Workshop on Appraisal of Disassembled Magnets: Lessons learned March 17 th, 2005 Boundary Conditions-Technical Specification Jos Vlogaert.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Spectrometer Solenoid Update Steve Virostek - LBNL MICE VC 150 August 23, 2012.
Advertisements

Cryogenic Experts Meeting (19 ~ ) Helium distribution system for Super-FRS dipoles and multiplets MT/FAIR – Cryogenics and Magnets Y. Xiang,
RHIC CRYOGENICS SYSTEM Time meeting /28/20141TIME MEETING RUN 14 –CRYOGENIC.
Coupling Coil Test Facility Update Ruben Carcagno Fermilab September 20, 2012.
Design pressure issues of Super-FRS dipole CrYogenic Department in Common System (CSCY), GSI, Darmstadt Yu Xiang, Hans Mueller* * Primay Beam Magnet Technology.
1 Superconducting Magnets for the MICE Channel Michael A. Green Oxford University Physics Department Oxford OX1-3RH, UK.
ANL HWR Cryomodule Status Update 27 January 2015 Zachary Conway On behalf of the ANL Linac Development Group Argonne National Laboratory Physics Division.
Test plan for the MICE SS cryostat and magnet Tapio Niinikoski LBNL Spectrometer Solenoid Workshop May 10, 2011.
Stimulating a discussion on cavity performance metrics.
New HV test specification for the LHC N. Catalan for the EI section.
TE-MPE –TM, 16/05/2013, Mateusz Bednarek, TE/MPE-EE ELQA testing during and beyond LS1.
11 T Dipole informal coil and assembly readiness review Long coil and fabrication tooling development status and plans September 22 nd, 2013 – F. Savary.
REPLACEMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF LIFTS GIVING ACCESS TO LHC UNDERGROUND AREAS TENDERING PROCEDURE IT-4056/EN 105 December 2014 Floris Bonthond.
Fcal upgrade for sLHC: Cryogenics modifications – TE-CRG/ C.Fabre 1 ATLAS FCal Upgrade for sLHC: Modifications to the Calorimeter Cryogenic.
LHC Magnet Tests: A challenge for an OperationTeam V. Chohan G.H. Hemelsoet CernGeneva Always set the trail, never follow the path.
Spectrometer Solenoid Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Roy Preece Rutherford Appleton Lab October 28, 2011 MICE Collaboration Meeting.
Possible HTS wire implementation Amalia Ballarino Care HHH Working Meeting LHC beam-beam effects and beam-beam interaction CERN, 28 th August 2008.
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (IMS) OCT 2011 R. Nahon.
Spectrometer Solenoid Test Plan Workshop: Spectrometer Solenoid Overview Steve Virostek - LBNL February 17, 2012.
Workshop Chamonix XIV Shortcuts during installation and commissioning: risk and benefit H. Gruehagen, G. Riddone on behalf of the AT/ACR group 18 January.
Spectrometer Solenoids MICO 214 Steve Virostek LBNL February 6, 2013.
Joint HiLumi LHC-LARP Meeting – May 11-13, 2015 MQXFA Functional Requirements Ruben Carcagno May 13,
2 IMPACT - THE FIRE PERMIT = Hot Work Permit 3 Welcome ! This course is linked to the use of IMPACT, so it is assumed that: You know how to use IMPACT.
Spectrometer Solenoid Test Plan Workshop: Safety Considerations Steve Virostek - LBNL February 17, 2012.
OLAV III Experience with the LHC Insulation Vacuum System S. Blanchard, P. Cruikshank, B. Jenninger, N. Kos, W. Maan, L. Mourier, N. Provot, J. Wallner.
F. Savary Question 1 A. Magnet design criteria for the prototype and production magnet to be tested before the installation into the tunnel.
Joint HiLumi LHC-LARP Meeting – October 26-30, 2015 MQXFA Functional Requirements Ruben Carcagno October 30,
