Some basic concepts Week 1 Lecture notes INF 384C: Organizing Information Spring 2016 Karen Wickett UT School of Information.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Toward an International Sharing and Use of Subject Authority Data
Advertisements

Principles of Cataloguing & Classification: a basic introduction
Subject Analysis: An Introduction Based on BASIC SUBJECT CATALOGING USING LCSH edited by Lori Robare.
Future of Cataloging RDA and other innovations pt.1a.
Module 5a: Authority Control and Encoding Schemes IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2007 Michael Crandall.
FRBR – A Refresher Course Marjorie E. Bloss RDA Project Manager April 9, 2008.
RDA Test at LC Module 1: Overview What RDA Is; Structure.
SLIDE 1IS 257 – Fall 2007 Codes and Rules for Description: History 2 University of California, Berkeley School of Information IS 245: Organization.
8/28/97Information Organization and Retrieval Metadata and Data Structures University of California, Berkeley School of Information Management and Systems.
Using Metadata in CONTENTdm Diana Brooking and Allen Maberry Metadata Implementation Group, Univ. of Washington Crossing Organizational Boundaries Oct.
The Metadata Landscape: Cataloging Cultural Objects, the VRA Core, and Our Visual Collections Margaret N. Webster Knight Visual Resources Facility December.
OLC Spring Chapter Conferences Metadata, Schmetadata … Tell Me Why I Should Care? OLC Spring Chapter Conferences, 2004 Margaret.
The Library Cataloging Tradition
SLIDE 1IS 245 – Spring 2009 Codes and Rules for Description: History University of California, Berkeley School of Information IS 245: Organization.
IMT530- Organization of Information Resources1 Feedback Like exercises –But want more instructions and feedback on them –Wondering about grading on these.
Descriptive Cataloging of Monographs 1. Introduction DRAFT.
SLIDE 1IS 257 – Fall 2007 Codes and Rules for Description: History University of California, Berkeley School of Information IS 245: Organization.
RDA AND AUTHORITY CONTROL Name: Hester Marais Job Title: Authority Describer Tel: Your institution's logo.
RDA Test “Train the Trainer Module 1: What RDA is and isn’t [Content as of Mar. 31, 2010]
Metadata: Its Functions in Knowledge Representation for Digital Collections 1 Summary.
The European Manuscript & Hand Press Book Heritage The role of the Consortium of European Research Libraries (CERL) Manuscript Collection in the National.
By Carrie Moran. To examine the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) metadata scheme to determine its utility based on structure, interoperability.
8/28/97Organization of Information in Collections Introduction to Description: Dublin Core and History University of California, Berkeley School of Information.
Improving Access to Audio- Visual Materials by Using Genre/Form Terms OLAC Conference 1-3 October 2004 Montreal, Quebec.
BEYOND THE OPAC: FUTURE DIRECTIONS FOR WEB-BASED CATALOGUES Martha M. Yee September 11, 2006 draft.
7/14/09. Robert L. Maxwell RDA Lecture Series National Library of South Africa 22 July /14/09 Cataloging: Still a Professional Asset to Become Excited.
History of Bibliographic Control. Library and Information-type Work –Undertaken through much of human history. –Information packages of various types,
The Library Cataloging Tradition Marty Kurth CS 431 February 9, 2005 [slides stolen from Diane Hillmann]
Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian IU Digital Library Program New Developments in Cataloging.
Metadata: Essential Standards for Management of Digital Libraries ALI Digital Library Workshop Linda Cantara, Metadata Librarian Indiana University, Bloomington.
JENN RILEY METADATA LIBRARIAN IU DIGITAL LIBRARY PROGRAM Introduction to Metadata.
The Future of Cataloging Codes and Systems: IME ICC, FRBR, and RDA by Dr. Barbara B. Tillett Chief, Cataloging Policy & Support Office Library of Congress.
Introduction to Metadata Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian IU Digital Library Program.
Resource Description and Access Deirdre Kiorgaard Australian Committee on Cataloguing Representative to the Joint Steering Committee for the Development.
Metadata and Documentation Iain Wallace Performing Arts Data Service.
Evidence from Metadata INST 734 Doug Oard Module 8.
RDA Compared with AACR2 Presentation given at the ALA conference program session Look Before You Leap: taking RDA for a test-drive July 11, 2009 by Tom.
RDA DAY 1 – part 2 web version 1. 2 When you catalog a “book” in hand: You are working with a FRBR Group 1 Item The bibliographic record you create will.
Introduction to Metadata Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian IU Digital Library Program.
The physical parts of a computer are called hardware.
Intellectual Works and their Manifestations Representation of Information Objects IR Systems & Information objects Spring January, 2006 Bharat.
Description of Bibliographic Items. Review Encoding = Markup. The library cataloging “markup” language is MARC. Unlike HTML, MARC tags have meaning (i.e.,
FRBR: Cataloging’s New Frontier Emily Dust Nimsakont Nebraska Library Commission NCompass Live December 15, 2010 Photo credit:
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records The Changing Face of Cataloging William E. Moen Texas Center for Digital Knowledge School of Library.
Metadata “Data about data” Describes various aspects of a digital file or group of files Identifies the parts of a digital object and documents their content,
IMT530- Organization of Information Resources1 Feedback Lectures –More practical examples –Like guest lecturers –Generally helpful in understanding concepts.
Future of Cataloguing: how RDA positions us for the future for RDA Workshop June, 2010.
RDA: history and background Ann Huthwaite Library Resource Services Manager, QUT ACOC Seminar, Sydney, 24 October 2008.
Differences and distinctions: metadata types and their uses Stephen Winch Information Architecture Officer, SLIC.
8/28/97Information Organization and Retrieval Introduction University of California, Berkeley School of Information Management and Systems SIMS 245: Organization.
Current initiatives in developing library linked data Gordon Dunsire Presented at the Cataloguing and Indexing Group Scotland seminar “Linked data and.
The ___ is a global network of computer networks Internet.
Queensland University of Technology Faculty of Information Technology Michael Middleton 1 CRICOS No J Bibliographic description.
Catalogs, MARC and other metadata Kathryn Lybarger March 25, 2009.
Information organization Week 2 Lecture notes INF 380E: Perspectives on Information Spring 2015 Karen Wickett UT School of Information.
Metadata standards and interoperability 384C – Organizing Information Spring 2016 Karen Wickett School of Information University of Texas at Austin.
Theoretical Perspectives: Information, Language and Cognition Week 14 Lecture notes INF 380E: Perspectives on Information Spring
Information organization Week 2 Lecture notes INF 380E: Perspectives on Information Spring 2015 Karen Wickett UT School of Information.
Theory, Tools, History: A Brief Introduction August 17, 2016.
From the old to the new… Towards better resource discoverability
Metadata Standards - Types
INFORMATION STRUCTURES FOR VISUAL WORKS
Introduction to Metadata
Metadata standards Guidelines, data structures, and file formats to facilitate reliability and quality of description INF 384 C, Spring 2009.
Cataloging Tips and Tricks
MARC: Beyond the Basics 11/24/2018 (C) 2006, Tom Kaun.
Introduction to Semantic Metadata & Semantic Web
Metadata to fit your needs... How much is too much?
Attributes and Values Describing Entities.
FRBR and FRAD as Implemented in RDA
Presentation transcript:

Some basic concepts Week 1 Lecture notes INF 384C: Organizing Information Spring 2016 Karen Wickett UT School of Information

Svenonius ‘The essential and defining objective of a system for organizing information, then, is to bring essentially like information together and to differentiate what is not exactly alike.’ – Sometimes referred to as “collocation”.

Information Organization (Svenonius) “Organizing information would seem to be no different from organizing anything else.... But there are important differences. One that is particularly important, because it is at the root of many of the complexities unique to organizing information, is that two distinct entities need to be organized in tandem and with respect to each other: works and the documents that embody them. – from The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization by E. Svenonius

Cutter's objectives (1876) According to Cutter, the objectives of a bibliographic system were: 1.to enable a person to find a book of which either the author, title, or subject is known 2.to show what the library has by a given author, on a given subject or in a given kind of literature 3.to assist in the choice of a book – as to its edition or its character

IFLA's obectives (1997) 1.to find entities that correspond to the user's stated search criteria 2.to identify an entity 3.to select an entity that is appopriate to the user's needs 4.to acquire or obtain access to the entity described

What is information organization? The creation of a system – that lets people do things find, manage, select, locate, obtain – with things that carry information an intellectual or creative work a text in a specific language a file with a specific format a physical item

What kind of system? A system that represents the things that carry information In a way that lets us meet our objectives for accessing information

