CORRELATION BETWEEN HIV-1 MOLECULAR CHARACTERISTICS AND RESPONSE TO HAART IN PEDIATRIC POPULATION FROM SAO PAULO, BRAZIL Cristina Mendes de Oliveira, Rosangela.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Emerging patterns of drug resistance and viral tropism in cART-naïve and failing patients infected with HIV-1 subtype C Thumbi Ndung’u, BVM, PhD Associate.
Advertisements

Monitoring the emergence of resistance mutations in patients under salvage therapy with Raltegravir in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: a six month follow-up Caroline.
Persisting long term benefit of genotypic guided treatment in HIV infected patients failing HAART and Importance of Protease Inhibitor plasma levels. Viradapt.
Global HIV Resistance: The Implications of Transmission
Nurses SOAR! Training Curricula Series For More Information and Inquiries:
Evaluation of residual HIV-1 replication among individuals receiving different antiretroviral treatment regimens Giron, LB; Tenore, S; Gabriel, R; Janini,
Failure Therapy VIRAL RESITANCE ADHERENCE!!!!!!!!!!! DRUG INTERACTION.
Phase 2 of new ARVs  Fostemsavir, prodrug of temsavir (attachment inhibitor) –AI Study  TAF (TFV prodrug) –Study –Study  Doravirine.
Prevalence of resistance mutations in a cohort of treatment-naïve people with chronic HIV infection in the U.S.: CPCRA 058 R M Novak 1, L Chen 2, R D MacArthur.
Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Pediatric HIV Infection DR. S.K CHATURVEDI DR. KANUPRIYA CHATURVEDI.
Naive CD4 T lymphocytes and recent thymic emigrants, 15 or more years after perinatal HIV infection The ANRS-EP38-IMMIP study Stéphane Blanche, Daniel.
Predicting NNRTI Resistance – do polymorphisms matter? Nicola E Mackie 1, Lucy Garvey 1, Anna Maria Geretti 2, Linda Harrison 3, Peter Tilston 4, Andrew.
1 ARV Drug Resistance HAIVN Harvard Medical School AIDS Initiative in Vietnam.
Increased phenotypic susceptibility (hypersusceptibility, HS) to NNRTIs is observed in ~30% of viral isolates with NRTI- resistance mutations 1 and has.
TO EVALUATE EARLY ANTIVIRAL RESPONSE AND SAFETY OF A DUAL BOOSTED PROTEASE INHIBITORS REGIMEN INCLUDING LOPINAVIR/r (LPV) PLUS AMPRENAVIR (AMP) OR FORTOVASE.
HIV Principles in Primary Care and Triage of the HIV patient David Aymond, MD, AAHIVM.
Connection Domain Mutations in Treatment-Experienced Patients in the OPTIMA (Options in Management with Antiretrovirals) Trial Birgitt Dau, M.D. Postdoctoral.
Arnold School of Public Health Health Services, Policy, and Management 1 Drug Treatment Disparities Among African Americans Living with HIV/AIDS Carleen.
Update on HIV Therapy Elly T Katabira, FRCP Department of Medicine Makerere University Medical School Scaling up Treatment Programs: Issues, Challenges.
Combined PI and NNRTI Resistance Analysis of the Pooled DUET Trial: Towards a Regimen-Based Resistance Interpretation J. M. Schapiro, J. Vingerhoets, S.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
12th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections February 22-25, 2005 Boston, Massachusetts, USA Poster No. 830 Hematological Benefit of Switching.
On the protease gene, no major mutation was detected. However, many minor mutations, feature of the non B strains, were present and the most important.
HIV-1 Evolution and Drug Resistance Among Patients Receiving ART in San Mateo County, California, S. Dalai MSc, S. Sethi MSc, V. Levy MD, D.
High Discordance in Plasma and Genital Tract HIV-1 Drug Resistance in Indian Women Failing First-line Therapy MOPDA0106 S. Saravanan, PhD Session Code:
Enfuvirtide for Drug-Resistant HIV Infection in North and South America Simon R. Bababeygy.
Transmitted drug resistance Pat Cane. Questions What is the level of TDR and is it changing? Are we measuring TDR accurately? Are more sensitive methods.
Long Term Therapeutic Success of Etravirine in Switch and Naive Patients L.Bull, M.Bower, M.Nelson Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London.
Clinical development programme for Second-Line treatment Anton Pozniak World AIDS Conference, July 2014.
Washington D.C., USA, July 2012www.aids2012.org Changing Patterns of NRTI and PI Resistance Mutations Between 2006 and 2011 in ART experienced SA.
Phase 2 of new ARVs  Fostemsavir, prodrug of temsavir (attachment inhibitor) –AI Study  TAF (TFV prodrug) –Study –Study  Doravirine.
Switch to RAL-containing regimen  Canadian Study  CHEER  Montreal Study  EASIER  SWITCHMRK  SPIRAL  Switch ER.
Treatment Failure HAIVN Harvard Medical School AIDS Initiative in Vietnam.
Response to Antiretroviral Treatment In an Ethiopian Hospital Samuel Hailemariam, MD, MPH; J Allen McCutchan, MD, MSc Meaza Demissie, MD, PMH, PHD; Alemayehu.
Assessment of Genetic Diversity and drug resistance mutations to current classes of inhibitors circulating in HIV -1 infected individuals in Nigeria Negedu-momoh,
Copyright © 2016, 2013, 2010 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 94 Antiviral Agents II: Drugs for HIV Infection and.
Dawit Assefa Ethiopia Health and Nutrition Research Institute Dawit Assefa Ethiopia Health and Nutrition Research Institute Evaluation of an in-house HIV.
ACTG 5142: First-line Antiretroviral Therapy With Efavirenz Plus NRTIs Has Greater Antiretroviral Activity Than Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus NRTIs Slideset.
First-Line Treatment of HIV Infection With Either NNRTI- or PI-Based Regimens Effective for Long-term Disease Control Slideset on: MacArthur RD, Novak.
HIV Drug Resistance Surveillance Satellite Session: HIV Drug Resistance Surveillance and Control: a Global Concern Silvia Bertagnolio, MD WHO,
Switch to PI/r monotherapy
Rilpivirine-TDF-FTC versus Efavirenz-TDF-FTC STaR Trial
Phylogenetic relationships of HIV-1 Pol RT strains
Figure 1 Inclusion criteria, exclusion criteria, and criteria for virologic failure. CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; ddC, zalcitabine;
Etravirine in Treatment Experienced DUET-2 (TMC125-C216)
Switch to RPV-TDF-FTC from Ritonavir-boosted PI Regimen SPIRIT STUDY
Etravirine versus Protease Inhibitor in ARV-Experienced TMC 125-C227
Introduction Results Objectives Methods Conclusion Funding
Once Daily Etravirine versus Efavirenz in Treatment-Naive SENSE Trial
Etravirine in Treatment Experienced DUET-1 (TMC125-C206)
Switch to DTG + 3TC ASPIRE Study.
Long-Term Clinical and Immunologic Outcomes Are Similar in HIV-Infected Persons Randomized to NNRTI versus PI versus NNRTI+PI-based Antiretroviral Regimens.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to FTC + ddI + EFV ALIZE 1.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Differential Detection of M184V/I Between Plasma Historical HIV Genotypes and Proviral DNA from PBMCs N Margot, R Ram, IR McNicholl, R Haubrich, C Callebaut.
ANTIRETROVIRAL RESISTANCE IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
Share your thoughts on this presentation with #IAS2019
Share your thoughts on this presentation with #IAS2019
Presentation transcript:

