M eetings of the IEP Team Produced by NICHCY, 2007 | Updated by CPIR, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Notification to Participate in an Individualized Education Program (IEP) Meeting Los Angeles Unified School District Division of Special Education.
Advertisements

I.E.P. on IEPs: Information Especially for Parents on Individualized Education Programs.
The Individualized Education Program (IEP) Legal and Practical Issues Families as Partners: School-Family Collaboration in the Education of Students with.
Reevaluation Exceptional Children Division 1. Reevaluation NC Policies , , and
THE IEP PROCESS Cassie A. Newson. Purpose of Initial Evaluation  To see if the child is a “child with a disability,” as defined by IDEA  To gather information.
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Services Special Factors/Considerations.
Working with Parents of a Child with Disabilities Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D.
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
Individual Education Program (IEP) Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
1 The Individualized Education Program (IEP) Yell / The Law and Special Education, Second Edition Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights.
Region 3 Monitors April What is a REED? It is a “process” whereby the IEP team reviews existing evaluation data to make evaluation decisions about.
Enforcing and Maintaining the IEP
Finalizing the IEP Process Consent for Initial IEP PWN following the IEP Copies to Parent IEP Amendments Revocation of Consent West Virginia Department.
Individualized Education Plans VS. Response to Intervention EEX 5051 Nelson & Rocha.
Everything you need to know before the Annual Review March 16, 2011 The New State Mandated IEP.
The IEP Process Georgia Department of Education Division for Special Education Services and Supports 1870 Twin Towers East Atlanta, Georgia Georgia.
Understanding the IEP Process
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
LEARNING MORE ABOUT SPECIAL EDUCATION Weng Ventura designs.
FRANK ESPOSITO DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SOUTH PLAINFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT Effective Communication Pathways in Special Education.
Defensible IEPs Douglas County School District 1 Module V: Documentation and Timelines.
MN CIMP 2012 COMPLIANCE FOR PARTS OF THE IEP. Compliance Self-Check.
1 IDEA REAUTHORIZATION 1997 AND IDEA REAUTHORIZATION 1997 Emphasized access to general education curriculum Strengthened role of parents Increased.
From Here to Here Transition from Infant and Toddler Connection Programs to ECSE School Division Programs.
Surrogate Parent Training
Q and A Regarding 34 CFR § (b)(4). On December 1, 2008, USDOE issued a series of new regulations for IDEA. These newly amended regulations took.
IEP Definition The Individualized Education Program (IEP) is developed for a student with an identified disability by an IEP team that includes the.
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
An Overview of the Law 1 Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE)
PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT. 11/10/05 22 Parent Involvement2 A parent is… (300.30)  Natural or adoptive parent of a child  A foster parent  A guardian but.
The SOPM Standard Operating Procedures Manual Highlights.
Produced by NICHCY, 2014 Procedures for the of the IFSP D evelopment R eview, E valuation & Module 5.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Planning together for service
1 Supplemental Regulations to 34 CFR Part 300 Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities and Preschool Grants for Children with.
Improving Student Outcomes Through Transition Planning: From Institutional Care to Public Schools.
Pre-referral Process Student support team Student support team –General education teacher identifies a student –Meets with the SST to discuss strategies.
Bilingual Students and the Law n Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 n Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act - The Bilingual Education.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
I.D.E.A LANGUAGE & LEGAL ISSUES Impacting the Process of the IEP Team, School Staff, and Parents LANGUAGE & LEGAL ISSUES Impacting the Process of.
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
Legal Aspects of Special Education and Social Foundations Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11 Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11.
Enrollment Determination Colorado Charter School Institute BOOT CAMP September 1, 2015.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Other Related Processes and Concepts Module – Revised July, 2010.
REEVALUATION: BEST PRACTICES M-DCPS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN BEESS 037.
REFERRAL AND ASSESSMENT DIVISION OF PERFORMANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY SPECIAL EDUCATION WEBINAR: MARCH 27, 2012.
FAPE “The Big Three”. FAPE Free and Appropriate Public Education Legal and Effective IEP Process Eligibility Procedural Safeguards.
Pathfinder Parent Center South Valley Special Education Unit John Porter, Director
IUSD Special Education Department October 14, 2015.
FAPE “The Big Three”. FAPE Free and Appropriate Public Education Legal and Effective IEP Process Eligibility Procedural Safeguards.
IDEA 1997 P.L The Facts. IEP Must explain how the child’s disability affects their ability to participate in the general education classroom Must.
SPECIAL EDUCATION BASICS Adrienne Volenik Education Rights Clinic University of Richmond School of Law
I ntroduction to Procedural Safeguards Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Individualized Education Programs Evaluations and Reevaluations.
Implementing IDEA 2004: 2007 Changes to NYS’ Special Education Law and Regulations CSE/CPSE Meeting Membership Individualized Education Programs Continuum.
Expert Topic Presentation By Chris Coombe March 9, 2009.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCESS. STEP 1- THE CHILD IS DETERMINED AS POSSIBLY NEEDING SPECIAL EDUCATION AND RELATED SERVICES There are two primary ways in which.
Menlo Park City School District Special Education Self-Review (SESR)
Understanding the IEP Process
Downingtown Area School District Central Office April 4, 2018
The IEP Process Georgia Department of Education
Meetings of the IEP Team
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
Presented By: Eric G. Rodriguez
New Enrollment and Transfer Students
Presentation transcript:

M eetings of the IEP Team Produced by NICHCY, 2007 | Updated by CPIR, 2016

Everything You Wanted to Know About... IEP Team Meetings Scheduling the meeting Developing the IEP Special factors IEP Team must consider Excusing a member from the meeting Implementing the IEP

This module also looks at : Reviewing and revising IEPs When the IEP can be amended without an IEP Team meeting Special IEP situations

Who must a public agency include on the IEP Team? Name as many IEP Team members as you can.

