Superconducting Cryogen Free Splittable Quadrupole for Linear Accelerators Progress Report V. Kashikhin for the FNAL Superconducting Magnet Team (presented.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Q1 for JLAB’s 12 Gev/c Super High Momentum Spectrometer S.R. Lassiter, P.B. Brindza, M. J. Fowler, S.R. Milward, P. Penfold, R. Locke Q1 SHMS HMS Q2 Q3.
Advertisements

Zian Zhu Superconducting Solenoid Magnet BESIII Workshop Zian Zhu Beijing, Oct.13,2001.
Coupling Coil Test Facility Update Ruben Carcagno Fermilab September 20, 2012.
S. Caspi, LBNL HQS Progress Report High Field Nb 3 Sn Quadrupole Magnet Shlomo Caspi LBNL Collaboration Meeting – CM11 FNAL October 27-28, 2008.
23 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 MICE Tracker Magnets, 4 K Coolers, and Magnet Coupling during a Quench Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
CM-18 June Magnet Conductor Parameters and How They affect Conductor Selection for MICE Magnets Michael Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley.
Twin Solenoid Twin Solenoid - conceptual design for FCC-hh detector magnet - Matthias GT Mentink Alexey Dudarev Helder Pais Da Silva Leonardo Erik Gerritse.
Development of Superconducting Magnets for Particle Accelerators and Detectors in High Energy Physics Takakazu Shintomi and Akira Yamamoto On behalf of.
Coil Manufacture, Assembly and Magnetic Calibration Facility for Warm and Cold Magnetic Measurements of LHC Superconducting Magnets CERN AT-MTM 1 / 21.
ILC Main Linac Superconducting Cryogen Free Splittable Quadrupole Progress Report V. Kashikhin for Superconducting Magnet Team.
Critical Current Probe Mid-Point Review Amy Eckerle Andrew Whittington Philip Witherspoon Team 16 NHMFL Applied Superconductivity Center 1.
April 24, 2008 FNAL ILC SCRF Meeting 1 Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V. Kashikhin, T. Fernando, J. DiMarco, G. Velev.
Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
Muons, Inc. AAC Feb. 4, 2009 V. Kashikhin 1 Fermilab AAC  V. Kashikhin for Superconducting Magnet Team Superconducting Helical Solenoids.
BNG Industrial experience on Superconducting Undulators C. Boffo, T. Gehrard, B. Schraut, J. Steinmann, W. Walter, Babcock Noell GmbH T. Baumbach, S. Casalbuoni,
Spectrometer Solenoid Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Roy Preece Rutherford Appleton Lab October 28, 2011 MICE Collaboration Meeting.
Coil parts & Instrumentation issues for LQ/HQ coils tested at Fermilab HQ/LHQ coil parts task force.
Short period wiggler prototype for the CLIC damping ring Alexey Bragin, Denis Gurov, Anatoly Utkin, Pavel Vobly Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk,
Magnet designs for Super-FRS and CR
LQS01 Test Preparation and Test Plan LARP Collaboration Meeting 12 LBNL - April 8-10, 2009.
HL-LHC/LARP, QXF Test Facility Workshop– R. Carcagno QXF Test Requirements Ruben Carcagno BNL Workshop December 17, 2013.
Development of the EuCARD Nb 3 Sn Dipole Magnet FRESCA2 P. Ferracin, M. Devaux, M. Durante, P. Fazilleau, P. Fessia, P. Manil, A. Milanese, J. E. Munoz.
11 T Nb3Sn Demonstrator Dipole R&D Strategy and Status
LARP CM15 Magnet Testing Working Group SLAC, November 2 nd 2010.
S. Caspi, LBNL HQ Progress and Schedule Shlomo Caspi LBNL LARP Collaboration Meeting – CM13 Port Jefferson November 4-6, 2009.
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Status and Schedule Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE RAL October 20, 2008.
Status of the HINS Linac Front End Focusing Lens Development Can we use these lenses in the SSR1 crymodule of PXIE ? 9/27/20111 I.Terechkine for PXIE Cryomodule.
SCU1 Vertical Test Results Matt Kasa 9/16/2014. Vertical Cryostat Assembly Coil Training Record the current decay and the terminal voltage across the.
