptutorial.com
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module
Early Literacy A Focus On Preschool.
Made for individuals ages birth to 89 years
How to Talk to Families about the 3 Global Outcomes and the EI Program
Families needed for SickKids research study on the genetics of reading disabilities Who can apply? Children aged 6 to 16 who struggle with reading, and.
Special Educational Needs
Individual Family Service Plan
Attachment Dependency
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module
Building State Systems to Produce Quality Data on Child Outcomes
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module
Early Childhood Special Education
How to Talk to Families about the 3 Global Outcomes and the EI Program
Child Outcome Summary Form
Using Program Assessments to Look at Children in Groups
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module
Profiles of Everyday Executive Function with the Behavior Rating of Executive Function, Second Edition (BRIEF2) Presented by Jennifer Greene, MSPH Melissa.
Introduction to the Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF)
Interreg-IPA Cross-border Cooperation Programme Romania-Serbia
Misc Internal Validity Scenarios External Validity Construct Validity
Chapter 3: How Standardized Test….
Presentation transcript:

USE OF THE COMMUNICATION FUNCTION CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM WITH TODDLERS Ashley Hopkin & Dr. Mary Jo Cooley Hidecker Division of Communication Disorders The World Health Organization developed the 2001 International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). The Communication Function Classification System (CFCS) and the Focus on the Outcomes of Communication Under Six (FOCUS) are based on the participation and activity level of the ICF (Figure 1). This research will investigate the relationship between typically developing toddlers’ age, the Communication Function Classification System (CFCS), and the Focus on Communication Under Six (FOCUS). PURPOSE Speech-language pathologists may use this information to determine if a toddler is making typical communication progress and whether intervention is necessary. Determine at what age 90% of typically developing toddlers consistently communicate at CFCS Level I and compare those results to the FOCUS. Determine the age range and FOCUS outcomes of typically- developing toddlers for each CFCS Level. OBJECTIVESCLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE The CFCS consists of five levels based on everyday communication performance (Figures 2 & 3). The FOCUS is a parent-reported questionnaire used to look at changes in young children’s communication. The FOCUS form uses a categorical response scale to rank daily communicative behavior (Figure 4). Though previous research has looked at the FOCUS and CFCS Levels when compared to children with disabilities, little research has been done with typically developing children. In CFCS pilot data of 32 children, ages 24 to 60 months, communication performances of children older than 31 months were generally classified as CFCS Level I. However, the relationship between age, the FOCUS Forms, and the CFCS Levels of typically-developing children needs further study. This research will expand the number of children observed by including a younger sample and adding the FOCUS information. PROPOSED RESEARCH PROJECT ACKNOWLEGDEMENTS For More Information… Level I The person independently alternates between sender and receiver roles with familiar and unfamiliar partners at a comfortable pace. Level II The person alternates between sender and receiver roles with familiar and unfamiliar partners, but at a slower pace. Level III The person alternates between sender and receiver roles with familiar partners, but is not consistently effective with unfamiliar partners. Level IV The person does not consistently alternate between sender and receiver roles, but may be effective with familiar partners. Level V The person is limited as both a sender and a receiver, and communication is seldom effective, even with familiar partners. Figure 1. Model of the ICF Not like my child A little like my child Some what like my child A fair bit like my child Quite a bit like my child Very much like my child Exactly like my child Figure 4. Sample FOCUS Form items My child makes friends easily. My child will ask for things from other children. FOCUS Figure 3. CFCS Page 4 Figure 2. CFCS Level explanation University of Wyoming McNair Scholars Program University of Wyoming Division of Communication Disorders Zackie Salmon, Susan Stoddard and Pilar Flores Rebecca Baldwin Participants Thirty children, between the ages of 12 months and 42 months, recruited from local daycares/preschools, and their parents/guardians and daycare/preschool providers. Instrumentation The CFCS classification is broken into five levels, from Level I (most functional) to Level V (least functional), by their ability to send and receive messages. These levels are dependent on communication effectiveness with familiar and unfamiliar partners (Figures 2 & 3). The FOCUS items were created to look at changes in children under six. Their communication activity and participation was reported by parents and clinicians after speech–language therapy. The FOCUS form consists of parent-friendly phrases surrounding topics based on their child’s ability to use speech and language in daily life (Figure 4). Procedure 1. 1.Two CFCS researchers will observe each toddler interacting with familiar and unfamiliar communication partners in a natural environment for approximately 30 minutes CFCS researchers will independently complete a questionnaire classifying the child’s overall communication performance using the CFCS If both CFCS researchers did not classify a child's communication as a CFCS Level I, the researchers will contact and re-observe the child at one-month intervals. This will continued until the child's communication performance is classified as Level I A parent and a teacher of the child will also be asked to complete the FOCUS. Data Analysis The relationship between the FOCUS and the CFCS Levels will be assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation. Descriptive statistics will be used to make summaries about the age range for each CFCS Level. INTRODUCTIONMETHODSCFCS