The Preparation for CSNS Accelerator Commissioning Sheng Wang June 8, 2015, Dongguan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R. Miyamoto, Beam Physics Design of MEBT, ESS AD Retreat 1 Beam Physics Design of MEBT Ryoichi Miyamoto (ESS) November 29th, 2012 ESS AD Retreat On behalf.
Advertisements

Experience with Bunch Shape Monitors at SNS A. Aleksandrov Spallation Neutron Source, Oak Ridge, USA.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,
Recirculating pass optics V.Ptitsyn, D.Trbojevic, N.Tsoupas.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
Sergey Antipov, University of Chicago Fermilab Mentor: Sergei Nagaitsev Injection to IOTA ring.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy SNS MEBT : Beam Dynamics, Diagnostics, Performance. Alexander Aleksandrov Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
ESS DTL beam commissioning
100 MeV- 1 GeV Proton Synchrotron for Indian Spallation Neutron Source Gurnam Singh Beam Dynamics Section CAT, Indore CAT-KEK-Sokendai School on Spallation.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
Experience from the Spallation Neutron Source Commissioning Dong-o Jeon Accelerator Physics Group Oak Ridge National Laboratory May 9, 2007.
J-PARC Accelerators Masahito Tomizawa KEK Acc. Lab. Outline, Status, Schedule of J-PARC accelerator MR Beam Power Upgrade.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
January 5, 2004S. A. Pande - CAT-KEK School on SNS MeV Injector Linac for Indian Spallation Neutron Source S. A. PANDE.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Storage Ring Commissioning Samuel Krinsky-Accelerator Physics Group Leader NSLS-II ASAC Meeting October 14-15, 2010.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Using Online Single Particle Model for SNS Accelerator Tuning Andrei Shishlo, Alexander Aleksandrov.
ATF2 Commissioning Toshiyuki Okugi 2008 / 7 /9 ATF2 beam commissioning meeting, KEK.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS OF NICA ACCELERATOR COMPLEX Tuzikov A., JINR, Dubna, Russia.
Bruno Muratori (for the EMMA team) STFC, Daresbury Laboratory EMMA commissioning 02/09/08.
Vertical Emittance Tuning at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Presented by Eugene Tan.
28-May-2008Non-linear Beam Dynamics WS1 On Injection Beam Loss at the SPring-8 Storage Ring Masaru TAKAO & J. Schimizu, K. Soutome, and H. Tanaka JASRI.
ICFA-HB 2004 Commissioning Experience for the SNS Linac A. Aleksandrov, S. Assadi, I. Campisi, P. Chu, S. Cousineau, V. Danilov, G. Dodson, J. Galambos,
Project X RD&D Plan Beam Transfer Line and Recycler Injection David Johnson AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
J-PARC Accelerator and Beam Simulations Sep. 7th, SAD2006 Masahito Tomizawa J-PARC Main Ring G., KEK Outline of J-PARC Accelerator Characteristics of High.
Y. R. Roblin Hall A beamline and accelerator status.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
3 MeV test stand measurement plans A. Lombardi for the LINAC4 team 10/01/2013BCC MeV test stand measurements1.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Beam Physics Issue in BEPCII Commisionning Xu Gang Accelerator physics group.
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
LINAC4 emittance measurements BI Day Divonne, 24 th November 11/24/2011 B.Cheymol, E. Bravin, D. Gerard, U. Raich, F. Roncarolo BE/BI 1.
Workshop on Accelerator R&D for Ultimate Storage Rings – Oct Nov.1 – Huairou, Beijing, China A compact low emittance lattice with superbends for.
RCS design Valeri Lebedev AAC Meeting November 16-17, 2009.
Experience with Novosibirsk FEL Getmanov Yaroslav Budker INP, Russia Dec. 2012, Berlin, Germany Unwanted Beam Workshop.
The Commissioning Plan and Preparation for CSNS Accelerators 王 生 for CSNS Accelerator Team Aug. 13, 2014, Lanzhou.
Development of Commissioning Software for CSNS Weibin Liu on behalf of CSNS AP Group Yuwen An, Mingyang Huang, Mingtao Li, Yong Li, Zhiping Li, Yudong.
XAL Applications Development in CSNS Weibin Liu for AP Group of CSNS Yuwen An, Mingyang Huang, Mingtao Li, Yong Li, Zhiping Li, Yudong Liu, Jun Peng, Jing.
M. Munoz April 2, 2014 Beam Commissioning at ESS.
PAL-XFEL Commissioning Plan ver. 1.1, August 2015 PAL-XFEL Beam Dynamics Group.
ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle for the US Department of Energy Commissioning experience of SNS Ring By M. Plum ICFA mini-workshop on beam commissioning.
ESS Front End diagnostic
Ultra-low Emittance Coupling, method and results from the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Accelerator Physicist Australian Synchrotron.
Beam Commissioning Adam Bartnik.
NICA injection complex status
Orbit Response Matrix Analysis
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
Linac4 Beam Characteristics
ILC Z-pole Calibration Runs Main Linac performance
Injection and Extraction in the J-PARC RCS
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
CSNS Accelerator Control and Beam Instrumentation JIN Dapeng, XU Taoguang … June 9, 2015
12 GeV CEBAF.
LINAC4 commissioning plans etc.
The new 7BA design of BAPS
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Considerations on Beam Diagnostics Physics
Linac/BC1 Commissioning P
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Physics Design on Injector I
PEPX-type BAPS Lattice Design and Beam Dynamics Optimization
DTL M. Comunian M. Eshraqi.
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

