Aldren R Comparison between Fosamax R and Aldren R for treatment of PMO : a randomized controlled trial.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
{ Dose Response to Vitamin D Supplementation in Postmenopausal Women Annals of Internal Med. 2012; 156: Jayme Bristow.
Advertisements

New Data on Ultra Low-Dose Estradiol Therapy in Osteoporosis Prevention New Data on Ultra Low-Dose Estradiol Therapy in Osteoporosis Prevention Marie Foegh,
New England Journal of Medicine October 18;367: Relapse Risk after Discontinuation of Risperidone in Alzheimer’s disease Molly Moncrieff.
The FRAX tool for Osteoporosis Should all GP’s be calculating the Frax score prior to treatment Dr Sanjeev Patel Consultant Physician & Senior Lecturer.
Aftercare Attendance Partially Moderated by History of Physical Abuse and Gender Louise F. Haynes 1 ; Amy E. Herrin 1 ; Rickey E. Carter 1 ; Sudie E. Back.
1 Health and Disease in Populations 2002 Week 9 – 2/5/02 Randomised controlled trials 2 Dr Jenny Kurinczuk.
Modified Megestrol The Clinical Trials by : Carolina R. Akib
Study by: Granger et al. NEJM, September 2011,Vol No. 11 Presented by: Amelia Crawford PA-S2 Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.
Slide 1 FOSAMAX ™ Once Weekly ACTONEL ™ Once A Week Comparison Trial FOSAMAX™ (alendronate) is a trademark of Merck & Co., Inc, Whitehouse Station, NJ,
Downloaded from 1 Alendronate vs. Risedronate Comparison Trial.
Slide 1 Update on Alendronate and Raloxifene in Osteoporosis EFficacy of FOSALAN ™ vs. Evista ® Comparison Trial (EFFECT) FOSALAN (alendronate) is a trademark.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence January–February 2011.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence January–February 2010.
OVBIAGELE B, DIENER H-C, YUSUF S, ET AL., PROFESS INVESTIGATORS. LEVEL OF SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE WITHIN THE NORMAL RANGE AND RISK OF RECURRENT STROKE.
Osteoporosis Lucy Cowdrey 4 th November What is it?
Breast Cancer and Bone Health. Bone Homeostasis Bone is a living tissue which is constantly renewing via a balance of resorption of old bone (via Osteoclasts)
Osteoporosis Dr. Lauren Phillips Sugar Land Women’s Health.
Fall Prevention subtitle.
Research Design: RCT and Cohort Studies John Q. Wong, MD, MSc 22 Jun 2010.
A significant proportion of diabetic patients develop diabetic nephropathy which can eventually progress to end-stage renal disease despite established.
OSTEOPOROSIS 06/25/12 José L. González, PGY3. Definition  Reduction in bone strength  increase risk of fx  T-score: < -2.5 SDs  T-score: 30 yo, matched.
The Effect of Zoledronic Acid (ZOL) on Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Bone Loss in Postmenopausal Women with Early Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Letrozole:
ECTS symposium 5 Anabolic treatment of osteoporosis.
Management of men and women over 50yrs who have sustained a fragility fracture: 2011 draft guidance Fragility fracture definition: Fracture site excluding.
1 Ipriflavone in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Randomized placebo-controlled, 4-year study conducted Europe 475 postmenopausal white women,
Denosumab NICE technology appraisal guidance 204 October 2010.
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network
“Known knowns, known unknowns, unknown unknowns….. Ronald Dumsfeld Senior Lecturer in Metabolic Bone Diseases.
Effects of Xalatan® (latanoprost) or Travatan® (travoprost) on Ocular Surface Signs and Symptoms in Ocular Hypertensive or Glaucoma Patients. M.B. McDonald1,
Bone Turnover Suppression Based on an ASBMR/ECTS Clincal Debate “Too Much Suppression of Turnover Is Bad for Bone” Co-Chairs: Socrates Papapoulos, Douglas.
Osteoporosis Management: Clinical scenario
UNDERTREATMENT AMONG WOMEN DIAGNOSED WITH OSTEOPOROSIS IN GERMANY Ankita Modi 1, Chun-Po Steve Fan 2, Shuvayu Sen 1 1 Global Health Outcomes, Merck & Company,
Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis (GIO) Nguyen Thy Khue, MD, PhD Department of Endocrinology, HoChiMinh City University of Medicine and Pharmacy.
TERIPARATIDE (r-hPTH 1-34) Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee Holiday Inn, Bethesda MD July 27, 2001 Bruce S. Schneider, MD CDER FDA.
