Categorical Propositions Chapter 5. Deductive Argument A deductive argument is one whose premises are claimed to provide conclusive grounds for the truth.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reason and Argument Chapter 7 (1/2).
Advertisements

THE CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM
Basic Terms in Logic Michael Jhon M. Tamayao.
Truth Functional Logic
Four Rules of Aristotelian Logic 1. Rule of Identity: A is A 2. Rule of Non-Contradiction: A is not (-A) 3. Rule of Excluded Middle: Either A or (-A)
An overview Lecture prepared for MODULE-13 (Western Logic) BY- MINAKSHI PRAMANICK Guest Lecturer, Dept. Of Philosophy.
Deductive Arguments: Categorical Logic
1 Philosophy 1100 Title:Critical Reasoning Instructor:Paul Dickey Website:
Deduction: the categorical syllogism - 1 Logic: evaluating deductive arguments - the syllogism 4 A 5th pattern of deductive argument –the categorical syllogism.
Today’s Topics Introduction to Predicate Logic Venn Diagrams Categorical Syllogisms Venn Diagram tests for validity Rule tests for validity.
Review: Logic. Fallacy: Appeal to Novelty New is better.
Analysis of Diagnostic Essay: The Deductive Argument English 102 Argumentation.
Philosophy 1100 Today: Hand Back “Nail that Claim” Exercise! & Discuss
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions and Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual
Patterns of Deductive Thinking
Basic Argumentation.
Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.
Categorical Syllogisms
Categorical Propositions To help us make sense of our experience, we humans constantly group things into classes or categories. These classifications are.

CATEGORICAL PROPOSITIONS, CHP. 8 DEDUCTIVE LOGIC VS INDUCTIVE LOGIC ONE CENTRAL PURPOSE: UNDERSTANDING CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS AS THE BUILDING BLOCKS OF.
Categorical Propositions All S is P No S is P Some S is P Some S is not P.
Logic and Philosophy Alan Hausman PART ONE Sentential Logic Sentential Logic.
Deductive versus Inductive Reasoning Consider the following two passages: Argument #1 Mr. Jones is a member of the Academy of Scholarly Fellows and only.
Critical Thinking Lecture 10 The Syllogism By David Kelsey.
The Science of Good Reasons
Philosophy 148 Chapter 7. AffirmativeNegative UniversalA: All S are PE: No S is P ParticularI: Some S is PO: Some S is not P.
Logic A: Capital punishment is immoral. B: No it isn’t! A: Yes it is! B: Well, what do you know about it? A: I know more about it then you do! B: Oh yeah?
Chapter 15: Rules for Judging Validity. Distribution (p. 152) Several of the rules use the notion of distribution. A term is distributed if it refers.
Chapter 18: Conversion, Obversion, and Squares of Opposition
4 Categorical Propositions
MLS 570 Critical Thinking Reading Notes for Fogelin: Categorical Syllogisms We will go over diagramming Arguments in class. Fall Term 2006 North Central.
READING #4 “DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS” By Robert FitzGibbons from Making educational decisions: an introduction to Philosophy of Education (New York & London:
Logic – Basic Terms Logic: the study of how to reason well. Validity: Valid thinking is thinking in conformity with the rules. If the premises are true.
LOGICAL REASONING FOR CAT 2009.
CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS
The construction of a formal argument
Chapter 13: Categorical Propositions. Categorical Syllogisms (p. 141) Review of deductive arguments –Form –Valid/Invalid –Soundness Categorical syllogisms.
Chapter Twelve Predicate Logic Truth Trees. 1. Introductory Remarks The trees for sentential logic give us decidability—there is a mechanical decision.
Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 6
Fun with Deductive Reasoning
Syllogisms and Three Types of Hypothetical Syllogisms
Chapter 7 Evaluating Deductive Arguments II: Truth Functional Logic Invitation to Critical Thinking First Canadian Edition.
Chapter 6 Evaluating Deductive Arguments 1: Categorical Logic Invitation to Critical Thinking First Canadian Edition.
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual
Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 7 Lecture Notes Chapter 7.
Chapter 14: Categorical Syllogisms. Elements of a Categorical Syllogism (pp ) Categorical syllogisms are deductive arguments. Categorical syllogisms.
Critical Thinking Lecture 10 The Syllogism By David Kelsey.
Philosophy 1504: Language and Logic March 28, 2016.
Deductive Reasoning. Inductive: premise offers support and evidenceInductive: premise offers support and evidence Deductive: premises offers proof that.
Deductive Logic, Categorical Syllogism
THE CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM
5 Categorical Syllogisms
Today’s Topics Introduction to Predicate Logic Venn Diagrams
The second Meeting Basic Terms in Logic.
Chapter 3 Philosophy: Questions and theories
Introduction to Logic PHIL 240 Sections
Rules and fallacies Formal fallacies.
4.1 The Components of Categorical Propositions
Philosophy 1100 Class #8 Title: Critical Reasoning
Hurley … Chapter 6.5 Indirect Truth Tables
Chapter 6 Categorical Syllogisms
Reason and Argument Chapter 7 (2/2).
6.4 Truth Tables for Arguments
Critical Thinking Lecture 10 The Syllogism
Evaluating Deductive Arguments
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

Categorical Propositions Chapter 5

Deductive Argument A deductive argument is one whose premises are claimed to provide conclusive grounds for the truth of its conclusion. Valid or Invalid

Deductive Logic Relationship b/w premises and conclusion. Techniques for appraisal of deductive arguments. Classical or Aristotelian Modern or Modern Symbolic

Class Collection of all objects that have some specified characteristic in common.

Categorical Propositions Such propositions affirm, or deny, that some class S is included in some other class P, in whole or in part. Relationships between classes are affirmed or denied by categorical propositions.

Types of Categorical Propositions Universal Affirmative Universal Negative Particular Affirmative Particular Negative

Types of Categorical Propositions All politicians are liars No politicians are liars Some politicians are liars Some politicians are not liars

Universal Affirmative A A universal affirmative proposition says that every member of the first class is also a member of the second class. All S is P A proposition

Universal Negative E Universal negative proposition says that the first class is wholly excluded from the second. No S is P E proposition

Particular Affirmative I At least one member of the class designated by the subject term S is also a member of the class designated by the predicate term P. Some S is P I proposition

Particular Negative O At least one member of the class designated by the subject term S is excluded from the whole of the class designated by the predicated term P. Some S is not P O proposition

Quality If the proposition affirms some class inclusion, whether complete or partial, its quality is affirmative. If the proposition denies class inclusion, whether complete or partial, its quality is negative.

Quantity If the proposition refers to all members of the class designated by its subject term, its quantity is universal.

Distribution A distributed term is a term of a categorical proposition that is used with reference to every member of a class. If the term is not being used to refer to each and every member of the class, it is said to be undistributed.