Presented to: Forest and Watershed Health Coordinating Group/Drought Task Force Watershed Management Subcommittee April 15, 2016 Heidi Henderson TMDL and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TMDL Development Mainstem Monongahela River Watershed May 14, 2014.
Advertisements

TMDL Development Upper Kanawha River Watershed August 18, 2011 WV DEP WV DEP Dave Montali.
Public Meeting: March 3, 2014 Truckee River Water Quality Standards Review.
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Nelly Smith EPA Region 6. - Develop or revise bacteria reduction program for consistency with new TMDL requirements and allocations - Develop or revise.
Stream Monitoring in Loudoun County David Ward, Water Resources Engineer Department of Building and Development, Department of Building and Development,
Bureau of Water Program Overview Local Government Interest.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
1 State Water Quality Assessments Under the Clean Water Act Charles Spooner Assessment and Watershed Protection Division Monitoring Branch National Water.
Trends in Stormwater Permitting Joyce Brenner, P.E. Chief of Stormwater Policy, Planning, and Permitting Division of Environmental Analysis Caltrans Headquarters.
Advisory Committee on Water Information 2005 Interim Status September 14, 2005 USGS National Center Auditorium.
Water Quality Monitoring The Role of the Clean Water Act.
Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary US Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Resources Section.
Nutrient Benchmark Development Gary Welker, Ph.D. USEPA Region 7 Environmental Services Division.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Item No. 13 Recommendation to the State Water Resources Control Board Regarding the Section 303(d) List Lahontan Water Board June 19, 2014 Carly Nilson.
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Lake Erie HABs Workshop Bill Fischbein Supervising Attorney Water Programs March 16, 2012 – Toledo March 30, Columbus.
Region 1 & 2 IR Workshop October 28,  The Water Quality Framework is a new way of thinking about how EPA’s data and information systems can be.
TMDL Development Monongahela River Watershed June 30th, 2009 WV DEP WV DEP James Laine James Laine.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
Overview of WQ Standards Rule & WQ Assessment 303(d) LIst 1 Susan Braley Water Quality Program
1 ATTAINS: A Gateway to State-Reported Water Quality Information Webcast Sponsored by EPA’s Watershed Academy June 18, 2008, 11:30am-1:30pm EST Shera Bender,
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program (SWQM)
2015 Environmental Trade Fair and Conference Jill Csekitz Technical Specialist TCEQ Monitoring & Assessment Section Devils River State Natural Area Image.
Being Accountable/Communicating Assessment Information to the Public in 2012 Update to the Management Board April 2012 Margaret Enloe, ACB CBPO and Nita.
Georgia’s Water Plan June 17, /09/08 Page 2 Agenda Plan Development Plan Overview.
Elaine Snouwaert – WA Department of Ecology Walt Edelen – Spokane Conservation District Spokane River DO Advisory Group Meeting January 19, 2012.
Working with Stakeholders in Developing Watershed and Water Quality Models: The Dos and Don’ts Well, at least some of them! Presented by: Brian J. Watson,
BACKRIVER TMDL PROJECT Technical Outreach Prepared by MDE/TARSA Prepared for the Baltimore Harbor Stakeholder Advisory Group September 10, 2002.
Support of the Framework for Monitoring Office of Management and Budget March 26, 2003.
Implementation Procedures (IPs) Brittany Lee Standards Implementation Team
TMDL Development Upper Guyandotte River Watershed May 4 th & 5 th, 2015.
San Francisco Estuary Institute Annual Meeting October 7, 2008 Water Quality Science and Management in the Delaware Estuary Thomas J. Fikslin, Ph.D.
R I O Hs - Rio Grande Silvery Minnow Index of Habitat Health Joel D. Lusk and Cyndie Abeyta U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Bosque Hydrology Group Water.
LA-UR PCBs in Rio Grande Watershed Surface Water and Sediment Sampling A Cooperative Study Ralph Ford-Schmid, NMED Ken Mullen, LANL October.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Sentinel Lakes Program: MPCA Update – WQ Sampling, Data Analysis & Reporting Steve Heiskary Prepared in conjunction with: Jesse Anderson Pam Anderson Lee.
Freshwater and Society Module 1, part C. Developed by: Updated: U?-m1c-s2 Water quality degradation
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM’s Monitoring Summary Reports Alabama – Tombigbee CWP Stakeholders Meeting Montgomery, Alabama 3 February 2010 Lisa Huff – ADEM Field.
Indicator Status Updates Overview Nita Sylvester, EPA CBPO Chair of STAR’s Indicator Workgroup.
Clean Water Act Mrs. Perryman Mrs. Trimble. Clean Water Act “Restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters”
Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards
Is the Mid-Atlantic Region Water Rich? Presentation to 5 th Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable November 7, 2008 Joseph Hoffman, Executive Director.
Nutrient Criteria Development for Lakes: Minnesota’s Approach & Timeline Steve Heiskary, Research Scientist III Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Environmental.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
Water Quality Investigations How Does Land-Use Impact Water Quality? Mitigating Water Quality – Current Issues July 9, 2015 Jim Kipp, Associate Director.
Protecting Alabama’s Water Resources “It’s A Data Driven Process” Presented by: Chris Johnson Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) 2006.
Development of Nutrient Water Quality Standards for Rivers and Streams in Ohio Ohio EPA ORSANCO, October 20, 2009 George Elmaraghy, P.E., Chief.
Commonwealth of Virginia TMDL Program Update Citizen for Water Quality Annual Summit September 22, 2001.
Nutrient Criteria Development Update Emily McArdle Nutrient Criteria Coordinator | Water Quality Standards Group
Connie Brower NC DENR Division of Water Resources.
Protecting Georgia’s Waters Jennifer Welte Program Manager Regulatory Development & Regional Water Planning Georgia EPD – Watershed Protection Branch.
IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE Rice County Local Water Management Plan BOARD PRESENTATION JUNE 16, 2015.
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader.
Arkansas Dept. of Environmental Quality Regulation No
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Cara Cowan Watts Graduate Student Biosystems Engineering
Lower Laguna Madre Water Quality
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
Surface Water Availability
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs
Vineyards and Water Quality
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Presentation transcript:

Presented to: Forest and Watershed Health Coordinating Group/Drought Task Force Watershed Management Subcommittee April 15, 2016 Heidi Henderson TMDL and Assessment Team Supervisor NMED/SWQB

Problem Identification Problem Solving FRAMEWORK FOR RESTORING POLLUTED WATERS Develop Water Quality StandardsMonitor and assess waterbodiesCWA 303(d)/305(b) Integrated List Develop TMDLs for impaired waters Issue/revise NPDES permits (point sources) Develop WBP and minimize non-point sources

2016 – 2018 INTEGRATED LIST The Integrated List is Appendix A of the State of New Mexico §303(d)/ §305(b) Integrated Report (IR) List includes designated use attainment status for all assessed surface waters in accordance with EPA’s Integrated Report Guidance (IR Categories 1-5) Category 5 waters = list of impaired waters = “§303(d) list” for EPA Region 6 review and approval purposes Impairment status based on: NMAC water quality standards (June 5, 2013) SWQB’s Assessment Protocols (June 22, 2015) 3

4

TOP CAUSES OF IMPAIRMENT (based on total miles STREAM/RIVER) 5 Watersheds of focus in the IR: Lower Pecos River (2013) Jemez River ( ) Middle Rio Grande and tributaries (2014)

TOP CAUSES OF IMPAIRMENT (STREAM/RIVER) Temperature ↑ ↑ More thermograph monitoring sites than in past Unattainable WQ standards for some streams -- tools/efforts to address WQS issues such as Hydrology Protocol, UAAs Current and predicted increase in 1) ambient air temp and 2) low flow condition (drought, diversion) will likely increase stream temperatures 6 E. coli ↔ Field IDEXX kit rotation around entire state Impacts from drought (lower flows) and development Riparian grazing Pet wastes in urbanized areas Water fowl and other natural sources