Characteristics of a Swedish Patient Registry and Its Application On Unmet Needs Analysis Dr. Dan Mellström 1, Arun Krishna 2, Zhyi Li 3, Chun-Po Steve.
A Look at Osteoporosis Screening Guidelines Cynthia Phelan PGY
A Phase II, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of Once-Weekly Alendronate in HIV- Infected Subjects with Decreased Bone Mineral Density Receiving Calcium.
Download from Slide 1 Update on Alendronate and Raloxifene in Osteoporosis EFficacy of Fosamax ™ vs. Evista ® Comparison.
Endpoint Comparison for Osteoporosis Assessment in Cancer Control Studies (N02C1 and N03CC) A. C. Dueck 1, P. J. Atherton 2, H. Liu 2, S. L. Hines 3, C.
A randomized crossover trial of venlafaxine (V) versus gabapentin (G) for hot flashes in breast cancer survivors Louise J Bordeleau 1, Olivera Jugovic.
Extended Treatment Effects with Zoledronic Acid Based on Poster 1070 “The Effect of 3 Versus 6 Years of Zoledronic Acid Treatment in Osteoporosis: a Randomized.
The COMBINE Study: Design and Methodology Stephanie S. O’Malley, Ph.D. for The COMBINE Study Research Group JAMA Vol. 295, , 2006 (May 3 rd.
EFFICACY OF A STAGE-BASED BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTION TO PROMOTE STI SCREENING IN YOUNG WOMEN: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL Chacko MR, Wiemann CM, Kozinetz.
CE-1 IRESSA ® Clinical Efficacy Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive.
Food and Drug Administration Regulatory Implications of The WHI Study Eric Colman, MD Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Division of Metabolic and.
Osteoporosis. Background ► The problem  Osteoporosis is common  Over 50% of women and 30-45% of men over age 50 have osteopenia/osteoporosis  White.
FDA’s Osteoporosis Guidance Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Division of Metabolic and Endocrine Drugs Eric Colman, MD September 25, 2002.
Alimohammad Fatemi Assistant Professor of Rheumatology 1.
Indiaclen Short course of Amoxicillin in treatment of Pneumonia (ISCAP) 3 versus 5 days amoxicillin for treatment of non-severe pneumonia in young children:
Does a high soy intake prevent the development of osteoporosis? Elizabeth Yahn.
Phase 2 Evaluation of Intravitreal Bevacizumab for DME Sponsored by the National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health.
Efficacy of Topical Azithromycin & Cyclosporine A(CsA) vs CsA Alone in the Treatment of Dry Eyes Associated with Blepharitis Kenneth A. Beckman, M.D.,
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network DRCR.net Prompt PRP vs Ranibizumab+Deferred PRP for PDR Study Jeffrey G. Gross, M.D. – Protocol Chair.
Randomized Controlled CTN Trial of OROS-MPH + CBT in Adolescents with ADHD and Substance Use Disorders Paula Riggs, M.D., Theresa Winhusen, PhD., Jeff.
NICE, FRAX & NOGG VTS meeting Jonathan Day 7 th April 2010.
Blood : R2 임규성.  Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is an autoimmune disease characterized by low platelet counts and may be responsible.
Osteoporosis Pharmacology Krishna Prasad Khanal, MD R1 CRMEF April 2, 2010.
Chapter 34: Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover in Osteoporosis Pawel Szulc and Pierre D. Delmas.
Consequences Of Non-Compliance To Osteoporosis Medication Among Osteoporotic Women Ankita Modi, Ph.D, M.D. 1, Jackson Tang, M.Sc. 2, Shuvayu Sen, Ph.D.
Perioperative Bridging Anticoagulation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation NEJM Aug 27, 2015.
Osteoporosis Vinod Kurup, MD December 22nd, 2006 CC-BY-SA.
Telbivudine Versus Lamivudine in Chinese Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B: Results at 1 Year of a Randomized, Double-Blind Trial HEPATOLOGY 2008;47:
Petranova T1, Boyanov M2, Shinkov A3, Petkova R4, Psachoulia E5
Effects of Uric acid- lowering therapy on renal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis Nephrol Dial Transplant (2014) 29: Vaughan Washco.
Fig. 1. Trial profile. From: Randomized Teriparatide [Human Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) 1–34] Once-Weekly Efficacy Research (TOWER) Trial for Examining the.
Recommendations for the screening of adherence to oral bisphosphonates
The Research Question RESEARCH METHOD
Clinical Needs In Osteoporosis
Reporting the Results of DXA Scan
Presentation transcript:

Aldren R Comparison between Fosamax R and Aldren R for treatment of PMO : a randomized controlled trial

Problems  Disintegration of drug  Poor GI absorption ( %)  Non-metabolized  Rapid adsorption on bone surface, preferentially high turnover site  Eliminated by kidney, solely

Objectives Aldren 70 once a week (Kaspa) Fosamax 70 (MSD) for  To evaluate the anti-resorptive efficacy of Aldren 70 once a week (Kaspa) in comparison to Fosamax 70 (MSD) for treatment of PMO  To assess the side effects, drug non- responder and drug compliance

Non-Inferiority trial: Power & Sample Size Program (Vandebuilt) : Different of BTM = 0.15, SD = 0.2 AlphaPower BTM reduction diff. betw groups SD of BTM No./ group No.+20%/ group

Inclusion criteria  Post-menopausal woman  Age > 60 years old  Menopause >5 year  BP naïve  Stop any anti-osteoporotic drugs > 1 year  BMD hip: T-score at Neck/Total < -2.5 or 450 pg/ml or 450 pg/ml

Exclusion criteria  Secondary osteoporosis: GIO, DM, Hyperthyroidism, etc.  Atrial fibrillation (irregular pulse/ personal history)  CKD IV, V  History of recent PU/ GI problems  Non-communicable

Enrolled BMD hip screening 210 post-menopausal women 80 fulfilled criteria Randomized 40 cases for Aldren70 40 cases for Aldren70 40 cases for Fosamax70 40 cases for Fosamax70

Time schedule & FU interval  0 mo. CBC UA Cr LFT CTX CBC UA Cr LFT CTX Drug once a week Drug once a week + Ca 1250 & MTV ( D IU)  3 mo. CTX CTX  6 mo. CBC UA Cr LFT CTX CBC UA Cr LFT CTX Telephone remind/AE every 4 wks

Statistics  Unpaired T-test  Fisher exact’s test STATA 11.0 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas)

RCT of Fosamax 70 vs Aldren 70

Comparison of outcomes between treatment groups

The comparisons of CTX between treatment groups according to time.

The comparisons of %CTX reduction between treatment groups according to time. Note: significant clinical improvement means > 55% improvement from the baseline.

Side effects and non compliance rate between treatment groups. (N=37/37) Variables Treatmentp-value FosamaxAldren70 Side effect (%) 8 (21.6) Fever 4 (10.8)3 (8.1) Myalgia 2 (5.4) Rash 2 (5.4)0 (0) Stress 0 (0)2 (5.4) Gastritis 0 (0)2 (5.4) Constipation 2 (5.4)0 (0) Dry mouth/oral burn 1 (2.7)2 (5.4)1.000 Loss to follow-up (%) 3 (8.1)2 (5.4)1.000 Non-adherence (%) 4 (10.8)9 (24.3)0.221 Non drug response (%) (*N=35/35) 7 (18.9) 6 (16.2) CTX reduction < 55% CTX reduction < 55% - 3 months 8 (23.5)7 (20) months 8 (25.8)5 (16.7)0.534

Side effects and non compliance rate between treatment groups. (N=37/37) Variables Treatmentp-value FosamaxAldren70 Side effect (%)8 (21.6) Fever 4 (10.8)3 (8.1) Myalgia 2 (5.4) Rash 2 (5.4)0 (0) Stress 0 (0)2 (5.4) Gastritis 0 (0)2 (5.4) Constipation 2 (5.4)0 (0) Dry mouth/oral burn 1 (2.7)2 (5.4)1.000 Loss to follow-up (%) 3 (8.1)2 (5.4)1.000 Non-adherence (%) 4 (10.8)9 (24.3)0.221 Non drug response (%) (*N=35/35) 7 (18.9) 6 (16.2) CTX reduction < 55% CTX reduction < 55% - 3 months 8 (23.5)7 (20) months 8 (25.8)5 (16.7)0.534 Side effect (%) Side effect (%) FosamaxAldrenp-valueFever4 (10.8) 3 (8.1) Myalgia2 (5.4) Rash2 (5.4) 0 (0) 0.493

