Bureau of Land Management Federal Coal Leasing Program Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Scoping Meeting Supporting Text.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GOLF COURSE HOSPITAL AGRICULTURE WILDLIFE HABITAT WETLANDS OPEN SPACE SCHOOL RECREATION HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WHAT DO ALL THESE PLACES HAVE IN COMMON?
Advertisements

Oil and Gas for Managers ( ) Pete Culp Assistant Director Minerals, Realty & Resource Protection May 1999.
Oil and Gas Drilling in America: The Most Drilled Nation?
August 2008 DOE Uranium Leasing Program 2008 Overview August 14, 2008 Steven R. Schiesswohl, Project Manager U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy.
Overview of SMARA Responsibilities for Lead Agencies California Department of Conservation Office of Mine Reclamation Leah Gardner Senior Environmental.
Oil and Gas Leasing Jim Albano – Lead Natural Resource Specialist Reservoir Management and Operations Section Montana State Office – (406)
Oil & Natural Gas Development in the West: Thoughts on Improving the Process 2014 Utah Governor’s Energy Summit Ursula Rick, PhD June 4, 2014.
Bureau of Land Management NAIP Information Meeting July 19 th, 2006.
Environmental Assessment August 2012 Oil & Gas Lease Sale.
Office of Natural Resources Revenue U.S. Department of the Interior Industry ComplianceAccurate Revenues & DataProfessionalism & Integrity Federal and.
Notebook Ref Summary of the Issue ADEC policy states: “If the quality of a water exceeds levels necessary to support propagation of fish, shellfish,
Bureau of Land Management Solid Minerals Programs June 12, 2013.
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement MissionEnsure that coal mines are operated in a manner that protects citizens and the environment.
Part 1.3 Mineral Rights & Leasing. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Understand.
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Experimental Permits COMSTAC Stacey M. Zee October 25, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
Managing Natural Gas & Oil Resources on Federal Lands on Federal Lands Colorado Bureau of Land Management.
U. S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Division of Fluid Minerals, 1.
Federal Lease Overview NHAPL Half-Day Seminar February 5, 2015.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
Carrin Williams.  Purity of Waters Act  To assure supplies of clean drinking water  Clean Streams Law  To protect the streams from pollution.
1 9/15/2015 Gogita Todradze National Statistics Office of Georgia Institutional Arrangements for Energy Statistics in Georgia.
Buckhorn Mountain EIS Project August Buckhorn Mountain Exploration Project Echo Bay Exploration is seeking federal and state authorization for.
State Permitting Issues for Wind Developments Southeast and Mid-Atlantic Regional Wind Summit 19 September 2005 Jennifer A. DeCesaro Energy Policy Specialist.
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves Statement of Scope (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing
Revenue-neutral Carbon Fee & Dividend March 31, 2015 Company LOGO.
1 DOE Office of Natural Gas and Petroleum Technology Overview of Environmental Program Retroactive Metrics Analysis July 2000.
1 Federal Oil and Gas Planning, NEPA, and Development Scott F. Archer USDI - Bureau of Land Management April 8, 2009.
Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis Presentation to Center for American Progress and Climate Solutions March 1, 2012 Washington, D.C.
Alternative Energy on the Outer Continental Shelf Robert P. LaBelle Deputy Associate Director Offshore Energy and Minerals Management Minerals Management.
Natural Resource Partners L.P. SMH Capital Investor Growth Conference New York, NY November 8-9, 2007.
MMS Alternative Energy Program November 28, 2007.
Office of Natural Resources Revenue U.S. Department of the Interior Industry ComplianceAccurate Revenues & DataProfessionalism & Integrity DOI Revenue.
Energy Exploration & Development On National Forest System Lands Barry Burkhardt
WESTAR CONFERENCE October 22, 2008 Bob Randall Colorado Department of Natural Resources.
1 EPA’s Climate Change Strategy Robert J. Meyers Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation December 3, 2007.
Linking Planning & NEPA Overview Mitch Batuzich FHWA Texas Division FHWA Texas Division April 17, 2007.
Reclaimed Wastewater Quality Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines
Balanced Portfolio for Reliable Electricity System YES Inc. Brief Assessment.
Wachovia Capital Markets Seventh Annual Pipeline and MLP Conference New York, NY December 9, 2008.
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
Effects Analysis and Comparison. Objectives Accurately determine which impacts need to be evaluated in the land use plan. Develop a matrix comparing the.
Realizing the Value of Public Assets Ensuring a Fair Return to Taxpayers January 28, 2016.
Rulemaking by APHIS. What is a rule and when must APHIS conduct rulemaking? Under U.S. law, a rule is any requirement of general applicability and future.
Preparation Plan. Objectives Describe the role and importance of a preparation plan. Describe the key contents of a preparation plan. Identify and discuss.
Special Meeting on Procedures for Information Exchange November 7, 2007 Geneva Session 1 Anne Meininger United States USA WTO TBT Enquiry Point.
1 Overview of Mineral Taxes in Colorado State Severance Tax and Federal Mineral Lease Revenue House and Senate Finance Committees Marc Carey and Jason.
WHITE HOUSE COAL REPORT White House Report Highlights How Federal Lands Provide Significant Resources for the Coal Industry Market Share of Coal Produced.
Proven Management – Proven Gold Districts – Safe Jurisdictions Symbol:PG Exchange:TSX Hardrock Project Environmental.
STATE OF ALASKA PERMITTING PROCESS
Mission: To protect human health and safeguard the environment
Federal Energy and Environmental Regulation Agencies and Laws
MGT 325 ASSIST Minds Online/mgt325assist.com
MGT 325 ASSIST Motivating Students to Learn/mgt325assist.com
MGT 325 ASSIST Master of Education in Teaching/mgt325assist.com
The Florida Energy and Climate Commission (FECC)
Coal Larenz Devaren.
WHAT DO ALL THESE PLACES
Offshore Oil and Gas Environmental Issues
Addressing Costs of Methane Waste and Future Policy Actions
BLM Wind Energy Program
BLM SOLID MINERALS PROGRAM
SEQRA as a Tool to Review Energy Projects
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act
Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA)
Joint Office Presentation for Modification 0678
Federal Lands and Fossil Fuels
A presentation by: Rebecca Fischer & Daniel Timmons
WHAT DO ALL THESE PLACES
WSUP (Lightning W Tank #2)
Presentation transcript:

Bureau of Land Management Federal Coal Leasing Program Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Scoping Meeting Supporting Text

Federal Coal Regulating Agencies Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Leasing Production verification Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation & Enforcement Mine permitting & reclamation (including bonding for reclamation) Office of Natural Resources Revenue Manages royalty collection and disbursement Mine Safety & Health Administration Develops and enforces safety and health rules for U.S. mines

BLM Coal Program Quick Statistics BLM currently administers 306 coal leases In the last 10 years ( ): BLM-managed lands produced approximately 4.3 billion tons, worth over $63.4 billion 1 This production generated $6.8 billion in royalties and $3.8 billion in rents, bonuses, and other payments 1 BLM held 32 coal lease sales In 2015: 33.2% of Nation’s electricity produced from coal % of the coal produced was federal coal; 88% of that was from the Powder River Basin in Wyoming and Montana 1 1 Data from Office of Natural Resources Revenue 2 Data from Energy Information Administration

Supporting Text Coal Fields of the Lower-48 United States Main Federal Coal Producing Areas

Coal Leasing Pause The pause does not apply to existing leases and coal production. There are about 20 years of reserves at current productions levels already under lease. Pending lease applications with signed decisions can proceed to sale if requested by the operator. Pending applications without a decision may proceed with NEPA and Fair Market Value analysis. Mines that need reserves to continue operations may apply for emergency leasing consideration. New applications received during the pause that do not meet emergency criteria or the other exceptions will be deferred for processing.

The Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) initiated by Secretarial Order 3338 will consider: How, when and where to lease Fair return Climate impacts Other impacts Socio-economic considerations Exports Energy needs Other potential modifications

The full set of issues in the PEIS will be decided through scoping; however, some that will be considered are listed in the Notice of Intent, including: How, when and where to lease Should scheduled sales be used (e.g., like onshore oil & gas)? Should market conditions affect the timing of lease sales, such that sales would occur when coal values are higher rather than during downturns? Where and where not should the BLM lease consistent with taking a landscape level view? Do the BLM’s unsuitability screening criteria adequately address the questions of where and/or where not to lease?

Fair Return Are the bonus bids, rents, and royalties received under the Federal coal program successfully securing a fair return to the American public? How should each of these components of fair return be calculated? Should externalities be considered as part of the fair return calculation? If so, what specifically and how?

Climate Impacts How can we best measure and assess the climate impacts of continued Federal coal production, transportation, and combustion? What are the potential substitution effects from any changes in Federal coal production? How may BLM best ensure no unnecessary and undue degradation of public lands from climate change impacts? How do we mitigate, account for, or otherwise address those impacts? How does the Federal coal program relate to the Nation’s climate objectives, as well as its energy and security needs?

Other Impacts What are the effects of Federal coal production on water resources, air quality, wildlife, and other land uses such as grazing and recreation? Are impacts from mining and combusting Federal coal adequately mitigated? Should standard mitigation at the programmatic level be required, in addition to on a project-by-project basis?

Socio-economic Considerations Does the current program adequately account for externalities related to Federal coal production, including environmental and social impacts? How does the administration, availability, and pricing of Federal coal affect State, regional, and national economies (including job impacts), and energy markets in general? What is the impact of possible program alternatives on the projected fuel mix and cost of electricity?

Exports Whether and, if so, how should, leasing decisions consider actual and/or projected exports of domestic coal from any given tract? What potential mechanisms could be used to appropriately evaluate export potential?

Energy Needs How does Federal coal support fulfilling the energy needs of the United States? How does the administration, availability, and pricing of Federal coal impact electricity generation in the United States, particularly in light of other regulatory influences? What other sources of energy supply (including efficiency) are projected to be available?

We look forward to your comments on these and other important issues related to the Federal coal program