Cloud workshop wrap-up OMI science team meeting, 21 June 2006.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Validation of SCIA’s reflectance and polarisation (Acarreta, de Graaf, Tilstra, Stammes, Krijger ) Envisat Validation Workshop, Frascati, 9-13 December.

Advertisements

OMI Science Team Meeting 24 – 27 June 2008, FMI Iterative Retrieval of Large SO 2 from Volcanic Eruptions Kai Yang 1,3, Nikolay Krotkov 1,3, Arlin Krueger.

Algorithm improvements for Dutch OMI NO2 retrievals (towards v3.0)

 nm)  nm) PurposeSpatial Resolution (km) Ozone, SO 2, UV8 3251Ozone8 3403Aerosols, UV, and Volcanic Ash8 3883Aerosols, Clouds, UV and Volcanic.

A New A-Train Collocated Product : MODIS and OMI cloud data on the OMI footprint Brad Fisher 1, Joanna Joiner 2, Alexander Vasilkov 1, Pepijn Veefkind.

WP 3: Absorbing Aerosol Index (AAI) WP 10: Level-1 validation L.G. Tilstra 1, I. Aben 2, and P. Stammes 1 1 Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute.

Envisat Symposium, April 23 – 27, 2007, Montreux bremen.de SADDU Meeting, June 2008, IUP-Bremen Cloud sensitivity studies.

Institute of Environmental Physics and Remote Sensing IUP/IFE-UB Physics/Electrical Engineering Department 1 ACCENT.

1 Operational O3M-SAF trace-gas column products: GOME-2 tropospheric NO 2, Ozone, and total SO 2 AT2 Seventh Workshop Helsinki, Sep Oct. 1, 2008.

Improvement and validation of OMI NO 2 observations over complex terrain A contribution to ACCENT-TROPOSAT-2, Task Group 3 Yipin Zhou, Dominik Brunner,

1 Ozone Profile Retrieval from SBUV/2 Sweep Mode Data---Preliminary Results Xiong Liu, Kelly Chance Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Matthew.

Retrieval of SO 2 Vertical Columns from SCIAMACHY and OMI: Air Mass Factor Algorithm Development Chulkyu Lee, Aaron van Dokelaar, Gray O’Byrne: Dalhousie.

A 21 F A 21 F Parameterization of Aerosol and Cirrus Cloud Effects on Reflected Sunlight Spectra Measured From Space: Application of the.

Development of GEMS Cloud Data Processing Algorithm Yong-Sang Choi 1, Bo-Ram Kim 1, Heeje Cho 2, Myong-Hwan Ahn 1 (Former COMS PI), and Jhoon Kim 3 (GEMS.

Status S5p TROPOMI Pepijn Veefkind.

WP 3: Absorbing Aerosol Index (AAI) WP 10: Level-1 validation L.G. Tilstra 1, I. Aben 2, and P. Stammes 1 1 Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute.

Cloud algorithms and applications for TEMPO Joanna Joiner, Alexander Vasilkov, Nick Krotkov, Sergey Marchenko, Eun-Su Yang, Sunny Choi (NASA GSFC)

M. Van Roozendael, AMFIC Final Meeting, 23 Oct 2009, Beijing, China1 MAXDOAS measurements in Beijing M. Van Roozendael 1, K. Clémer 1, C. Fayt 1, C. Hermans.

Determination of the optical thickness and effective radius from reflected solar radiation measurements David Painemal MPO531.

Xiong Liu, Mike Newchurch Department of Atmospheric Science University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama, USA

EUMETSAT METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE CONFERENCE 15/09/2013 – 20/09/2013, VIENNA EUMETSAT METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE CONFERENCE 15/09/2013 – 20/09/2013, VIENNA.

Near UV Aerosol Group Report Omar Torres NASA GSFC 614 GSFC Aerocenter Update May 31, 2013.

OMI total-ozone anomaly and its impact on tropospheric ozone retrieval Jae Kim 1, Somyoung Kim 1, K. J. Ha 1, and Mike Newchurch Department of Atmospheric.

A. Bracher, L. N. Lamsal, M. Weber, J. P. Burrows University of Bremen, FB 1, Institute of Environmental Physics, P O Box , D Bremen, Germany.

S5P tropospheric ozone product: Convective Cloud Differential method First German S5P Verification Meeting Bremen, November 2013 Pieter Valks DLR,

Validation workshop, Frascati, 13 December 2002Page 1 SCIAMACHY products quality and recommendations Based on presentations and discussions during this.

