A CW Linac scheme for CLIC drive beam acceleration. Hao Zha, Alexej Grudiev 07/06/2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tom Powers Practical Aspects of SRF Cavity Testing and Operations SRF Workshop 2011 Tutorial Session.
Advertisements

Stephen Molloy RF Group ESS Accelerator Division
CLIC drive beam accelerating (DBA) structure Rolf Wegner.
CARE07, 29 Oct Alexej Grudiev, New CLIC parameters. The new CLIC parameters Alexej Grudiev.
Injector RF Design Review November 3, 2004 John Schmerge, SLAC LCLS RF Gun Thermal Analysis John Schmerge, SLAC November 3,
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,
Cell-Coupled Drift Tube Linac M. Pasini, CERN AB-RF LINAC4 Machine Advisory Committee 1 st meeting CERN January 29-30, 2008.
DESIGN OF A 7-CELLS, HOM DAMPED, SUPERCONDUCTING CAVITY FOR THE STRONG RF FOCUSING EXPERIMENT AT DANE David Alesini, Caterina Biscari, Roberto Boni, Alessandro.
Beam loading compensation 300Hz positron generation (Hardware Upgrade ??? Due to present Budget problem) LCWS2013 at Tokyo Uni., Nov KEK, Junji.
CLIC Drive Beam Linac Rolf Wegner. Outline Introduction: CLIC Drive Beam Concept Drive Beam Modules (modulator, klystron, accelerating structure) Optimisation.
SRF Results and Requirements Internal MLC Review Matthias Liepe1.
E. KAKO (KEK) 2009' Sept. 30 Albuquerque Global Design Effort 1 Cavity Test Items in S1-G Cryomodule Eiji Kako (KEK, Japan)
RF Distribution Alternatives R.A.Yogi & FREIA group Uppsala University.
1 C-Band Linac Development Satoshi Ohsawa 2004.Feb.19LCPAC.
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Christopher Nantista ARD R&D Status Meeting SLAC February 3, …… …… …… … ….
Baseline Workshop Preparation At the close of each BAW, we would like to write down a summary that is based on our common understanding of the issues.
F Project X Overview Dave McGinnis October 12, 2007.
EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.
1Matthias LiepeAugust 2, 2007 LLRF for the ERL Matthias Liepe.
704MHz Warm RF Cavity for LEReC Binping Xiao Collider-Accelerator Department, BNL July 8, 2015 LEReC Warm Cavity Review Meeting  July 8, 2015.
RF Development for ESS Roger Ruber and Volker Ziemann Uppsala Universitet 4 Dec Dec-20091RR+VZ: ESS RF Development.
Current CLIC Energy Stages D. Schulte1. Main Beam Generation Complex Drive Beam Generation Complex Layout at 3 TeV D. Schulte2.
RF system issues due to pulsed beam in ILC DR October 20, Belomestnykh, RF for pulsed beam ILC DR, IWLC2010 S. Belomestnykh Cornell University.
Marc Ross Nick Walker Akira Yamamoto ‘Overhead and Margin’ – an attempt to set standard terminology 10 Sept 2010 Overhead and Margin 1.
Status of the Rebaselining D. Schulte for the Rebaselining Team D. Schulte, CLIC Rebaselining, October 2013.
ECE 662 – Microwave Electronics
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
Ding Sun and David Wildman Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee
Aug 23, 2006 Half Current Option: Impact on Linac Cost Chris Adolphsen With input from Mike Neubauer, Chris Nantista and Tom Peterson.
FFAG Studies at RAL G H Rees. FFAG Designs at RAL Hz, 4 MW, 3-10 GeV, Proton Driver (NFFAGI) Hz,1 MW, GeV, ISIS Upgrade (NFFAG) 3.
John Carwardine 21 st October 2010 TTF/FLASH 9mA studies: Main studies objectives for January 2011.
Design Optimization of MEIC Ion Linac & Pre-Booster B. Mustapha, Z. Conway, B. Erdelyi and P. Ostroumov ANL & NIU MEIC Collaboration Meeting JLab, October.
MEIC Electron Ring Injection from CEBAF
R.SREEDHARAN  SOLEIL main parameters  Booster and storage ring low level RF system  New digital Booster LLRF system under development  Digital LLRF.
POWER REQUIREMENTS FOR THE LHC HARMONIC CAVITIES WITH THE FULL-DETUNING SCHEME P. Baudrenghien, T. Mastoridis, CERN BE-RF 2nd LHC Harmonic Cavity meeting,
How CLIC-Zero can become less expensive A.Grudiev, D. Schulte 16/06/09.
RF 1/33 ALBA RF system why, how and other questions Francis Perez.
KCS and RDR 10 Hz Operation Chris Adolphsen BAW2, SLAC 1/20/2011.
Comparison of Fermilab Proton Driver to Suggested Energy Amplifier Linac Bob Webber April 13, 2007.
Jan Low Energy 10 Hz Operation in DRFS (Fukuda) (Fukuda) 1 Low Energy 10Hz Operation in DRFS S. Fukuda KEK.
Overview of long pulse experiments at NML Nikolay Solyak PXIE Program Review January 16-17, PXIE Review, N.Solyak E.Harms, S. Nagaitsev, B. Chase,
ALBA RF Systems Francis Perez.
THE ANDRZEJ SOŁTAN INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR STUDIES INSTYTUT PROBLEMÓW JADROWYCH im. Andrzeja Sołtana
ESS SC cavities development G. Devanz TTC meeting, march 1st 2011, Milano.
The LEP Superconducting RF system has reached its maximum configuration of 288 four-cell cavities powered by 36 klystrons in In 2000, this system,
Multi-stage pulse compressor
CEPC APDR Study Zhenchao LIU
TTC Topical Workshop - CW SRF, Cornell 12th – 14th June 2013
Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ
CEPC injector high field S-band accelerating structure design and R&D
Notkestrasse 85, Hamburg, Germany
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
Measurements, ideas, curiosities
Superbeams with SPL at CERN
Review of the European XFEL Linac System
Klystron Power Supplies for ILC
XFEL Project (accelerator) Overview and recent developments
CEPC RF Power Sources System
Implications of HOMs on Beam Dynamics at ESS
Test plan of ESS HB elliptical cavity
Status of the CLIC Injector studies
CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3
CEPC APDR SRF considerations(4) -LEP Cavity Voltage &BBU
ERL Director’s Review Main Linac
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
CEPC SRF Parameters (100 km Main Ring)
Parameters Changed in New MEIC Design
Jiquan Guo, Haipeng Wang
Presentation transcript:

A CW Linac scheme for CLIC drive beam acceleration. Hao Zha, Alexej Grudiev 07/06/2016

CLIC drive beam linac design (Pulse mode) Drive beam Linac IP 21.5 Km 540 Klystrons, 22 MW, 140 us 2.37 GeV, 4.2 A IP 3.5 Km Drive beam Linac 540 Klystrons, 22 MW, 35 us …… Feed PETs of positrons linac Time Stored RF power in the structure 140 us 20 ms 10 GW Time Stored RF power in the structure 20 ms 35 us 10 GW 35 us 10 GW Final 3 TeV Scheme : Normal conducting structure operated at pulse mode 375 GeV Scheme: Shorter pulse length but same power): means need same accelerator length and klystron amounts (~ 1.2 Billion $ per linac).

CLIC drive beam linac design (CW mode) Drive beam Linac IP 21.5 Km 200 Klystrons, 0.35 MW, CW 2.37 GeV, 4.2 A IP 3.5 Km Drive beam Linac 50 Klystrons, 0.35 MW, CW …… Feed PETs of positrons linac Time Stored RF power in the structure 35 us 20 ms 17.5 MW Time Stored RF power in the structure 140 us 20 ms 70 MW Release energy (Discharging) Store energy (Charging) Release energy (Discharging) Final 3 TeV Scheme: Superconducting structure run at CW mode (but beam comes at pulse mode) like a battery (Super capacitors). Less amount of power source and no modulator. 375 GeV Scheme: Need less energy storage. Less power source and shorter structure length (possible lower cost). Saved money/ 40000

Big challenge: Beam loading effect! Energy filling time (0.14 ms) >> releasing time (20 ms); Filing power (70 MW) << Beam power (10 GW); Cavity stored energy (voltage) dropped due to strong beam loading during beam time; We need a flat energy distribution (variation < 1%) of drive beam for the acceptance of combiner ring. Cavity stored energy 70 MW 10 GW Time Energy variation

