(404) 874-0555 WWW.WPG-INC.COM. The Wesley Peachtree Group, CPAs Presented by Keith X. Terrell, CPA, Cr.FA, FCPA, CGMA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Documentation Transactions posted to sponsored funds Sponsored Programs Administration October 2012.
Advertisements

Office of Management & Budget
OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
© 2014 University of New Hampshire. All rights reserved. Uniform Guidance Highlights What you really need to know.
A-133 Compliance & Audit Readiness Presented By: Tracy Jackson and Susan Cook.
Rules Governing Sponsored Projects (aka OMB Circulars) Presented by Beverly Blakeney, Diane Cummings and Julie Macy.
OMB Circulars and Beyond Nancy Duncan, Award Analysis Supervisor Sponsored Projects Administration.
OMB Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Part 200.  The final guidance was issued on December 26, 2013 and supersedes and streamlines requirements from OMB Circulars.
4/28/20151 Presented by: Anne Taylor, NECTAC David Steele, OSEP OSEP Part C Fiscal Management Verification: What Is It And How Do I Prepare For It?
Introduction to Uniform Guidance Presented to Engineering Research Network – Nov 19, 2014 by Sponsored Programs Accounting.
New Uniform Guidance Combines the requirements of OMB Circulars A-21, A-87, A-110, A-122, A-89, A-102, A-133, and A-50 into a streamlined format. *NOTE:
External Auditors – Common Findings in Federal Programs Allen, Green & Williamson, LLP.
2011 National Extension and Research Administrative Officers’ Conference Session #33, May 24, :30 p.m. – 2:45 p.m. Anchorage,Alaska Federal Audits.
Grant Guidance Changes
Presented by Tim Ray, CPA, CGFM Federal Compliance Coordinator Georgia Department of Audits Education Audit Division 1.
Subrecipient Monitoring Webcast Presenters Pat O'Rourke, Irene St. Croix, Bridget Ware Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services.
Presented by Edward A. Hofma, CPA, CGMA Principal in the CPA firm of Averett Warmus Durkee, PA 1417 East Concord Street Orlando, Florida (407) 849.
Cost Sharing Date Presenter Name Presenter Phone Number Presenter .
Subawards and Subrecipient Monitoring
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 COST SHARING.
“The mission of the Sub-recipient Monitoring Section is to monitor, assess, and assist Sub-recipients to successfully implement and complete Grant Program.
MODULE 8 MONITORING INDIANA HPRP Training 1. Role of Independent Financial Monitors 2 IHCDA is retaining an independent accounting firm to monitor its.
Indirect Cost Presented by Bonita Brown HMEP Grant Program
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
School Lunch Internal Controls Ryan Preston W. Tyler Michael Stephanie Jacobs.
1 CDBG Procurement Requirements For Local Officials.
Audits of Federal Awards AGA-Olympia October 20, Brad White, SAO.
Financial Management For Project Administrators. How Feds View Themselves.
T HE W ESLEY P EACHTREE G ROUP, CPAs Helping to Build Stronger Institutions for the Next Generation HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES TITLE.
Grant Requirement Reminders Michigan State Police Emergency Management and Homeland Security Division Ms. Jackie Reese, Audit Unit Manager Mr. Richard.
2013 INBRE Project Subaward Management Barbara Bunge MSU Subaward Manager (406)
2015 VOCA National Training Conference Grant Financial Management.
Monitoring & Oversight Adult Education and Literacy (AEL) Programs Brenda B. Williams Project Manager Texas Workforce Commission Regulatory Integrity Division.
Presented by Raaj Kurapati and Charlene Hart. Introduction  The Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 was enacted to streamline and improve the effectiveness.
UT-Arlington Accounting CPE Day August 13, 2014 SEFA Preparation and Subrecipient Monitoring.
The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards The OMB SuperCircular Information for FTA Grantees.
Presented by: Dan Parker/FHWA. Streamlines the language from eight OMB circulars to one consolidated set of guidance. The following have been combined.
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY IN TITLE III AND OTHER SPONSORED PROGRAMS AND GRANTS ADMINISTRATION Presented by Sharon S. Crews, M.Ac., CPA Vice President for Administrative.
The University Corporation Cost Sharing Sponsored Programs The University Corporation Research, Investments and Commercial Services California State University,
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
New NSF Awardee Checklist Requirements: WHY? November 19, 2014 joyce y. JOHNSON POST-AWARDS COORDINATOR OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
Audit and Audit Resolution Presented by Wendy Spivey ADECA Audit Manager.
Arkansas Association of Federal Coordinators September 23, 2011.
SUBAWARDS & SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING UNIFORM GUIDANCE AT K-STATE 2 CFR Part 200 – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements.
Office of Sponsored Programs- OMB Uniform Guidance October 21, 2015.
Uniform Administrative Requirements 2014 YouthBuild Webinar Series.
JEOPARDY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT EDITION Documentation Procurement Mystery Cost Principles Administrative Requirements Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500.
Sponsored Project Administration Fall 2012 CERTIFICATION PROGRAM Sponsored Project Lifecycle Introduction Overview Creating a Project Budget Compliance.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
A risk assessment is the process of identifying potential hazards an organization may face and analyzing methods of response if exposure occurs.
Changes to come from the Supercircular Presented by Sefton Boyars CPA, CGFM.
Federal Schedule Webinar Presented in Conjunction with ODJFS January 11, 2012 Rhonda Kline, CPA Accounting & Auditing Division.
Juanita Syljuberget Alabama Cooperative Extension System May 23, 2012.
THE BIGGEST WINNER Uniform Guidance. Test Your Knowledge UG Basics Equipment & Facilities Shared Costs Items of Cost Bits & Pieces
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
Financial and Administrative Management
UNIFORM GUIDANCE: RESULTS AND BEST PRACTICES
Subaward - 2 CFR A formal legal agreement between your institution and another legal entity An award provided by a pass-through entity (PTE) to.
NCJA’s National Forum on Financial Management Training
OMB Super Circular Big Changes for Nonprofits
Office of Monitoring & Internal Controls
TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT FORUM
The Importance of Subrecipient Monitoring
Sponsored Programs at Penn
WPOWER HUB WORK PLANNING & PROGRAM REVIEW RETREAT
Research Administration
Managing Perkins Funds
Uniform Guidance and Grants Accounting
Presentation transcript:

(404)

The Wesley Peachtree Group, CPAs Presented by Keith X. Terrell, CPA, Cr.FA, FCPA, CGMA

Introduction The Wesley Peachtree Group, CPAs: Largest minority-owned firm in the southeast Specialize in higher education Audit more HBCUs than any other CPA firm T HE W ESLEY P EACHTREE G ROUP, CPAs Helping to Build Stronger Institutions for the Next Generation

Takeaways This presentation should help you: Improve Uniform Guidance (“UG”) audit readiness Interpret UG audit compliance requirements Understand testing performed for each compliance area. Understand Time and Effort reporting T HE W ESLEY P EACHTREE G ROUP, CPAs Helping to Build Stronger Institutions for the Next Generation

Agenda 1.Explain UG compliance requirements 2.Discuss what to expect during the audit 3.Walk through time and effort reporting 4.Answer questions T HE W ESLEY P EACHTREE G ROUP, CPAs Helping to Build Stronger Institutions for the Next Generation

Understanding Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirements (1 of 2) A - Activities Allowed or Unallowed B - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles C - Cash Management D - Reserved (was Davis-Bacon Act) E - Eligibility F - Equipment and Real Property Management G - Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking T HE W ESLEY P EACHTREE G ROUP, CPAs Helping to Build Stronger Institutions for the Next Generation

Understanding Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirements (2 of 2) H - Period of Performance I - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment J - Program Income K - Reserved (was Acquisition and Relocation – not addressed in this session) L - Reporting M - Sub-recipient Monitoring N - Special Tests and Provisions T HE W ESLEY P EACHTREE G ROUP, CPAs Helping to Build Stronger Institutions for the Next Generation

A - Activities Allowed or Unallowed The requirements for activities allowed or unallowed are contained in program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. (We select a sample of expenses and verify compliance after reading the grant agreement.) T HE W ESLEY P EACHTREE G ROUP, CPAs Helping to Build Stronger Institutions for the Next Generation

B - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles The three superseded cost principles (OMB Circular A ‑ 87, OMB Circular A-21 and OMB Circular A-122) were replaced with 2 CFR 200 Subpart E, Sections 400 through 475. Check Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. (We select a sample of expenses and verify compliance after reading the grant agreement.) Indirect costs are derived from negotiated rate, extended rate (one-time extension up to four years) or 10% De Minimis rate. (not applicable to Title III) T HE W ESLEY P EACHTREE G ROUP, CPAs Helping to Build Stronger Institutions for the Next Generation

C - Cash Management Only draw down amounts needed to meet your immediate cash needs. (We trace drawdowns from G5 system to the bank to verify date of receipt.) Drawdowns should be supported by incurred expenses. (We test a sample of drawdowns and verify they were expended within three days and supported by GL transactions.) Interest earned in excess of $500 on advanced Federal funds should be returned to the Federal government. (Verify that advanced funds are not held for the purpose of interest earnings.) T HE W ESLEY P EACHTREE G ROUP, CPAs Helping to Build Stronger Institutions for the Next Generation

D - RESERVED The Davis-Bacon Act was moved to Special Tests and Provision. T HE W ESLEY P EACHTREE G ROUP, CPAs Helping to Build Stronger Institutions for the Next Generation

E - Eligibility Eligibility requirements are generally defined by program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. (Sample selection is made and eligibility criteria is tested for each.) T HE W ESLEY P EACHTREE G ROUP, CPAs Helping to Build Stronger Institutions for the Next Generation