S5P Ozone Profile (including Troposphere) verification: RAL Algorithm R.Siddans, G.Miles, B.Latter S5P Verification Workshop, MPIC, Mainz th May.

SAO OMI formaldehyde, water vapor and glyoxal retrievals Gonzalo Gonzalez Abad Helen Wang Christopher Miller Kelly Chance Xiong Liu Thomas Kurosu OMI Science.

OMI ST, June 26, 2008 Krueger, AJ, “Sighting of El Chichon Sulfur Dioxide Clouds with the Nimbus 7 Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer”, Science, :

Retrieval of Ozone Profiles from GOME (and SCIAMACHY, and OMI, and GOME2 ) Roeland van Oss Ronald van der A and Johan de Haan, Robert Voors, Robert Spurr.

Satellite and Ground-based Total Column Ozone Comparisons- Latest Results and Remaining Issues Gordon Labow 1, Rich McPeters 2, P.K. Bhartia 2 1 =Science.

The Second TEMPO Science Team Meeting Physical Basis of the Near-UV Aerosol Algorithm Omar Torres NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Atmospheric Chemistry.

Folkert Boersma Reducing errors in using tropospheric NO 2 columns observed from space.

Combining Simultaneously Measured UV and IR Radiances from OMI and TES to Improve Tropospheric Ozone Profile Retrievals Dejian Fu 1, John Worden 1, Susan.

Intercomparison of OMI NO 2 and HCHO air mass factor calculations: recommendations and best practices A. Lorente, S. Döerner, A. Hilboll, H. Yu and K.

Air Pollution/Environmental Technology laboratory Initial results on OMI NO 2 Validation during CINDI A contribution to the BIRA Cindi Workshop Yipin Zhou,

Evaluation of OMI total column ozone with four different algorithms SAO OE, NASA TOMS, KNMI OE/DOAS Juseon Bak 1, Jae H. Kim 1, Xiong Liu 2 1 Pusan National.

Trace gas algorithms for TEMPO G. Gonzalez Abad 1, X. Liu 1, C. Miller 1, H. Wang 1, C. Nowlan 2 and K. Chance 1 1 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.

Henk Eskes, OMI meeting June 2006 OMI Nitrogen Dioxide: The KNMI Near-Real Time Product Henk Eskes, Pepijn Veefkind, Folkert Boersma, Ronald van.

Retrieval of Vertical Columns of Sulfur Dioxide from SCIAMACHY and OMI: Air Mass Factor Algorithm Development, Validation, and Error Analysis Chulkyu Lee.

S5P cloud products Sebastián Gimeno García, Ronny Lutz, Diego Loyola German S5P Verification Meeting 1 Bremen, November Chart 1>

C. Lerot 1, M. Koukouli 2, T. Danckaert 1, D. Balis 2, and M. Van Roozendael 1 1 BIRA-IASB, Belgium 2 LAP/AUTH, Greece S5P L2 Verification Meeting – 19-20/05/2015.

The GeoTASO IIP Project Jim Leitch Ball Aerospace

TOMS Ozone Retrieval Sensitivity to Assumption of Lambertian Cloud Surface Part 1. Scattering Phase Function Xiong Liu, 1 Mike Newchurch, 1,2 Robert Loughman.

1 Monitoring Tropospheric Ozone from Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) Xiong Liu 1,2,3, Pawan K. Bhartia 3, Kelly Chance 2, Thomas P. Kurosu 2, Robert.

Comparisons of LER/MLER Cloud Pressures with a Model of Mie Scattering Plane-Parallel Cloud Alexander Vasilkov 1, Joanna Joiner 2, Pawan K. Bhartia 2,

S5P tropical tropospheric ozone product based on convective cloud differential method Klaus-Peter Heue, Pieter Valks, Diego Loyola, Deutsches Zentrum für.

Evaluation of model simulations with satellite observed NO 2 columns and surface observations & Some new results from OMI N. Blond, LISA/KNMI P. van Velthoven,

Kelly Chance Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Xiong Liu, Christopher Sioris, Robert Spurr, Thomas Kurosu, Randall Martin,

1 Xiong Liu Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics K.V. Chance, C.E. Sioris, R.J.D. Spurr, T.P. Kurosu, R.V. Martin, M.J. Newchurch,

MAXDOAS observations in Beijing G. Pinardi, K. Clémer, C. Hermans, C. Fayt, M. Van Roozendael BIRA-IASB Pucai Wang & Jianhui Bai IAP/CAS 24 June 2009,

Validation of OMI and SCIAMACHY tropospheric NO 2 columns using DANDELIONS ground-based data J. Hains 1, H. Volten 2, F. Boersma 1, F. Wittrock 3, A. Richter.