Process Definition of the Operation Modes for Super-FRS Magnet Testing CSCY - CrYogenic department in Common System, GSI, Darmstadt Y. Xiang, F. Wamers.
11 T Dipole Project Cold mass integration status & plan F. Savary / TE-MSC-LMF.
Plan for test station Marta Bajko For the Technical Review of FReSCa2 June 2015 Saclay Paris.
The integration of 420 m detectors into the LHC
Mike Struik / LHC-CRI INSTRUMENTATION FEEDTHROUGH SYSTEM FOR LHC MACHINE ARC QUADRUPOLE MAGNETS. 123rd LHC Vacuum Design Meeting 19 April 1999.
D. Delikaris, TE-CRG, LSC 25th Meeting Page 2 October 18 th, 2013 LS1 Committee (LSC)- 25 th Meeting D. Delikaris, TE-CRG Cryogenics activities.
Cryogenic Summary - K. C. Wu Testing D2L102 in MAGCOOLJune, 02 Difference between D2L102 and D2L101 Operating Summary Cooldown to 100 K and 6 K Test Condition.
TE-CRG Activities D. Delikaris, TE-CRG.
Cryogenic scheme, pipes and valves dimensions U.Wagner CERN TE-CRG.
Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.
LMC 1 (Pre Chamonix) DN200 relief valve position DN200 relief valve position On top wherever possible. Open W bellows for MLI protection. On top wherever.
Ruben Carcagno, Sandor Feher, George Velev (team leader) MQXFS1 status meeting Summary of the MQXFS1 Investigation.
PROCUREMENT RULES FOR EXPERIMENTS AT CERN Dante Gregorio CERN Procurement Service.
Thermal screen of the cryostat Presented by Evgeny Koshurnikov, GSI, Darmstadt September 8, 2015 Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (Dubna)
Development of Cryo-Module Test Stand (CMTS) for Fermi Lab (R.L.Suthar, Head,CDM, BARC) Cryo-Module Test stand (CMTS) is a very sophisticated equipment.
Superconducting Cryogen Free Splittable Quadrupole for Linear Accelerators Progress Report V. Kashikhin for the FNAL Superconducting Magnet Team (presented.
IT-4135/EN Supply of Air Handling Units for Industrial HVAC Projects at CERN Technical Specification Paul Pepinster / EN-CV.
Inner Triplet Review 1 H. Prin AT/MEL Activities on the triplets at CERN Reception and Acceptance Triplet String Assembly in Building 181 Handling and.
Scope of PCP Phase 1: Solution Design of Q4 First-of-a-kind prototype QUACO Bid Conference, CERN, 07 th July 2016 Arnaud Foussat, CERN TE MSC-LMF Helene.
Crab Cavity Technical Coordination meeting:
Existing Prototype Test Facility (PTF) and planned Series Test Facility Schroeder, Claus Cryo-Review Darmstadt
MQXC Nb-Ti 120mm 120T/m 2m models
Quality assurance for Manufacturing Dressed Cavities for SPS prototype cryomodule C. Parente (HL-LHC Technical Quality Officer) Date:
HL-LHC IT STRING and Series test of SC link
IT-4189 Supply and installation of a cryogenic distribution system
Administration of a FIDIC Contract - Project Control
Cryogenic behavior of the cryogenic system
The HL-LHC Circuits: Global View and Open Questions
HFM Test Station Main Cryostat
AEGIS Magnet System.
Consequences of warming-up a sector above 80 K
HO Corrector Magnets: decapole test and future plans
(vertical cryostat, Gersemi)
Thomas Otto, TE Department, CERN
Cryostat design Mechanical design: Thermal screens: Specifications:
MICE Coupling Coil Update
TEST PLANS for HL LHC IT STRING
based on WP29/2018/157, SLR-28-09rev1, SLR-28-12
MQXFS1e – PH-to-Coil hipot tests
Other arguments to train two sectors to 7 TeV
RECEIVE AND STORE KITCHEN SUPPLIES AND FOOD STOCK
F.Pasdeloup, H.Prin, L. Williams
J. Fleiter, S. C. Hopkins, A. Ballarino
Presentation transcript:

Workshop on Appraisal of Disassembled Magnets: Lessons learned March 17 th, 2005 Boundary Conditions-Technical Specification Jos Vlogaert

