CAEP Standard 3: Candidate quality, recruitment and selectivity Thursday, March 27 3:00-4:00 PM Emerson Elliott, CAEP CONNECT WITH CAEP | www.CAEPnet.org.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
Advertisements

Scottish Baccalaureate in Languages Planning for the Interdisciplinary Project.
Annual Parent Meeting Klein Road Elementary. © Not for use of distribution without permission. Why are we here?  NCLB law requires that Title I Schools.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Teachers Know Their Content And Teach Effectively: CAEP Standard 1 Stevie Chepko,
 Assessing Student Achievement New Teacher Induction Program.
To develop a bridging programme which would be offered to entry level students at the beginning of the academic year, to bridge the gap between school.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Timeline for Accreditation Handbook and Early Adopters Stevie Chepko, Sr., VP.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Building on Strong Foundations: CAEP Standards 2 & 4 OCTEO Spring Conference,
BUILDING STRONG TEACHERS FOR TEXAS STUDENTS Welcome to TAP Connect.
Dr Elena Luchinskaya, Lancaster University/ Leeds Metropolitan University, UK.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Three-Year-Out Review of Assessments (Pending Accreditation Council and CAEP.
The Federal Government
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | CAEP Standard 3: Candidate quality, recruitment and selectivity Jennifer Carinci,
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Transitioning from NCATE and TEAC to CAEP: How? Patty Garvin, Senior Director,
March 24, :00 pm to 3:00 pm Exhibition Lounge, Corey Union TEC Agenda and Notes.
SMARTR Goals for School-Based Administrators
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | The Next Horizon Incorporating Student Perception Surveys into the Continuous.
Word Generation and Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation August 5, 2013 Presenter: Sophia Boyer Documents 1 and 2 adopted from Catherine.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
The New CAEP Standards: Implications for Teacher Education Programs Kathryn Chval.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | CAEP Accreditation and STEM Stevie Chepko, Sr. VP for Accreditation
Connect with CAEP The Common Core Standards: Transforming Teacher and Leader Preparation with Stronger Accreditation.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
New Assessment Arrangements at Old Cleeve. No more Levels? This academic year the Government abolished the use of levels (eg 3C, 4A etc) in school as.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Standard 2: Partnership for Practice Stevie Chepko, Sr. VP for Accreditation.
Council for the Accreditationof EducatorPreparation Standard 5: Provider Quality Assurance and Continuous Improvement 2014 CAEP –Conference Nashville,
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | CAEP Update Stevie Chepko, CAEP Sr. VP for Accreditation.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Measures of Teacher Impact on P-12 Students Stevie Chepko, Sr. VP for Accreditation.
Connavino Honors Program In The Patton College of Education and Human Services at Ohio University.
CAEP Standard 2 Clinical Partnerships and Practice Dana Leon-Guerrero, CAEP Ann Nutter Coffman, National Education Association CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w.
Council for the Accreditationof EducatorPreparation Standard 1: CONTENT AND PEDAGOGICAL KNOWLEDGE 2014 CAEP –Conference Nashville, TN March 26-28, 2014.
Overview of CAEP Guidelines 2014 CAEP –Conference Nashville, TN March 26-28, 2014 Presenters: Mark LaCelle-Peterson, CAEP Hilda R. Tompkins, CAEP, Emerson.
CAEP Standard 4: Program Impact Emerson Elliott, CAEP Dana Leon-Guerrero, CAEP CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter:
Prince William County Public Schools Strategic Plan “Providing a World-Class Education” Superintendent’s Advisory Council on Instruction November 14, 2013.
Designing Quality Assessment and Rubrics
GROWTH PLANS LTCT OBJECTIVES What is a growth plan? How to fill in the growth plan? Spend time filling in your plan. Sign-up for a session to review.
Allegany County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
OTLA Report Writing Training
Partnership for Practice
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Office of Field and Clinical Partnerships and Outreach: Updates
Promoting Teacher Education Quality Through Standards
A Level Business Studies- AQA
IMPLEMENTATION - JANUARY 2013
PPMES-UPRM Methodology & Practice Working Retreat
COLLEGE COUNSELING LOOKING FORWARD
Baltimore City March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Standard 3 Candidate Quality, Recruitment, and Selectivity
National Science Teachers Association
Annual Parent Meeting Klein Road Elementary
Evaluating the Quality of Student Achievement Objectives
Danvers Public Schools: Our Story
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
College Counseling Looking forward
Calvert County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
International Baccalaureate Information Night
OTLA Report Writing Training
It’s About The Process December Principal’s Meeting
Getting Prepared for College
Annual Parent Meeting October 10, 2018 Lamar Elementary
January 17, 2019 Principals’ Meeting
Getting Prepared for College
Standard one: revisions
Preparing for CAEP Accreditation: Standard 2
OTLA Report Writing Training
Summit Hill Elementary School
Lamar Elementary Library
Presentation transcript:

CAEP Standard 3: Candidate quality, recruitment and selectivity Thursday, March 27 3:00-4:00 PM Emerson Elliott, CAEP CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Dr. Rosa I. Roman Perez University of Puerto Rico Mayaguez Campus Dr. Rosa I. Roman Perez University of Puerto Rico Mayaguez Campus

New CAEP Standard 3 : Candidate quality, recruitment and selectivity What we plan to do during this hour:  Walk through the language of the standard  Discuss some glossary terms  Thinking about EPP responsibilities  Examples of evidence Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WITH CAEP | | | Twitter:

Some glossaryterms  Cohort  Group average  STEM  Others? Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WITH CAEP | | | Twitter:

Why this NEW standard? Research on academic ability  Developing effective teachers - what matters and what works Other factors—both academic and non-academic  International comparisons  Accountability No Child Left Behind Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WITH CAEP | | | Twitter:

Why this NEW standard? Need for a diverse education workforce Need more able teachers for diverse student population needs Focus on P-12 student learning Convergence of views, US and international Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WITH CAEP | | | Twitter:

A deeper look Need to be more selective, but also need more diversity Need to be selective and therefore need to recruit Need selectivity at admissions but also throughout the program Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WITH CAEP | |

A deeper look Need academic qualifications but also non- academic abilities Need to reach challenging academic criteria but EPPs can offer alternative criteria EPPs need to prepare candidates for available jobs Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WITH CAEP | |

Thinking about EPP responsibilities What is the EPP’s mission What candidate admissions criteria will support that mission?  Academic achievement and ability  Other criteria CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Educator Preparation

Thinking about EPP responsibilities What annual targets should be met in a recruitment plan?  Phasing in How can the EPP monitor candidate progress during preparation? Are candidate’s achieving the EPP’s mission for exit knowledge and skills? CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Educator Preparation

Examples of evidence from the Standards Recruitment plans  based on mission and employment opportunities  year by year targets  evidence of marketing to diverse schools  evidence of collaboration Data collected from applicants  PEAU, ACT, SAT, AP, IB, SAT II, honors, awards, high school courses CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Educator Preparation

Examples of evidence from the Standards Case studies of alternative criteria  Leadership, grit, perseverance, etc. Case studies of assessments of candidates  demonstrating developing responsibilities in the classroom and impact on P-12 learning CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Educator Preparation

Questions, doubts, concerns, worries, thoughts, ideas, recommendations, suggestions… CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Educator Preparation We welcome your…