Adequacy and Compatibility: The DNA of a National Materials Program Presented at the 2014 OAS Annual Meeting 1 Stephen James, Supervisor Ohio Department.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 Safety Policy April Safety Policy National Level Regulator Service Provider Service Provider.

Advertisements

Session No. 3 ICAO Safety Management Standards. The Big Picture Two audience groups Two audience groups States States Service providers Service providers.

DOE O Changes and the CRS

District of Columbia Health Benefits Exchange Authority Network Adequacy Working Group February 14, 2013 Chair: Diane Lewis Vice Chair: Stephen Jefferson.

Job Hazard Analysis. © Business & Legal Reports, Inc Session Objectives Identify the purpose of JHA Recognize the benefits of JHA Understand the.

DOT Office of Inspector General Audit of DOT’s Office of the Secretary’s Acquisition Function Federal Audit Executive Council Procurement Training Conference.

© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU. Civil Service Performance Assessment in Lithuania: Current.

ADEQUACY AND COMPATIBILITY David Walter, Chair. NO MATTER HOW YOU LOOK AT IT.

ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP OVERVIEW OF DOE POLICY -- USE OF INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS COLLEEN OSTROWSKI (202)

Branch Technical Position on Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation

Submitted to the 4 th Steering Committee Meeting on Competence of Human Resources for Regulatory Bodies.

IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.

1 Management Review Board (MRB): Roles and Responsibilities for the OAS Liaison Richmond, Virginia August 22, 2011.

1 Milestones of Cooperation Michael Weber Deputy Executive Director for Operations U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission August 22, 2011.

Expanded Version of COSO a presentation by Steve Wadleigh Expanded Version of COSO a presentation by Steve Wadleigh Standards for Internal Control in the.

SAFA- IFAC Regional SMP Forum

2010 Performance Evaluation Process Information Session for Staff

Protection Against Occupational Exposure

Session No. 3 ICAO Safety Management Standards ICAO SMS Framework

AGREEMENT STATES VS U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AUBREY GODWIN AZ RADIATION REGULATORY AGENCY.

Postgraduate Educational Course in radiation protection and the Safety of Radiation sources PGEC Part IV The International System of Radiation Protection.

Updated Performance Management for Exempt Staff Fall 2009.

A Proposed Risk Management Regulatory Framework Commissioner George Apostolakis Presented at the Organization of Agreement States 2012 Annual Meeting Milwaukee,

ACADs (08-006) Covered Keywords Commission, regulation, advisory, standards. Description This presentation provides general information about each of the.

What do these changes mean for Agreement State Programs?

1 Going From Good to Great: Cooperation, Collaboration, and Continual Learning Mark A. Satorius, Director Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental.

OAS Meeting August 2012 Jennifer Opila (CO) and David Allard (PA)

Presentation for China Migrant Labour Occupational Health and Safety Project - June, 2009 Overall Policy and Regulatory Considerations Affecting Migrant.

Proposed Regulations for Foreign Supplier Verification Programs (FSVPs)

Consideration of Michigan Pursuing an NRC Agreement A Discussion with Stakeholders January 24, 2007.

Act 117: “Every Child A Learner” Presented by: Vermont Department of Education Vermont School Boards Association.

1 FRENCH PROPOSAL FOR ESARR6 1 - BACKGROUND - 15/02/00 : Kick-off meeting, Presentation of the CAA/SRG input (SW01), Request from the chairman to comment.

Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Program Integrity Final Rule.

Programme Performance Criteria. Regulatory Authority Objectives To identify criteria against which the status of each element of the regulatory programme.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Summary and Overview of TECDOC Russel Edge Decommissioning and Remediation Unit Division of Radiation,Transport.

MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” WASTE MANAGEMENT SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo.

1 Commonwealth Low-risk Grant Agreement Template Grants Policy Team Resource Management Department of Finance Government Programme Community of Practice.

Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.

Division of Risk Management State of Florida Loss Prevention Program.

NOAA Cooperative Institutes John Cortinas, Ph.D. OAR Cooperative Institute Program, Program Manager NOAA Cooperative Institute Committee, Chairperson.

