SM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® RETI 2.0 Workshop 03/16/2016 IOU Panel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENERGY VALUE. Summary  Operational Value is a primary component in the Net Market Value (NMV) calculation used to rank competing resources in the RPS.
Advertisements

Making Clean Local Energy Accessible Now Storage Bid Evaluation Protocols Role of CEP, Quantifiable Benefits Stephanie Wang Policy Director Clean Coalition.
CPUC Procurement Policies Robert L. Strauss California Public Utilities Commission Energy Division - Procurement Section.
RESOURCE VALUATION 1. Summary of Resource Value Guiding principles: 1.Capture saturation effects on resource value 2.Evaluate resource value on a marginal.
Capacity Valuation.
Energy Storage in California’s Grid of the Future Don Liddell, Douglass & Liddell Co-Founder and General Counsel, California Energy Storage Alliance ​
Compare and Contrast ELCC Methodologies Across CPUC Proceedings
OVERVIEW OF RPS CALCULATOR FUNCTIONALITY 1. Model Specification Model developed to provide plausible portfolios to CPUC LTPP and CAISO TPP to facilitate.
ENERGY ONLY RESOURCES & THE RPS CALCULATOR. Deliverability Overview Most resources procured to date have been procured to be fully deliverable – CAISO.
IOU LEAST COST-BEST FIT (LCBF): ALIGN WITH RPS CALCULATOR? 1.
INTEGRATION COST. Integration Cost in RPS Calculator While “Integration Cost” is included in NMV formulation, the Commission stated that the Integration.
1 Portfolio Analysis Mike Hopkins Senior Manager, Price Risk & Resource Planning.
Utah Schedule 37 Update June 25, Schedule 37 Background Schedule 37 – Published rates for standard power purchase agreements with qualifying facilities.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future * NREL July 5, 2011 Tradeoffs and Synergies between CSP and PV at High Grid Penetration.
GE Energy Asia Development Bank Wind Energy Grid Integration Workshop: Issues and Challenges for systems with high penetration of Wind Power Nicholas W.
California Energy Action Plan Tim Tutt California Energy Commission Dan Adler California Public Utilities Commission June 24, 2004 Goal II – Accelerate.
SM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® Page 1 Discussion on CEC’s and SCE’s Forecast Differences Presentation at CEC Preliminary Demand Forecast Workshop July.
RELIABILITY and RENEWABLES: Two Case Studies Using the SuperOPF Tim Mount Department of Applied Economics and Management Cornell University
Avoided Costs of Generation
0 CPUC / CEC Workshop Reporting and Tracking GHG Emissions for a Load Based Cap PG&E Reporting Emissions and Estimating Emissions from Unspecified Purchases.
Reaching the Next Level of the State’s Environmental Policy Goals Panel: Energy Procurement, Infrastructure and Policy: Climate Challenges Beyond 2020.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SM Local Capacity Requirements (LCR) RFO for New Resources and Other SCE Solicitations Stu Hemphill September 26, 2013.
California Energy Commission Staff Paper - April 12,20071 Estimating the Generation Resource Mix of Electricity Imports to California – Energy Commission.
Energy Analysis Department Cost-Effectiveness Valuation Framework for Demand Response Resources: Guidelines and Suggestions Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley.
0 Distributed Energy Resources: Going Small IEP 2015 Annual Conference September 30, 2015 Colin Cushnie V.P., Energy Procurement & Management Southern.
California’s Proposed DR Cost-Effectiveness Framework January 30, 2008.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SM REC cost estimation April 23, 2010 Eric Lavik.
Ramping and Demand Shifting: A Case Study Tim Mount Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management Cornell University Demand Response.
IWWG Annual Conference Wind Management at MISO July 22, 2011.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® SM Preferred Resources Pilot August 17, 2015
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SM Southern California Edison Company’s Proposal to Participate in Convergence Bidding August 23, 2010.
Illinois Wholesale Market Update December 10, 2003.
Updated 1/28/2011. Renewables Integration Plans and Challenges March 8, 2011 Jay Caspary ·
EDISON INTERNATIONAL® SM Demand Side Management The Natural Purview of Utilities Presented to Marketing Executive Council Presented by Lynda Ziegler Southern.
OPSI Annual Meeting October 8 th Should all capacity resources be paid the same? -Demand Response operational deployment.
California Energy Action Plan December 7, 2004 Energy Report: 2004 and 2005 Overview December 7, 2004.
ISO Confidential Overview of California’s Current Drought and its Effects on the Energy System Dede Subakti, P. E. Director, Operations Engineering Services.
RETI Workshop March 16, 2015 Arne Olson, Partner Lakshmi Alagappan, Sr. Managing Consultant Identifying High Value Renewable Resources.
SFPUC IRP Presentation to CEC April 18, INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLANNING SAN FRANCISCO PUC JAMES HENDRY SAN FRANCISCO PUC.
UM 1751 Energy Storage Workshop #3 May 9, UM 1751 Workshop #3 Topics Most viable and beneficial applications (HB 2193 time frame: ) Emerging.
Presentation Title SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® SM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® SM Regulatory Policy SCE Discussion on the Relationship Between NQC and EFC.
MTS Working Group San Francisco F2F Agenda Mar. 23, 2015.
CPUC Resource Adequacy Program – LAO briefing May 25, 2009.
Presentation Title SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® SM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® SM Regulatory Affairs Net Load Peak ELCC Draft Results / Work.
May 9 th, 2016 California Public Utilities Commission Power Charge Indifference Adjustment (PCIA) Workshop.
Joint Energy Auction Implementation Proposal of PG&E, SCE and SDG&E California Public Utilities Commission Workshop – November 1, 2006.
© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Salvador A. Casente, Jr. Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer.
CPUC Supply-side Procurement Processes
LNBA Subgroup: Avoided Transmission Value
RENEWABLES AND RELIABILITY
Wind Management at MISO
Asia-Pacific Energy Regulatory Forum
Mike Jaske California Energy Commission
Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Electricity Wholesale Markets: Designs for a low-carbon future
Flexible Forward Contracts for Renewable Energy Generators
Lorenzo Kristov, Ph.D. Principal, Market & Infrastructure Policy
penetration of wind power
Evolving Economic Dispatch in SPP
The Transition to a High DER Future
SDG&E Procurement Perspective IEPA 35th Annual Meeting September 21st, 2016 Dan Skopec Vice President, Regulatory Affairs Sempra Energy Utilities.
New England Electricity Restructuring Roundtable
Resource Adequacy Demand Forecast Coincidence Adjustments
Integrated Distribution Planning Process
DECISION
Portfolio Analysis Mike Hopkins
Planning Reserve Margin
Wholesale Electricity Costs
Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive Operations Advisor California ISO
MCE Procurement and More
Presentation transcript:

SM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® RETI 2.0 Workshop 03/16/2016 IOU Panel

SM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® Page 2 High-level Overview of SCE’s LCBF Principles Purpose: Select a mix of products in a competitive environment that in aggregate meet a specified RPS, system or local need, in a cost competitive manner –LCBF is applied to a wide variety of products Resource adequacy and bulk energy products Renewable procurement (RPS and other requirements) Local capacity needs (e.g., recent 2012 LTPP procurement cycle) –LCBF can meet requirements subject to a reasonable set of constraints The key element is that the offer selection provides competition that benefits SCE’s customers –LCBF quantifies direct utility customer benefits associated with a contractual product in assessing net costs Calculation subtracts benefits not directly associated with the product being procured from the cost of the contractual product Example: the cost of renewable energy purchased to meet an RPS obligation is reduced by the RA value and avoided energy procurement associated with the renewable energy procurement Typically, bids are ranked in terms of net cost per MW or MWh of the specified RPS, system or local requirement before qualitative criteria are applied

SM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® Page 3 RPS Valuation and Selection: LCBF Methodology Overview “Least-Cost” – Proposals are evaluated and ranked by Net Market Value ($/MWh) “Best-Fit” – After the quantitative valuation process, SCE evaluates each proposal’s qualitative characteristics –Contribution to other SCE programs and goals (e.g. Energy Storage, portfolio diversity, LCR, WMDVBE, TRTP, viability, safety, environmental impacts, etc.) Costs Contract Payments Based on the capacity prices, expected generation and contract term Transmission Cost Cost adders for required network upgrades based on the best information Debt Equivalence Cost Cost of contract commitments on SCE’s balance sheet GHG Cost (if applicable) There is usually no GHG cost to the majority of renewable offers Renewable Integration Cost Adder (RICA) Adopted interim methodology Congestion This can be a negative or a positive number for projects based on the location Energy Only Cost Adder Benefits Energy Value Captures market value of the energy including a forecast for GHG while taking into account generation profile of offers Capacity Value The value of the countable Resource Adequacy capacity. (zero for energy only projects) Ancillary Services and Real Time Flexibility Value (if applicable) Attributed to dispatchable, supply-side projects offering AS capability All costs and benefits are valued using SCE’s latest forecasts

SM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® Page 4 The annual system peak hour is expected to shift due to both behind-the-meter solar DG growth and increasing TE charging load Annual Peak Hour is Shifting

SM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® Page 5 Resource Adequacy Value – Ensuring incentives are aligned with reliability need 5 Reserve Margin Net Load Need Gap Peak Load Need How Much Solar and Wind Reduce Net Peak Wind and Solar QC Non-Solar and Non-Wind RA Resources RA Requirement after Solar and Wind