The Preparation for CSNS Accelerator Commissioning Sheng Wang June 8, 2015, Dongguan

Outline  A brief review to CSNS accelerator  The planned commissioning schedule  Preparation for accelerator commissioning  The Linac commissioning plan  The RCS commissioning plan  Discussion

3 A brief introduction to CSNS

Linac design Tank1Tank2 Tank3Tank4 CT FCT CT FCT CT FCT Tank number1234total Output energy (MeV) Number of cell RF driving power (MW) Total RF power (MW) (I=15mA) Accelerating field (MV/m) Synchronous phase (degree)-35 to

5 RCS design Lattice consists of 16 triplet cells Small magnet aperture Dispersion-free long uninterrupted straight Straight at arc with large dispersion  Arcs: Triplet cells as achromatic insertion  Straights: Triplet, 3.85×2+11 m long drifts at each straight  Gap of Dipole : 160mm  Max. Aper. Of Quadrupoles: 272mm

6 Tune Diagram for 4-fold Structure red : 1 st order structure resonance golden : 2 nd 1st order structure resonance blue : 3 rd order structure resonance green : 4 th order structure resonance gray : 3 rd deference structure resonance pink : coupling resonance

Beam dumps Beam energyPower limit Linac-dump1250MeV4kW Linac-dump2250MeV0.2kW Temp-dump30MeV0.16kW Inj-dump250MeV2kW RCS-dump1.6GeV7.5kW

Peak current Pulse widthRepetition Short-pulse5-15mA50-100μs1Hz Commissioning goal for acceptance 15mA420μs5Hz Design15mA420μs25Hz Single shot5-15mA150ns~420μs Beam parameters for commissioning

IS+LEBT RFQ+MEBT DTL DTL2-4+LRBT RCS RTBT – First beam on target Beam power to 10kW CSNS to acceptance goal Official acceptance Beam power to 100kW Planned commissioning Schedule

Preparation for the beam commissioning

11 Emittance growth with different lattice structure ( I=15mA ) Simulation study for DTL commissioning

12 Beam size with different lattice structure ( I=15mA )

Calculating the emittance parameter at the exit of RFQ RFQDTL Simulation by using PARMILA, I=15mA WS3 WS4 WS2 WS1

Signature matching Examples of the phase scan signature-matching technique for the DTL-1 at the CSNS Simulation study on DTL phase scan

Tracking Error and Control 15 The harmonic injection in time domain plays a key role in the control of the tracking errors among the main magnets of RCS in AC mode operation.

The Field Compensation by Harmonic Injection The field deviation from pure 25Hz sinusoidal curve, before and after harmonic injection. The effect of harmonic injection. The harmonic injection is based on the individual measurement. Dr. Shouyan Xu

Magnet sorting

The study on the injection orbit matching

Model measurement and correction For k=1, 2, 3,…., n; we can get BPM offset can be solved :, and

20 Application software development  First step: transplanting and modifying XAL to CSNS  Second step: developing the applications according to requirement of CSNS commissioning  Move from XAL to Open XAL Based on the application of virtual accelerator, many functions have been performed by transplanting XAL or developing Dr. Weibin Liu

Linac Commissioning Plan

MEBT commissioning MEBT is comprised of: 10 electrical megnets 6 Steering magnets 2 Bunchers Beam diagnostics including: 8 BPMs 2 CTs 5 FCTs 4 Wire Scanners 1 Emittance Monitor PR, EM(1)

 Longitudinal tuning Find the RF set point of buncher cavities with a phase scan method. The amplitudes of two bunchers will be optimized finally by the beam transmission rate at the exit of DTL-1.  Transverse tuning Beased on the values of measured beam parameters, calculate the emittance and Twiss parameters at the exit of RFQ, and then the quadrupole gradient is determined based on the calculated emittance parameters.

