Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2012 1 Other Key Uniform Administrative Grant Requirements.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

Threshold System Presented by Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability Fall Title I Directors Conference October 23-25,
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
Office of Management & Budget
OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Audit Requirements for Nonprofits.
PLENARY SESSION Financial Management and Accountability Accountability and Grants Management: Connecting the Dots U.S. Department of Labor, ETA, Region.
OMB Circulars and Beyond Nancy Duncan, Award Analysis Supervisor Sponsored Projects Administration.
OMB Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Part 200.  The final guidance was issued on December 26, 2013 and supersedes and streamlines requirements from OMB Circulars.
OMB Circulars: Guidebooks to Grants Management National Extensions and Research Administrative Officers’ Conference May 19, 2010.
4/28/20151 Presented by: Anne Taylor, NECTAC David Steele, OSEP OSEP Part C Fiscal Management Verification: What Is It And How Do I Prepare For It?
OMB CIRCULAR A-110 Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements With Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other Non- Profit.
THE SUPER CIRCULAR – “OMNI CIRCULAR” THE ONE-STOP SHOP FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE OMB Revised Administrative, Cost, Audit Rules Governing All Federal Grants.
Grants Administration Updates - OMB’s Uniform Guidance Division of Grants Administration Office for Grants and Federal Fiscal Compliance Texas Education.
REGULATORY REVIEW National Association of State Community Services Programs and the U.S. Department of Energy – Weatherization Assistance Programs 1.
Subrecipient Monitoring Webcast Presenters Pat O'Rourke, Irene St. Croix, Bridget Ware Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services.
Subrecipient Monitoring OFFICE OF RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION 2010.
Reporting Requirements and Procedures. Trafficking in Persons Reporting Requirements FAR Combating Trafficking in Persons* –Contractors shall.
Subcontracts 101 By Mitali Ravindrakumar USC Collaboration between Parties Perform Subcontractor Analysis Sponsor - Fund Project/Subcontr act Negotiate.
Award Notification and Acceptance (ANA)  The ANA module deployed through the Grants Management System (GMS) will electronically issue an award instead.
1 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Guidance -- History & New Structure Steve Bradley, Director.
Marcy Mealy Procurement Specialist CDBG Program
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR STATE COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAMS AND THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY REGULATORY REVIEW TRAINING – Susan White, ACKCO, Inc. – 1.
1 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY. 2 AGENDA u Overview Financial Management Systems u Financial Management Standards u Payment u Cost Sharing and Matching u Program.
Grants Management Close Out Requirements School Improvement Grant 2014 Office of General Counsel and the Office of School Transformation 1.
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
Grants.maryland.gov The Governor’s Grants Office Presents Successful Post Award Grants Management For the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Lifecycle.
Negotiating Federal Awards April 17, Negotiating Federal Awards Vincent (Bo) A. Bogdanski Assistant Director, Office of Sponsored Projects, University.
1 CDBG Procurement Requirements For Local Officials.
Financial Management For Project Administrators. How Feds View Themselves.
Financial Assistance Workshop Contract versus Grant.
1 Susan Weigert, Project Officer GSEGs Overview of GSEG Management.
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.
Financial Management Stacey Jones, Resolution Specialist OGCM- Division of Policy, Review and Resolution Young Offender Grants New Grantee Orientation.
Monitor and Closeout Awards Lamar Revis NMFS Team Leader Paulette S. Moss OAR, NWS, NESDIS Team Leader.
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
Procurement Policies under the Uniform Guidance U.S. Department of Education.
1. The Perkins Act – bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_cong_bills&docid=f:s250enr.tx t.pdf Your OMB Circulars
The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards The OMB SuperCircular Information for FTA Grantees.
Page 1 Discretionary Grants Administration David J. Downey Office of the Deputy Secretary Risk Management Service.
USDOL REGION 3 FISCAL FORUM Introduction to Grants ManagementApril 26 – 29, 2005.
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY IN TITLE III AND OTHER SPONSORED PROGRAMS AND GRANTS ADMINISTRATION Presented by Sharon S. Crews, M.Ac., CPA Vice President for Administrative.
10 CODE OF FEDERAL REGISTRATIONS 600 MAJOR SUBPARTS t Subpart A - General t Subpart B - Grants to Other Than State and Local Governments t Subpart C -
Risk and Subaward Management under the Uniform Guidance U.S. Department of Education.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
New NSF Awardee Checklist Requirements: WHY? November 19, 2014 joyce y. JOHNSON POST-AWARDS COORDINATOR OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
Preston Alderman MSDE, Director of Audit.  As recipients of federal and state funds we are charged with ensuring that the funds are adequately accounted.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 The Basics of Grants Administration.
National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services NIEHS SRP Annual Meeting November 18 – 20, 2015 George Tucker Chief, Grants.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
Uniform Administrative Requirements 2014 YouthBuild Webinar Series.
Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services United States Department of Education Program Review and Best Practices: Who, What, When, Where,
JEOPARDY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT EDITION Documentation Procurement Mystery Cost Principles Administrative Requirements Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500.
Uniform Grant Guidance Roundtable Discussion: October 5, 2015 Procurement 1.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Accounting for Grant Funds, including Documentation for Expenditures.
A risk assessment is the process of identifying potential hazards an organization may face and analyzing methods of response if exposure occurs.
Introduction to Procurement for Public Housing Authorities Getting Started: Basic Administrative Requirements Unit 1.
A Cooperator’s Guide to Forest Service Assistance Through Grants and Cooperative Agreements.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency The Approved Application, NOGA, Budget, and Provisions & Assurances Sorting It All Out.
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
Subaward - 2 CFR A formal legal agreement between your institution and another legal entity An award provided by a pass-through entity (PTE) to.
Other Key Uniform Administrative Grant Requirements
2015 Leadership Conference “All In: Achieving Results Together”
Managing Outgoing Subawards April 18, 2017
The Importance of Subrecipient Monitoring
Grants Management 101 Part A
Managing Federal grants
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © Texas Education Agency Other Key Uniform Administrative Grant Requirements