Parameters in beam loading study Cavity stored energy Time : Maximum stored energy in the cavity (Capacity) : Beam (in a pulse) absorbed energy: here 1.4 MJ represents how many cavities do we need (cost). : Stacked beam voltage (Maximum beam loading) : Required accelerating voltage: here 2.37 GeV represents which cavity do we need (geometry). Two parameters are defined:

Parameters for a reasonable cost

1. Regular accelerating structure Time Normalized accelerating voltage Full pulse length (140 us) Not applicable Go back

2. Structure with frequency shift (to beam frequency)

2. Parameters for CLIC-DB- 3TeV Real Imag 2 ** This plot is only for demonstration (here energy variation limitation is 10%) Not applicable Go back

3. Structure with variable frequency shift The phase shift is changing by a given function of time in order to make every bunch seeing the same voltage. Variable phase shift is achieved by tuning the resonant frequency of cavity. Real Imag Time Frequency Energy releasing Energy filling

3. Frequency tuning function Frequency change rapidly

3. Tuner speed limitation Real Imag Stage5 MHz/s400 MHz/s 375 GeV TeV

3. Parameters for CLIC-DB-Linac Newly build structure Upgrade 375 GeV 3 TeV L μLμL old structure Optimum for 3 TeV stage Optimum for 375 GeV stage Stage375 GeV3 TeV Cost0.41 B2.29 B

4. Mixed structures with various frequency shifts Accelerating voltage in the structure with constant frequency shift : sine or cosine function. If phase shift for full pulse is 2n, it provides harmonic voltage profile (Fourier series). Average accelerating voltage is 0, they only correct voltage distribution. We need the fundamental section to provide the DC component to the voltage profile. Voltage profile =? Fundamental section: Provide average voltage Harmonic sections: Provide voltage correction = Flat voltage f=500MHz +7kHz*1 f=500MHz +7kHz*2 f=500MHz +7kHz*3 f=500MHz +7kHz*4

4. Choices of fundamental section Sine series (Odd functions) Cosine series (Even functions) st Harmonic 2 nd Harmonic Fundamental See hereSee here for feature of this fundamental structure See here See here for feature of this fundamental structure 1/2 Harmonic 1 st Harmonic Fundamental + + f=500MHz+7kHz*1/6 f=500MHz+7kHz*1 f=500MHz+7kHz*2 f=500MHz f=500MHz+7kHz*0.5 f=500MHz+7kHz*1

4. Even structure (cosine series)

4. Odd structure (sine series)

4. Upgrade plan mLength m m m m mLength m m m Final stage 3 TeV Phi = 78.5 degree First stage 375 TeV Phi = 52 degree Cost = 2.36 BCHFCost = 0.32 BCHF Applicable

Summary We explore the beam loading compensation of CW drive beam linac scheme: Tuner based scheme : reply on tuner speed, easier to upgrade Mix structures scheme : more stable, sophisticate upgradation.

Thank you

SC Linac design Klystrons 350 kW CW RF Loads Circulator 1 Cryo-modules with 2 couplers, Length : 4.5 m RF couplers 175 kW 1 RF Unit 1 Cryo-modules 2 cavities per module: Length: 4.5 m Frequency500 MHz, TM020 Length1.67 m Diameter1.08 m G-factor900 Store energy capacity 3.5 KJ (3 Ohm/m) Q-ext3.5 * 10^7 4K~5 * 10^10 Half of the cavity Item3 TeV375 GeV RF units540 Cryogenics (4.5K) 34.5 MW RF (67%)250 MW Total284.5 MW Max-H field: 100 mT

Power feeding issue

Decay effect

Stability of variable frequency shift For 100 KHz/ms (1 MHz/ms) tuner speed, to order to achieve < 1% energy flatness, require: -Frequency calibration error < 0.2% (0.07%) -Cavity resonant frequency vibration < 6000 Hz (500 Hz) -Initial gradient change < 0.3% (0.08%) -Initial phase shift < 0.06° (0.04°) For 1 MHz/mm tuner speed For 100 KHz/mm tuner speed

Stability of mix frequency shifts. This system works fine with any Qe (support all power feeding scheme)->Normal conducting for Harmonic structures??? To order to achieve < 1% energy flatness gain, require: -Frequency calibration error < 0.8% -Cavity resonant frequency vibration < 3000 Hz -Initial gradient change < 1.3% -Initial phase shift < 0.2°