California Independent System Operator 1 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, 10 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Energy in Todays Economy: Challenges and Opportunities Dr. Kenneth L. Lay Chairman, Enron Corp. Economy Roundtable Austin, Texas January 3, 2001 For further.
Advertisements

Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Consideration of Price Caps Reduction Meeting of the Board of Governors of the California ISO By David Parquet Vice President Enron North America Corp.
Convergence Bidding Overview Margaret Miller Manager, Market Design & Regulatory Policy CPUC Convergence Bidding Workshop August 26, 2010.
Highlights of the 2004 State of the Market Report New York Electricity Markets David B. Patton, Ph.D. Potomac Economics Independent Market Advisor May.
Demand Response in New York State Northwest Power and Conservation Council DR workshop February 24, 2006.
Resource Adequacy in PJM
Valuing Load Reduction in Restructured Markets Supply Cost Curve Regressions Market Price vs. Value of Load Reduction Photovoltaic Case Study William B.
9/22/00 1 Jerry W. Smith. 9/22/00 2 Jerry W. Smith.
MISO’s Midwest Market Initiative APEX Ron McNamara October 31, 2005.
Utility Regulation March 10, 2011 Raj Addepalli Deputy Director, Electric, Office of Electric,Gas and Water New York State Department of Public Service.
Overview of LMP Markets Features of ISOs / RTOs David Withrow Senior Market Economist Fall 2007 Meeting of the NARUC Staff Subcommittee on Accounting and.
North American Electricity Markets APEX Paris, France October 15-16, 2007 Kenneth Laughlin, PJM.
Managing California’s Electricity Crises Vikram S. Budhraja President, Electric Power Group, LLC Chair, Consortium for Electric Reliability Technology.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
John Dumas Director of Wholesale Market Operations ERCOT Operating Reserve Demand Curve.
ERCOT Public 1 AS Demand Curves for Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services.
Convergence Bidding Issues Eric Hildebrandt, Ph.D. CAISO Department of Market Monitoring CPUC Convergence Bidding Workshop July 26, 2010.
MIDWEST ENERGY OUTLOOK THE ROLE OF COMPETITIVE POWER SUPPLIERS ENERGY MARKETS IN TURMOIL May 17, 2001 Freddi L. Greenberg.
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
©2004 PJM 1 STATE OF THE MARKET REPORT 2003 Joseph E. Bowring Manager PJM Market Monitoring Unit FERC Briefing Washington, D.C. April 14, 2004.
Retail Competition: Managing a Difficult Transition David L. O’Connor Commissioner Massachusetts Division of Energy Resources (DOER) Presentation to National.
THE PJM INTERCONNECTION STATE OF THE MARKET REPORT 2001 Joseph E. Bowring Manager PJM Market Monitoring Unit Federal Energy Regulatory Commission June.
1 New England Demand Response Resources: Present Observations and Future Challenges Henry Yoshimura Demand Resources Department ISO New England, Inc. Holyoke,
EPSA REGULATORY AFFAIR CONFERENCE 2006 Washington, DC October 25, 2006 Garry Brown Vice President, External Affairs New York ISO.
1 Capacity Markets Investment in Generation Capacity Payments October 31, 2005 J. W. Charlton.
Colombian Firm Energy Market: Discussion and Simulation Peter Cramton (joint with Steven Stoft and Jeffrey West) 9 August 2006.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
Bulk Power Transmission System
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
ISO Outlook Summer 2005 and Beyond Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee February 22, 2005 Jim Detmers Vice President of Grid Operations.
1 Electricity System and Energy Market Basics David J. Lawrence Manager, Auxiliary Market Products Prepared for: RGGI I&L Workshop June 15, 2006.
E x p e r i e n c e C o m m i t m e n t SM ERCOT Nodal – Fuel Cost Analysis Verifiable Cost Working Group October 6, 2008.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
1March 24, 2000California PX Demand Responsiveness Workshop Christensen Associates Lessons from California The Role of Demand Response Energy Markets in.
Review of CAISO Wholesale Electricity Market Trends APEX Sydney Conference California Electricity Wholesale Market Trends October 13, 2008 Anjali Sheffrin,
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION NATURAL GAS ASSESSMENT: SHORT AND LONG TERM Briefing to the Legislature Assembly Utilities and Commerce Committee January.
©2005 PJM 1 STATE OF THE MARKET REPORT 2004 Joseph E. Bowring Market Monitor FERC Briefing April 13, 2005.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
1 Pacific Northwest Hydro-Thermal System and RTO West Market Design FERC Market Design Workshop January 23, 2002.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
Managing Reliability and the Markets with PI
IWWG Annual Conference Wind Management at MISO July 22, 2011.
Winter Power Supply Adequacy/Reliability Analysis Power Committee Briefing October 17, 2001.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SM Southern California Edison Company’s Proposal to Participate in Convergence Bidding August 23, 2010.
Illinois Wholesale Market Update December 10, 2003.
2003 State of the Market Report ERCOT Wholesale Electricity Markets.
ERCOT Monthly Operational Overview (July 2012) August 15, 2012.
1 Market Operations Presentation Board of Director’s Meeting January 17, 2006.
Extra electricity slides
Role Of ERC in the WESM To enforce the rules and regulations governing the operations of the WESM and monitors the activities of the Market Operator and.
1 Market Operations Presentation Board of Director’s Meeting December 13, 2005.
Ahmed Kaloko, Ph.D. Director Bureau of Conservation, Economics & Energy Planning Harrisburg PA COMPARISON OF PJM-ISO WITH CALIFORNIA-ISO Pennsylvania.
Multi-Use Application Use Case #3: Optimized Pricing and Resource Allocation (OPRA) Project. May 3, 2016.
IMM Report on MISO South Integration Presented by: David B. Patton, Ph.D. Independent Market Monitor Presented to: Entergy Regional State Committee April.
1 Market Operations Presentation Board of Director’s Meeting February 16, 2005.
Joint Energy Auction Implementation Proposal of PG&E, SCE and SDG&E California Public Utilities Commission Workshop – November 1, 2006.
Aligning the Gas and Electric Markets: EDF Solutions
Prepared by California Department of Water Resources May 31, 2001
California Product Offerings
Wind Management at MISO
FERC Standard Market Design Working Papers
Regional Transmission Organizations
What To Do About Western Wholesale Markets?
Flexible Forward Contracts for Renewable Energy Generators
Basin Electric SPP Market Update
Homework Ch 13 Electricity Restructuring
Forecasting and Operations CAISO Case
Solar Energy Commercialization
Wholesale Electricity Costs
Presentation transcript:

California Independent System Operator 1 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm Market Analysis Report Anjali Sheffrin, Ph.D. Director, Market Analysis July 25, 2001

California Independent System Operator 2 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm I. Review of Energy, Ancillary, and Congestion Market Performance for June 2001 II. Special Issues Under Investigation and Analysis

California Independent System Operator 3 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm Market Overview Average energy cost in CA markets was reduced by about 50% from May 2001 Two FERC order became effective for June 2001 –April 26 Order: effective May 29 – June 19: Price mitigation during emergency hours for CA spot markets –June 19 Order: effective after June 20: Price mitigation expanded to all hours and entire WSCC spot markets Lower load than June 2000 and increased supply helped moderate costs –Conservation helped to keep load down –New power plants brought on-line –Generation outages reduced significantly (continue the trend from May 2001) –Reduced natural gas price

California Independent System Operator 4 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm System Load and Average Unit Cost of Energy Average energy costs since January 2001 based on weighted average of production cost of utility owned generation, and purchase prices of wholesale energy to meet “net short” load of California utility distribution companies (UDCs), and other non-UDC loads

California Independent System Operator 5 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm Significantly Reduced Load Compared With Last Year (Growth Rates from same month prior year)

California Independent System Operator 6 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm Comparison of Loads - June 2001

California Independent System Operator 7 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm Significant Reduction in Generation Outages

California Independent System Operator 8 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm Reduced imports and hydro would have put pressure on higher cost, but reduced load more than covered those shortfall. Avg. Hourly Energy by Source

California Independent System Operator 9 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm Average Hourly Energy by source June 2000 vs Reduced imports and hydro would have put pressure on higher cost, but reduced load more than covered those shortfall. As a result total gas fired generation is slightly less than June 2000.