(e.g.) Bibliographic systems The library solution to information organization is the catalog Catalogs have increased in complexity over time in response to changes in – technology for making catalogs book lists to card catalogs to machine readable cards to databases to … – technology for making and accessing information resources printed books to microforms to electronic resources – expectations for the genres a library will hold reference and classics to fiction … to comic books, video games, movies sheet music to recordings

Bibliographic Records A bibliographic record represents an information resource in a library catalog – sometimes referred to as a surrogate Each record consists of a number of fields that are used to describe a resource – this kind of record is a container for information about a resource

Standards

Types of Data Standards: structure Data structure standards – metadata element sets, schemas. “categories” or “containers” of data that make up a record or other information object. Examples – The set of MARC (Machine-Readable Cataloging format) fields – Encoded Archival Description (EAD), – Dublin Core Metadata Element Set (DCMES), – Categories for the Description of Works of Art (CDWA)

MARC 21 record format A standardized record format for bibliographic data – a list of fields and subfields – including header fields that describe the record – a container for data a data encoding syntax example MARC Record in UT catalog

Types of data standards: value Data value standards – controlled vocabularies, thesauri, controlled lists. the terms, names, and other values that are used to populate data structure standards or metadata element sets. Examples – Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) – Library of Congress Name Authority File (LCNAF) – Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), – Art & Architecture Thesaurus (AAT), – Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names (TGN)

Vocabulary control “A controlled vocabulary is an organized arrangement of words and phrases used to index content and/or to retrieve content through browsing or searching. It typically includes preferred and variant terms and has a defined scope or describes a specific domain.” – Values for certain fields in a bibliographic record will come from a controlled vocabulary – Subject headings – Authors

Controlled vocabularies, generally “an artificial language that maps users’ vocabulary to a standardized vocabulary and to bring like information together” in service of: “The essential and defining objective of a system for organizing information is to bring essentially like information together and to differentiate what is not alike.” -- Svenonius

Knowledge Organization Systems A knowledge organization system is used to organize information-bearing objects according to their content. If we want to collocate according to the knowledge contained within documents, we need some notion of the relationships between areas of knowledge

Hierarchical organization in a KOS

Hierarchical organization

KOS are Linguistic Made up of terms Rule of literary warrant – terms should be selected and used as they appear in relevant literature – (what does the above imply about literatures?) Effective design requires knowledge of entry vocabulary

The Organizational Mandate Svenonius points to the influence of logical positivism in the development of bibliographic organization in the 19 th century.

Types of data standards: content Data content standards – cataloging rules and codes. guidelines for the format and syntax of the data values that are used to populate metadata elements. examples – Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR), Resource Description and Access (RDA), – International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD) – Cataloging Cultural Objects (CCO) – Describing Archives: A Content Standard (DACS)

Cataloging Rules MARC is a record format, a container for bibliographic data (roughly, data syntax) But it doesn’t say how to get the values that go into the fields of a record (data semantics) This comes from a content standard for bibliographic data – i.e. a set of cataloging rules – Resource Description and Access (RDA) is the current standard, and was informed by the FRBR model – Much current catalog data was created with AACR2

Types of data standards: format/technical interchange Data format/technical interchange standards (metadata standards expressed in machine-readable form). often a manifestation of a particular data structure standard encoded or marked up for machine processing. examples – MARC21, MARCXML – EAD XML DTD – CDWA Lite XML schema, – Simple Dublin Core XML schema – VRA Core 4.0 XML schema

Principles of Description Cataloging content standards (like AACR2 and RDA) are based on directives that guide the construction of the representations that make up a bibliographic system. These principles are based on the perceived objectives for bibliographic systems.

Principles of description (Svenonius) Principle of user convenience – Design decisions should be made with the user in mind. – Includes the Principle of common usage vocabulary used in descriptions should accord with that of a majority of users Principle of representation – Descriptions should be based on the way an information entity describes itself – Includes Principle of accuracy Descriptions should faithfully portray the entity described.

Principles of description (con’t) Principle of sufficiency and necessity – Descriptions should be sufficient to achieve stated objectives and not include elements not required for those purposes. – Includes Principle of significance Descriptions should include only those elements that are bibliographically significant. Principle of standardization – Descriptions should be standardized, to the extent and level possible Principle of integration – Descriptions for all types of materials should be based on a common set of rules, to the extent possible