DTL commissioning Temporal Beam Diagnostic system: 1BPM,1CT,2FCT,1 QEM,1 x-y steering magnet,1EM,1WS 1 Energy degrader /Faraday cup,1 Beam dump(0.163kW) Tank1Tank2 Tank3Tank4 CT FCT CT FCT CT FCT Tank number1234total Output energy (MeV) Number of cell RF driving power (MW) Total RF power (MW) (I=15mA) Accelerating field (MV/m) Synchronous phase (degree)-35 to

DTL-1 commissioning  Measuring the transmission rate The RF of DTL-1 is turned off and the quadrupole setting is 3MeV beam transport line mode.  Longitudinal tuning Find the RF set point of DTL-1 with a phase scan method. The tuning goal of the RF set point is 1deg in phase and 1% in amplitude.  Match between RFQ and DTL Longitudinal match –- transmission rate Transverse match --- emittance at the exit of the DTL

DTL-2,3,4 commissioning  The three tanks will be tuned one by one  The tuning procedure for each tank is similar to the DTL-1.

RCS, LRBT and RTBT Commissioning

Commissioning goal of first stage  Bring the LRBT, RCS, and RTBT (up to the Extraction Dump/target) into beam operation  Characterize the primary beam parameters with low beam intensity  Establish and validate the whole commissioning procedures which will used for the high intensity normal operations  Study the dependence of beam performance on various tuning parameters  Study various error effects on the beam  Study the beam loss, and measure the beam losses to determine the threshold of beam loss for MPS

Diagnostics for RCS and Beam line commissioning Section CTFCTBPMBLMFBLMWSWCMMWPM LRBT RTBT Inj. Dump12311 R-Dump12611 SCTMCTDCCTFCTWCMBPMBLMFBLMtune RCS

LRBT commissioning  Transporting a beam through the LRBT line (including linac dump line), the RCS injection region, the injection dump line and to the injection dump;  Commissioning the diagnostic devices, BPMs, BCMs, WSs, then measure the beam energy, emittance, trajectory and optics;  The dispersion in LRBT can be measured by adjusting the linac energy via the accelerating phase of the last cavity;  In the beginning, the beam can be tracked by both BPM and BLMs;  The beam orbit can be corrected by correctors to minimize the beam loss;  The optics model can be re-calculated and calibrated based on the measured emittance, twiss parameters and the beam profiles as constraints;  Linac beam ready to inject into RCS…

RCS commissioning – injection  In day 1 commissioning, large stripping foil will be used  Firstly, multi-turn injection with fixed injection point  After the beam has been stored, the injection bump orbit need to be precisely tuned. By using one turn by turn BPM, with a single short mini-pulse injection beam (for single turn injection or 3-5 turns injection if necessary), the relative injection orbit height can be precisely measured. The precise measurement of relative injection orbit height is one of the most important issue in the injection commissioning.

RCS commissioning – painting  The phase space painting will be performed first in one plane, and then in both plane  The painting beam will be extracted immediately after painting, and the painting beam distribution can be measured by using MWPM in the RTBT beam line  The injected beam momentum spread can be estimated by using WS at the dispersion region of LRBT  Debuncher parameters will be optimized according to the estimation of momentum spread and beam loss

RCS commissioning –DC mode  The RCS will be commissioned with DC mode and short pulse  The transverse secondary collimators can be used as beam dump  By using turn by turn BPM and BLM to track the beam, perform the storage of the first beam  Chicane and COD correction  Measure and restore the nominal tunes and linear optics  Measure the BPM offset by BBA  Measurement of beta-function and fudge factor of qudrupoles  Beam loss and collimation study  Application software commissioned with beam

RCS commissioning – AC mode  Start with the minimum injection pulse  Based on the optimized DC mode with RF cavities  Do the orbit matching with AC mode  Check the tracking among 5 families Q power supply and 1 family dipole power supply based on the beam  Measure the COD and optics parameters during the different stage of a RCS cycle by Response Matrix method  Optimizing the extraction parameters under AC mode  ……

RF cavity commissioning with beam  Commissioning for both DC mode and AC mode  Commissioning with both low beam density and high beam density  The lowest frequency will be set according to the measured energy of injection beam  Interlock with LEBT chopper and extraction kickers will be checked  8 cavities will be firstly independently commissioned with beam, and then commissioned together  For AC mode, the voltage curve should be optimized based on the beam

RCS commissioning – extraction and RTBT  Extracting beam from RCS and transport the beam to the RCS dump;  The diagnostics will be commissioned in the RTBT line up to dump.  The kicker strength will be checked independently with beam, as well as the timing of kicker  In the beginning, BLMs in RCS and RTBT will be the tool to track the extraction procedure, and the extraction condition will be established by tuning the timing and amplitude of kickers  The emittance of extraction will be measured.  The optics of RTBT line up to dump will be corrected based on beam measurement

RTBT commissioning  The remain part of RTBT will be commissioned upon target condition  The orbit and optics will be corrected based on beam  The effect of octupoles will studied with low intensity beam OCT H OCT V

Discussion Possible uncertainty on commissioning schedule In DTL, the drift tube quality have caused some delay, and the time for field measurement and tuning is tight. The time planned for RF conditioning is sufficient or not. The delay due to the hardware malfunction: the experience of front end commissioning…… Unknown uncertainty

Thank you for your attention!