What’s in the IEP? List the information that must be in a child’s IEP Work with a partner

Coming together is a beginning; keeping together is progress; working together is success. -- H enry Ford

Within 30 days of determination that the child needs special education and related services… …an IEP Team meeting must be conducted to develop the child’s IEP For Starters:

Public agency must: Scheduling the IEP Meeting schedule an IEP meeting at a mutually agreed-upon time and place; and provide parents with specific information about the meeting

Ensuring Parent Participation The public agency must take whatever action is necessary to ensure that the parent understands the proceedings of the IEP Team meeting… …including arranging for an interpreter for parents… with deafness, or whose native language is other than English § (c)

Developing the IEP The IEP Team must consider… Strengths of the child Concerns of parents for enhancing their child’s education Results of the child’s initial evaluation (or most recent evaluation) Academic, developmental, and functional needs of the child

Special Factors to Consider IEP Team must consider special factors associated with: Children whose behavior impedes own learning or learning of others

Language and communication needs of children with limited English proficiency Special Factors to Consider

Instruction in Braille and the use of Braille for children who are blind or visually impaired Special Factors to Consider

Communication needs of all children, with particular emphasis on children who are deaf or hard of hearing Special Factors to Consider

Regardless of the child’s disability, IEP Team must consider: Whether the child needs assistive technology devices and services Special Factors to Consider

Excusing a Member from Attending the Meeting Being “excused”? N ew with IDEA 2004! Parents and LEA must agree that the member’s attendance is not necessary Parents’ agreement (and the LEA’s) must be in writing When a member of the IEP Team’s area is NOT being modified or discussed, the member may be excused from attending the meeting, in whole or in part, under two conditions :

Yes, if: May a certain member of the IEP Team be excused if his or her subject area is going to be discussed? Parent consent to excuse any member must be in writing Parents and LEA consent to excuse the member Member submits, in writing to the parent and the IEP Team, input into the development of the IEP before the meeting Excusing a Member from Attending the Meeting

A Closer Look At These Provisions Parent consent vs. parent agreement What parent’s written informed consent means Members where excusal provisions apply Excused member’s “written input” Sharing the IEP with excused members Excusing a Member from Attending the Meeting

Parent Participation at the Meeting May the agency hold the IEP meeting without the parent in attendance? Yes, if the public agency is unable to convince the parents to attend In this case: The agency must keep detailed records of its attempts to arrange a mutually agreed-on time and place for the meeting

For Children With Disabilities Aged 3* Through 5 An IEP or an IFSP? § (b) * At the State’s discretion, § (b) also can apply to children with disabilities who will turn 3 during the school year

When the IEP Is Completed… The public agency must give the parent a copy of the child’s IEP at no cost to the parent

Placement

Nuh-huh. This.

Implementing the IEP As soon as possible following development of the IEP… Special education and related services must be made available to the child in accordance with the child’s IEP All Service Providers Who Will Be Implementing the IEP… Must have access to the IEP Must be informed of their specific responsibilities Must be informed of specific accommodations, modifications, and supports to be provided to the child, in accordance with the IEP

At the beginning of each school year… …each public agency must have an IEP (as defined in § ) in effect for each child with a disability within its jurisdiction When IEPs Must Be In Effect

Reviewing & Revising the IEP Review periodically but not less than annually Revise as appropriate in accordance with § (b)(1) and (2)

Meeting w/out Meeting (Part A) If parents or LEA want to amend or modify the IEP, does the team have to actually, physically, meet? No, not necessarily, subject to certain conditions

Meeting w/out Meeting (Part B) When may this occur? Only for changes being made to the child's IEP after the annual IEP Team meeting for a school year Only if parents and LEA agree not to convene the meeting Only if parents and LEA instead develop a written document to amend or modify the child’s current IEP Child’s IEP team must be informed of changes made to child’s IEP through this approach

Special IEP Situations, under IDEA 2004 Children placed in private schools by the public agency Children with an IEP transferring between schools

Children placed in private schools by the public agency What the public agency must do before What the public agency must do after Other Provisions Private school may initiate and conduct IEP meetings to review and revise the IEP, at discretion of public agency Even though the private school implements a child's IEP, responsibility for compliance with this part remains with the public agency and the SEA

Children with an IEP transferring between schools In the same State, but in different public agencies The new public agency must, in consultation with parents, provide FAPE to the child (including services comparable to those in the child’s existing IEP), until it either— Necessary circumstance: Child must have had an IEP that was in effect and must enroll in new school in the same school year adopts the IEP from the last public agency, or develops, adopts, and implements a new IEP ( that meets requirements in §§ – )

Children with an IEP transferring between schools In different States The new public agency must, in consultation with parents, provide FAPE to the child (including services comparable to those in the child’s existing IEP), until it— conducts an evaluation (if new agency determines this is necessary), and develops, adopts, and implements a new IEP if appropriate Necessary circumstance: Child must have had an IEP that was in effect in the previous public agency and must enroll in new school in the same school year

Transferring the child’s records & The new public agency must take reasonable steps to promptly obtain the child’s records from the previous public agency* The previous public agency must take reasonable steps to promptly respond to the request [§ (g)] *Pursuant to 34 CFR 99.31(a)(2)

Enough! Talk about paperwork burden! We’re running away!

Gotcha! Time for review.