F - Equipment and Real Property Management Equipment means tangible personal property having a useful life of more than one year and a per-unit acquisition cost which equals or exceeds the lesser of the capitalization level established by the non-Federal entity for financial statement purposes or $5,000 (2 CFR section ). Property records must be maintained. (We verify that all purchases are logged by amount, description, location and useful life.) Inventory must be taken once every two years. (We examine inventory sheets to ensure it is maintained.) T HE W ESLEY P EACHTREE G ROUP, CPAs Helping to Build Stronger Institutions for the Next Generation

G – Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking The requirements for matching, level of effort and earmarking are contained in program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. (After identifying testing attributes for each upon reading the grant, a sample is selected for testing.) T HE W ESLEY P EACHTREE G ROUP, CPAs Helping to Build Stronger Institutions for the Next Generation

H - Period of Performance Spend money within the original funding period (We determine the date expense was incurred to ensure it’s within the performance period.); or Request a no-cost extension to allow additional time to spend the funds without any additional funding. (If expense was incurred outside of the performance period, we verify if a no-cost extension was obtained.) T HE W ESLEY P EACHTREE G ROUP, CPAs Helping to Build Stronger Institutions for the Next Generation

I - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment (1 of 2) Procurement- Micro-purchases if for less than $3,000 ($2,000 for construction) Small Purchases < $150,000 Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT) Seal Bids Proposals Sole Source (We ensure that one of the above methods was used to procure goods and services. Documentation should clearly indicate which method was used.) T HE W ESLEY P EACHTREE G ROUP, CPAs Helping to Build Stronger Institutions for the Next Generation

I - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment (2 of 2) Suspension and Debarment- Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making sub-awards under covered transactions (non-procured contracts for goods and services expected to equal or exceed $25,000) to parties that are suspended or debarred. This verification may be accomplished by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS) maintained by GSA and available at: (We examine processes to determine if they are sufficient. We may test a few as a follow-up.) T HE W ESLEY P EACHTREE G ROUP, CPAs Helping to Build Stronger Institutions for the Next Generation

J – Program Income Program income may be used in any of the following three methods: Deduction - Program income is deducted from total allowable costs in order to determine the net allowable costs, rather than to increase the funds committed to the project. Addition - With prior approval, program income may be added to the Federal award by the Federal agency and the non-Federal entity. Cost Sharing or Matching - With prior approval, program income may be used to meet the cost sharing or matching requirement of the Federal award. (We test to ensure that one of the three methods was used.) T HE W ESLEY P EACHTREE G ROUP, CPAs Helping to Build Stronger Institutions for the Next Generation

L - Reporting Non-Federal entities are required to submit financial, performance and special reports, when applicable, during the grant period. (We test for reasonable accuracy and timely filing. Evidence needed to support timely filing.) T HE W ESLEY P EACHTREE G ROUP, CPAs Helping to Build Stronger Institutions for the Next Generation

M – Sub-recipient Monitoring Sub-recipient monitoring has increased its oversight under the new guidance. Evaluate risk factors of the entity Impose specific sub-award conditions Monitor activities Ensure Uniform Guidance audits are being performed Consider adjustments based on audit results, on-site reviews or other monitoring Consider enforcement actions against non-compliant sub- recipients (We examine processes to determine if they are sufficient. We do not monitor compliance directly with the sub-recipient, but ensure it is done by you consistently.) T HE W ESLEY P EACHTREE G ROUP, CPAs Helping to Build Stronger Institutions for the Next Generation

N – Special Test and Provision The requirements for special test and provision are contained in program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. (After identifying testing attributes for each upon reading the grant, a sample is selected for testing.) T HE W ESLEY P EACHTREE G ROUP, CPAs Helping to Build Stronger Institutions for the Next Generation

TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (1 of 3) Covered under 2 CFR Emphasis placed on strong internal controls. (Provide a copy for review.) Reporting form must capture 100% of employee’s work activity. (Sample will be selected for testing.) Salary allocation cannot be based on budget amounts but rather based on record of work actually performed. (After- the-fact review required. Salary allocations will be examined.) T HE W ESLEY P EACHTREE G ROUP, CPAs Helping to Build Stronger Institutions for the Next Generation

TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (2 of 3) Non-exempt employees must list activity by day. Should encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the Institution. Must comply with the established policies and procedures of the Institution. (Consistently applied for everyone.) T HE W ESLEY P EACHTREE G ROUP, CPAs Helping to Build Stronger Institutions for the Next Generation

TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING (3 of 3) Extra Service Pay (ESP) for faculty during the academic year. Institutional Base Salary (IBS) policy must be clearly defined by the Institution to determine when work beyond that point has occurred. Duties beyond IBS must be clearly delineated in the appointment letter. ESP policy must apply to all faculty members and not just those working on Federal awards. ESP must be approved by Federal awarding agency and should be arranged at times that do not interfere with regular duties. T HE W ESLEY P EACHTREE G ROUP, CPAs Helping to Build Stronger Institutions for the Next Generation

Conclusion Any Questions? T HE W ESLEY P EACHTREE G ROUP, CPAs Helping to Build Stronger Institutions for the Next Generation

(404) WPG-INC.COM T HE W ESLEY P EACHTREE G ROUP, CPAs Helping to Build Stronger Institutions for the Next Generation