LCLS 2009 NSLS-II 2015 APS 1995 BES Light & Neutron Sources SPEAR3 2004 ALS 1993 HFIR 2008 SNS 2007 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Report of the Committee of Visitors Energy Frontier Research Centers and Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis Energy Innovation Hub Office of Basic.
Advertisements

ESS Timing System Plans and Requirements Timo Korhonen Chief Engineer, Integrated Control System Division May 19, 2014.
Superconducting Particle Accelerator Forum of the Americas December 11, 2013 Dr. Patricia M. Dehmer Acting Director, Office of Science, U.S. Department.
James B. Murphy, Director BES Scientific User Facilities Division
Recommendations Ward Plummer BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center Recommendations Ward Plummer Washington, D. C. December 11, 2000.
DOE/NSF U.S. CMS Operations Program Review Closeout Report Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory March 10, 2015 Anadi Canepa, TRIUMF Anna Goussiou, University.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Procurement Dave Paveglio, Contract Administrator NSLS-II PAC Meeting May 25, 2007.
Safety at ESS. Thomas Hansson Nuclear Safety Engineer at ESS, since November 2011 Experience from Swedish Nuclear Power Plants since 1991 (Mainly Fuel.
FACET: The Proposal Process with Q & A Carsten Hast SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
Sept. 18, 2008SLUO 2008 Annual Meeting Vision for SLAC Science Persis S. Drell Director SLAC.
February 19, 2008 FACET Review 1 Lab Overview and Future Onsite Facilities Persis S. Drell DirectorSLAC.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Dr. Raymond L. Orbach Under Secretary for Science U.S. Department.
Senior Review Evaluations (1 of 5) Proposals due: 6 March 2015 Panel evaluations: Week of 22 April 2015 Performance factors to be evaluated will include.
The R&M Task Group mandate is to: Develop specific recommendations on how social housing project reporting and monitoring could be improved and made more.
BESAC 29 July 2014 Patricia M. Dehmer Acting Director, Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy.
Jefferson Lab Status Hall A collaboration Dec. 16, 2013 R. D. McKeown Deputy Director For Science.
Reorganization at NCAR Presentation to the UCAR Board of Trustees February 25, 2004.
Regional Technical Forum End-use Load Shape Business Case Project Project Initiation Meeting Portland, OR March 5, 2012.
The Future of US Accelerator Science – Comments from NSF Tony F. Chan Assistant Director MPS/NSF AAAS Chicago February 13, 2009.
US Particle Accelerator School Sub-committee Report: Basic Energy Sciences Facilities Prioritization William A. Barletta Director, United States Particle.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 1 Chi-Chang Kao / Steve Dierker NSLS-II Project Advisory Committee May 24, 2007 Joint Photon Sciences Institute Planning.
HEPAP and P5 Report DIET Federation Roundtable JSPS, Washington, DC; April 29, 2015 Andrew J. Lankford HEPAP Chair University of California, Irvine.
AL-QADISIYIA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT Submitted by SAR committee.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Overview John Hill Experimental Facilities Division Director NSLS-II XPCS/SAXS workshop Jan 10 th 2008.
24 April 2015 FY 2016 Budget Request to Congress for DOE’s Office of Science Dr. Patricia M. Dehmer Acting Director, Office of Science
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Project Baseline Jim Yeck NSLS-II Deputy Project Director NSLS-II PAC Meeting November 20, 2007.
Scientific Facility User Access Policy - Synchrotron & Neutron Facilities Chi-Chang Kao Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource March 17, 2011, BESAC.
1 Metrics for the Office of Science HPC Centers Jonathan Carter User Services Group Lead NERSC User Group Meeting June 12, 2006.
BESAC Dec Findings and Recommendations Subcommittee on Theory and Computation of the Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee U.S. Department.
Keith O. Hodgson SSRL Director Brief Update on the Linac Coherent Light Source - LCLS February 26, 2002 Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee Undulator.
BESAC Dec Outline of the Report I. A Confluence of Scientific Opportunities: Why Invest Now in Theory and Computation in the Basic Energy Sciences?
P5 and the HEP Program A. Seiden Fermilab June 2, 2003.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES User Access and Beamline Development John Hill Director, NSLS-II Experimental Facilities Division NSLS-II User Workshop.
Light Source Reviews The BES Perspective July 23, 2002 Pedro A. Montano Materials Sciences and Engineering Basic Energy Sciences BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Raymond L. Orbach Director Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Presentation to BESAC December 6, 2004.
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science 20 th Meeting of the IEA Large Tokamak ExCo, May th Meeting of the IEA Poloidal Divertor ExCo, May.
