Review visit Heli Mattisen 23.-24.02.2016. Visit to one HEI – 1-3 days Committee has a working room where, among others, pre-requested documents/materials.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the author, and.
Advertisements

Quality and Outcomes Framework Assessor Training Group-oriented skills in chairmanship, time management and team-working (during the review visit) Module.
PROFESSIONAL DISCUSSION
ACCREDITATION Community Day February 1, Significance of Accreditation Accreditation – Accreditation – Allows the students at KC to apply for Federal.
Research Degree Examining and Chair of Viva: Professor Stephen Lacey Friday 30 November 2012 A104.
Business and Management Research WELCOME. Lecture 6.
Q Comp Peer Reviewer Training Covering: Job Description and Expectations Norms and Confidentiality Agendas Interviews Rubric and Debriefing Wrap-up.
Topics: Interviewing Question Type Interviewing techniques
Focus Groups for the Health Workforce Retention Study.
UniSA - a strategies workshop. Today’s program: (if of course, we have time for it all!!) Developing good tutor skills Tutorial dynamics Continuing.
LOGO Internal Quality Assurance Model: Evidence from Vietnamese Higher Education Tang Thi Thuy, Department of International and Comparative Education,
Preparing for an Academic Career
Rogaška Slatina 30. november- 1. december 2007 ESTABLISHING EXTERNAL QA SYSTEM IN SLOVENIA Franci Čuš Marinka Drobnič Košorok.
G. Herbst Interviews.
OB : Building Effective Interviewing Skills Building Effective Interviewing Skills Structure Objectives Basic Design Content Areas Questions Interview.
Research Design and Methods Professor Tamo Chattopadhay Institute for Educational Initiatives & Kellogg Institute for International Studies University.
DIES ASEAN- QA Training Workshop on External Quality Assurance Manila 16 th – 19 th of October 2012 Roles and Responsibilities of the Assessors (Do’s and.
QAA Summative Review Staff Briefing Leeds College of Art 8 September 2010.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Evidence. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
December 8, 2010 Ensuring Educator Excellence Accreditation Handbook 2. Team Member Ethics 3. Responsibilities prior to arriving at the Site Visit.
Overview of program For the fourth year, Shanghai American School is proud to be part of a collaborative internship program with East China.
BIR Update Sessions: General Updates January-February 2009 Ensuring Educator Excellence.
Qualitative Approaches for FS Assessments Summary of Day 1.
Report Helka Kekäläinen Baku. What makes a good report?
Preparing for Observation The New Common Inspection Framework.
Tasks, responsibilities and ethics of the evaluator Helka Kekäläinen Baku.
Then Now  Teaching as Art  Teachers and Teaching  Great teachers are born  How did I do?  Scholarship informs Teaching  Culture of Unexamined assumptions.
Some business of External QA: Transparency (reports), measuring impacts, follow up implementation, expected benefits, strategies for the future Josep Grifoll.
In-depth interviews The in-depth interview is a qualitative research technique that conducts intensive individual interviews with a small number of respondents.
HOW TO MAKE AN ORAL PRESENTATION.
Induction toolkit 1. introduction Welcome the group.
name of trainer associate trainer | sparqs
Be sincere. Say it like you would want to be said to you
External Quality Assurance 2017 – New Approach and New Opportunities
Preparing for Observation The New Common Inspection Framework
Making of the modern world: introduction to year 2/revision
Welcome to SSCC Structure and Roles (Workbook)
Course name: Weekly Planning
Why bother – is this not the English Department’s job?
Academic representative Committee CHAIR training
Work Experience Year 10.
Teacher slide Objectives: To understand how to formulate strong answers to person and position specific questions. You need: Feedback form x2 per student.
Formulating a research question
Using Friendly Controversy
Business and Management Research
Debate Prep!.
INTERVENTION Goal Zero. No Harm. No Leaks..
Announcement of Online Teaching Evaluation
IRRS REFRESHER TRAINING Lecture 2
Work Experience Year 10.
Preparation for the Final Exam Presented by: Dr. Khaoula Hamdi
Internal Audit Training
Be sincere. Say it like you would want to be said to you
Business and Management Research
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
Tuning South East Asia - TASE
Group Talk Feedback – A focus on the individual
name of trainer associate trainer | sparqs
Social and Emotional Aspects of Learning (SEAL)
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module Two: Developing the Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLOP)
Aim of the institutional evaluation
SLOs, Curriculum, and Other Things that Shape Your Classroom
Making of the modern world: introduction to year 2/revision
English Language Centre The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Take home exercise.
Level 1 & 2 Speaking Test Workshop. Why are we conducting this workshop?  To set the standards for assessment level 1 & 2.  To train students according.
REACH Accreditation Preparing Your School for a Team Visit
Presentation transcript:

Review visit Heli Mattisen

Visit to one HEI – 1-3 days Committee has a working room where, among others, pre-requested documents/materials Reflection slots between interviews (incl. lunch and coffee breaks) Duration of interviews min Recommended: not to have more than 6 interviewees at a time Final meeting to staff and students: presentation of preliminary conclusions (without questions/discussion) General 2

access statutes and normative documents which provide for and govern the activities of the higher education institution and its structural units; interview employees and students of the higher education institution at the choice of experts; access information related to teaching, learning and students; educational materials; and the study information system; access information related to the teaching staff concerning their CVs, work load, methodological work and research activities; Rights of the assessment committee 3

examine the internal quality assurance system of teaching and learning; examine the condition of the infrastructure of the higher education institution; access subject syllabuses/programmes as well as instructional documents related to the content of teaching and learning; access students’ final papers; access information related to financial activities of the higher education institution; visit any forms of contact learning (lectures, seminars, laboratory work, etc.). Rights of the assessment committee (cont.) 4

examine documents regulating accreditation and complete assessment training provided; review the self-evaluation report of HEI, pre-fill in the assessment report according to the tasks divided between the committee members, and prepare and submit to the coordinator a list of topics/questions to be focused on in the course of assessment visit by assessment areas as well as a list of additional materials they would like to get from the institution. Before the visit 5

Agree among the committee what questions to ask from whom. Ask similar questions from different people (head of department, teachers, students, …) Divide the questions among the committee members Decide who chairs the interviews Decide how to take notes Adhere to the agreed division of tasks and committee deadlines Before the visit (cont.) 6

Drafting and asking questions Helka Kekäläinen Baku

Site visit questions  Principal way of getting information - the teams are also encouraged to use other methods to complement the picture.  Themes or prepared questions? Prepared questions / question lists, because:  To ensure that the different aspects related to the criteria are covered.  To create a common understanding within the team of the topics discussed during the site visit.  Provides support for the interviews, functions as a check list.  However, remember to use question lists flexibly. Give room for interview dynamics and follow-up questions

How to ask good questions?

Formulation is everything

Open question How do you gather feedback from students? With questionnaires after each course.

Direct question Do students have access to the intranet? Yes they do.

Leading question Do you have a system with which you gather feedback, which is then analysed and used to improve operations ? Absolutely.

Two-part question Do you gather feedback from students and are your indicators linked to your strategy ? Yes, they are linked to the strategy.

Bad questions create empty answers

How?Why? Please assess… Please provide examples of … Good questions – some examples

(Introduce yourselves) and try to reduce strain at the beginning of each interview! (We are here to support your development etc.). NB! Very important as it has a strong impact on the success or failure of an interview! Opening an interview 17

Pose short and easily understandable questions, one question at a time! Use „quality-cycle“ questions: What have you done? Why have you done so? What are the results? Are they good or bad? Why do you think so? How do you use them? What have you learned from the process?... Directing (advising) questions should be avoided (Wouldn’t it be better if you...? Why don’t you...?) Let everyone talk. Address questions to specific persons if necessary. Reduce domination. Interrupt if necessary. Core of an interview 1 18

Reflect back what has been said in order to make sure that you have understood the point Always remember your goals (what we want do know and why)! Keep the interview within the time frames you set Collect evidences! Show your interest with appropriate body-language Keep eye-contact Listen! Avoid the tendency of filling the interview with your own voice It is not polite to eat or drink during an interview Core of an interview 2 19

Thank interviewees for their responses and time If possible, leave 2-3 minutes for additional question „Is there anything we did not ask but you would like to tell us“? Avoid making any premature conclusions („You have a fabulous/horrible institution!“ If you think you still need further information, agree on next steps Ending an interview 20

Discuss and decide whom you want to meet during an interview (up to 2 people) and which questions to ask. An interview lasts max 10 minutes – please keep the time! Decide the strategy of an interveiw: who will chair it, how you will start, how you give word to each other, how you will end the interview etc. Teamwork 21

Examples of follow-up questions  That’s interesting. Can you tell me more about …  We haven’t got a clarity about… Can you please explain?  Can you give a practical example of how … works in practice?  Is this a standard approach?  How has this been carried forward/followed-up?  What is the institution planning to do about this?  How does this affect you/your department/student group…?  How would you go about this?