PRINCIPAL STATE GROWTH SCORES. 2014-15 50/50 2015-16 Principal Performance/Visit= 50 Student Performance=50.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 New York State Education Department Interpreting and Using Your New York State-Provided Growth Scores August 2012.
Advertisements

EngageNY.org State-Calculated Growth Measures Overview July 2013 Network Training Institute.
Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model Understanding and Using SGPs to Improve Student Performance 1.
Texas State Accountability 2013 and Beyond Current T.E.A. Framework as of March 22, 2013 Austin Independent School District Bill Caritj, Chief Performance.
APAC Meeting | January 22, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of Performance.
School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
Educator Evaluations Education Accountability Summit August 26-28,
School Report Cards For 2003–2004
Student Growth Percentiles For Classroom Teachers and Contributing Professionals KDE:OAA:3/28/2014:kd:rls 1.
CCRPI Trends and Achievement Gap Details. Pioneer RESA Evaluation & Assessment.
The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global workplace, ready for personal.
Student Growth Percentile (SGP) Model
Carolyn M. Wood - Assistant State Superintendent Division of Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems October 31,
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Mathematics Results August 8, 2011.
99th Percentile 1st Percentile 50th Percentile What Do Percentiles Mean? Percentiles express the percentage of students that fall below a certain score.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008.
Embargoed until 11:00 a.m. Wednesday, March 17, 2004 School Report Card Data 2002–2003.
Region 7 September 16, Region 7 State TEKS PD June 1 to August 31, 2010 Copyright 2009 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
Dr. Michael Flicek Education Consultant October 8, 2013 Wyoming School Performance Rating Model Report to: Wyoming State Board of Education.
1 New York State Education Department Using Growth Measures for Educator Evaluation August 2012.
2012 Traditional SPF Background & Measures September 17, 2012.
Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model Understanding and Using SGPs to Improve Student Performance 1.
Student Impact Rating Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Daviess County Public Schools.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
How Can Teacher Evaluation Be Connected to Student Achievement?
EngageNY.org State-Calculated Growth Measures Overview July 2013 Network Training Institute Revised 8/22/2013.
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation 2011–12 July 2012 PRESENTATION as of 7/9/12.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations.
Highlights of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Waiver Renewal Application.
Mission: The Hancock Central School District believes that every child can learn and challenges all students to reach their full potential in a caring.
1 Results for Students with Disabilities and School Year Data Report for the RSE-TASC Statewide Meeting May 2010.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
OCM BOCES SLOs Workshop. Race To The Top: Standards Data Professional Practice Culture APPR.
New York State Scores 2011—2012 School Year. Growth Ratings and Score Ranges Growth RatingDescriptionGrowth Score Range (2011–12) Highly EffectiveWell.
Western Suffolk BOCES Boot Camp Emma Klimek Eastern Suffolk BOCES 2012.
WELCOME CLASS OF 2016 Deer Park High School North Campus.
2014 A - F Letter Grades - AIMS The State of Arizona utilizes AIMS to measure student growth. In measuring student growth, the State of Arizona then identifies.
South Lewis Central School District. Student Outcomes – Percent Meeting Common Core Expectations (District-Wide) ELA - Grade % Levels 3 and 4 BOCES Rank.
Median Student Growth Percentile For Classroom Teachers and Contributing Professionals 1 ONGL-12/15/14.
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation 2011–12 July 2012 PRESENTATION as of 7/9/12.
Sonoraville Elementary Parent Meeting February 3, 2015.
Teacher Scores from the State
Educator Effectiveness Summit School District’s Recommendation for the School Year.
Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
Student Growth Percentiles For Classroom Teachers and Contributing Professionals 1 October 22, 2014.
Student Growth Percentiles (SGPs) MDE - AdvancED Michigan 2014 Fall School Improvement Conference November 18, 2014.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
1 Mississippi Statewide Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress Model Improving Mississippi Schools Conference June 11-13, 2003 Mississippi Department.
October 25, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
Student Growth Measures ODU Leadership Conference June 19, 2014.
Measuring Turnaround Success October 29 th, 2015 Jeanette P. Cornier, Ph.D.
1 Proposed Changes to School Grades for and Beyond.
Copyright © 2014 American Institutes for Research and Cleveland Metropolitan School District. All rights reserved. March 2014 Interpreting Vendor Assessment.
School Accountability and Grades Division of Teaching and Learning January 20, 2016.
Update on Accountability March “…to ensure that all children have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high-quality education.
EngageNY.org State-Calculated Growth Measures Overview July 2013 Tracy Rowlands & Deb Duffy.
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation June 2012 PRESENTATION as of 6/14/12.
EngageNY.org State-Calculated Growth Measures Overview July 2013 Deb Duffy.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Overview of the Georgia Student Growth Model 1.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007.
February 2012 State Board Ruling: School Grade Calculations
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
ESSA Update “Graduation Rate & Career and College Readiness”
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
New York State Education Department Using Growth Measures for Educator Evaluation August 2012.
Secondary Data Presentation
Presentation transcript:

PRINCIPAL STATE GROWTH SCORES

/ Principal Performance/Visit= 50 Student Performance=50

A school or principal’s State-provided growth rating (the “HEDI” rating) and growth points (0–20) are based on the mean growth percentile (MGP), the aggregate measure of student growth in the principal’s school. An MGP is calculated by finding the average of all the SGPs for students attributed to a school or principal, across grades and subjects.

Grades 4-12 Student Growth Percentile (SGP): A measure of a student’s academic growth compared to similar students

Grades 4-12 Mean Growth Percentile (MGP): The average of all SGPs linked to a school or principal Students who do not meet the continuous enrollment requirement (i.e., who were not enrolled on BEDS day and during the June Regents test administration) are not included in a school or principal’s MGP

Grades 4-12 Mean Growth Percentile (MGP): The average of all SGPs linked to a school or principal To determine the school’s MGP, we find the average of the SGPs for all students who were enrolled on BEDS and assessment day. In this case, the calculations would be as follows: Step 1: = 196 Step 2: 196 / 4 = 49 The school’s MGP is 49.4

HOW MANY MGP’S CAN I HAVE? An MGP is computed for each course associated with a state assessment which has 16 students enrolled

Adjusted MGP (School): Adjusted MGP is the mean of the SGPs for students linked to a school, based on academic history as well as ELL, SWD, and economically disadvantaged student characteristics. This MGP is used to determine a school’s State- provided growth score and growth rating.

Note that student linkage rules are different and therefore MGPs are computed differently for teachers than they are for principals. Specifically, SGPs for students who were enrolled in a teacher’s course for a longer period of time and who attended more regularly count more heavily in a teacher’s MGP than those who were enrolled and attended for less time. Students with less than 60 percent course enrollment are not included in a teacher’s MGP. For more details and an example, see the brochure YOUR SCORE AND THE TEACHER’S SCORES ARE NOT COMPARABLE

Comparative Growth in Regents Exams Passed Another growth measure for principals of Grades 9–12 is the Comparative Growth in Regents Exams Passed (GRE) metric. Because a major graduation requirement is for students to pass five Regents Exams (more for advanced Regents diplomas), this measure compares how much progress a school’s students are making from one year to the next toward passing up to eight Regents Exams (the five required Regents Exams plus up to three more). A principal’s score on this measure reflects whether his or her students exceeded the average change in number of Regents Exams passed each year by similar students statewide. On average, about 84 percent of students in a high school are included in the GRE measure.

Because Regents Exams are offered multiple times each year and students take Regents Exams at different points in their schooling, we include students and test scores using the following rules:  We count Regents Exam scores from the following administrations: August of prior year, January, and June.  If a student takes a Regents Exam more than once during the year, we use the higher test score.  Students must have a valid prior score from Grade 7 or 8 ELA or mathematics.  Student scores count up until they pass (after students pass, we do not want the measure alone to encourage additional test taking, which may not be necessary).  Five required Regents Exams and no more than three others are counted. Students who exceed eight Regents Exams passed are NOT included in a school’s or principal’s results.

 Modified passing score rules for students with disabilities are used.  All students who meet the minimum enrollment requirement (i.e., students who are enrolled on BEDS and during the June Regents Exam administration) are included in determining a school’s score, whether or not they take a Regents Exam during the year. Students are included for up to eight years after first entering ninth grade.  Dropouts are counted until they have reached their fourth year since entering ninth grade, starting with students who dropped out during the 2012–13 school year. Students who dropped out prior to the 2012–13 school year are not counted. In 2014–15, students who dropped out of a school in 2012–13 or 2013–14 are included in the GRE measure for that school.

SGPMGPGRE 4-8XX 9-12XXX 7-12XXX