Subscale quadrupole (SQ) series Paolo Ferracin LARP DoE Review FNAL June 12-14, 2006.
Test Program and Results Guram Chlachidze for FNAL-CERN Collaboration September 26-27, 2012 Outline Test program Quench Performance Quench Protection Magnetic.
56 MHz SRF Cavity Thermal Analysis and Vacuum Chamber Strength C. Pai
1 V. Kashikhin for ILC ALCPG 2007, FNAL Meeting October 23, 2007 Ring to Main Linac Magnets.
Muon Cooling Channel Superconducting Magnet Systems Muon Collider Task Force Meeting on July 31, 2006 V.S. Kashikhin.
November 19, 2008 SLAC Linear Collider Department Slide 1 ILC Superconducting Quadrupole Characterization J. C. Sheppard, Cherrill Spencer, et al. SLAC.
Helene Felice HQ Test Results Review Thursday December 16 th Overview of HQ coils and Magnet.
HQM01 Test Summary Outline -Magnet Instrumentation and Shim System -SG Data -Short Sample Limits -Quench Training at 4.6 K and 2.2 K -Ramp rate and Temperature.
Highlights of Prototype SC Magnet Tests (LCLSII- 4.5-EN-0612) and Proposed Production Magnet Test Plan (LCLSII-4.5-EN-611-R0) and XFEL Magnet Test Results.
MLI Summary Chris Adolphsen SLAC. Summary of MLI Talks Quadrupoles (V. Kashikhin) –Expect test of a SLAC/CIEMAT and FNAL cos(2phi), ~ 60 T/m, SC Quads.
ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V. Kashikhin for Superconducting Magnet Team.
ILC Main Linac Superconducting Cryogen Free Splittable Quadrupole Technical Design V. Kashikhin for Superconducting Magnet Team.
Super Fragment Separator (Super-FRS) Machine and Magnets H. Leibrock, GSI Darmstadt Review on Cryogenics, February 27th, 2012, GSI Darmstadt.
Cold Mass and Assembly Tooling Design, Procurement Status and Assembly Plan Igor Novitski Fermilab 15 T Dipole Design Review April 2016 April 28-29,
D. Arbelaez for the LBNL LCLS SCU team Mar. 3,
MICE CC Magnet Cryostat Design Overview Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CC Cryostat Design Review LBNL, February.
MLI Update Chris Adolphsen SLAC. CAVITY VESSEL T4CM QUAD T4CM BPM QUADS LEADS 80K BLOCK 4K BLOCK Quadrupole Package.
CERN –GSI/CEA MM preparation meeting, Magnetic Measurements WP.
BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Long Quadrupole Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab Many people contributed to this work, most of all the Long Quadrupole Task Leaders:
MQXFS1 Test Results G. Chlachidze, J. DiMarco, S. Izquierdo-Bermudez, E. Ravaioli, S. Stoynev, T. Strauss et al. Joint LARP CM26/Hi-Lumi Meeting SLAC May.
LQS01a Test Results LARP Collaboration Meeting 14 Fermilab - April 26-28, 2010 Guram Chlachidze.
FNAL Workshop, July 19, 2007 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V.Kashikhin 1 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole (ILC HGQ1) V. Kashikhin.
September 27, 2007 ILC Main Linac - KOF 1 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V. Kashikhin for Magnet group.
Jim Kerby Fermilab With many thanks to Vladimir Kashikhin, the FNAL, KEK, and Toshiba teams. SCRF BTR Split Quadrupole ILC ML & SCRF Baseline Technical.
Design ideas for a cos(2q) magnet
MQXC Nb-Ti 120mm 120T/m 2m models
11T Magnet Test Plan Guram Chlachidze
Model magnet test results at FNAL
HO correctors update Massimo Sorbi and Marco Statera
TQS Structure Design and Modeling
Status of the CLIC DR wiggler design and production at BINP
MQXF Goals & Plans G. Ambrosio MQXF Conductor Review
SC Quadrupole Magnets in ILC Cryomodules
Challenges of vacuum chambers with adjustable gap for SC undulators
Superconducting Helical Solenoids
MBHSP02 test STATUS and first results
the MDP High Field Dipole Demonstrator
MQYY: superconducting Quadrupole magnet for Hl-lhc
Guram Chlachidze Stoyan Stoynev
ILC Main Linac Superconducting Splittable Quadrupole
FNAL Superconducting Quadrupole Test
MQXFS1e – PH-to-Coil hipot tests
Presentation transcript:

