Chapter 16,17,18 Negative Terms. Debate Terms-Negative Must directly clash with the affirmative Must directly clash with the affirmative Negative wins.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Matt Gomez Debating the Disadvantage (DA). 4 Part One: What is a Disadvantage?
Advertisements

A Firm Foundation: CX Debate Basics (Part I) A N INTRODUCTION TO P OLICY D EBATE - The Minnesota Urban Debate League -
POLICY DEBATE Cross-Examination (CX). POLICY DEBATE  Purpose of policy debate is to compare policies and decide which is best  Affirmative: Supports.
Cross Examination (CX) Debate
The Structure of a Debate Constructive Speeches 1AC: 8 Minutes Cross-Examined by 2NC: 3 Minutes 1NC: 8 Minutes Cross-Examined by 1AC: 3 Minutes 2AC: 8.
The Structure of a Debate Constructive Speeches 1AC: 8 Minutes Cross-Examined by 2NC: 3 Minutes 1NC: 8 Minutes Cross-Examined by 1AC: 3 Minutes 2AC: 8.
Rebuttal By Chanise (My favorite speech). First Speaker Position Rebuttal You have the advantage of a full four minutes of attacking your opponents case.
+ Debate Basics. + DEBATE A debate is a formal argument in which two opposing teams propose or attack a given proposition or motion in a series of speeches.
What is Debate? A debater’s guide to the argumentative universe…
Lincoln-Douglas Debate An Examination of Values. OBJECTIVES: The student will 1. Demonstrate understanding of the concepts that underlie Lincoln-Douglas.
Introduction to Debate -Negative- To access audio: Skype: freeconferencecallhd and enter # Or call and enter # © L. Husick,
POLICY DEBATE Will look like CX on the sign up sheet.
Debate Notes: Arguments Building the Affirmative and the Negative Constructive Arguments.
Introduction to Debate -Affirmative- To access audio: Skype: freeconferencecallhd and enter # Or call and enter # © L.
8th Annual Great Corporate Debate Corporate Team Training Session # 1 May 27 & 29, 2014 Stephen Buchanan Education Consulting Corporate Team Training Session.
Constructive Speeches (1AC)- 6 MINUTES CX 1A to 2N- 3 MINUTES (1NC)- 6 MINUTES CX- 1N to 1A- 3 MINUTES (2AC)- 6 MINUTES CX- 2A to 1N- 3 MINUTES (2NC)-
Chapter 21 Supporting Your Views
How to Read the Packet. STEPS 1.Assign parts 2.Definitions 3.Cursory Read 4.Examine the Info 5.Pro/Neg construction 6.Rebuttals 7.Discuss.
DEBATE FINAL EXAM STUDY GUIDE Spring Debate Final Exam Study Guide Define terms using the answers here; if the answers aren’t complete, use Google.
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF THE SPEECHES
Debate. What is debate? Formalized Public Speaking Contest to find out which side has better logical reasons.
Debating Year 10 extension. By the unit of this unit, you will be able to: Understand debating terms and apply them to your own and others’ debates. Form.
Building Opposition Cases In Parliamentary Debate
FORMAT (RULES AND PROCEDURES) OMS INSIGHTS Parliamentary Debate.
The Stock Issues of Debate 5 Things Every Debater Needs, and Needs to Know!
Debate A contest of argumentation.. Argument A reason to support your side of the debate.
Debate Basics: The Logical Argument. Argument An argument is a set of claims presented in a logical form. An argument attempts to persuade an audience.
DEBATING BASICS Tuesday, August 25, IMPORTANT VOCAB  Resolution: A debate topic specifically worded to make for fair debates.  Affirmative: The.
LINCOLN-DOUGLAS DEBATE
Lincoln-Douglas Debate RefutationRefutation. Step One: Briefly restate your opponent’s argument. The purpose of restating is to provide geographic marker.
Week 1. Q. From where did LD debate come? Q. Where policy debate involves federal policy, what does LD involve? Q. LD involves which civilization?
Lincoln Douglas Debate RJ Pellicciotta, Cary Academy Dogwood Speech & Debate League.
Opposition Strategy NCFA Rookie Debate Camp. Agenda ❖ A Brief Word on Trichotomy ❖ Basic Path to Winning ❖ Opposition Strategies by Position* ❖ Quick.
LINCOLN DOUGLAS DEBATE. Table of Contents  What is it  LD Debate Structure  Terms to Know  Constructive Arguments  Affirmative  Negative  Cross.
Chapter Study Guide GROUP COMMUNICATION. Chapter What are the 4 steps in the problem solving process? Describe and understand the problem.
Introduction to Policy Debate The Forensics Files.
Sydney Apple Boston College 2015 Georgia Debate Institutes
Debate The Essentials Ariail, Robert. “Let the Debates Begin.” 18 Aug orig. published in The State, South Carolina. 26 Sept
Debate Ch. 18 Group One.
 4 th stock issue  Significance means that the issue addressed by the Affirmative team is a major force affecting a large group.  The penalty for not.
Individual Policy Debate Orientation. Volunteers Make it Happen! 2 We can’t do this without you. You are making an investment. You are performing a teaching.
 If you can convince the judge that passing your affirmative plan is a good idea, you will win the debate. Essentially, you need to prove that the affirmative.
POLICY DEBATE. WHAT IS POLICY DEBATE? A structured format for fairly arguing a topic of policy TEAM DEBATE: two teams of two students each 8 speeches.
Lincoln-Douglas Debate. Resolutions: The resolution is a statement with which one contestant must agree (affirm) and the other contestant must disagree.
Beginning Policy Debate: I ain’t scared ! NSDA Nationals 2014 Jane Boyd Grapevine HS, TEXAS.
Hays Watson Head Debate Coach UGA.  It is the counterpoint to the Affirmative – instead of Affirming a particular course of action (i.e. the resolution),
Mariner Speech and Debate Club Meeting #3 Tuesday, October 23, 2012.
Matt Gomez.  What will occur in the status quo  Factors for good uniqueness  Post-dating – things change  Brink – why is the squo good but not guaranteed.
Chapter 25 Cross-Examination Techniques. Purposes of Cross-Examination Clarify arguments Clarify arguments Point out misinterpretations Point out misinterpretations.
Affirmative vs. negative
Shouldn’t we have started with this?!?
Standing up for the SQUO
Introduction to the Negative
Policy Debate Speaker Duties
8th Annual Great Corporate Debate
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF THE SPEECHES
Debate: The Basics.
Debate.
Negative Strategies.
The Affirmative Adapted from:.
Policy Analysis in Cross-ex Debate
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF POLICY SPEECHES
DEBATE So you like to argue?.
Informative, Persuasive, and Impromptu Speaking all rolled into one!
Negative Attacks.
Stock Issues.
Building Affirmative Case Template
Getting To Know Debate:
Debate.
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 16,17,18 Negative Terms