TOP CAUSES OF IMPAIRMENT (STREAM/RIVER) Nutrients ↑ ↑ Performing full nutrient assessment at more sites than in past due to more DO loggers Increase in low flow conditions Current protocol based on causal (TN/TP) and response (DO, pH, chlorophyll a) variables Nutrient impairment thresholds will be revised for next listing cycle based on EPA N-STEPS/Tetra Tech/SWQB project 7 Dissolved Oxygen ↓ DO impairment is the primary response to (i.e., observed effect of) nutrient enrichment, so if both determined impaired, listed for nutrients. Sediment ↔ Level 1 determines % sand and fines, then Level 2 uses geomorphic measurements to determine the systems ability to move sediment SWQB’s Sediment Assessment Protocol is a good tool for measuring restoration success with respect to sedimentation

TOP CAUSES OF IMPAIRMENT (STREAM/RIVER) Turbidity ↑ Current protocol uses magnitude and duration of sonde data and the severity of ill effects (SEV) index for coldwater fisheries 8 Aluminum ↑ EPA-approved change from dissolved to hardness-based total recoverable Assessment requires concurrent hardness data Naturally high aluminum in many parts of the state may require development of segment-specific WQ criteria ~65% of aluminum listings are based on the old dissolved WQ criterion (retained until total recoverable aluminum with concurrent hardness is available)

TOP CAUSES OF IMPAIRMENT (LAKES/RESERVOIRS) NUTRIENTS ↑ 8,652 to 13,778 acres (Protocol in place since 2014 IR) 9 No F ULLY S UPPORTING ^ Yes No Yes N OT S UPPORTING F ULLY S UPPORTING ^ Do one or more variables indicate enrichment*? Does TN or TP indicate enrichment? Does at least one response variable (Chl-a, cyanobacteria, DO, or pH) indicate enrichment? Do Chl-a and one or more other response variables indicate enrichment? N OT S UPPORTING F ULLY S UPPORTING ^ Yes No Yes

IR—incorporated data SWQB data Lower Pecos River (2013) Jemez River ( ) Middle Rio Grande and tributaries (2014) – Caballo Reservoir to San Ildefonso 10 US Corp of Engineers with the University of New Mexico (sonde data) US Forest Service with New Mexico State University (thermograph data) Los Alamos National Laboratory (thermograph data) San Juan Soil and Water Conservation District (E. coli, nutrients) Valles Caldera National Preserve (sonde data) Village of Ruidoso (sonde data) National Water Quality Monitoring Council Water Quality Portal - USGS NWIS and WQX combined ( Middle Rio Grande DOE Oversite Bureau and LANL data available in Intellus ( Outside sources of data

ASSESSMENT RESULTS Lower Pecos River (2013, TMDLs 2016) New listings Concerns/Issues: Proposed triennial review WQS change to – will result in two additional E. coli listings in the Pecos River 11

Jemez River ( , TMDLs 2016) List / De-list summary: 12

Middle Rio Grande (2014, TMDLs 2017) New river listings De-listing-E. coli 13

Middle Rio Grande tributaries and reservoirs (2014) Santa Fe River (TMDLs 2016) MRG near Albuquerque (TMDLs 2017 with MRG) New listings Reservoir update -Caballo Reservoir- new nutrient listing, Hg in fish tissue consumption advisory remains -Elephant Butte Reservoir- PCB and Hg in fish tissue consumption advisories remain 14

IR SCHEDULE Opened for 45-day public comment period February 3 – March 18. Currently preparing Response to Comments and final revisions to all related documents. Final documents will be posted to SWQB web site by late April. Presenting final draft Integrated Report and List to the New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission on May 10, 2016 in Santa Fe.