National Quality Center Evaluating Your CQM Program and Improvement Efforts Kevin Garrett, MSW Lori DeLorenzo, RN, MSN May 19, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Quality Management Branch Cady Clark, MSN, RN Branch Manager Claudia Himes-Crayton, BSN, RN Patricia Palm, MS, RNC Nurse Consultants.
Global Congress Global Leadership Vision for Project Management.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk –
Eastern Area Programs Webinar “Showtime in the East” November 18, 2013 Presented by: Link Michelle M. Spady-EA Program Chair EA Program Team Link Kim.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Team Readiness: Probing questions for coaches to ask before an Open Standards process begins Are the minimum capacities in place to engage in a planning.
1 The CMO – One Size Fits All? Jake Julia, Ph.D.Brenda Sprite Northwestern UniversityNavigator Management Partners Session Presented at the Inaugural Global.
Comprehensive Literacy Program Louisiana Department of Education
Quality Improvement/ Quality Assurance Amelia Broussard, PhD, RN, MPH Christopher Gibbs, JD, MPH.
2015 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 2015 Baldrige Excellence Framework (Health.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
1 MQA Feedback Report Update Board of Education February 19, 2015 Building learners of tomorrow…
Funded by HRSA HIV/AIDS Bureau An Introduction to Performance Measurement for Quality Improvement Lori DeLorenzo, Jennifer Keller & Terry Bray Thursday,
Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Do You Know ???.
Orientation to Performance and Quality Improvement Plan
Clinical Management Nutr 564: Management Summer 2003.
Clinical Quality Management (CQM) in the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program- Ryan White Part A Administrative Reverse Site Visit Meeting July 30, 2013 CAPT. Tracy.
2015 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 2015 Introduction to the Baldrige Excellence.
Integrated Capability Maturity Model (CMMI)
Creating Sustainable Organizations The Baldrige Performance Excellence Program Sherry Martin HIV Quality of Care Advisory Committee September 13, 2012.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Applicant Name RMPEx Site Visit Opening Meeting Team Leader - Team Members –
Engineering, Operations & Technology | Information TechnologyAPEX | 1 Copyright © 2009 Boeing. All rights reserved. Architecture Concept UG D- DOC UG D-
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,
The Challenge of IT-Business Alignment
FHWA Reorganization Update Program Performance Management Standing Committee on Performance Management Meeting Detroit, MI October 14, 2011 Peter Stephanos.
Implementation Science Vision 21: Linking Systems of Care June 2015 Lyman Legters.
Clinical Quality Management: Guiding Better HIV Care USCA Sunday, September 13, 2015.
Alaska Staff Development Network – Follow-Up Webinar Emerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Alaska April 17, :45 – 5:15.
BPK Strategic Planning: Briefing for Denpasar Regional Office Leadership Team Craig Anderson Ahmed Fajarprana August 11-12, 2005.
Implementing QI Projects Title I HIV Quality Management Program Case Management Providers Meeting May 26, 2005 Presented by Lynda A. O’Hanlon Title I HIV.
Strategic Planning and AdvancEd Accreditation In partnership with Quality New Mexico Taos NMSBA Leadership Conference July 13, 2012.
Integrating Knowledge Translation and Exchange into a grant Maureen Dobbins, RN, PhD SON, January 14, 2013.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING
Tier 2/ Tier 3 Planning for Sustainability Rachel Saladis WI PBIS Network/Wi RtI Center Katrina Krych Sun Prairie Area School District.
Suggested Components of a Schoolwide Reading Plan Part 1: Introduction Provides an overview of key components of reading plan. Part 2: Component details.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Monitoring progress of coaching in QI. Remember, goal of coaching in QI A team should be able to: – measure and/or use data to do QI (PM) – improve care.
Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 2016
ELI Educational Leadership Initiative Learning and Leading Together for a Brighter Future.
There are 6 main components to Care Provider’s Committed to Quality Program: Visionary Leadership Mission Statement Customer Satisfaction Employee Satisfaction.
Albemarle County’s Departmental Assessment Process Who, What, When and How? Lori Allshouse, County Executive Department John Freeman, Department of Social.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Info-Tech Research Group, Inc. Is a global leader in providing IT research and advice. Info-Tech’s products and services combine.
Reporting, Monitoring and Evaluation Giovanni Rum, Chao Xing GEO Secretariat GEO Work Programme Symposium Geneva, 2-4 May 2016.
Huntsville City Schools AdvancEd Survey District Accreditation Cathy C. McNeal, Ed.D. January 8, 2013.
ELEMENTS OF A HIGH FUNCTIONING/EFFECTIVE ORGANIZATION LEADERSHIP  Leaders’ behaviors instill trust and respect, demonstrate integrity when it comes to.
Establish and Identify Processes  Identify and establish current state:  Roles and responsibilities  Processes and procedures  Operational performance.
ASK MBSAQIP Agenda ASK MBSAQIP November 10, 2016 Time (CST)
Developing a Quality Management Plan December 2005
Using Regional Groups and Peer Learning to Improve HIV Care
East Carolina University-Brody School of Medicine
Getting Started with Your Malnutrition Quality Improvement Project
Using Regional Groups and Peer Learning to Improve HIV Care
QI Management Plan Learning Objectives
Conducting a Self Assessment and Developing Your CQI Plan
Conducting a Self Assessment and Developing Your CQI Plan
Georgia’s Tiered System of Supports for Students Karen Suddeth, Project Director Carole Carr, Communications & Visibility Specialist
Performance and Quality Improvement
Module 3 Part 2 Developing and Implementing a QI Plan: Planning and Execution Adapted from: The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Quality.
Module 3: Part 1 Developing and Implementing a QI Plan: Understanding the QI Plan Adapted from: The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)
Sustainability Planning
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Presentation transcript:

National Quality Center Evaluating Your CQM Program and Improvement Efforts Kevin Garrett, MSW Lori DeLorenzo, RN, MSN May 19, 2016

National Quality Center

Agenda Discuss the core elements to review as part of the evaluation process Review tools and approaches to facilitate the evaluation of your quality management program Discuss use of evaluation results to plan for future QI activities

National Quality Center

Why?

National Quality Center

g-faces/funderburg-text

National Quality Center Purpose Building in time to conduct evaluation provides valuable window for team to pause and assess functioning. Structured approach provides opportunity to understand what worked well and what needs improvement, thereby facilitating planning for the next year.

National Quality Center National Quality Center (NQC)10 Quality is Continuous

National Quality Center What?

National Quality Center Two Levels of Assessment

National Quality Center Infrastructure Core Components for Review

National Quality Center Infrastructure: Core Elements for Review

National Quality Center Infrastructure: Core Elements for Review Leadership Quality Management Committee Dedicated Staffing Dedicated Resources Quality Management Plan Annual Goals Consumer Involvement Stakeholder Involvement, esp. Subrecipients

National Quality Center National Quality Center (NQC)16

National Quality Center Performance Measurement: Core Elements for Review

National Quality Center Performance Measurement: Core Elements for Review Performance Measures Type & comprehensiveness Alignment with key priorities Data Results, trends & comparison Achievement of outcomes and goals Validity Display and dissemination Use of Data for Quality Purposes Identification of QI projects Incorporated into planning process

National Quality Center National Quality Center (NQC)19

National Quality Center Quality Improvement Projects: Core Elements for Review

National Quality Center Quality Improvement Projects: Core Elements for Review Number and Type Engagement of Staff Support and Resources Quality Committee Kept Informed Goals Realized Efforts Sustainable

National Quality Center Project Cycle

National Quality Center Quality Improvement Projects: Core Elements for Review

National Quality Center Quality Improvement Projects: Core Elements for Review Process How was the project selected? Was a goal clearly articulated? Was the scope of work and timeline realistic? Did you have senior leader support? Was the root cause determined before solutions were identified?

National Quality Center Quality Improvement Projects (cont.) QI Team Were the right members on the team? Were the team members actively engaged? Did the team members assume the necessary roles and share responsibilities? Were consumers involved? Were subrecipients involved?

National Quality Center Quality Improvement Projects (cont.) Measurement Was the appropriate goal set? Was the correct performance measure used? Were the results tracked for discrete PDSA cycles? Were improvements shown over time? Were the interventions effective?

National Quality Center Quality Improvement Projects (cont.) Documentation Were the change ideas tracked and documented? Was a summary of key change ideas compiled? Sustainability Were the change ideas spread beyond the implementation site? Were the processes institutionalized so the efforts can be sustained over time? Information Dissemination Were the results, successes and lessons learned shared with internal and external stakeholders?

National Quality Center Who?

National Quality Center Key Informants Clinical Quality Management Program Internal and External Stakeholders Quality Improvement Projects Team Members

National Quality Center When?

National Quality Center How?

National Quality Center Available at NQC website: esources/organizational-assessment/

National Quality Center

Available at: Baldrige Excellence Framework

National Quality Center Baldrige Framework: Processes Approach: How systematic are your key processes? Deployment: How consistently are your key processes used throughout your organization? Learning: Have you evaluated and improved your key processes? Have improvements been shared within your organization? Integration: How do your processes address your current and future organizational needs?

National Quality Center Baldrige Framework: Results Levels: What is your current performance? Trends: Are the results improving, staying the same, or getting worse? Comparisons: How does your performance compare with that of other organizations or with benchmarks? Integration: Are you tracking results that are important to your organization? Are you using the results in organizational decision making?

National Quality Center

Lori DeLorenzo, RN, MSN NQC Coach Kevin Garrett, MSW Senior Manager, NQC

National Quality Center To access the recording… Go to: 6ced4c51e54b0b97784a4686d9dacf