SUPA Proposition Maxim Klyus, NetCracker John Strassner, Huawei Technologies July, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2 Introduction A central issue in supporting interoperability is achieving type compatibility. Type compatibility allows (a) entities developed by various.
Advertisements

Mapping Service Templates to Concrete Network Semantics Some Ideas.
Multi-Mode Survey Management An Approach to Addressing its Challenges
Software-Defined Networking, OpenFlow, and how SPARC applies it to the telecommunications domain Pontus Sköldström - Wolfgang John – Elisa Bellagamba November.
Connect. Communicate. Collaborate Click to edit Master title style MODULE 1: perfSONAR TECHNICAL OVERVIEW.
Policy-based Service Management
OASIS Reference Model for Service Oriented Architecture 1.0
Gap Analysis of Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions (SUPA) Presenter: Jun Bi draft-bi-supa-gap-analysis-02 IETF 92 SUPA BoF Dallas, TX March 23, 2015.
Policy Based Routing using ACL & Route Map By Group 7 Nischal ( ) Pranali ( )
1 Presentation_ID © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc. Programmable Networks OPENSIG-99 Industry Panel John Hopprich.
Establishing the overall structure of a software system
NFVRG Dallas Verification of NFV Services : Problem Statement and Challenges draft-shin-nfvrg-service-verification-01 M-K. Shin, ETRI.
Jaehoon (Paul) Jeong, Hyoungshick Kim, and Jung-Soo Park
A Survey on Interfaces to Network Security
Private Cloud: Application Transformation Business Priorities Presentation.
Dependency Injection and Model-View-Controller. Overview Inversion of Control Model-View-Controller.
A Policy-based Approach to Wireless LAN Security Management George Lapiotis, Byungsuk Kim, Subir Das, Farooq Anjum Speaker: George Lapiotis
DPI in an SDN world Charles Glass.
S T A N F O R D U N I V E R S I T Y I N F O R M A T I O N T E C H N O L O G Y S E R V I C E S C o m m u n i c a t i o n S e r v i c e s July 12,
Framework: ISA-95 WG We are here User cases Studies
VeriFlow: Verifying Network-Wide Invariants in Real Time
Status of Work Feb 2, What and how fits? (option 1) Network Manager Network Elements (routers, switches, etc) RESTCONF / NETCONF Service Management.
Windows 7 Firewall.
DR Software: Essential Foundational Elements and Platform Components UCLA Smart Grid Energy Research Center (SMERC) Industry Partners Program (IPP) Meeting.
Lucy Yong Young Lee IETF CCAMP WG GMPLS Extension for Reservation and Time based Bandwidth Service.
SDN AND OPENFLOW SPECIFICATION SPEAKER: HSUAN-LING WENG DATE: 2014/11/18.
Aaron Gember, Theophilus Benson, Aditya Akella University of Wisconsin-Madison.
SDN Management Layer DESIGN REQUIREMENTS AND FUTURE DIRECTION NO OF SLIDES : 26 1.
The concepts of Generic AAA are described in RFC2903 [1] (Generice AAA Architecture) and RFC2904 [2] (Authorization Framework). Several.
12 Chapter 12: Advanced Topics in Object-Oriented Design Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, 3 rd Edition.
Java EE Patterns Dan Bugariu.  What is Java EE ?  What is a Pattern ?
TEMPLATE DESIGN © SUPA – Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions Policy-driven Service Management Date: Wednesday, July.
1 Web Services Policy Management Greg Pavlik Web Services Architect Oracle Corporation May 11, 2005.
© FPT SOFTWARE – TRAINING MATERIAL – Internal use 04e-BM/NS/HDCV/FSOFT v2/3 JSP Application Models.
Improving Network Management with Software Defined Network Group 5 : z Xuling Wu z Haipeng Jiang z Sichen Wu z Aparna Sanil.
Slide 1 Simple, Flexible Programming of Data Movement Paths using Algorithmic Policies PIs: Y. Richard Yang, Robert Bjornson, Andrew Sherman Architect:
WS-B327 Dynamic, policy-driven network (re)configuration Consistent, profile- based deployment of SDN traffic policies through distributed.
ISA 95 Working Group Process Centric Exchanges Gavan W Hood July 23, 2015 GWH 2.1.
Moving towards an IRS WG Charter Ross Callon IETF 85, Atlanta.
Network Virtualization Sandip Chakraborty. In routing table we keep both the next hop IP (gateway) as well as the default interface. Why do we require.
Slide 1 2/22/2016 Policy-Based Management With SNMP SNMPCONF Working Group - Interim Meeting May 2000 Jon Saperia.
Company LOGO Network Management Architecture By Dr. Shadi Masadeh 1.
Text TCS Internal September 29, 2014 Introduction to TMN Layer.
1 Revision to DOE proposal Resource Optimization in Hybrid Core Networks with 100G Links Original submission: April 30, 2009 Date: May 4, 2009 PI: Malathi.
TMN Architecture and EMS/NMS Overview
OPEN-O for MODM Unified NFV/SDN Open Source Orchestrator
Enterprise Architectures Course Code : CPIS-352 King Abdul Aziz University, Jeddah Saudi Arabia.
Luigi Cicchese Partner Reply Building a Smarter City.
Cisco Exam Questions IMPLEMENTING CISCO IOS NETWORK SECURITY (IINS V2.0) VERSION: Presents: 1.
Craig Farrell CTO Telecom IBM. Why to operators want SDN and NFV? Definitions SDN: Separate control/management & data plane of switches Centralization.
Issues in Cloud Computing. Agenda Issues in Inter-cloud, environments  QoS, Monitoirng Load balancing  Dynamic configuration  Resource optimization.
Software Defined Networking BY RAVI NAMBOORI. Overview  Origins of SDN.  What is SDN ?  Original Definition of SDN.  What = Why We need SDN ?  Conclusion.
Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions (SUPA) Policy Data Model Overview 1 Michiaki Hayashi KDDI R&D Labs. Inc Nov. 3 rd, 2015.
J2EE Platform Overview (Application Architecture)
Multi-layer software defined networking in GÉANT
draft-bernini-nfvrg-vnf-orchestration
15-744: Computer Networking
OPEN-O Modeling Directions (DRAFT 0)
The SUPA Information Model
Enterprise vCPE use case requirement
Using the MEF Core Model in ONAP John Strassner, Ph. D. Andy Mayer, Ph
Intent Based Orchestration for Applications
Interface to Routing System (I2RS)
ONAP Amsterdam Architecture
ONOS Drake Release September 2015.
2. Updates from the Last Meeting
Management and Orchestration in Complex and Dynamic Environment
Enabling Innovation Inside the Network
Draft-ietf-supa-generic-policy-info-model-01
SUPA Policy-based Management Framework (SUPA: Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions) draft-ietf-supa-policy-based-management-framework-01 Will Liu, John.
Presentation transcript:

SUPA Proposition Maxim Klyus, NetCracker John Strassner, Huawei Technologies July, 2015

Management and Orchestration SDN, NFV, LegacyCLI, TL1, scriptsData Models Syntax Services Multiple Vendors Multiple Technologies Multiple Paradigms Programmatic Control Challenges -Complicated network infrastructure operation and management -Hard to deploy new and manage existing network services -Difficult to adapt new technologies to existing network operation and management ecosystem Problem Statement Semantics Network

Management and Orchestration Problem Statement Policy SUPA GPIM – Generic Policy Information Model Unified technology independent operation and management framework based on declarative (intent) and/or ECA policies will help to solve the challenges and improve existing SP network SDN, NFV, LegacyCLI, TL1, scriptsData Models Syntax Services Multiple Vendors Multiple Technologies Multiple Paradigms Programmatic Control Semantics Network

SUPA Framework SUPA GPIM Defines Policy (ECA or Declarative) for the set of Network Objects OSS Network Objects Database represents SP Network NE Filtering NE and Defining Rules Selecting the set of NEs based on specific policy Defining rules how to handle configuration for selected set of NEs Feeding selection result and rules to internally implemented translation system Applying Configuration to NEs Set of NEs OSS Orchestration or Translation System under the OSS (Selecting appropriate IETF YANG DM and building configuration snippets based on selected NEs and Rules NE Set of Rules for NEs + Feeding results to Translation System in terms of specific IETF YANG DM SUPA Policy Each SP can use own internal implementation how to translate SUPA Policies to configuration snippets NE SUPA Framework defines how to build requests for selecting NEs and applying rules to this NEs based on specific conditions or without in terms of a specific IETF YANG Data Models POLICY REPRESENTATION INSERT NO_DATABASE L4_ACL = “permit snmp /16 any” /*rule we need to apply*/ where NO_TYPE = router /* set of NO*/

Generic Policy Informational Model (GPIM) SUPA GPIM DeclarativeImperative Rule-based Event, Condition, and Action clauses Technology-agnostic Reactive network management Intent-based Logic clauses Technology-agnostic Goal-based network management

GPIM Application Examples SUPA GPIM Declarative Imperative Deny SNMP if request is not sourced from management network Select all aggregation switches from OSS database. Send SNMP Deny Rules to internally implemented Translation System / OSS Orchestration for these switches, which generates configuration snippets by using appropriate IETF YANG Data Models Balance inbound traffic on edge-links in case of edge-interface load more than 70% Select all edge routers from OSS database where interface utilization with incoming traffic is more than 70%. Send Load Balancing Rules for these routers to internally implemented Translation System / OSS Orchestration, which generates configuration snippets by using appropriate IETF YANG Data Models

Value and Benefits of SUPA Vendor and Technology Independent Policy Framework Unified Centralized Network Logic and Capacity Control Real-time and event-based Network Management Intent-based Network Management Network Policy independence reduces complexity and vendor lockin. Helps unify network management. Simplifies deployment of new Network Function and Services. Increased abstraction enables simpler management for operators The network functions and capacities can changes flexibly based on SP requirements and needs The network can automatically changes based on context monitored by policy at the current moment of time The network can be managed based on intent – simplified and effective network management, similar effect can be achieved by using policy in terms of the different technologies New Independent Network Management Layer Policy can help to build intermediate layer between SP and Subscribers, between different SPs or between different administrative domains within one SP in terms of unified and shared management purpose. Policy-holders can provide an instruments to Policy-users for their network resource management.

Deliverables and goals  Generic Policy Informational Model -SUPA GPIM defines a generic structure for imperative and declarative policies. This is converted to generic YANG data models. The IETF produces the models, and IANA is used to register the model and changes.  Generic Policy Framework -Define how to construct Generic Policies for Network Infrastructure (Functions, Services and Intermediate layer) -Define a set of YANG data models that express the concepts defined in the generic policy information model in concrete data models. These models will be designed to be generic and extensible. The SUPA is a way to make the alignment for the Network Infrastructure Management based on Unified Policy approach