March 17th, 2005 Workshop on Appraisal of Disassembled Magnets: Lessons Learnt 2 Boundary Conditions-Technical Specification COLD MASS STATUS on MARCH 16 th DELIVERED CRYOSTATED COLD TESTED RETURNED CMA CAM CMA TOTAL % of Delivered

March 17th, 2005 Workshop on Appraisal of Disassembled Magnets: Lessons Learnt 3 Boundary Conditions-Technical Specification REMINDER of CONTRACTUAL ASPECTS of ACCEPTANCE/REJECTION of COLD MASSES COLD MASSES are REJECTED and RETURNED to the CMA because they did not pass the: “PROVISIONAL ACCEPTANCE at CERN” as specified in Chapter 9 of the “Technical Specification for the Supply of the Cold Masses of the S.C. dipole Magnets for the LHC Collider” Ref: LHC-MMS/98 Rev.2.0 and its Annexes

March 17th, 2005 Workshop on Appraisal of Disassembled Magnets: Lessons Learnt 4 Boundary Conditions-Technical Specification 1.The acceptance criteria for the Acceptance Tests at Room Temperature The Acceptance tests at room temperature performed at CERN are the same as specified for the final tests at the Contractor’s premises as described in Annex B2 of the Techn. Spec.: Inspection and Test Plan for the Dipole Cold Mass The ITP contains 6 Positions for the Completed Cold Masses: Position 20: Geometry Measurement Position 21: Warm Magnetic Measurements Position 22: Safety Test (inspection of welds)

March 17th, 2005 Workshop on Appraisal of Disassembled Magnets: Lessons Learnt 5 Boundary Conditions-Technical Specification Continued….. Position 23: Leak Test Position 24: Pressure Test Position 25 (a to p) : Final Electrical Tests The Cold Masses shall successfully pass all the tests at room temperature before the performance of the provisional reception tests at liquid helium temperatures.

March 17th, 2005 Workshop on Appraisal of Disassembled Magnets: Lessons Learnt 6 Boundary Conditions-Technical Specification 2.Acceptance Test at liquid helium temperature. These tests are performed with the cold mass in a helium bath at 1.9 K or about 4.4 K and the coils in the superconducting state. 2.1 Leak Test To verify the cold helium leak-tightness across separate volumes of the cold mass: -cold mass to insulation vacuum -cold mass to beam vacuum -heat exchanger to insulation vacuum Should these tests show that cold leaks originate in welds and parts that are the responsibility of the Contractor, he will, at his expense take appropriate corrective actions.

March 17th, 2005 Workshop on Appraisal of Disassembled Magnets: Lessons Learnt 7 Boundary Conditions-Technical Specification 2.2 Integrity and impedance of instrumentation and power circuits The list of the items to be tested, the tests to be carried out and their acceptance criteria are presented in Table of the Techn. Spec. Cold Masses that do not withstand these tests are deemed to present faults due to poor workmanship and will be returned to the Contractor at his expense for implementation of corrective actions. The Contractor must seek CERN’s Approval before undertaking any corrective action in view to re-submitting the returned cold mass to the cold acceptance tests.

March 17th, 2005 Workshop on Appraisal of Disassembled Magnets: Lessons Learnt 8 Boundary Conditions-Technical Specification 2.3 Performance of Quench Heaters. Before powering the dipole magnet to ultimate field, it must be ascertained that the protection system is in working order. Cold masses equipped with quench heaters showing anomalous performance will be returned to the Contractor at his expense for implementation of corrective actions.

March 17th, 2005 Workshop on Appraisal of Disassembled Magnets: Lessons Learnt 9 Boundary Conditions-Technical Specification 2.4 Quench Performance Tests. As in technical specification: 1)The cryo-dipole shall reach the ultimate field (provisionally 9.0 T) after no more than eight quenches. 2)Cryo-dipoles that reach the ultimate field with a number of quenches between three and eight may be submitted to a thermal cycle after which they shall reach the field of 8.6 T without any quench. 3)The provisional acceptance of cryo-dipoles which reach the ultimate field after more than eight quenches will be temporarily suspended by CERN. If their number is limited to a few units, CERN will eventually declare their provisional acceptance, provided that they have satisfied the acceptance criterion 2)

March 17th, 2005 Workshop on Appraisal of Disassembled Magnets: Lessons Learnt 10 Boundary Conditions-Technical Specification Continued …. 4) Cryo-dipoles that do not satisfy the acceptance criteria 1), 2) and 3) for reasons which can be traced back to manufacturing faults or damages due to transport, shall be replaced within six months at the Contractor's cost.

