2016 University of Waterloo Clean Snowmobile. Philosophy ●Embrace design challenges ●Engage students and public through originality ●Open and safe learning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Snowmobile Modifications Appeal to Snowmobile Enthusiasts Dealers Perspective Engine Control Strategy Emissions Control Noise Reduction Conclusion.
Advertisements

2014 Clean Snowmobile Challenge
Direct Injection Reduced Emissions Improved Efficiency Presented By: Andrew Findlay Justin Johnson.
University of Buffalo, SUNY 2005 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
University of Minnesota Clean Snowmobile Team. Overview Our team Original snowmobile Design objectives Development process Current snowmobile 2.
NDSU Clean Snowmobile Presented by: Michael Niehoff Jared Quinlan Advisor: Dr. Robert Pieri.
Design and Testing of a Four-Stroke Snowmobile with Catalytic Exhaust Treatment Scott Miers and Ryan Hayes.
University of New Hampshire Clean Snowmobile Challenge 2006.
U NIVERSITY O F W ATERLOO T EAM E CO -S NOW. T EAM B ACKGROUND Team Eco-Snow is a student organization at the University of Waterloo The project is managed.
1 Presenters: Ozzie Goodman Zak Parker. Design Objectives  Create Efficient Snowmobile Fueled by 16%-32% Isobutanol  Emissions Reductions  Noise 
Work Distribution Analysis of I.C. Engine Cycles P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Find true Scope for Development….
Design Intent  Improve upon the Best Available Technology (BAT) standard of the power sports industry to enhance fuel efficiency while reducing emissions.
North Dakota State University Ross Larson Justin Omdalen.
University of Wisconsin - Platteville 2014 Clean Snowmobile Team
University Of Maine Clean Snowmobile The Rock!. Introduction Maine – New England Snowmobiling! The Economic Impact –3000 full time equivalent jobs* –Jobs.
Maximization of Flow through Intake & Exhaust Systems
Development of a Flexible Fueled Snowmobile for the 2015 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
2006 Michigan Tech Clean Snowmobile Matt Prusak - Team Leader Wes Barrett – Vice President.
Presented By Dillon Savage & Crystal Green UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO TWO-STROKE WITH DIRECT INJECTION AND SOUND REDUCTION.
Minnesota State University, Mankato X treme  AET Program  1989  TAC-ABET Accredited  140 Majors  The Team  Seven Seniors  Ten Undergraduates 
University Of Maine Clean Snowmobile The Rock!. Introduction Maine – New England Snowmobiling! The Economic Impact –3000 full time equivalent jobs* –Jobs.
Kettering University Clean Snowmobile Challenge March 23 rd – April 1 st, 2001 Presented by: Kyle Schwulst and Andrew Stahr.
Powertrain Matching John Bucknell DaimlerChrysler Powertrain Systems Engineering September 30, 2006.
University of Wisconsin Madison Presented by: Eric Schroeder Adam Schumacher 2005 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation.
2005 Michigan Tech Clean Snowmobile Greg Davis David Meyer Advisor: Dr. Bernhard Bettig Incorporation of a High Performance, Four-Cylinder, Four-Stroke.
2015 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Rich Stueber Pryce Nutting.
Kettering University Presenters: Chad Swartz John Stimpson.
University of Minnesota Duluth 2014 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Joe Lofgren Brandon Salaba Kyle Schroer Kyle Levanen Dylan Dahlheimer UMD University.
Direct Injection Reduced Emissions Improved Efficiency Presented By: Andrew Findlay Russell Schiermeier.
University of Minnesota Duluth 2015 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Presented by: Dylan Dahlheimer Ryan Schefers Brenden Bungert Mark Boeckmann UMD University.
2015 University of Waterloo Clean Snowmobile. Philosophy  Develop a platform that meets competition objectives while providing a significant design challenge.
Michigan Technological University Bill GieldaMax Farrell Development and Implementation of Flex Fuel Technology of a 2014 Yamaha Phazer 500.
Development of a Flexible Fueled Snowmobile for the 2014 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
2006 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Team Members: Steve Battaglia, Brian Belmont, Dan Bughbee, Kevin Gastle Mike Ide, Kelly McRory, Eric Peckham, Dan Sweeney,
Minnesota State University Mankato Dylan Brandt, Nick Perkins, Abdulsalam Hamud, Wayne Minnichsoffer, Andrew Pickle.
Clean Snowmobile Challenge 2005 Minnesota State University, Mankato.
Re-Engineering a 2015 Polaris Indy 2016 SAE Clean Snowmobile Competition Presented by: Pryce McDaniel, Josh McCoy, Mike Waloch 3/7/16.
Development of a Flexible Fueled Snowmobile for the 2016 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
University of Waterloo 2014 Clean Snowmobile. Strategy Four-stroke engine Weber MPE 750 Turbo (2 cyl) Lightweight cross-country chassis Better control.
Iowa State University Clean Snowmobile Club Iowa State University 2016 Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
Variable Geometry Turbocharger
University of Wisconsin-Platteville
Jeff Robinson Eric Gleich
Innovations in Zero Emissions Snowmobile Technology
University of Wisconsin Platteville 2017 CSC Diesel Team
Team Members Jacob Schofield - President Nels Eide – Driveline / Testing Mark Boeckmann - Engine Keith Propson – Sound / Exhaust.
University of Wisconsin - Platteville 2017 Clean Snowmobile Team
Re-Engineering a 2015 Polaris Indy
Strategies for Complete Expansion in I.C. Engine
Presented By Ian Sullivan
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
Iowa State Clean Snowmobile Challenge
Iowa State University Design Presentation
2018 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
Clarkson Winter Knights
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
2018 IC Design Presentation
Overview Project Management Base Sled Selection Engine Management
Who We Are Samuel Wick – President Blake Thurnbeck – Engine Packaging
2018 North Dakota State University Clean Snowmobile Challenge
University of Minnesota-Twin Cities
Variable Geometry Turbocharger
University of Wisconsin-Platteville Clean Snowmobile
2017 University of Waterloo E62 Clean Snowmobile
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge
University of Wisconsin-Platteville CSC CI Team
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
University of Wisconsin – Platteville 2019 SI Snowmobile Team
University at Buffalo SAE Clean Snowmobile Team
Last Year’s Foundation
Presentation transcript:

2016 University of Waterloo Clean Snowmobile

Philosophy ●Embrace design challenges ●Engage students and public through originality ●Open and safe learning environment for students ●3 Year Cycle ●Focus on reliability

Design Criteria ● Six criteria chosen to weigh against CSC scoring ● Weighting represents impact based on prior experience ● Used to evaluate relative merit of various design alternatives Efficiency20% Emissions21% Weight16% Power8% Noise18% Reliability17%

Before this year ● 2013 Polaris Rush 600 ● Upgraded to align with 2014 Pro-R Model ● Competition MSRP requires current model

Engine Selection ● Weber MPE 750 Turbo ● Originally used in Polaris FST models ● 750cc, 2 cylinder, four-stroke ● 7750rpm

2016 Design Overall ● Balanced approach of engine, control, and driveline efficiency ● Systems with modularity and independence Engine ●Miller Cycle ●Electronic throttle control ●Stoichiometric calibration Drivetrain ● E-CVT ● Increased track pitch ● Increased idler diameter Exhaust System ●3 way catalytic converter ●Replaceable configuration

Miller Cycle ● Trade displacement (power) for efficiency (3% efficiency gain, 15% power loss) ● Expansion ratio is greater than compression ratio ●11:1 pistons 30 degree later valve closing produces stock 9:1

Electronic Throttle Control Motec M400 ECU Processes analog values from request unit Translation table, with throttle safety switch Motec DBW4 Independent feedback control of throttle bodies Emphasis on safety CAN Cable

Electronic Throttle Control

● Dealer/Outfitter/Manufacturer Perspective ● System is modular (upgrade path, assembly line) ● System is invisible to the user ● System can be marketed as high-tech ● Opportunity for different response based on rider experience ● Environmental perspective ● A ‘BAT’ package can use a smoother throttle response to reduce emissions from harsh transients ● Snowmobiler Perspective ● Improved fuel economy ● Extraordinarily responsive if so desired ● Extraordinarily forgiving if so desired ● Expensive components are protected inside the snowmobile ● Familiar throttle cable feel

Drivetrain ● Large diameter rear idler wheels ● Reduces bearing and track losses

Drivetrain ● 2.86” Pitch Track ● Camoplast ICE Attak XT, 120” ● 1.2” lug, pre-studded, 37lb ● 3lb savings over 2.52” pitch version (121”) ● Use of pre-studded track allows for increased traction and control ● Only 2lb heavier than the stock track for Pro-R

New for 2016 Exhaust SystemE-CVT

Testing, yes testing. BSFC Map

Testing, yes testing. Clutch position

Testing, yes testing. Clutch Efficiency

Electronic Continuously Variable Transmission

Emissions After-Treatment ● Three-Way Catalytic Converter ● Dramatically reduces emissions ● Widely available technology ●Muffler and Resonator ● Targets a wide range of sound frequencies ● Complete assembly is 15lb ● Reduced Backpressure ● High flow muffler and resonator ● 2” tubes

Emissions After-Treatment ● Three-Way Catalytic Converter ● Dramatically reduces emissions ● Widely available technology ●Muffler and Resonator ● Targets a wide range of sound frequencies ● Complete assembly is 15lb ● Reduced Backpressure ● High flow muffler and resonator ● 2” tubes

Emissions After-Treatment ● Stock Wideband lambda ● PID tuned for environment instabilities ● Changes PID parameters based on rpm ● Modifies open loop fuel table by up to +/- 20% ● Can maintain lambda within +/ with constant input

Summary ● Snowmobiler Perspective ● Four-stroke reliability and longevity ● Capable of high performance ● Premium suspension ● Familiar look and feel ● Dealer/Outfitter/Manufacturer Perspective ● Modularity and configurability ● Reliability/longevity ● Environmental Perspective ● Reduced fuel consumption ● Reduced emissions

Questions?