California Independent System Operator 10 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm Net Imports Peak Hours for (January through June) 2000 and 2001

California Independent System Operator 11 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm Net Imports Off-peak Hours for (January through June) 2000 and 2001

California Independent System Operator 12 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm Natural Gas Spot Prices for Aug 2000 Through Present So. Cal. Border and Henry Hub (No Transportation Costs)

California Independent System Operator 13 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm Comparison of Calif Border and National Natural Gas Spot Prices for Aug 2000 Through Present PG&E Citygate and Henry Hub (No Transportation Costs)

California Independent System Operator 14 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm Significant Reduction in Wholesale Energy Cost and Competitive Baseline Price in June Market power cost estimates are for the ‘net short’ energy requirement of California UDCs. Part of the net short energy is covered by long term contract which is not affected by the FERC price mitigation for the spot markets. Price cost mark-up in both real time and spot markets have been reduced in June while the long term contract price kept the overall market power index high.

California Independent System Operator 15 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm Real Time Prices and Net Volumes - June 2001 Loads + MCP As-bidBEEP OOM Effective Real Time Unsch. Peak $72$137$76$127$11729,966 GWh 37 GWh0 GWh37 GWh504 GWh541 GWh2.6% Off-peak $49 $124 $53$85$7822,472 GWh % All Hrs $64$136$68$113$10427,468 GWh % Note: Effective real-time price is weighted average of MCP, As Bid, and OOM. Dollar figures are $/MWh, Quantities are presented in GWh, and % represents percent underscheduling. The above dollar values are the average of prices transacted in real-time and do not represent the average cost of electricity.

California Independent System Operator 16 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm Significant Reduction in Price-Cost Mark-Up in ISO Real- Time Market in June 1 to 19 and further in June 20 to 30

California Independent System Operator 17 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm Regional Spot Market Prices (on-peak) Converge to Competitive Baseline Cost

California Independent System Operator 18 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm Out-of-market Purchases and Average Cost December June 2001

California Independent System Operator 19 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm Ancillary Services Markets and Congestion Management

California Independent System Operator 20 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm Summary for A/S Markets June 2001

California Independent System Operator 21 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm Average Daily Regulation Up Prices June 2001

California Independent System Operator 22 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm Average Daily Regulation Down Prices June 2001

California Independent System Operator 23 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm Average Daily Spin Prices June 2001

California Independent System Operator 24 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm Average Daily Non-Spin Prices June 2001

California Independent System Operator 25 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm Average Daily Replacement Reserve Prices June 2001

California Independent System Operator 26 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm Day Ahead Congestion - June 2000 Day Ahead Congestion - June 2001

California Independent System Operator 27 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm Total Congestion Costs Day Ahead & Hour Ahead Markets June 2001 vs. June 2000

California Independent System Operator 28 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm Path 15 Congestion Cost Summary Mar 2002

California Independent System Operator 29 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm Issues Under Investigation DMA analysis for FERC settlement conference and refund proceeding Monitoring and reporting to FERC regarding anti-competitive bidding practices Bid insufficiency in regulation market Implementation of must-offer procedure for units with long start-up time

California Independent System Operator 30 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm Insufficient Bids in Regulation Market Insufficient Supply –IOU participation has been limited due to insolvency issues. IOUs prefer to schedule their generation against their own load. IOUs concerned about creditworthiness in providing downward regulation. –The method by which suppliers are paid for regulation energy may be reducing incentives to supply regulation. Current pricing approach settles regulation energy at the ISO Real- time Uninstructed Energy Price, which can be very volatile and risky. High Demand for Regulation being driven in part by sub- optimal forward energy procurement. –16 hour block forward energy purchases can create excessive energy imbalances across the shoulder hours of the day that must be offset by regulation energy given the absence of an efficient Imbalance Energy market.

California Independent System Operator 31 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm Regulation Market Performance Issue High Demand and Insufficient Supply have reduced the competitiveness of the regulation market. –Regulation market has been generally dominated by 2-3 Scheduling Coordinators. –Market concentration is very high. –In June 2001, a single SC set the day-ahead downward regulation price in over 50% of the total hours.

California Independent System Operator 32 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July, :29:17 pm ISO Efforts to Improve Regulation Market Performance Efforts to increase regulation supply –ISO is encouraging CERS to pursue long-term bilateral contracts for regulation capacity to reduce dependence on spot market. –ISO is examining several alternative regulation energy payment methods that would provide greater energy price certainty and reduce risk. Efforts to decrease regulation demand –ISO is working with CERS to improve forward energy procurement practices to better match demand during the shoulder hours of the day.