Watershed Management Plan Summary of 2014 Activities/Progress Presented by: Matthew Bennett, MS December 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LOWER SALMON RIVER Tributary Protection and Enhancement.
Advertisements

Lawyer Creek Steelhead Trout Habitat Improvement Project presented by: Lewis Soil Conservation District.
- Environment - Climate - Landscape - Land use - Local Population (animals and humans) Depends on…
TMDL Development Mainstem Monongahela River Watershed May 14, 2014.
TMDL Development Upper Kanawha River Watershed August 18, 2011 WV DEP WV DEP Dave Montali.
2009 Water Quality Monitoring Report – Fish Creek Vaughn Hauser, B.Sc. Naomi Parker, B.Sc., BIT, CEPIT.
Nelly Smith EPA Region 6. - Develop or revise bacteria reduction program for consistency with new TMDL requirements and allocations - Develop or revise.
Stream Monitoring in Loudoun County David Ward, Water Resources Engineer Department of Building and Development, Department of Building and Development,
Imperial River: Water Quality Status and Basin Management Action Plan.
Texas Stream Team …is a joint partnership with Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, U.S. EPA Region VI, Texas State University-San Marcos, and numerous.
H 2 whOa! The Governor’s Institute of Environmental Science & Technology- Water Group.
Presented at the 9 th Stakeholder Meeting Mike Herrmann, NCEEP Central Watershed Planner April 20th, 2010 Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) Intake Stessor.
Common Monitoring Parameters. Step 1 Consider purpose/objectives of monitoring Assess use attainment Characterize watershed Identify pollutants and sources.
Assessing Aquatic Ecosystems & Measurement. Aquatic Ecosystem Assessment The health of an aquatic ecosystem can be determined by examining a variety of.
Determining the effectiveness of best management practices to reduce nutrient loading from cattle grazed pastures in Utah Nicki Devanny Utah State University,
Fundamentals of River Restoration and Salmonid Fisheries OWEB, 1999, Fundamentals of River Restoration and Salmonid Fisheries OWEB, 1999, Fundamentals.
1 Water Quality: Temperature How is water quality affected by temperature?
Water Monitoring. What/Why? Water testing Identifying water content Allows scientists to have a full understanding of what is affecting their stream or.
Marilyn Murphy, David Plavcan, William Shepard, Donna Suevo, Jeff Thomas, Karen Trozzo, Timothy Woods and David Yezuita West Chester University July 2002.
Temperature of Stream Site (upstream to downstream) Temperature ( °C )Average ( °C ) °C °C °C °C °C °C According to.
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Source Water Protection Plans A case study of the Ross Barnett Reservoir in Central MS.
Catoctin Creek: A Stream in Distress Catoctin Watershed Project A Partnership of County and Citizen Organizations.
TMDLs on the Clearwater River Fecal Coliform Impairment of the Trout Stream Portion of the Clearwater River By Corey Hanson Water Quality Coordinator Red.
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program (SWQM)
Red Lake Watershed District Water Quality Monitoring.
Dr. Matt Helmers Assistant Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer Dept. of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Iowa State University How is.
Elaine Snouwaert – WA Department of Ecology Walt Edelen – Spokane Conservation District Spokane River DO Advisory Group Meeting January 19, 2012.
Chumstick Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land development, road construction, and other human activities have affected channel migration and sediment.
The Non-tidal Water Quality Monitoring Network: past, present and future opportunities Katie Foreman Water Quality Analyst, UMCES-CBPO MASC Non-tidal Water.
Redwood River TMDL Critique David De Paz, Alana Bartolai, Lydia Karlheim.
Charlotte Harbor Environmental Center Water Quality Canal Sampling Gated access to harbor.
METHODS. Physical Methods Steam Profile Discharge Air Temperature Water Temperature Relative Humidity.
Conceptual Modeling as a Tool for Developing a Watershed Management Plan An aid to understanding linkages Barbara Washburn California Watershed Assessment.
Main Creek Water Quality Report Sandy Wingert UDWQ PRWC October 8,
INDIAN HEAD RIVER PROJECT Whitman-Hanson Regional High School RiverNet Club 2005.
Lesson 1.5 Pg
TMDLs on the Clearwater River Fecal Coliform Impairment of the Trout Stream Portion of the Clearwater River By Corey Hanson Water Quality Coordinator Red.
Kuskokwim Watershed Council Key Parameters for Baseline Water Quality Assessment © David Griso.
Coles Creek Watershed Assessment and Education Summary The Coles Creek Watershed, located in the southwestern quadrant of the state of Mississippi, with.
Habitat Mapping of High Level Indicators at Multiple Scales for Fish and Wildlife.
Nehalem River Basin: Technical Assistance for Watershed Data Synthesis, Restoration, and Outreach Priorities 4/16/2008.
STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
Monitoring Water Quality for ecosystem health. Why Monitor? Under the Clean Water Act, EPA asks VA to enforce laws improving the quality of our streams,
The Chesapeake Bay: How is it Doing? An Overview of The Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan Revised Terms of Reference
Dodge County Water Monitoring Update
Sources, Transport, Fate Treatment Methodologies BMP Case Studies
Water Quality Rice Creek Watershed.
Mulberry River Watershed
Adapted From Ms. Hasan Mr. Aguilar Uteach Step 2 Lesson 3, 2012
Fundamentals of River Restoration and Salmonid Fisheries OWEB, 1999, Fundamentals of River Restoration and Salmonid Fisheries Dylan Castle.
Chesapeake Monitoring Cooperative
Dave Clark and Michael Kasch
Watersheds Review Science 8 SOL.
Middle Fork Project AQ 11 – Water Quality Technical Study Plan Report Overview March 10, 2008.
Discover Life in West Virginia ( )
WENDELL PARK STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS
Food Chains to Food Webs - Journals
Mulberry River Watershed Management Plan
INFO FROM: HEALTHY WATER, HEALTHY PEOPLE WATER QUALITY GUIDE
Warmup QUIZ! Write three facts from the notes you took last night for homework.  Hope you did it!!!
Aquatic Ecology Envirothon
Leon River Watershed Protection Plan: Addressing EPA Comments
DETERMINING STREAM QUALITY
Indicators of Stream Health
Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs
Marco island water quality monitoring
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Presentation transcript:

Watershed Management Plan Summary of 2014 Activities/Progress Presented by: Matthew Bennett, MS December 2014

Outline  Introduction  2014 Program Objectives  Sampling Plan  Results  Recommended Corrective Actions

Introduction  Little Bushkill Creek Watershed  17.5 square miles  38.8 miles of regulated streams  East, West, and Main Branches  Water Quality Sampling Program: Portions of Little Bushkill Creek (LBC) had elevated fecal coliform levels  2012 PADEP Impaired for Recreational Use

 2013: Township Initiated Watershed Management Plan  Fecal Coliform water quality sampling  Macroinvertebrate Study  2014 Obtained Growing Greener Grant funds from PADEP to continue the Plan Introduction continued

2013 Potentially Obtaining 2012 Impaired Reaches

2014 Program Objectives  Identify additional stream reaches eligible for delisting  Continue monitoring reaches with historic elevated fecal coliform levels  Conduct riparian assessments to identify the extent and source of potential fecal coliform impairment  Identify locations where restoration/management efforts could improve water quality

2014 Sampling Plan  Sample Types  Monitoring  Attainment  Source Identification  Sampling Periods/Sample Methods  5 samples collected during low flow conditions in both June and September  Parameters Collected  Fecal Coliform & Fecal Enterococcus  Nitrates and other water quality parameters (temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, and conductivity)

Sampling Plan continued  Riparian Watershed Assessment  Land Use, Springs/Seeps, and Wetlands  Fish, macroinvertebrates, and stream blockages  Stream vegetation and substrate  Unique Water Quality Issues  Locations  West Branch  Heimer Road Spring Tributary  Delabole Road Tributary  Benders Church Road Tributary  Browntown Road Tributary

Results  Fecal Coliform  Fecal Enterococcus  Nutrients  Other Parameters  Riparian Assessment Add Picture here

Fecal Coliform Results  Several locations satisfy PADEP’s requirements for fecal coliform water quality standards  One location was not attaining  Monitoring locations continued to show elevated levels, as expected  Source ID locations provided a better understanding of potential sources

Fecal Enterococcus Results  Several instances of elevated fecal enterococcus levels were obtained: *Acceptable levels = 33 CFU/ 100 ml  Benders Church Road Tributary (6)  Heimer Road Spring Tributary (1)  East Branch (1)  Indicative of potential human impact/input

Nutrient Sampling Results  Nitrate/Nitrite Ratio and Total Kjeldah Nitrogen (TKN)  Determine possibility of fecal coliform coming from wastewater  May indicate agricultural runoff input  Some locations on Benders Church Road Tributary and Heimer Road Spring Tributary had high levels, but were still within the EPA acceptable range

Water Quality Parameters Temperature  Cold temperatures decrease the reproduction rate of fecal coliform bacteria pH  May indicate chemical disturbance into stream (i.e. acid mine drainage or chemical additives) Dissolved Oxygen  Required to sustain health of aquatic life  Low levels may indicate a pollution source Conductivity  Abnormal values may indicate water source may be from non natural sources

 Fresh water trout streams should not exceed 18.9 degrees  One exceedance, but located in a pond not a stream  Dissolved Oxygen (DO) should be higher than 7.0 mg/L  DO was sufficient at all sampling locations

 pH should range between 6.0 and 9.0  One location more acidic  One location more alkaline  Typical conductivity range for streams is between 0.15 uS/cm to 0.50 uS/cm.  One location was below of range

Riparian Assessment Results  Fish  Macroinvertebrates  Stream Blockages  Springs/ Seeps  Stream Vegetation

 Land Use  Stream Substrate  Wetlands Riparian Assessment Results cont.

Outfall Documentation  In outfalls were identified during the field surveys  The 2014 riparian assessment identified 7 more, previously unidentified outfalls  2 along West Branch  5 along Delabole Road Tributary  Source and potential water quality concerns associated with these outfalls warrants further investigation

2014 Program Results  5 new reaches eligible for delisting  38.8 total stream miles  74% have met PADEP water quality requirements and are eligible for delisting  A few tributaries continue to have elevated levels & a few potential source areas have been identified  Recommended actions have been developed for certain reaches

West Branch  Additional sampling  Monitoring  Attainment  Expand sampling into Wind Gap Borough  Investigate outfalls  Improve flow  Remove log debris jams

Delabole Road Tributary  Additional monitoring samples  Restoration measures recommended:  Land Owner Outreach  Implementation of Agricultural Best Management Practices (BMP’s)

Heimer Rd Spring Tributary  Additional monitoring samples  Riparian buffer enhancement

Benders Church Rd Tributary  Additional monitoring samples  Restoration measures recommended:  Land Owner Outreach  Implementation of Agricultural BMP’s  Evaluation of potential up gradient groundwater sources

Browntown Road Tributary  Additional sampling  Monitoring  Attainment