Transportation Planning Asian Institute of Technology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Traffic assignment.
Advertisements

CEE 320 Winter 2006 Route Choice CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Corridor planning: a quick response strategy. Background NCHRP Quick Response Urban Travel Estimation Techniques (1978) Objective: provide tools.
1 EL736 Communications Networks II: Design and Algorithms Class8: Networks with Shortest-Path Routing Yong Liu 10/31/2007.
GEOG 111 & 211A Transportation Planning Traffic Assignment.
4-step Model – Trip Assignment 1CVEN672 Lecture 13-1.
REVISION. Sample Question The sample questions for this year. Describe briefly the classic transport model, explaining the four stages of the model. [10]
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Sequential Demand Forecasting Models CTC-340. Travel Behavior 1. Decision to travel for a given purpose –People don’t travel without reason 2. The choice.
CE 2710 Transportation Engineering
Urban Transport Modeling (based on these two sources) A Transportation Modeling Primer May, 1995 Edward A. Beimborn Center for Urban Transportation Studies.
Lec 28: Ch3.(T&LD): Traffic Analysis – Traffic assignment Learn how to assign generated and distributed trips to the street system approaching the site.
11 Quantifying Benefits of Traffic Information Provision under Stochastic Demand and Capacity Conditions: A Multi-day Traffic Equilibrium Approach Mingxin.
Chapter 11 Network Models. What You Need to Know For each of the three models: –What is the model? (what are given and what is to calculate) –What is.
1 The Four-step Travel Model GEOG 111 & 211A – Fall 2004 October 14.
Norman W. Garrick Trip Assignment Trip assignment is the forth step of the FOUR STEP process It is used to determining how much traffic will use each link.
TRIP ASSIGNMENT.
GEOG 111/211A Transportation Planning Trip Distribution Additional suggested reading: Chapter 5 of Ortuzar & Willumsen, third edition November 2004.
Transportation Logistics Professor Goodchild Spring 2011.
Transportation Logistics Professor Goodchild Spring 2009.
Lec 12 TD-Part 5: ch5.4.4, H/O, pp.498, Intro to trip assignment Know the purpose of trip assignment Know a few names of trip-assignment procedures Know.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
Internet Traffic Policies and Routing Vic Grout Centre for Applied Internet Research (CAIR) University of Wales NEWI Plas Coch Campus, Mold Road Wrexham,
The Impact of Convergence Criteria on Equilibrium Assignment Yongqiang Wu, Huiwei Shen, and Terry Corkery Florida Department of Transportation 11 th Conference.
Traffic Assignment Convergence and its Effects on Selecting Network Improvements By Chris Blaschuk, City of Calgary and JD Hunt, University of Calgary.
Urban Transport Modeling (based on these two sources) A Transportation Modeling Primer May, 1995 Edward A. Beimborn Center for Urban Transportation Studies.
Workshop PRIXNET – 11/12 Mars CONGESTION PRICING IN AIR TRANSPORTATION Karine Deschinkel Laboratoire PRiSM – Université de Versailles.
Some network flow problems in urban road networks Michael Zhang Civil and Environmental Engineering University of California Davis.
Asst. Prof. Dr. Mongkut Piantanakulchai
Travel Demand Forecasting: Trip Distribution CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Regional Traffic Simulation/Assignment Model for Evaluation of Transit Performance and Asset Utilization April 22, 2003 Athanasios Ziliaskopoulos Elaine.
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
Comparing Dynamic Traffic Assignment Approaches for Planning
1 Introduction to Transportation Systems. 2 PARTIII: TRAVELER TRANSPORTATION.
Dynamics of Traffic Flows in Combined Day-to-day and With- in Day Context Chandra Balijepalli ITS, Leeds September 2004.
Benjamin Heydecker JD (Puff) Addison Centre for Transport Studies UCL Dynamic Modelling of Road Transport Networks.
1 Importance and Exposure in Road Network Vulnerability Analysis: A Case Study for Northern Sweden Erik Jenelius Transport and Location Analysis Dept.
1 An Arc-Path Model for OSPF Weight Setting Problem Dr.Jeffery Kennington Anusha Madhavan.
1 Slides by Yong Liu 1, Deep Medhi 2, and Michał Pióro 3 1 Polytechnic University, New York, USA 2 University of Missouri-Kansas City, USA 3 Warsaw University.
Generated Trips and their Implications for Transport Modelling using EMME/2 Marwan AL-Azzawi Senior Transport Planner PDC Consultants, UK Also at Napier.
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or.
Assignment. Where are we? There are four scopes 1. Logit 2. Assignment Today! 3. LUTI 4. Other models and appraisal.
CEE 320 Fall 2008 Route Choice CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Traffic Assignment CE331 Transportation Engineering.
September 2008What’s coming in Aimsun: New features and model developments 1 Hybrid Mesoscopic-Microscopic Traffic Simulation Framework Alex Torday, Jordi.
Peter Vovsha, Robert Donnelly, Surabhi Gupta pb
Provincial Models in Gauteng
Route Choice Lecture 11 Norman W. Garrick
T-Share: A Large-Scale Dynamic Taxi Ridesharing Service
Prepared for 16th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Outline Gap Value in Simulation-Based Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTA) Models:
1st November, 2016 Transport Modelling – Developing a better understanding of Short Lived Events Marcel Pooke – Operational Modelling & Visualisation Manager.
Network Assignment and Equilibrium for Disaggregate Models
URBAN TRANSPORTATION NERWORKS
Modelling Sustainable Urban Transport
Macroscopic Speed Characteristics
Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply
Fuzzy Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model
Routing and Logistics with TransCAD
Solving For User Equilibrium Chapter 5
Transportation Engineering Route Choice January 28, 2011
Modeling Approach Direct vs. Sequenced
TransCAD Vehicle Routing 2018/11/29.
Trip Distribution Meeghat Habibian Transportation Demand Analysis
MATS Quantitative Methods Dr Huw Owens
Introduction to Transportation Engineering
Multi-modal Bi-criterion Highway Assignment for Toll Roads Jian Zhang Andres Rabinowicz Jonathan Brandon Caliper Corporation /9/2018.
Route Choice Lecture 11 Norman W. Garrick
Chapter 6 Network Flow Models.
Incremental Assignment (fixed demand)
Presentation transcript:

Transportation Planning Asian Institute of Technology Traffic Assignment Transportation Planning Asian Institute of Technology

Contents Basic Concepts Traffic Assignment Methods All-or-Nothing Assignment Stochastic Methods Congested Assignment

Basic Concepts Introduction The equilibrium point between demand and supply defines the price at which goods will be exchanged. Supply side is made up of road (transport) network, S(L,C) Cost C is a function of distance, free-flow speed, capacity, and speed-flow relationship Demand side is made up of the number of trips by O-D pair and mode under a given level of service.

Basic Concepts Introduction In private transport mode, a main element defining LOS is travel time. In public transport mode, addition consideration should be given to routes, capacity, frequency and other random characteristics. At a higher level resulting flow may affect choices of mode, destination and time of day for travel. (System Equilibrium)

Basic Concepts Definitions and Notation Tijr = number of trips from i and j via route r Va = the flow on link a C(Va) = the cost-flow relationship for link a c(Va) = the actual cost for a particular level of flow Va c(Va) = 0 is free-flow cost cijr = cost of traveling from i and j via route r dijra = 1 if link a is on path r from i to j; 0 otherwise superscript n shows iteration #, and superscript * indicates optimum value.

Basic Concepts Speed-Flow and Cost-Flow Curve Speed, S (km/h) Travel Time (minutes/km) Vmax Vmax Flow, V Flow, V

Basic Concepts Speed-Flow and Cost-Flow Relationship The cost on a link a is a function of all the flows V in the network. Ca = Ca({V}) Considering long links to simplify the problem (separable): Ca = Ca(Va) The function should be Realistic - Allowing overloading Non-decreasing - Easy to transfer Continuous and differentiable

Basic Concepts Total operating cost = VaCa(Va) Marginal cost contributed by the marginal addition of a vehicle to the stream (10.3) BPR Function (10.6) UK Department of Transport divides speed-flow into three regions: free-flow, moderate flow, and over-capacity.

Traffic Assignment Methods Introduction Primary objectives To obtain aggregate network measures To estimate zone-to-zone travel costs To obtain reasonable link flow & identify congested links Congestion will be studied using peak-hour trip matrices

Traffic Assignment Methods Route Choice Most common approximation considers only time and monetary costs (proportional to travel distance) Different drivers may choose different routes when traveling between the same two points Different individual perceptions Congestion effects affect shorter route first and attract more traffic to initially less attractive routes

Traffic Assignment Methods Example Demand 3,500 from A to B Capacity (through)= 1,000 vph Capacity (bypass) = 3,000 vph A B Stochastic Effects? No Yes No All-or-nothing pure stochastic Capacity Restraint? Wardop’s equilibrium Stochastic user equilibrium Yes

Traffic Assignment Methods Tree Building Identifies a set of routes which might be considered attractive to drivers. All dA = ∞ except dS = 0 set L = loose-end containing all nodes Set origin S as current node A then Check each link (A, B). If dA + dA,B < dB then dB = dA + dA,B Remove A from L then select another node until L is empty.

All-or-Nothing Assignment Example A 5 6 2 10 4 8 4 3 6 4 C 3 4 8 10 5 2 3 2 D B A-C = 400 B-C = 300 A-D = 200 B-D = 100

All-or-Nothing Assignment Example A 5 6 2 10 4 8 4 3 6 4 C 3 4 8 10 5 2 3 2 D B

All-or-Nothing Assignment Example A 600 400 400 200 400 200 C 200 200 D B 200

All-or-Nothing Assignment Example A 600 400 400 200 400 300 500 C 300 300 200 100 300 D B 300 Does not reflect real situation Act like desired lines

Stochastic Methods Varied perceptions of costs and other attributes. Second-best routes must be identified. The number of second-best routes may be very large. Simulation-based method Proportion-based method

Stochastic Method Simulation-based Method Relies on Monte Carlo Simulation Distribution of perceived costs are assumed independent. Drivers choose the route that minimizes their perceived route costs. Proportion of drivers Mean link cost

Stochastic Method Simulation-based Method Split population traveling between each OD pair into N segments. (Tij/N trips) n = 0 n = n+1 For each O-D compute perceived cost for each link using random numbers to sample link cost. Build a minimum path from i to j and assign Tij/N If n = N stop, otherwise go to 2.

