Stopped K beam at J-PARC Designed by J.Doornbos 1)Optics design of a K0.8 branch 2)Performance 3)Pion contamination 4)Comments on K1.1 Nov. 4, 2005 Korea.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ozgur Ates Hampton University HUGS 2009-JLAB TREK Experiment “Tracking and Baseline Design”
Advertisements

1 Pion beam tracker for HADES Jerzy Pietraszko CBM Collaboration Meeting, March 9-13, 2009, GSI, Darmstadt.
MERIT beam optics I.Efthymiopoulos – CERN, AB Dept. MERIT, VRVS Meeting July 16, 2008.
Pion yield studies for proton drive beams of 2-8 GeV kinetic energy for stopped muon and low-energy muon decay experiments Sergei Striganov Fermilab Workshop.
Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura On behalf of PRISM Target Group Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization.
Pion capture and transport system for PRISM M. Yoshida Osaka Univ. 2005/8/28 NuFACT06 at UCI.
MERIT beam spot from optics (update of July 16,2008 talk) I.Efthymiopoulos – CERN, AB Dept. MERIT, VRVS Meeting September 25, 2008.
KEK Beam Test Koji YOSHIMURA KEK MICE Collaboration Meeting Koji YOSHIMURA KEK MICE Collaboration Meeting
Particle flux simulations Sergei Striganov Fermilab June 11, 2008.
May 22, 2008 TJRMICE Beamline Collimation and Correction 1 Tom Roberts Carol Johnstone Muons, Inc.
Neutrino Study Group Dec 21, 2001 Brookhaven Neutrino Super-BeamStephen Kahn Page 1 Horn and Solenoid Capture Systems for a BNL Neutrino Superbeam Steve.
1.Beam Tuning Simulation 2.IP Beam Position Stability 2-1 ) Magnet Vibration 2-2 ) IP position jitter subtraction for 2 nd bunch with FONT feedback 2-3.
MC_ Muon Beam Lines 8/3/06 Want a  beam of ~300MeV/c –This requires a  beam of ~300 MeV/c Possible Sources: SY Proton Beam line components removed.
JHF2K neutrino beam line A. K. Ichikawa KEK 2002/7/2 Overview Primary Proton beamline Target Decay Volume Strategy to change peak energy.
March A. Chancé, J. Payet DAPNIA/SACM / Beta-beam ECFA/BENE Workshop The Decay Ring -First Design- A. Chancé, J.Payet CEA/DSM/DAPNIA/SACM.
J-PARC: Where is it? J-PARC (Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex) Tokai, Japan 50 GeV Synchrotron (15  A) 400 MeV Linac (350m) 3 GeV Synchrotron.
A Reconstruction Algorithm for a RICH detector for CLAS12 Ahmed El Alaoui RICH Workchop, Jefferson Lab, newport News, VA November th 2011.
FFAG-ERIT R&D 06/11/06 Kota Okabe (Kyoto Univ.) for FFAG-DDS group.
ハイパー核ガンマ線分光用 磁気スペクトロメータ -SksMinus- 東北大学 大学院理学研究科 白鳥昂太郎 ATAMI.
SHMS Optics and Background Studies Tanja Horn Hall C Summer Meeting 5 August 2008.
Possibility for hypernuclei including pentaquark,   Kiyoshi Tanida (Seoul National Univ.) 19 Sep 2009 High resolution search for   &
Original plan for secondary line installation. Hadron hall beamlines in Phase1 Hadron hall secondary beamlines ① ② ③ ④.
Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK)
Setup for hypernuclear gamma-ray spectroscopy at J-PARC K.Shirotori Tohoku Univ. Japan for the Hyperball-J collaboration J-PARC E13 hypernuclear  -ray.
Status of E391a Search for K L    decay G.Y.Lim IPNS, 32nd ICHEP 19 th August 2004 Beijing.
Omega meson in nucleus, experimental study K. Ozawa (Univ. of Tokyo)
SHMS Optics Studies Tanja Horn JLab JLab Hall C meeting 18 January 2008.
PSI July 2002MuEGamma Review Meeting1 Beam Line Status update 1.  E5 Test Beam Overview : Aims + RequirementsAims + Requirements Zone Layout + Measurement.
