UBW2012, A. Matveenko Michael Abo-Bakr (presented by Alexander Matveenko) Unwanted Beam Workshop (UBW 2012) 17.-18.12 2012 Dark Current Issues for Energy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam Dynamics in MeRHIC Yue Hao On behalf of MeRHIC/eRHIC working group.
Advertisements

1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
Chris Tennant Jefferson Laboratory March 15, 2013 “Workshop to Explore Physics Opportunities with Intense, Polarized Electron Beams up to 300 MeV”
ERHIC Main Linac Design E. Pozdeyev + eRHIC team BNL.
1 Low-energy RHIC electron Cooler (LEReC) Update November 17, 2014.
Thomas Roser RHIC Open Planning Meeting December 3-4, 2003 RHIC II machine plans Electron cooling at RHIC Luminosity upgrade parameters.
News from HZB / BESSY Wolfgang Anders at ESLS-RF Meeting September 2010 Trieste.
Photocathode 1.5 (1, 3.5) cell superconducting RF gun with electric and magnetic RF focusing Transversal normalized rms emittance (no thermal emittance)
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
Compton/Linac based Polarized Positrons Source V. Yakimenko BNL IWLC2010, Geneva, October 18-22, 2010.
I.V. Bazarov, ERL advisory mtg, Sept 2012 CLASSE Cornell University CHESS & ERL Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based ScienceS and Education (CLASSE)
High Current Electron Source for Cooling Jefferson Lab Internal MEIC Accelerator Design Review January 17, 2014 Riad Suleiman.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
Recent Experiments at PITZ ICFA Future Light Sources Sub-Panel Mini Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations of X-RAY FELs August 18-22, 2003 at DESY-Zeuthen,
Electron Source Configuration Axel Brachmann - SLAC - Jan , KEK GDE meeting International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
BERLinPro An ERL Demonstration facility at the HELMHOLTZ ZENTRUM BERLIN.
SRF Requirements and Challenges for ERL-Based Light Sources Ali Nassiri Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory 2 nd Argonne – Fermilab Collaboration.
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
Optics considerations for ERL test facilities Bruno Muratori ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory (M. Bowler, C. Gerth, F. Hannon, H. Owen, B. Shepherd, S. Smith,
ERHIC design status V.Ptitsyn for the eRHIC design team.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Extended ALICE Injector J.W. McKenzie, B.D. Muratori, Y.M. Saveliev STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
Energy Recovery Linacs
Electron Sources for ERLs – Requirements and First Ideas Andrew Burrill FLS 2012 “The workshop is intended to discuss technologies appropriate for a next.
Christopher Gerth DL/RAL Joint Workshop 28-29/4/04 Modelling of the ERLP injector system Christopher Gerth ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
FLS2010 Workshop, Stanford, March 1-5, 2010 Florian Loehl (Cornell University) Commissioning of the High Current ERL Injector at Cornell Florian Loehl.
Future Circular Collider Study Kickoff Meeting CERN ERL TEST FACILITY STAGES AND OPTICS 12–15 February 2014, University of Geneva Alessandra Valloni.
Intro to WG, part II T. Kamps, C. Hernandez-Garcia FLS 2012 Workshop – FLS 2012 | Intro to WG eSources | Thorsten Kamps.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
ICFA Workshop on Future Light Source, FLS2012 M. Shimada A), T. Miyajima A), N. Nakamura A), Y. Kobayashi A), K. Harada A), S. Sakanaka A), R. Hajima B)
J. Corlett. June 16, 2006 A Future Light Source for LBNL Facility Vision and R&D plan John Corlett ALS Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting June 16, 2006.
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
T. Atkinson*, A. Matveenko, A. Bondarenko, Y. Petenev Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie The Femto-Science Factory: A Multi-turn ERL.
Workshop on Accelerator R&D for Ultimate Storage Rings – Oct Nov.1 – Huairou, Beijing, China A compact low emittance lattice with superbends for.
Experience with Novosibirsk FEL Getmanov Yaroslav Budker INP, Russia Dec. 2012, Berlin, Germany Unwanted Beam Workshop.
Rong Xiang I I Dark current measurements at the ELBE SRF gun Rong Xiang, Jochen Teichert, Pengnan Lu, Andre Arnold, Petr Murcek,
PAL-XFEL Commissioning Plan ver. 1.1, August 2015 PAL-XFEL Beam Dynamics Group.
Seesion1 summary Unwanted Beam Workshop (UBW 2012) Dark Current Issues for Energy Recovery Linacs.
Beam Commissioning Adam Bartnik.
WG3 Summary High current and CW accelerators
Plans of XFELO in Future ERL Facilities
Options and Recommendations for TL and Dumps
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Linac possibilities for a Super-B
Joint Accelerator Research JGU & HZB
Dark current and halo tracking in ERLs
Background, IBS, gas scattering halo, collimation and etc. *
Operational Experience with the Cornell ERL Injector SRF Cavities
The Cornell High Brightness Injector
Compton effect and ThomX What possible future?
ERL Main-Linac Cryomodule
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
R. Bartolini Diamond Light Source Ltd
Analysis of Multi-Turn ERLs for X-ray Sources
Electron Source Configuration
ERL accelerator review. Parameters for a Compton source
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
Cui Xiaohao, Bian Tianjian, Zhang Chuang 2017/11/07
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Injector: What is needed to improve the beam quality?
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
ERL Director’s Review Main Linac
Injection design of CEPC
CEPC SRF Parameters (100 km Main Ring)
Electron Optics & Bunch Compression
Update on ERL Cooler Design Studies
Cooler Ring Design Status - July 2017
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
Presentation transcript:

UBW2012, A. Matveenko Michael Abo-Bakr (presented by Alexander Matveenko) Unwanted Beam Workshop (UBW 2012) Dark Current Issues for Energy Recovery Linacs

UBW2012, A. Matveenko ERL (REMINDER) 2 Storage Rings: beam dimensions result from an equilibrium state of excitation and damping, high energy (GeV) & current (~10 2 mA)  virtual beam power ~ 10 2 MW – GW Linacs: break equilibrium state limit from Storage Ring  benefit from present high brightness sources  single path device: power limited to ~ MW  only low high energies: ~ GeV ERL: high current operated linacs: 100 GeV  100 MW??? - recovery of the energy invested for acceleration  second passage trough rf structure with  = 180° - lowest bunch charge at a given current  cw operation

UBW2012, A. Matveenko ERL: BERLINPRO 3 BERLinPro: Berlin Energy Recovery Project funding decision late 2010, start of project 2011 extensive gun development: Gun0.1 (2011), Gun0.2 (2012) and Gunlab 2015: first electrons from Gun2 & Booster  6 MeV 2017: merger 2018: 50 MeV recirculation

UBW2012, A. Matveenko BERLINPRO: SRF R&D & CAVITY DESIGN 4 CornellJLAB BERLinPro: SRF componentsBoosterLinac Cavity type3 X 2 cell3 X 7 cell Acc. gradient (MV/m)1219 avail. RF power per cavity (kW)15 / 270 / 2703 X 15 Design (cavity / module)Cornell / Cornell mod.under dev. / under dev. Booster cavity:Linac cavity: Adapt KEK style high power coupler to Cornell cavity design Strongly HOM damped cavity by waveguides Calculate HOM spectrum for beam dynamics court.: A. Neumann

UBW2012, A. Matveenko BERLINPRO: BEAM OPTICS 5 Basic ModeShort Bunch Mode Bunch charge, pC77~ 10 Bunch repetition rate, GHz1.3variable Max average current, mA100≤ 1 Transv. emitt., norm., mm mrad~ 11 … 5 Bunch length, ps, rms Relative energy spread, % rms~ … 1.0 a) b) c) Recirculator: a) linear beam optics (R 56 =0), comparision of basic and short bunch mode: b) evolution of R 56 (m), c) evolution of bunch length (m). Emittance is mostly conserved (thus not drawn). BM SBM BM SBM 2 ps 140 fs Injector: comparision between basic and short bunch mode, a) evolution of the normalized emittance (mm mrad), b) bunch length (mm). a)b) BM SBM  BM,x  BM,y  SBM,x  SBM,y

UBW2012, A. Matveenko BERLINPRO: HIGH CURRENT EFFECTS 6 μ x, rad μ y, rad I th, A Beam halo modeling: particle distribution from ASTRA. Red – active beam particles, blue – passive halo particles, green – particles lost in collimators. Initial distribution on the cathode in a) – x-y plane, b) – x-t plane. Particle distribution after the merger section in c) – x-z plane, d) – p z -z plane. a) b) c) d) Beam Break-up instability: Betatron phase scan of BBU threshold currents, using (reasonably optimistic) cavity parameters of CEBAF 5-cell cavities. Horizontal axes - betatron phase advances, vertical – threshold current.