CORRELATION BETWEEN HIV-1 MOLECULAR CHARACTERISTICS AND RESPONSE TO HAART IN PEDIATRIC POPULATION FROM SAO PAULO, BRAZIL Cristina Mendes de Oliveira, Rosangela Rodrigues, Carla M P Vazquez, Maria do Socorro Carneiro Ferrão, Alexandre Campeas, Márcia Crozatti, Silvia Marques, Luis Fernando de Macedo Brígido. Laboratório de Retrovírus, Instituto Adolfo Lutz, São Paulo, Brasil Instituto de Infectologia Emílio Ribas, são Paulo, Brasil

Decision on when to start ARV therapy is a matter of controversy even for adults Children pose additional challenges even in virological failure due to specific issues, including: –Potential interference with normal growth and development –Toxicity; Pharmaco-dynamics –Limited ARV options; posology limitations –Adherence

What is the contribution of molecular information to the management of children living with HIV/AIDS ARV drug resistance test were the fist molecular characterization brought into clinical practice routine, subsidizing salvage ARV therapy. Additional molecular characteristics of HIV-1 that provide surrogate markers do determine when and how to treat HIV infected children can be useful in subsidizing decision on starting as well as changing ARV therapy.

Methodology Inclusion criteriaInclusion criteria Informed consent from parents or gardian and additional informal consent for older children at inclusion visit Informed consent from parents or gardian and additional informal consent for older children at inclusion visit Naïve : samples collected before initiation of ARV ( ) Treated : children or adolescent using EFV or LPV based HAART ( collected from 6 / 2005 to 11 / 2006 ) Viral load bDNA (Bayer); TCD4 ( BD), performed at certified National Network Laboratory HIV sequencing performed at Retrovirus Laboratory, Adolfo Lutz Institute

Samples collected at baseline EDTA blood collected at service and processed within 6 hs Cell lysade and plasma maintained at -70 °C Extraction plasma RNA and/or Cell DNA (Qiagem/GFX) RNA retrotranscrition (Superscript II, Invitrogen, USA) Nested PCR Sequencing (ABI 3100) with Big Dye chemistry (ABI,USA) Edition : Sequencher (Gene codes corp.,USA) Phylogeny : REGA, NCBI, SIMPLOT, PAUP Drug Resistance Mutations (DRM), Stanford HIV Database