Variables Treatmentp-value FosamaxAldren70 Side effect (%) 8 (21.6) Fever 4 (10.8)3 (8.1) Myalgia 2 (5.4) Rash 2 (5.4)0 (0) Stress 0 (0)2 (5.4) Gastritis 0 (0)2 (5.4) Constipation 2 (5.4)0 (0) Dry mouth/oral burn 1 (2.7)2 (5.4)1.000 Loss to follow-up (%) 3 (8.1)2 (5.4)1.000 Non-adherence (%) 4 (10.8)9 (24.3)0.221 Non drug response (%) (*N=35/35) 7 (18.9) 6 (16.2) CTX reduction < 55% CTX reduction < 55% - 3 months 8 (23.5)7 (20) months 8 (25.8)5 (16.7)0.534 Side effect (%) Side effect (%) FosamaxAldrenp-value Gastritis0 (0) 2 (5.4) Constipation2 (5.4) 0 (0) Dry mouth/oral burn1 (2.7) 2 (5.4) Side effects and non compliance rate between treatment groups. (N=37/37)

Variables Treatmentp-value FosamaxAldren70 Side effect (%) 8 (21.6) Fever 4 (10.8)3 (8.1) Myalgia 2 (5.4) Rash 2 (5.4)0 (0) Stress 0 (0)2 (5.4) Gastritis 0 (0)2 (5.4) Constipation 2 (5.4)0 (0) Dry mouth/oral burn 1 (2.7)2 (5.4)1.000 Loss to follow-up (%) 3 (8.1)2 (5.4)1.000 Non-adherence (%) 4 (10.8)9 (24.3)0.221 Non drug response (%) (*N=35/35) 7 (18.9) 6 (16.2) CTX reduction < 55% - 3 months 8 (23.5)7 (20) months 8 (25.8)5 (16.7)0.534 Non-responder Treatmentp-valueFosamaxAldren70 CTX reduction < 55% CTX reduction < 55% - 3 months 8 (23.5) 7 (20.0) months 8 (25.8) 5 (16.7) Side effects and non compliance rate between treatment groups. (N=37/37)

Variables Treatmentp-value FosamaxAldren70 Side effect (%) 8 (21.6) Fever 4 (10.8)3 (8.1) Myalgia 2 (5.4) Rash 2 (5.4)0 (0) Stress 0 (0)2 (5.4) Gastritis 0 (0)2 (5.4) Constipation 2 (5.4)0 (0) Dry mouth/oral burn 1 (2.7)2 (5.4)1.000 Loss to follow-up (%) 3 (8.1)2 (5.4)1.000 Non-adherence (%)4 (10.8)9 (24.3)0.221 Non drug response (%) (*N=35/35) 7 (18.9) 6 (16.2) CTX reduction < 55% CTX reduction < 55% - 3 months 8 (23.5)7 (20) months 8 (25.8)5 (16.7)0.534 Treatmentp-valueFosamaxAldren70 Non-adherence (%) 4 (10.8) 4 (10.8) 9 (24.3) 9 (24.3) Side effects and non compliance rate between treatment groups. (N=37/37)

High suppression Treatmentp-value FosamaxAldren70 CTX < 150 pg/ml - 3 months18 (52.9) 19 (54.3) months18 (58.1) 22 (73.3) CTX < 100 pg/ml - 3 months9 (26.5) 12 (34.3) months15 (48.4) 13 (43.3) 0.799

Number of patients at each interval of follow-up FosamaxAldren Start drug(0 mo.) mo.35 6 mo.3229

Number of drug non-responders and non-compliance FosamaxAldren Start drug(0 mo.) mo.7/35 (20%) 6 mo.+1/32+3/29

Conclusion 1. EfficacyAldren & Fosamax 1. Efficacy between Aldren & Fosamax has no statistical difference (by Bone resorption marker measurement, CTX). 2. Side effects (AE/SAE) Aldren & Fosamax 2. Side effects (AE/SAE) between Aldren & Fosamax has no statistical difference. 3. Non-responder to oral BP is 20% (in both groups by BTM) 4. Non-compliance of BP once a week is 17% in 3 mo. and 26% in 6 months.

Quiz 1 BP non-responder, sCTX should be lower than.. A. -30% B. -40% C. -50% D. -55% E. -60%

Quiz 2 The non-responder to BP(Alendronate) in Thai, by BTM monitoring is …… A. 5% B. 10% C. 15% D. 20% E. 30%

Quiz 3 The non-adherence to BP once a week in Thai, at 6 months is …… A. 5% B. 7% C. 17% D. 26%

Quiz 4 High turnover OP is determined by … A. BMD < 1.5 %/year B. BMD < 5 %/year C. BTM, CTX > 2.0 SD D. BTM, CTX > 2.5 SD

Quiz 5 Who is NOT a candidate for BP treatment? A. Low turnover osteoporoisis B. Prior vertebral fracture C. Steroid induced ostetoporosis D. Osteoporosis in malignancy