UBW2012, A. Matveenko TERMINOLOGY 7 Accelerated Beam Unwanted Beam Wanted Beam I ~ 10 2 mA E ~ 10 2 – 10 3 MeV  n ~ 1.0 mm mrad low  E and short  s Halo generated by / together with the wanted beam - scattered particles (residual gas, IBS) - laser stray light - … (?) Dark Current generated indepen- dently of wanted beam (laser off) - field emission in rf cavities - … (?)

UBW2012, A. Matveenko DARK CURRENT 8 large amounts of dark current have to be expected in machines with: long rf sections – high energy: large number of potential emitters high accelerating gradients in the rf structures – compact machine layout: field emission current (density) scales according to Fowler- Nordheim with: E – electric field,  – work function high duty cycle – high current: emission only when rf is on  worst case: cw  one of the most affected kind of machine: Energy Recover Linac’s (ERL)

UBW2012, A. Matveenko 9 DARK BERLINPRO LINAC Booster Gun Dark Current affects: energy recovery efficiency (available linac rf power) machine protection (affects aperture definition and choice of vacuum chamber material) collimation system requirements radiation safety (during and after a machine run)

UBW2012, A. Matveenko 10 BERLINPRO: IMPACT POSITIONS OF LOSS CURRENT Dark current from gun & booster:

UBW2012, A. Matveenko 11 Dark current from linac: BERLINPRO: IMPACT POSITIONS OF LOSS CURRENT

UBW2012, A. Matveenko 12 Optical functions in recirculator: BERLINPRO: IMPACT POSITIONS OF LOSS CURRENT

UBW2012, A. Matveenko CURRENT LOSSES AND … 13 … Linac RF Power available Linac RF power limits losses and dark current due to beam loading: P rf = 10 … 30 kW  I loss = 200 … 600   E = 50 MeV 0.2 … mA  T = 99.8 %  3.1 Gaussian Beam Sources of potentially lost beam: 1.Dark current (laser = OFF) source: field emission & multi-packting in rf cavities theory: hardly predictable in advance (neither amount nor spatial, temporal and energy distribution) field emission current = heat load for sc cavity  cryo budget sets intra cavity dark current limits; escape ratio defines current leaving cavities 100 nA (1  A ?) / Cavity  1  A for BERLinPro counteracts: -limit RF field amplitude -collimate beam -estimate more probable positions of impact

UBW2012, A. Matveenko 14 … Machine Protection assumption on permanent (s, min, h ?) losses so far: 25  A / low energy: 5 … 10 MeV  250 W / section 5  A / high energy: 50 MeV  250 W / section section = 2…3 m = one radiation control segment  100 W / m uniform distributed power  water cooling might be required, but no problem spot like distribution  may not occur, must be detected by transmission measurements and must lead to immediate machine switch off … Activation & Personal Interlock decide current limits on acceptable radiation limits: e.g. 100  Sv after 1 h w/o beam derive according loss currents (depending on chamber material, and other possibly activated surrounding hardware) CURRENT LOSSES AND …

UBW2012, A. Matveenko 15 BERLINPRO: INJECTOR ACCEPTANCE Wanted Beam + Fowler Nordheim DC  track & mark particles lost injector studies ongoing

UBW2012, A. Matveenko 16 BERLINPRO: RECIRCULATOR ACCEPTANCE Fill 2D phase space (uniform)  track & mark particles lost hor. & ver. phase space

UBW2012, A. Matveenko 17 BERLINPRO: RECIRCULATOR ACCEPTANCE Fill 2D phase space (uniform)  track & mark particles lost horizontal & longitudinal phase space

UBW2012, A. Matveenko injector linac merger booster recirculator (1 st half) 1 st 180° recirculator arc splitter chicane fractional losses / %: transv. phase space filled long. phase space filled aperture Loss positions strongly depend on assumed 6D dark current distribution !!! BERLINPRO: POTENTIAL LOSS POSITIONS

UBW2012, A. Matveenko MEASURES AT DESIGN STAGE TO MINIMIZE EFFECT OF DARK BERLINPRO 19 Do not plan to operate at ultimate gradients Collimation Protect potentially weak places (water cooling of vacuum chambers) Diagnostics to control the unwanted beam losses Do the modeling … but do not believe it…