Debate Terms-Negative Must directly clash with the affirmative Must directly clash with the affirmative Negative wins until the status quo is indicted and affirmative makes a case for change Negative wins until the status quo is indicted and affirmative makes a case for change Negative must document objections to affirmative case Negative must document objections to affirmative case

Negative Block Negative has last constructive and first rebuttal speeches Negative has last constructive and first rebuttal speeches Negative can use this “block” of time to tear down the affirmative, devote a lot of time to different arguments that the affirmative must respond to…the key is for the negative to not REPEAT the same information in these two speeches. Negative can use this “block” of time to tear down the affirmative, devote a lot of time to different arguments that the affirmative must respond to…the key is for the negative to not REPEAT the same information in these two speeches. Make sure to divide arguments and avoid overlap! Make sure to divide arguments and avoid overlap!

Negative Topicality Bring this up when affirmative has a blatant violation of the definition of terms. Bring this up when affirmative has a blatant violation of the definition of terms. Bring this up if the affirmative case is not a valid interpretation of the resolution. Bring this up if the affirmative case is not a valid interpretation of the resolution. Always ask for clarification of vague or ambiguous terms, then negative should ask for clarification. Always ask for clarification of vague or ambiguous terms, then negative should ask for clarification.

Negative Harms The negative must attempt to minimize the degree of the problems in the status quo presented by the affirmative The negative must attempt to minimize the degree of the problems in the status quo presented by the affirmative Always ask affirmative to provide statistics to back up claims-can counter these stats with current updated stats! Always ask affirmative to provide statistics to back up claims-can counter these stats with current updated stats! If affirmative cannot back up claims, then their argument is weak-attack this If affirmative cannot back up claims, then their argument is weak-attack this

Inherency Negative can argue that the present system is effective and then address the problems stated by the affirmative Negative can argue that the present system is effective and then address the problems stated by the affirmative Or the negative (status quo) is reaching the same advantages that are stated by the affirmative Or the negative (status quo) is reaching the same advantages that are stated by the affirmative

Minor Repairs Case Admit that there are some problems in the status quo, but do not need major overhaul as the affirmative is stating. Admit that there are some problems in the status quo, but do not need major overhaul as the affirmative is stating. With a few minor adjustments, the status quo will work effectively With a few minor adjustments, the status quo will work effectively Cannot be MAJOR changes like the affirmative is advocating Cannot be MAJOR changes like the affirmative is advocating

Attack Affirmative Evidence Listen carefully to affirmative evidence and use it against them when you can! Listen carefully to affirmative evidence and use it against them when you can! Remember the fallacies discussed earlier- use these (Chapters 6,7) Remember the fallacies discussed earlier- use these (Chapters 6,7)

Total Refutation of Affirmative Plan Will the plan do what is says it will do? Will the plan do what is says it will do? Sometimes affirmative overstates the plan’s effectiveness Sometimes affirmative overstates the plan’s effectiveness The affirmative plan must work, if you can prove it can’t work…negative wins the debate! The affirmative plan must work, if you can prove it can’t work…negative wins the debate!

Total Refutation of Affirmative Plan Attack funding-how much will this cost? Attack funding-how much will this cost? Will plan actually produce the results claimed? Will plan actually produce the results claimed? Will affirmative produce disadvantages that outweigh advantages-then point this out in debate! Will affirmative produce disadvantages that outweigh advantages-then point this out in debate!

Disadvantages-How to present 1. Show a direct link to affirmative plan 2. This disadvantage does not occur now 3. State effects/impacts of plan DA-(brink) 4. Show their weight!