C ollaboration for E ffective E ducator D evelopment, A ccountability, and R eform (CEEDAR) Center U.S. Department of Education, H325A120003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Advertisements

Dr. Kathleen Magiera, Project Director Dr. Rhea Simmons, Co-PI Dr. Christine Givner, Co-PI Raising the Bar through Curriculum Enhancements: SUNY Fredonia's.
Connecticut Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability, and Reform (CEEDAR) Grant.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
Linda Nickel EPSB Project Specialist 1.
Comprehensive Literacy Program Louisiana Department of Education
The SWIFT Center SCHOOLWIDE INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK FOR TRANSFORMATION.
OCTOBER 25, m-NET Mobilizing National Educator Talent (“m-NET”) is an innovative, nontraditional program to help special education teachers earn.
Professional Learning in the Learning Profession Effective Practice  Increased Student Learning Frederick Brown Director of Strategy.
Using Evidence Based Practices to Reform Teacher and Leader Education: Useful Tools and Resources in Action U.S. Department of Education, H325A
CEEDAR Cross State Convening Overview: Innovation Configurations Course Enhancement Modules H325A
OSEP Strand : IDEAs That Work: Session 2: Innovation and Improvement Tools, Training, and Resources: Instant Access Free of Charge Larry Wexler Renée Bradley.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Healthy Schools Leadership Program Findings and Lessons Learned.
Florida Turnaround Leaders Program Florida Turnaround Leaders Program Preparing Leaders for Florida’s Most Challenging Schools Florida Department of Education.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Connecting with the SPP/APR Kansas State Personnel Development Grant.
Measuring Educator Effectiveness: Implications for Improving Teacher Preparation Programs Lynn Holdheide, Deputy Director Office of Special Education Program’s.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Ruth Ryder SPDG National Meeting March 5-6, 2013 ESEA Flexibility and SPDG: What’s the connection?
Policy for Results: How Policy Meets Preparation to Lead the Way to Improved Outcomes: H325A
Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A
Performance Based-Assessment Highlight on edTPA Greg Blalock, Columbus State University David Cihak, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Stacey Bock, Illinois.
C ollaboration for E ffective E ducator D evelopment, A ccountability, and R eform (CEEDAR) Center U.S. Department of Education, H325A
2014 National Call Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A
Leveraging Federal Resources: Teacher Quality, Research, and Program Improvement Peggi Zelinko Office of Innovation and Improvement (OII) Robert Ochsendorf.
Special Education Teacher Preparation Program Improvement Grants (325T) Bonnie D. Jones, Ed. D. Education Program Specialist Office of Special Education.
Preparing Principals to Support the Development of Effective Inclusive Schools James McLeskey CEEDAR Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL Wayne.
Utah State Spotlight 2014 Cohort. Why We Applied  To improve Tier 1/core instruction to meet the needs of an increasingly diverse student population,
SEA Strategies for Promoting Equity: SEA/IHE Collaboration on Teacher Preparation Lynn Holdheide, Center on Great Teachers and Leaders & Collaboration.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
Description of a Process for Enhancing Pre-service Programs to Better Prepare General Education Teachers to Teach Students with Disabilities 2016 CEEDAR.
Grant Activities, Needs Assessments And other SPDG application Issues to Consider.
Dr. Marty Hougen, CEEDAR Center
Leaders for All Learners: Reforming Leadership Preparation in Oregon
Georgia State University
U.S. Department of Education, H325A120003
Cross-State Convening June 2017
Early Childhood Personnel Center
Aligning Efforts to Improve Capacity
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
NC State Improvement Project
U.S. Department of Education, H325A120003
Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A
August 1, 2016 Erica McCray, CEEDAR Center
2016 CEEDAR Cross-State Convening
Educator preparation policy as a lever for improving teacher and leader preparation: Keeping promises in Tennessee Collaboration for Effective Educator.
High-Leverage Practices
CEEDAR 2.0: Where we’ve been and where we’re going
Strategies for Going BIGGER
Ohio Deans Compact Overview CEEDAR CONVENING June 27-29, 2017
Meg Kamman & Erica McCray University of Florida Nichelle Robinson
Ohio Deans Compact Overview CEEDAR Webinar June 21, 2018
Ohio Dean’s Compact Meeting September 14, 2018 ceedar.org
NCSI Cross-State Learning Collaboratives Part B Meeting
Sustaining Continual Progress Across Policy Levers
Statewide Systems of Support
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Mary T. Brownell, Director
Who We Are For more than 20 years, we have believed the key to preparing student for a successful future is providing rigorous and relevant instruction.
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Margaret Boorady Mary Jo Conrad Casandra Wright
Introduction Introduction
Introductions Introduction
February 21-22, 2018.
It pays to partner: Building reform capital through cross-agency collaboration Erica D. McCray, Margaret L. Kamman, Kim Paulsen, & Thurma F. DeLoach.
Essential Questions How can states, districts, and educator preparation programs work together to ensure equitable outcomes for diverse learners? What.
Multiple background possibilities
Presentation transcript:

C ollaboration for E ffective E ducator D evelopment, A ccountability, and R eform (CEEDAR) Center U.S. Department of Education, H325A120003

CEEDAR Center  Funded by OSEP for five years  Cooperative Agreement with the University of Florida  Directed by Dr. Mary Brownell  Began Jan 1, 2013  Intensive technical assistance to 20 states (5 this year)

CEEDAR Center Leadership  Mary Brownell, Director  Paul Sindelar and Erica McCray, Co-directors  Meg Kamman, Project Coordinator Partners  American Institutes for Research (AIR)  University of Kansas, Center for Research on Learning  Council of Chief State School Officers  New Teacher Center  Goodlad Institute for Educational Renewal at the University of Washington  Major organizations  Senior advisors OSEP Project Officers: Dr. Bonnie Jones and Dr. David Guardino

CEEDAR’s Mission  To create aligned professional learning systems that provide teachers and leaders effective opportunities to learn how to improve and support core and specialized instruction in inclusive settings that enable students with disabilities to achieve college and career readiness standards

Our Approach

Polling Question  What area of reform is your SPDG engaged in? –Teacher and leader reform –Preparation program evaluation/approval –Licensure and certification –Alignment 6

Key Assumptions Powerful strategies Effective and sustained learning opportunities Supportive policies Change through collaboration

Fundamentals of Our Approach  Facilitate collaborative relationships among SEAs, IHEs (and other training programs), and LEAs to:

Effective Opportunities to Learn Content Quality of instruction Time --Elliott, 2012; Kurz, 2011

Focusing on the Evidence Knowledge Development Papers Innovation Configurations Access to Experts Course Enhancement Modules Reform Rubrics 10

CEEDAR Products  Innovation configurations – novation-configurations/  Course enhancement modules – 11

IMPLEMENTING THREE LEVELS OF TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

Achieving Our Mission

Intensive TA 14 Implement and support state and IHE/LEA reform teams. Analyze program content, and program pedagogy using innovation configurations and reform rubrics. Improvement in teacher/leader preparation and ongoing professional development using TA tools. Revise licensure/certification standards to support reformed programs. Refine teacher and leader evaluation systems to strengthen preparation. Increase capacity for scale up.

Intensive Technical Assistance

Process of State Strategy Development &/or Refinement Identifying State Needs and Priorities Review of student, educator, preparation, and policy data Leveraging Existing Efforts Identify existing SEA, IHE, and LEA Efforts Targeting Efforts V ision setting and high level review of existing efforts Technical Assistance Blue-Print Establish goals and action steps

Polling Question  Is your state involved with the CEEDAR Center? –Yes –No 17