Copyright © Texas Education Agency Uniform Administrative Grant Requirements Federal Grants: OMB Circular A-110 (34 CFR Part 74) (also codified in 2 CFR Part 215) Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs) and NonProfit Organizations State and Federal Grants: Texas – Uniform Grants Management Standards (UGMS) (Authority – Tx Gov’t. Code, Chapter 783, Uniform Grant and Contract Management Standards Act of 1981) – instructed Governor to develop and implement a set of uniform grant administrative requirements for state-funded grants

Copyright © Texas Education Agency Sources of Grant Requirements U. S. Constitution – Ex: Due Process; nondiscrimination Statutes and Executive Orders – Ex: Civil Rights, Privacy Act, Lobbying, DrugFree Workplace, Americans with Disabilities Act; mandatory but may have some flexibility in how to comply Authorizing program statute OMB Circulars – government wide Considered by federal courts to be mandatory and binding on grantees as condition of accepting grant awards Agency wide regulations – Ex: EDGAR (Education Department General Administrative Regulations) All regulations have the full force and effect of law Program regulations, handbooks, guidelines, etc. – Education regulations are codified in 34 CFR. Unless contrary to other regulations, they are mandatory and binding. Non-regulatory guidance is not mandatory and binding, but if grantee implements according to guidance, they will be considered to be in compliance Grant agreement

Copyright © Texas Education Agency General Principles of Applicability When possible, individual grant requirements should be read in conjunction with all other grant administration requirements. When there is more than one consistent grant requirement, the more specific requirement should govern When grant requirements are inconsistent, courts and agencies generally apply in the following order: 1. Constitution takes precedence over statute 2. Statute takes precedence over regulations 3. Published regulations take precedence over unpublished requirements

Copyright © Texas Education Agency Organization of 34 CFR Part 74 (OMB Circular A-110) Subpart A – General Subpart B – Pre-Award Requirements Subpart C – Post-Award Requirements Subpart D – After-the-Grant Requirements

Copyright © Texas Education Agency CFR Part 74 IHEs, Hospitals, and Other Nonprofits Subpart A – General Requirements such as definitions and applicability – Grantee (Texas Education Agency) – Subgrantee (LEAs, Nonprofits, IHEs etc)

Copyright © Texas Education Agency Subpart B – Pre-Award Requirements Special award conditions for high-risk grantees Agencies may impose special award conditions if applicant: 1) Has history of unsatisfactory performance 2) Not financially stable 3) Financial management system does not meet standards 4) Noncompliant with terms and conditions of award 5) Otherwise not responsible.