Superconducting Cryogen Free Splittable Quadrupole for Linear Accelerators Progress Report V. Kashikhin for the FNAL Superconducting Magnet Team (presented by J. Kerby)

2 Outline Quadrupole design Quadrupole fabrication First test results Future test program

3 Responsibilities N. Solyak, J. Kerby, A. Yamamoto - Specification N. Andreev, V. Kashikhin – Quadrupole design, fabrication D. Smith – Quadrupole yoke assembly T. Wokas – Coil fabrication, quadrupole assembly C. Hess – Quadrupole mounting to the top head, splices F. Lewis – electrical wiring, tests, and electronics D. Orrys – test coordination, DAQ, quench detection and protection M. Tartaglia – test leader, magnet training and Hall measurements G. Velev – rotational coil measurements

4 Quadrupole Specification & Superconductor NbTi wire diameter, mm0.5 Number of filaments7242 Filament diameter, um3.7 Copper : Superconductor1.5 Insulated wire diameter, mm0.54 InsulationFormva r Twist pitch, mm25 RRR of copper matrix100 Critical current 4.2K, at 5T 204 A Integrated gradient, T36 Aperture, mm78 Effective length, mm666 Peak gradient, T/m54 Peak current, A100 Field non-linearity at 5 mm radius, %0.05 Quadrupole strength adjustment for BBA, % -20 Magnetic center stability at BBA, um5 Liquid Helium temperature, K2 Quantity required560

5 Quadrupole in Cryomodule (1)

6 Quadrupole in Cryomodule (2)

7 Quadrupole in Cryomodule (3)

8 Quadrupole Cold Mass Assembly

9 Two Halves of the Quadrupole

10 Half of Iron Yoke Assembly Laminated MI steel yoke Lamination Fixing weld Calibrated steel rod AISI 1010 steel end plate The yoke laminations are laser cut from MI low carbon 1.5 mm thick steel. The half core is assembled in the FNAL IB2 horizontal press. Calibrated rods and base surfaces provide package straightness. Final mechanical rigidity provided by fixing welds. Base surfaces for assembly

11 Half Yoke with Al End Plate Half yoke Steel end plate Al end plate Coils Al end plate mechanically and thermally connected to the coil and outer shell Al collars providing better thermal conductivity between coils and cooling tube.

12 Coil Winding (January 21, 2011]

13 Quadrupole Coil Vacuum Impregnation

14 Quadrupole Coils & Tooling

15 Fabricated Quadrupole Coils Four coils were initially fabricated. Coil N3 lead was damaged during test setup preparations. One more coil was fabricated to replace the damaged coil.

16 Quadrupole Yoke Parts

17 Laminated Yoke Assembly 1.Half yoke assembly in the press. 2.Half yoke final assembly 3.Yoke control assembly Yoke material – MI low carbon steel, 1.5 mm thick.

18 Quadrupole with Top Head Assembly Current leads Top head Quadrupole yoke Yoke halves clamping rings

19 MTF Stand 3 for Quadrupole Test Stand 3 used for the initial quadrupole test and training in a bath cooling mode. It has 500 A current leads and the room temperature warm finger. The field measurements were made with 3D Hall probe and rotational coil measurement system.

20 Quadrupole Electrical Scheme All coils connected in series. 4 RTD’s to monitor the temperature. 5 voltage taps to detect the quench. 4 coil heaters connected in series and fired when the quench event is detected. Quadrupole is protected with 9 Ohm dump resistor. The peak voltage is < 1kV.

21 Quench History Quench history for two thermal cyclesQuench history for each coil Peak operating current 100 A. Magnet trained up to 110 A – limit for the Stand 3 peak safe pressure during uncontrollable quench.

22 Critical Current & Load Line Peak operating current 100 A. Magnet trained up to 110 A ( green line). Critical current (short sample limit) for this magnet is 185 A at the coil field 5.4 T.

23 Quadrupole Gradient vs. Current At 90 A current the quadrupole reached the specified peak gradient 54 T/m.

24 Quadrupole Current during Tests

25 Magnetic Center Measurements (8A-20A) Quadrupole magnetic center shift at -20% current change dx<3um, dy<0.1 um.

26 Magnetic Center Measurements (40A-60A) Quadrupole magnetic center shift at -20% current change dx<6um, dy<0.1 um.

27 Magnetic Center Measurements (80A-100A) Quadrupole magnetic center shift at -20% current change dx<6um, dy<0.1 um.

28 Quadrupole Training Results Quadrupole was initially trained to the 95 A during first thermal cycle (interrupted by the cryo system maintenance), and to 110 A during the second thermal cycle. There were observed large voltage spikes up to 5 V, and after several power supply trip offs, was used 5 V QD threshold. Each coil has 900 turns and all quenches had mechanical nature. For the magnet protection were used strip heaters in each coil and an external dump resistor.

29 Quadrupole Measurement Results During magnetic center position measurements was observed the time dependent effect. At -20% current change from the investigated maximum value, the magnetic center shift was less than 6 um. But when the current went up with several stops for measurements the value of magnetic center shift was 2 times larger. Nevertheless, the first obtained results are very promising and close to the specified value 5 um. The main center shift was observed for dx in the X-direction, and about zero for Y. It is suspected this is due to the effect of gap fluctuations between two halves of the magnet, in the next test this gap will be modified to ensure closure.

30 Future Tests The full set of goals for future tests includes: thermal study of conduction cooling quench performance (at 2K) protection heater performance (at 2K) integral field gradient and magnetic field quality at small (~1 cm) radius quad center stability (measure to ~1 micron) over -20% variation in current. The most critical design and fabrication issue for ILC quadrupoles is the micron level of magnetic center stability which only could be verified by very high precision magnetic measurements.