March 21, ‘06 comp. May 5, ‘06 comp Summary ~4% swath angle dependent difference Up to 9% difference over clouds Differences correlate with snow/ice.

Challenge the future Corresponding author: Delft University of Technology Collocated OMI DOMINO and MODIS Aqua aerosol products.

1 Synthetic Hyperspectral Radiances for Retrieval Algorithm Development J. E. Davies, J. A. Otkin, E. R. Olson, X. Wang, H-L. Huang, Ping Yang # and Jianguo.

1 SO 2 Air Mass Factors for pollution and volcanic emissions OMI Science Team Meeting De Bilt, June 2006 Pieter Valks, Werner Thomas, Thilo Ebertseder,

1 Deriving cloud parameters for O 3 profile retrieval Zhaonan Cai 1, Xiong Liu 1, Kai Yang 2, Kelly Chance 1 1 SAO 2 UMD 4 th TEMPO Science Team Meeting,

Fourth TEMPO Science Team Meeting

Assumption of Lambertian Cloud Surface (I)

DOAS workshop 2015, Brussels, July 2015

V2.0 minus V2.5 RSAS Tangent Height Difference Orbit 3761

Intercomparison of SCIAMACHY NO2, the Chimère air-quality model and

Absolute calibration of sky radiances, colour indices and O4 DSCDs obtained from MAX-DOAS measurements T. Wagner1, S. Beirle1, S. Dörner1, M. Penning de.

Johan de Haan Pepijn Veefkind

Intercomparison of SCIAMACHY NO2, the Chimère air-quality model and

Retrieval of SO2 Vertical Columns from SCIAMACHY and OMI: Air Mass Factor Algorithm Development and Validation Chulkyu Lee, Aaron van Dokelaar, Gray O’Byrne:

6th TEMPO Science Team Meeting

Retrieval of SO2 Vertical Columns from SCIAMACHY and OMI: Air Mass Factor Algorithm Development and Validation Chulkyu Lee, Aaron van Dokelaar, Gray O’Byrne:

Cloud trends from GOME, SCIAMACHY and OMI

Presentation transcript:

Cloud workshop wrap-up OMI science team meeting, 21 June 2006

Agenda Presentations incl. questions: 9:00 –10:15 h PK Bhartia: Introduction Sasha Vassilkov: Comparisons of LER/MLER Cloud Pressures with a Model of Mie Scattering Plane-Parallel Cloud Maarten Sneep: Cloud algorithm choices: comparing OMCLDO2 and OMCLDRR Ping Wang: Effects of clouds on detection of tropospheric NO2 Bastiaan van Diedenhoven: Retrieval of cloud parameters from the 477 nm O4 band and UV measurements Nick Krotkov: Altitude resolved AMF in clouds Gordon Labow: INTEX-B data of cloud effect on total ozone Discussion: 10:15 – 10:45 h Conclusions/Recommendations: 10:45 – 11:00 h

Summary (1/3) The Mixed-LER cloud model with assumption A c =0.8 gives better Raman cloud retrievals than with assumption A c =0.4. A c =0.4: OMCLDRR STD A c =0.8: OMCLDRR for O3 (A c =0.8 is also used in O2-O2 and Fresco algor.) Comparison Raman – O2-O2 cloud products: - Effective cloud fractions c eff (for A c =0.8) correlate well (0.97), but there is an offset at small c eff, due to different surface albedo assumptions. - Cloud pressures correlate poorly ( ) for small c eff, but much better ( ) for large c eff. - The cloud pressure difference p O2-O2 - p Raman amounts to hPa, depending on c eff. - The O2-O2 cloud pressure is a consistent function of c eff.

Summary (2/3) Correct cloud height is essential for total ozone. But O2-O2 gives generally lower cloud height than Raman and the currently used THIR climatology. So which cloud height is better? Use INTEX-B aircraft validation campaign with ozone lidars. Also spectral radiation experiments are needed to analyse the RT at O3, O2-O2 and Raman wavelengths above, in, and below clouds. Validation of cloud heights with Calipso/Cloudsat.

Summary (3/3) For tropospheric NO2 retrieval, the effective cloud fraction is an essential input parameter; here the surface albedo database is an important ingredient, which should be improved in spatial resolution. The geometric cloud fraction can be obtained from combining O2-O2 with UV reflectance; could be used in future algorithm improvements. The altitude-resolved AMF for O3 and NO2 in cloudy scenes can be well approximated by the Mixed-LER model.