Copyright © Texas Education Agency High-Risk Grantees May impose special conditions on high-risk grantees, including: 1) Payment on reimbursement basis only 2) Withhold authority to proceed to next phase until evidence of acceptable performance 3) Require additional, more detailed financial reports 4) Additional monitoring 5) Require they obtain technical assistance 6) Establish additional prior approvals (special conditions come from 34 CFR 80.12)

Copyright © Texas Education Agency High-Risk Grantees TEA must notify grantee as early as possible in writing of: nature of additional requirements reason(s) for imposing them corrective actions which must be taken prior to removing and time allotted method for requesting reconsideration of the additional requirements imposed

Copyright © Texas Education Agency Copyright Grantees may not copyright, patent, or trademark any product developed with grant funds from TEA without express written permission from TEA and usually without a royalty agreement See Schedule #6A, General Provisions and Assurances, section R, Intellectual Property Ownership

Copyright © Texas Education Agency Procurement Standards 34 CFR establishes procedures for purchasing supplies, equipment, real property, and other services with federal funds. Written standards of conduct to ensure no conflict of interest (real or perceived) in awarding contracts Solicitations (bids, RFPs, etc.) shall clearly establish all requirements Make offers to the vendor whose bid or offer is responsive to the solicitation and is most advantageous to the grantee, considering price, quality and other factors

Copyright © Texas Education Agency Procurement Procedures Establish written procurement procedures that: – avoids purchasing unnecessary items – provides for an analysis of lease vs. purchase to ensure most economical and practical – provides for clear, accurate description of the requirements

Copyright © Texas Education Agency Cost or Price Analysis Conduct cost or price analysis for every procurement – Price analysis – comparison of price quotations, market prices, and similar indices – Cost analysis – review and evaluation of each element of cost in the proposed budget to determine reasonableness, allocability, and allowability

Copyright © Texas Education Agency Contract Administration System Maintain system for contract administration to ensure: – contractor is conforming to terms and conditions of award and specifications – adequate and timely follow up of all purchases – evaluation of contractor performance and documentation of performance – contract defines a sound and complete agreement

Copyright © Texas Education Agency Contract Provisions Contractual provisions in contracts more than $25,000 that allow for: – administrative, contractual, or legal remedies in the event the contractor violates or breaches the contract terms, and the remedies – termination (for cause or for convenience) by the grantee, including the manner for termination and basis for settlement – termination for default or for circumstances beyond the control of the contractor

Copyright © Texas Education Agency Monitoring and Reporting Grantees must: – manage and monitor each project – monitor any subawards or subcontracts – report to TEA as required (both fiscal and programmatic reports) – retain all original records for 5 years from the ending date of the award – provide timely and unrestricted access to records and to personnel by TEA, USDE, OIG, etc. as long as records are retained – NOTE: Records need to be organized and easily accessible.

Copyright © Texas Education Agency Termination Awards may be terminated if the grantee materially fails to comply with the terms and conditions of the award

Copyright © Texas Education Agency Enforcement Actions Remedies for noncompliance: Temporarily withhold payments Disallow all or part of cost Wholly or partly suspend or terminate current award Withhold further awards

Copyright © Texas Education Agency Closeout Grantee shall submit required financial reports and program reports to TEA in the time and manner requested All obligations must be liquidated (paid out) in order to file the final expenditure report Grantees shall promptly refund any amounts owed to TEA; constitutes a debt to the federal government

Copyright © Texas Education Agency Closeout Closeout does not affect: – Right to disallow and recover funds at a later date – Grantee’s obligation to submit a refund – Audit requirements – Property management requirements – Records retention

Copyright © Texas Education Agency Collection of Amounts Due Excess funds paid to a grantee constitute a debt to the Federal government If not paid within reasonable time, TEA may reduce debt by: – making administrative offset against other requests for reimbursement – withhold advance payments – other action permitted by law