Development of TOP counter for Super B factory K. Inami (Nagoya university) 2007/10/ th International Workshop on Ring Imaging Cherenkov Counters.
G-2 accelerator and cryo needs Mary Convery Muon Campus Review 1/23/13.
Mass production (Super-K) Setup of jnubeam – 3 horn 250 kA – 30-GeV proton beam of Gaussian distribution (  x,y = cm) – On center, parallel beam.
SksMinus status Hyperball collaboration meeting 2009/3/11 K. Shirotori.
RSVP AGS Upgrade Projects MECO RSVP Preliminary Baseline Review Brookhaven National Lab April 6-8, 2005 D. Phillips.
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
Douglas Bryman University of British Columbia APS May 3, 2011.
Design options for emittance measurement systems for the CLIC RTML R Apsimon.
Search for double-kaonic nuclear cluster (K - K - pp) using p+p reaction F.Sakuma, RIKEN discussion is based on Proc. Jpn. Acad., Ser. B, 87 (2011) ,
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
Luminosity Monitor Design MICE Collaboration Meeting 31 May 2009 Paul Soler.
Status of E14 G.Y.Lim IPNS, KEK. E14 Experiment Step-by-step approach to precise measurement of Br( K L    ) KEK-PS E391a J-PARC E14 (Step-1) J-PARC.
J-PARC でのシグマ陽子 散乱実験の提案 Koji Miwa Tohoku Univ.. Contents Physics Motivation of YN scattering Understanding Baryon-Baryon interaction SU(3) framework Nature.
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Interaction Region Design and Detector Integration V.S. Morozov for EIC Study Group at JLAB 2 nd Mini-Workshop on MEIC Interaction Region Design JLab,
Detector / Interaction Region Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski Joint CASA/Accelerator and Nuclear Physics MEIC/ELIC Meeting.
P.F.Ermolov SVD-2 status and experimental program VHMP 16 April 2005 SVD-2 status and experimental program 1.SVD history 2.SVD-2 setup 3.Experiment characteristics.
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
L. Nemenov, EXA05 Using  -  and  -K atoms for the experimental check of low-energy QCD L. Nemenov (CERN, Switzerland) Presented by L. Tauscher Basel.
NEAR DETECTOR SPECTRA AND FAR NEAR RATIOS Amit Bashyal August 4, 2015 University of Texas at Arlington 1.
Search for a nuclear kaon bound state K - pp at the J-PARC K1.8 beam line. Dep. of physics, Kyoto University / JAEA Y. Ichikawa for E27 Collaboration Korea-Japan.
Li-Lens length options for pion yield (OptiM tracking) V.Nagaslaev.
October, 2001 Hybrid Spectrometer for Single Crystal Studies at the Pulsed SNS: an update. n Principal features of the proposed hybrid spectrometer. n.
J-Parc Neutrino Facility Primary Proton Beam Design A. K. Ichikawa(KEK), Y.Iwamoto(KEK) and K.Tanabe(Tokyo) et.al. 7 th Nov. 2003,
The New CHOD detector for the NA62 experiment at CERN S
Zgoubi tracking study of the decay ring
SBS Magnet, Optics, and Spin Transport
of secondary light ion beams
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
NuSTORM - μ Storage Ring with Injection
RICH simulation for CLAS12
Upgrade magnets and power supplies
Kaon beam at K1.1BR KEK Jun Imazato.
Special Considerations for SIDIS
Upgrade magnets and power supplies
Details of K1.8BR Beam line
The future of the E391a experiment
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov (SLAC), M-H. Wang
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
Option 1: Reduced FF Quad Apertures
Presentation transcript:

Stopped K beam at J-PARC Designed by J.Doornbos 1)Optics design of a K0.8 branch 2)Performance 3)Pion contamination 4)Comments on K1.1 Nov. 4, 2005 Korea J-PARC seminar - A branch option of K1.1 -

LoI’s with stopped K beam LoI-04 Study of the Rare Decay K + →  +  with Stopped Kaon Beam at J-PARC LoI-05 Measurement of the K 0 L →   Branching Ratio LoI-16 Study the Kaon Decay Physics at JHF LoI-19 Search for T-violation in K + decays LoI-20 Precise Measurement of the K + →  0 e + (Ke3) Branching Ratio

Possibility of a stopped beam in Phase 1 K0 Line ( K L beam ) E391a detector K0.8 Line ( stopped K ± ) as a branch of K1.1 Use of K1.1 by lowering beam momentum

Phase-2 Hall Hall size = 60m (W) x 100 m (L) More than 2 target stations K0.8 Use of T2

Can we use K1.1?

A branch option of K1.1 designed by J.Doornbos A branch of K1.1 at B3 Common use of the upstream part up to MS1 Macroscopic time sharing with K1.1 Effective use of IFY Single-stage DCS Moderate beam intensity -> Feasibility to start the T-violation experiment with minor upgrades of the Toroidal Detector

Layout of the K0.8 branch

Design principle Effective use of wedge focus to make HFOC Suppression of slit-scattered pions at HFOC Cloud pion source definition by IFY

Replacement of B3

Beam optics First order beam 0.8 GeV/c x’= 43 mr y’= 9 mr x = 3.5 mm y = 2.0 mm  p/p = 0 Length = m

Momentum dispersion R 16 (FF) = 0 R 26 (FF) ≠0

Beamline elements

IFY profile ZGOUBI calculation Source size  x = 2 mm  y = 2 mm

MS1 profile DCS = 550 kV/10cm Pion kick = 2.2 mr ZGOUBI calculation

HFOC profile ZGOUBI calculation

Final focus ZGOUBI calculation R 16 = 0 cf. R 16 K5 → source of systematic errors R 26 ≠0 less problematic longer target

 p/p momentum acceptance

Angle acceptance

Pion contamination 1.Higher order aberration 2.Slit scattering 3.Cloud pions from Ks (c  =2.7 cm) simulation by ZGOUBI Aberration: y = R 33 y 0 + R 34  + A 1  + A 2  2 + B 1  + B 2  2 + ・・ A 1, B 1 = 0 by adjusting the sextupoles S1 and S2 A 2, B 2 were minimized by optimizing the octupole O1

Rejection of slit-scattered pions Slit scattering simulation with REVMOC IFY and MS1 with 30 cm thickness tapered (20 mr at both ends) x-profile at HFOC

Rejection of cloud pions Accepted y region at the production target IFY = 5 mm MS1 = 4 mm HFOC = 1.6 cm HFOC is effective ! Pion source of x = -2 ~ +2 cm y = -1 ~ +3 cm was assumed. ( c.f. c  = 2.7 cm)

Kaon yield and  / K ratio

Cloud pion contamination

Summary of the K0.8 beam Acc = 6 msr %  p/p c.f. Acc (K1.1) ~ 4 msr %  p/p Acc (LESB3) ~ 50 msr %  p/p I K + ~ ( 1~ a few) × 10 6 /s  + /K + < 0.5 assuming   /  K = 500 Beam spot : d x ~ d y ~ 1 cm

Further studies Realistic source distribution in T1 1. rotating target angle 2. cloud pion source Effects of proton beam halo  /K ratio optimization

Comments on the K1.1 optics Sector type B4 with HFOC effective suppression of  +

  /K separation at MS1

MS2 profile

Final focus of the new design

Rejection of cloud pion by HFOC

Conclusion The C-type branch of K1.1 for stopped beam is feasible The intermediate vertical focus IFY plays an important role. The installation of an IFY slit is very necessary. A switching mechanism has to be considered for B3+Q7. We will propose this option of the low momentum separate K-line together with the experiment proposal There is no concrete plan yet for funding.