Baseline characteristics of HPS participants by prior cerebrovascular disease.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Funding to Oxford University for MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study Medical Research Council$14M British Heart Foundation$2M Merck $8M Roche Vitamins$8M Designed,
Advertisements

Protecting the heart and the kidney: Implications from the SHARP trial Dr. Christina Reith University of Oxford United Kingdom.
HPS2-THRIVE: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of ER niacin and laropiprant in 25,673 patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease. Jane Armitage.
HPS2-THRIVE: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of ER niacin and laropiprant in 25,673 patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease. Jane Armitage.
CVD prevention & management: a new approach for primary care Rod Jackson School of Population Health University of Auckland New Zealand.
On-Treatment LDL and CHD Events in Statin Trials 2 Adapted from Rosenson RS. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2004;9: LaRosa JC et al. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:
Cholesterol quintile (mg/dL)
IHS SDPI COMPETITIVE GRANT PROGRAM CVD RISK REDUCTION DEMONSTRATION PROJECT WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE? HOW ARE WE DOING? HOW CAN WE DO BETTER? Karl Hammermeister,
Economic evaluation of MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group University of Oxford UK.
Lancet : doi: /S (08)60104-X Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from.
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials Ungroup once.
HYPERLIPIDAEMIA. 4S 4444 patients –Hx angina or MI –Cholesterol Simvastatin 20mg (10-40) vs. placebo FU 5 years  total cholesterol 25%;  LDL.
Who should have statins 18 th March Nonfatal MI CHD death Any major coronary event CABG PTCA Unspecified Any coronary revascularisation.
Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease Presented at Late Breaking Clinical Trials AHA 2002 PROSPER.
Rationale, Study Design & Study Population
Cholesterol Lowering and CV Risk: Meta-analyses. On-Treatment LDL and CHD Events in Statin Trials 2 Adapted from Rosenson RS. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs.
ELIGIBILITY: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study Increased risk of CHD death due to prior disease: Myocardial infarction or other coronary heart disease; Occlusive.
HPS: Heart Protection Study Purpose To determine whether simvastatin reduces mortality and vascular events in patients with and without coronary disease,
Copyleft Clinical Trial Results. You Must Redistribute Slides HYVET Trial The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
The Prospective Pravastatin Pooling Project L I P I D CARECARE PPP Project Investigators Am J Cardiol 1995; 76:899–905.
Aim To determine the effects of a Coversyl- based blood pressure lowering regimen on the risk of recurrent stroke among patients with a history of stroke.
SPARCL – Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) Jim McMorran Coventry GP GP with Specialist Interest in Diabetes and.
Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study CARDS Dr Sachin Kadoo.
ALLHAT 6/5/ CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (3 GROUPS by GFR)
VBWG Growth in heart disease, 2000–2050 Deaths Population Foot DK et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:
Ridker PM, et al. Lancet 2009;373: Baseline clinical characteristics of the study population in the placebo and rosuvastatin groups according.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
Baseline characteristics of participants presenting with or without peripheral artery disease (PAD) Heart Protection Study Group J Vasc Surg 2007;45:
6/5/ CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (4 GROUPS by GFR) ALLHAT.
ELIGIBILITY: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study Increased risk of CHD death due to prior disease: Myocardial infarction or other coronary heart disease; Occlusive.
Number of participants with diabetes by trial Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaborators Lancet 2008;371:
Baseline characteristics and eligibility criteria of participating trials Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators Lancet 2005;366:
December 02 1 Vascular mortality: Age-specific hazard ratios for 20 mmHg lower usual SBP deaths at ages
Over Time Additional Risk Factors Can Progress: Effect of Cholesterol and BP on CHD Risk in MRFIT Trial
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck.
Hazard ratio (& 95% CI) for 20 mmHg lower usual systolic BP
US cost-effectiveness of simvastatin in 20,536 people at different levels of vascular disease risk: randomised placebo-controlled trial UK Medical Research.
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials Ungroup once.
Title slide.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
Funding to Oxford University for MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study
Economic evaluation of MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study
Cholesterol Lowering and CV Risk: Meta-analyses
Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results (LEADER) Trial Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cardiovascular.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease Louise Bowman on behalf of the HPS.
Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease
Effects of Anacetrapib on the Incidence of New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus and on Vascular Events in People With Diabetes Louise Bowman & Martin Landray on.
Copyright © 2007 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
The Anglo Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial
ELIGIBILITY: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study
Comparison of baseline characteristics in participants who subsequently had an incident cardiovascular event or new-onset diabetes in the Prospective.
PS Sever, PM Rothwell, SC Howard, JE Dobson, B Dahlöf,
AIM HIGH Niacin plus Statin to prevent vascular events
Copyright © 2012 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Jane Armitage on behalf of the HPS2-THRIVE Collaborative Group
Baseline characteristics of HPS participants by prior diabetes
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
The results of the SHARP trial
Determinants of new onset diabetes among hypertensive patients randomised in the ASCOT-BPLA Trial Dr Ajay K Gupta International Centre for Circulatory.
Case 1: A 73-year-old white female with carotid disease
Insights from the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT)
Description of studies for pooled analyses
ELIGIBILITY: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study
Lipid-Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): Results in the Subgroup of Patients with Diabetes Peter S. Sever, Bjorn Dahlöf, Neil Poulter, Hans Wedel, for the.
Delahoy PJ, et al. Clin Ther 2009;31:236-44
The results of the SHARP trial
PROSPER: trial design                                                                                                                                                                 
Simvastatin in Patients With Prior Cerebrovascular Disease: HPS
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Presentation transcript:

Baseline characteristics of HPS participants by prior cerebrovascular disease

Baseline lipids (mmol/L) and apolipoproteins (g/L) by prior cerebrovascular disease

Baseline lipids (mg/dL) and apolipoproteins (g/L) by prior cerebrovascular disease

FACTORIAL TREATMENT COMPARISONS

(10269)(10267) SIMVASTATINPLACEBORate ratio & 95% CI STATIN betterPLACEBO better Type Ischaemic 5153 Haemorrhagic Unknown Severity Fatal 4251 Severe Moderate Mild 6171 Unknown (4.3%)(5.7%) 25% SE 5 reduction (2P< ) ALL STROKES HPS: Stroke Incidence

SIMVASTATINPLACEBORate ratio & 95% CI STATIN betterPLACEBO better Baseline feature (10269)(10267) Age (years) < (3.3%)(4.0%) ≥ 65 < (4.5%)(6.3%) ≥ (5.8%)(8.2%) Sex Male331453(4.3%)(5.9%) Female113132(4.4%)(5.2%) ALL PATIENTS444585(4.3%)(5.7%) 25% SE 5 reduction (2P< ) HPS: STROKE incidence by AGE & SEX

(10269)(10267) SIMVASTATINPLACEBORate ratio & 95% CI STATIN betterPLACEBO better Baseline feature Age (16.9%)(22.1%)< (20.9%)(27.2%) (23.8%)(27.7%) (23.1%)(32.3%)  75 Sex (21.6%)(27.6%)Male (14.4%)(17.7%)Female 24% SE 3 reduction (2P< ) (19.8%)(25.2%)ALL PATIENTS HPS: MAJOR VASCULAR EVENT by AGE & SEX

SIMVASTATINPLACEBORate ratio & 95% CI STATIN betterPLACEBO better Baseline feature (10269)(10267) Prior coronary disease Yes265347(4.0%)(5.2%) No179238(5.0%)(6.7%) Prior cerebrovascular disease Yes169170(10.3%)(10.4%) No275415(3.2%)(4.8%) Prior diabetes Yes149193(5.0%)(6.5%) No295392(4.0%)(5.4%) ALL PATIENTS444585(4.3%)(5.7%) 25% SE 5 reduction (2P< ) HPS: STROKE by PRIOR DISEASE

SIMVASTATINPLACEBORate ratio & 95% CI STATIN betterPLACEBO better Baseline feature (10269)(10267) Prior coronary disease Yes175237(2.6%)(3.5%) No115172(3.2%)(4.8%) Prior cerebrovascular disease Yes100122(6.1%)(7.5%) No190287(2.2%)(3.3%) Prior diabetes Yes102140(3.4%)(4.7%) No188269(2.6%)(3.7%) ALL PATIENTS290409(2.8%)(4.0%) 30% SE 6 reduction (2P< wœ4õ) HPS: ISCHAEMIC STROKE by PRIOR DISEASE

SIMVASTATINPLACEBORate ratio & 95% CI STATIN betterPLACEBO better Baseline feature (10269)(10267) Prior coronary disease Yes (21.8%)(27.5%) No574744(16.1%)(20.8%) Prior cerebrovascular disease Yes406488(24.7%)(29.8%) No (18.9%)(24.3%) Prior diabetes Yes601748(20.2%)(25.1%) No (19.6%)(25.2%) ALL PATIENTS (19.8%)(25.2%) 24% SE 3 reduction (2P< ) HPS: MAJOR VASCULAR EVENTS by PRIOR DISEASE

Absolute effects on major vascular events and strokes subdivided by prior cerebrovascular disease S S P P Yes No Prior cerebrovascular disease Major vascular event (%) Risk reductions (SE): Proportional Absolute/1000 P-value 20% (6) 58 (18) p= % (3) 60 (7) p< Other event Stroke

SIMVASTATINPLACEBORate ratio & 95% CI STATIN betterPLACEBO better Baseline feature (10269)(10267) LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) < (4.0%)(5.7%) ≥ 3.0 < (4.2%)(6.2%) > (4.6%)(5.4%) HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) < (4.7%)(5.6%) ≥ 0.9 < (4.1%)(5.8%) > (4.1%)(5.7%) ALL PATIENTS444585(4.3%)(5.7%) 25% SE 5 reduction (2P< ) HPS: STROKE incidence by BASELINE LIPIDS