Baseline Characteristics Naïve Treated n=16 n=79 Age (mean years ) Gender (% males) 44% 54% Mean number of ARV regimens TCD4 ( cels/mm 3 ) Plasma Viremia (log) % undetectable 0% 24%

Clinical outcome of ARV treated cases 78 cases with follow up information 79.5% Asymptomatic 7% Bacterial Pneumonia 4% TB Other complications One death (adenocarcinoma) One loss to follow up (change town) - Citopenias in 6% - Pancreatitis - CMV

Outcome categories defined based on : (i)Viral load at last observation (end first semester of 2008) (ii)Clinical observation (patients’ pediatrician) at last documented visit and TCD4 cell counts (cells / mm3) at last observation GOOD RESPONDERS TCD4 counts over 350 and clinically asymptomatic POOR RESPONDERS TCD4 counts under 350 or clinical Aids related condition

Viral Load and TCD4 outcome TCD4 mean 650 cels/mm3 TCD4 mean 691cels/mm3 61% with TCD4 over % % below % aviremic - among viremic Log % aviremic - among viremic Log At baseline At last visit

Treatment at last evaluation NNRTIs + EFV and/or LPV based HAART ARVAvir GR LPV 65%41%62% EFV 21%23%67% EFV+LPV 12%40%80%

Age (mean) % males number regimens (mean) Time on ARV (weeks) Time of follow up (weeks) % avir at baseline * Baseline Viremia among viremic Avir (<50c/ML) Vir 2-4 Log Vir> 4 Log Baseline characteristics by Virological outcome * P< 0.002

Presence of DRMs by virological strata TAM NRTI. DRM NNRTI DRM PI. DRM PI. sec/acc PI Major DRM Vir> vir Avir Vir>4 x Avir P= 0.43 p=0.14 p=0.9 P<0.001 p<0.05 p<0.01 Mean number of DRM at RT and PT DRM Drug Resistance Mutations RT reverse transcriptase gene PT –Protease gene Tam -Tymidine Analogue mutations NRTI -Nucleoside analogue ARV class NNRTI - Non analogue ARV class PI -Protease inhibitor class Sec/acc -Secondary/accessory mutations Major- Principal mutations to PI

Proportion of DRM to NRTI class in ARV resistance codons at Reverse transcriptase (RT) by treatment outcome PR poor response; GR good response

Proportion of DRM to NNRTI class in ARV resistance codons at Reverse transcriptase (RT) by treatment outcome PR poor response; GR good response

Proportion of DRM to Protease Inhibitors (PI) at ARV resistance codon at PROTEASE by treatment outcome

Proportion of DRM to Protease Inhibitors (PI) at ARV resistance codon at PROTEASE by treatment outcome PR poor response; GR good response

Proportion of DRM to Protease Inhibitors (PI) at ARV resistance codon at PROTEASE by clinical outcome

Impact of DRM on treatment outcome V82A/F/T/SL90M GR 9% PR 45% 30% Proportion of selected major DRM at PR p< P=0.067

Impact of DRM on treatment outcome Among cases currently using LPV based HAART P< p=0.2 NNRTINRTI ALL NRTI TAM IP Acc /sec IP major GR PR GR Good responders ; PR Poor responders Mean number of DRM at RT and PT BY outcome

Impact of DRM on treatment outcome among cases using EFV based HAART NNRTINRTI ALL NRTI TAM IP Acc /sec IP major GR PR Mean number of DRM at RT and PT GR Good responders ; PR Poor responders

Protease polimorphisms by pol clade

V3 loop signatures among naïve and treated cases stratified by poor responders (PR) and good responders (GR)

PR GR

Recombination patterns at gag ( ), pol ( ) and env ( ), positions related to HXB2 ( K03455). HIV-1 B HVI-1 F HIV-1 C BF mosaics

HIV-1 clades by virological outcome and clinical outcome

Predicted HIV tropism by virological and clinical outcome

V3 loop AA alignment of paired cell and plasma

Impact V3 mixtures on treatment outcome Proportion of V3 with mixtures Proportion of nu Mixtures N GR49% PR44% Mean number of Mixtures at V3 by outcome Most sequences ( 51% among GR and 54% among PR) do not show mixtures at V3 P<0.031

DIVERSIDADE - DIVERGENCIA intra- hospedeiro Arts et al. 2007

Conclusions Albeit treated for over a mean of 449 weeks (8.6 years) over one third of these children had viral load< 50 c/ml at last evaluation Protease inhibitors mutations, both major as well as accessory/ Secondary DRM, correlated to viremia and poor clinical outcome; some polymorphisms common among naïve cases and may have an impact in resistance evolution Presence of mixtures at V3 codons were associated to good clinical outcome