Congested Assignment Wardrop’s Equilibrium No user can improve the trip travel time (cost) by unilaterally change changing the routes Traffic arranges itself in congested networks such that all used routes between O-D pair have equal and minimum costs while all unused routes have greater of equal costs.

Congested Assignment Example Time Ct = 10 + 0.02Vt Cb = 15 + 0.005Vb Town Bypass Time Time Flow, V Flow, V Ct = 10 + 0.02Vt Cb = 15 + 0.005Vb Vb + Vt = V; Vb = 0.8V – 200 = 1,400

Congested Assignment Wardrop’s Equilibrium Second Principle: under social equilibrium conditions, traffic should be arranged in congested networks in such a way that the average or total travel cost is minimized. This become known as social equilibrium or system optimum.

Congested Assignment Wardrop’s Equilibrium Complexity City suburb Route 1: x1 = 3 km v1f = 45 km/hr t1f = (3x45)/60 = 4 min t1 = 4 + (q1/1000)2 min Route 2: x2 = 6 km v2f = 60 km/hr t2f = (6x60)/60 = 6 min t2 = 6 + 2(q2/500) min

Congested Assignment Wardrop’s Equilibrium Complexity

Congested Assignment Incremental Assignment Traffic does not all come at the same time, but gradually spread over a given time period. Incremental loading traffic into the network is more realistic. Easy to program and solve. Represents a build up of traffic congestion during a short peak period.

Congested Assignment Incremental Assignment Select an initial set of current link costs. Set Va = 0 and select fraction pn such that (Typical value 0.4, 0.3, 0.2, 0.1) Build the set of minimum cost trees using current costs. Set n = n + 1 Load Tn = pnT (all-or-nothing) with a set of auxiliary flow Fa. Calculate flow on each link as: Calculate a new set of current link cost based on the flows Van Continue until all fractions of T is assigned.

Congested Assignment Example Consider again the problem of the two routes, town centre and bypass, of previous example. We split the demand of 2000 trips into four increments of 0.4, 0.3, 0.2 and 0.1 of this demand, i.e. 800, 600, 400 and 200 trips. At each increment we calculate the new travel costs using equations The following table summarizes the results of this algorithm

Congested Assignment Example V = 2000 Ct = 10 + 0.02Vt Cb = 15 + 0.005Vb N Increment Flow Town Cost Town Flow Bypass Cost Bypass 10 15 1 800 26 2 600 18 3 400 1000 20 4 200 1200 21

Congested Assignment Method of Successive Averages (MSA) Iterative algorithm developed to overcome the problem of overloading on low- capacity links. Heuristics approach. Provide close solution to real equilibrium.

Congested Assignment Method of Successive Averages (MSA) Initialize all Va = 0 and set n = 0 Build a set of minimum cost tree with the current costs; set n = n + 1 Load the whole matrix T (all-or-nothing) then obtain auxiliary flow Fa. Calculated the current flows where 0 ≤ f ≤ 1 Calculate a new set of current link costs based on flows Van. Stop when converged.

Congested Assignment Method of Successive Averages (MSA) Iteration f Flow town Cost town Flow bypass Cost bypass 1 F 2000 Vn 50 15 2 1/2 1000 40 20 3 1/3 667 23.3 1333 21.7 4 1/4 500 1500 22.5 5 1/5 800 26 1200 21

Congested Assignment Method of Successive Averages (MSA) Iteration f Flow town Cost town Flow bypass Cost bypass 6 F 2000 Vn 1/6 667 23.3 1333 21.7 7 1/7 572 21.4 1428 22.1 8 1/8 750 25 1250 21.2 9 1/9 10 1/10 600 22 1400

Assignment #9 Providing two origins, A and B, and two destinations, L and M, with the following trip interchanges A − L = 600 A − M = 400 B − L = 300 B − M = 400 Find the shortest path and the link volumes by all-or-nothing assignment 5 11 13 2 A C F I L 15 9 12 7 7 9 9 11 7 3 B D G J 12 11 7 9 9 7 3 2 E H K M

Assignment #9 Consider the following network where there are 100 vehicles per hour travelling from A to D and 500 from B to D. The travel time versus flow relationships are depicted in the figure in minutes and the flow q in vehicles per hour. Use an incremental loading technique with fractions 40, 30, 20 and 10% of the total demand to obtain an approximation to equilibrium assignment. t = 1.0+0.001q t = 2.0+0.01q A C D t = 3.4+0.001q t = 12.0+0.001q t = 1.0+0.001q A C