March 17th, 2005 Workshop on Appraisal of Disassembled Magnets: Lessons Learnt 11 Boundary Conditions-Technical Specification Backlog Criteria: Case A: the cold mass reaches 8.4 T within two quenches: the cold mass is accepted and tests are stopped. Case B: the cold mass reaches 9.0 T within 9 ramps (8 quenches): the cold mass is accepted and tests are stopped. Case C: if case B is not fulfilled: the cold mass shall be submitted to a thermal cycle (second run) with quench location.

March 17th, 2005 Workshop on Appraisal of Disassembled Magnets: Lessons Learnt 12 Boundary Conditions-Technical Specification Continued….. C1: if the first quench after thermal cycle is above 8.4 T: the cold mass is accepted and tests are stopped. C2: if the second quench after thermal cycle is above 8.6 T: the cold mass is accepted and the tests are stopped. C3: in remaining cases there is a probability that the cold mass be rejected: do at least five quenches. (apart when the quench location was present in the first run and localization was done for at least six out of the nine quenches. In this case only two quench locations are requested)

March 17th, 2005 Workshop on Appraisal of Disassembled Magnets: Lessons Learnt 13 Boundary Conditions-Technical Specification List of Disassembled Magnets: % % % of Delivered Electrical Training NCs Performance CMA01 :5, 19, 26, 126, CMA02 :2, 13, 23, 32, 49, CMA03 :4, 136, 143, 224, Total

March 17th, 2005 Workshop on Appraisal of Disassembled Magnets: Lessons Learnt 14 Boundary Conditions-Technical Specification From the previous slide one can see that magnets were rejected and returned to the manufacturer for two different reasons: -Electrical Non Conformities detected, after delivery of the Cold Mass to CERN, before or during Cold Test. -Unacceptable Training Behavior.

March 17th, 2005 Workshop on Appraisal of Disassembled Magnets: Lessons Learnt 15 Boundary Conditions-Technical Specification REMINDER of “PERFORMANCE BONUS CLAUSE” For CMA01: If a Cold Mass requires 2 training quenches to exceed the ultimate field of 9.0 T a performance bonus corresponding to 0.5 % of the unit price for the Cold Mass concerned shall be due If a COLD Mass requires 1 training quench to exceed the ultimate field of 9.0 T a performance bonus of 1 % of the unit price of the Cold Mass concerned shall be due If a Cold Mass exceeds the ultimate field of 9.0 T without any training quench, a performance bonus corresponding to 1.5 % of the unit price of the Cold Mass concerned shall be due.

March 17th, 2005 Workshop on Appraisal of Disassembled Magnets: Lessons Learnt 16 Boundary Conditions-Technical Specification For CMA02 and CMA03: If a Cold Mass requires less than 3 training quenches to exceed the ultimate field of 9.0 T a performance bonus of 1 % of the unit price of Cold Mass concerned shall be due.

March 17th, 2005 Workshop on Appraisal of Disassembled Magnets: Lessons Learnt 17 Boundary Conditions-Technical Specification BONUS EARNED TO DATE (PERFORMANCE BONUS CLAUSE is applied to date on fully tested COLD MASSES of the SERIES CONTRACTS) FULLY TESTED CMs Number of BONUS MAGNETS CMA CMA CMA Total

March 17th, 2005 Workshop on Appraisal of Disassembled Magnets: Lessons Learnt 18 Boundary Conditions-Technical Specification

March 17th, 2005 Workshop on Appraisal of Disassembled Magnets: Lessons Learnt 19 Boundary Conditions-Technical Specification