SIMVASTATINPLACEBORate ratio & 95% CI STATIN betterPLACEBO better Baseline feature (10269)(10267) LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) < (17.6%)(22.2%) ≥ 3.0 < (19.0%)(25.7%) > (22.0%)(27.2%) HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) < (22.6%)(29.9%) ≥ 0.9 < (20.0%)(25.1%) > (17.0%)(20.9%) ALL PATIENTS (19.8%)(25.2%) 24% SE 3 reduction (2P< ) HPS: MAJOR VASCULAR EVENTS by BASELINE LIPIDS

SIMVASTATINPLACEBORate ratio & 95% CI STATIN betterPLACEBO better Baseline feature (10269)(10267) Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) < (3.9%)(5.2%) ≥ 80 < (4.0%)(5.8%) ≥ (5.6%)(6.5%) Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) < (3.6%)(4.2%) ≥ 140 < (3.9%)(5.3%) ≥ (6.1%)(8.8%) ALL PATIENTS444585(4.3%)(5.7%) 25% SE 5 reduction (2P< ) HPS: STROKE incidence by baseline BLOOD PRESSURE

(10269)(10267) SIMVASTATINPLACEBORate ratio & 95% CI STATIN betterPLACEBO better Baseline feature DBP (mmHg) (20.4%)(26.4%)< (19.5%)(23.5%)  80 < (19.2%)(25.1%)  90 SBP (mmHg) (19.4%)(23.5%)< (17.9%)(24.4%)  140 < (22.7%)(29.2%)  % SE 3 reduction (2P< ) (19.8%)(25.2%)ALL PATIENTS HPS: MAJOR VASCULAR EVENTS by baseline BLOOD PRESSURE

SIMVASTATINPLACEBORate ratio & 95% CI STATIN betterPLACEBO better Baseline feature (10269)(10267) Treated hypertension Yes223274(5.3%)(6.5%) No221311(3.6%)(5.2%) Aspirin Yes286378(4.4%)(5.8%) No158207(4.2%)(5.5%) ALL PATIENTS444585(4.3%)(5.7%) 25% SE 5 reduction (2P< ) HPS: STROKE incidence by TREATED HYPERTENSION and ASPIRIN USE

SIMVASTATINPLACEBORate ratio & 95% CI STATIN betterPLACEBO better Baseline feature (10269)(10267) Treated hypertension Yes (22.4%)(28.1%) No (18.0%)(23.1%) Aspirin Yes (21.1%)(27.4%) No663801(17.5%)(21.3%) ALL PATIENTS (19.8%)(25.2%) 24% SE 3 reduction (2P< ) HPS: MAJOR VASCULAR EVENTS by TREATED HYPERTENSION & ASPIRIN USE

SIMVASTATINPLACEBORate ratio & 95% CI STATIN betterPLACEBO better Year of follow-up (10269)(10267) (0.8%)(1.0%) (0.8%)(1.3%) (0.8%)(1.2%) (0.9%)(1.2%) (1.2%)(1.4%) ALL PATIENTS444585(4.3%)(5.7%) 25% SE 5 reduction (2P< ) HPS : STROKE incidence by YEAR

Years of follow-up PLACEBO SIMVASTATIN Benefit/1000(SE)2(1)7(2)10(2)13(3)14(4)15(10) Logrank p< Proportion with stroke HPS: STROKE by YEAR

STATINPLACEBORate ratio & 95% CI STATIN betterPLACEBO better Study GREACE917(1.1%)(2.1%) AFCAPS/TexcAPS1417(0.4%)(0.5%) Post-CABG1816(2.7%)(2.4%) GISSI2019(0.9%) WOSCOPS4651(1.4%)(1.5%) CARE5276(2.5%)(3.7%) SSSS5676(2.5%)(3.4%) ASCOT89121(1.7%)(2.4%) PROSPER135131(4.7%)(4.5%) LIPID169204(3.7%)(4.5%) ALLHAT209231(4.0%)(4.5%) HPS444585(4.3%)(5.7%) ALL PATIENTS (3.0%)(3.6%) 21% SE 4 reduction (2P< ) Effects on STROKE in major STATIN trials

HPS: Conclusions for people with cerebrovascular disease Lowering LDL cholesterol by 1 mmol/L (40 mg/dL) reduces the 5-year risk of ischaemic stroke by about one-quarter, with no apparent adverse effect on cerebral haemorrhage Similar proportional reductions in stroke risk are seen with statin therapy irrespective of age, sex, lipid levels, blood pressure, or use of other medications (including aspirin) Statin therapy clearly reduces the risk of major vascular events among people with pre-existing cerebrovascular disease, irrespective of the presence of coronary disease