Licensing of a Potential Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain Lawrence Kokajko, Director Division of High-Level Waste Repository Safety U.S. Nuclear Regulatory.

1 10 CFR Part 61: Licensing Requirements for Land Disposal of Radioactive Waste Gregory Suber, Branch Chief Environmental Protection & Performance Assessment.

Clear thinking on Nuclear: Waste disposal 1.One site for high-level radioactive waste is easier to monitor, regulate, and secure 2.A repository will provide.

International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.

Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Annmarie Weisman U.S. Department of Education WVASFAA Conference Morgantown, WV April 2011.

International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.

Module N° 6 – SMS regulation

Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.

Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.

DoD Lead Agent: Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Environment) Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center.

GMC Approval of trainers in the UK Enid Rowland and Patricia Le Rolland.

Real Property Policy Update Planning and Development Committee August 4, 2015.

Auditors’ Dilemma – reporting requirements on Internal Financial Controls under the Companies Act 2013 and Clause 49 of the Listing agreement V. Venkataramanan.

Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence (VPP CX) Capability for the Department.

NRC’s 10 CFR Part 37 Program Review of Radioactive Source Security

Low-Level Radioactive Waste Forum Spring 2016 Meeting – Park City, UT

Prescriptive vs Performance-Based Regulatory Approaches

DOE Worker Safety and Health Policy

Proposed Revisions to 10 CFR Part 61

Performance Management System

South Carolina Perspective on Part 61 Proposed Revisions

LLW Forum Meeting October 16, 2017 Alexandria, Virginia

Fall Low Level Waste Forum Meeting

Low-Level Radioactive Waste Forum

TOPICAL TRAINING SESSION TENORM

LLW Forum Meeting October 17, 2017 Alexandria, Virginia

Armenian Nuclear Regulatory Authority

Standard Operating Procedures and Termination Procedures

TRTR Briefing September 2013

Presentation transcript:

Adequacy and Compatibility: The DNA of a National Materials Program Presented at the 2014 OAS Annual Meeting 1 Stephen James, Supervisor Ohio Department of Health Bureau of Radiation Protection

What are the Options? 2

Put Lipstick On The Pig 3 What is my job?

The Holistic Approach… The working group was tasked to determine whether a revised set of performance metrics should be developed which could replace, supplement, or expand upon the IMPEP program to determine the adequacy of States’ radiation safety programs such that both the adequacy and compatibility of the program is measured holistically. 4

What is a holistic approach? In broad terms, a holistic approach simply means the properties of a system cannot be described by its separate parts – the system as a whole influences the parts. 5

An Issue since 1959… Adequacy and Compatibility were not defined when Section 274 was adopted by Congress as part of the Atomic Energy Act 6

An Adequate program provides an acceptable level of protection of the public health and safety from the radiation hazards associated with the use of radioactive materials. 7

8 A Compatible program means there is consistency between the NRC and the Agreement States which is needed in order to maintain a National Materials Program for the regulation of radioactive materials.

National Materials Program 9

Adequacy and compatibility are integral components of an Agreement State regulatory program 10 Adequacy Compatibility

How we will evaluate… 11 Common & Non-Common Performance Indicators Adequacy Compatibility

The Findings… 1. Same as the NRC 2. Different than the NRC 3. Better than the NRC 12

The Findings… Adequate and Compatible for the Protection of Public Health and Safety 13 Satisfactory in all performance indicators. Issuance of “clean” IMPEP report. No further response required.

The Findings… Adequate and Compatible for the Protection of Public Health and Safety with Required Follow-up Actions 14 Satisfactory but needs improvement in one or more performance indicators, or possibly unsatisfactory in one or more performance indicators. Required follow-up actions specified in final IMPEP report. May result in Monitoring, Heightened Oversight, or Probation for the Agreement State.

The Findings… Not Adequate and Compatible for the Protection of Public Health and Safety 15 The program is not capable of reasonably assuring public health and safety. Program will be considered for Suspension or Termination of Agreement.

The Benefits… Allows programs to establish specific and common performance goals. Will develop a clear set of performance-based metrics that provide increased flexibility. Encourages program improvement. Promote overall consistency, transparency, and objectivity. 16

Questions? 17