24-Aug-11 ILCSC -Mumbai Global Design Effort 1 ILC: Future after 2012 preserving GDE assets post-TDR pre-construction program.
U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee Meeting FY 2009 Budget.
F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division.
BERAC Subcommittee Report Follow-on Management and Operations Review of EMSL May 31 - June 1, 2006 EMSL, Richland, WA.
BESAC Workshop on Opportunities for Catalysis/Nanoscience May 14-16, 2002 William S. Millman Basic Energy Sciences May 14, 2002 Catalysis and Nanoscience.
Director’s Comments on the BNL Strategic Plan RHIC/AGS Users Meeting May 29, 2008 Steve Vigdor, filling in for Sam Aronson.
BESAC Subcommittee on Theory and Computation Co-Chairs Bruce Harmon – Ames Lab and Iowa State University Kate Kirby – ITAMP, Harvard Smithsonian Center.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Overview Satoshi Ozaki Director, Accelerator Systems Division NSLS-II Project March 27, 2007.
DOE Stanford Site Office Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1 U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Office of Science Review of the LCLS.
Proposition 1 Workshop: the Grant Application Process July 2015.
BESAC August Part III IV. Connecting Theory with Experiment V. The Essential Resources for Success Co-Chairs Bruce Harmon – Ames Lab and Iowa.
Max Cornacchia, SLAC LCLS Project Overview BESAC, Feb , 2001 LCLS Project Overview What is the LCLS ? Transition from 3 rd generation light sources.
Patricia M. Dehmer Deputy Director for Science Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy
Presentation to the SLIS Community on Accreditation Planning Dr. Kimberly B. Kelley Dean, SLIS February 11, 2008.
Workshop Overview, Charge and Deliverables Joachim Stöhr.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Strategic Planning John Hill Experimental Facilities Division Director NSLS-II EFAC May 5 th 2008.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Beamline Development John Hill NSLS-II Experimental Facilities Division Director PAC Meeting November 20, 2007.
Future Direction of the U.S. Fusion Materials Program Dr. Pete Pappano US Department of Energy Fusion Energy Sciences Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting.
Department of Energy Office of Science  FY 2007 Request for Office of Science is 14% above FY 2006 Appropriation  FY 2007 Request for HEP is 8% above.
O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY The Spallation Neutron Source Project: Update T. E. Mason Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Committee to Assess the Current Status and Future Direction of High Magnetic Field Science in the United States 18 May 2012 Dr. Patricia M. Dehmer Deputy.
Report of the Committee of Visitors of the Division of Materials Science and Engineering (DMSE) to the Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee Review.
Argonne Accelerator Institute Activites Rod Gerig Argonne May 18, 2007 Presentation to the Fermilab-Argonne Directors’ Collaboration Meeting.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Project Status Steve Dierker Associate Laboratory Director for Light Sources NSLS-II Project Director Accelerator.
J. Corlett. June 16, 2006 A Future Light Source for LBNL Facility Vision and R&D plan John Corlett ALS Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting June 16, 2006.
Standards of Achievement for Professional Advancement District 2 Career Ladder Training April 29, 2016 Ronda Alexander & Michael Clawson.
Eric Prebys, Fermilab Program Director, LARP July 10, 2012.
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Presentation to the Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (BESAC) Dr. Raymond L. Orbach, Director November.
WBS 5.0 LCLS Strategic Projects Division
LCLS History and Science Overview Keith Hodgson, SSRL Director April 23, 2002 LCLS DOE Review, April 23, 2002 Keith Hodgson, SSRL.
NSS Instrument Project Tollgate Coordinator
Experimental Program and Endstations System (WBS ) J
Test Beamline System Requirements and Charge to PDR Committee
Presentation transcript:

LCLS 2009 NSLS-II 2015 APS 1995 BES Light & Neutron Sources SPEAR ALS 1993 HFIR 2008 SNS

I am writing to present a new charge to BESAC, related to the prioritization of upgrades of existing user facilities and major construction projects for new user facilities. This charge is directed by the 2016 Omnibus appropriation for BES that stated: “Since the February 2013 and the July 2013 Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (BESAC) studies of BES facilities, the mix and status of ongoing and prospective BES major facility upgrades and construction projects have changed. Therefore the BESAC is directed to update its assessment of the proposed upgrades to x-ray scattering facilities (both free-electron laser-based sources and ring-based sources) and to the Spallation Neutron Source using the same criteria that were used in prior studies-the ability of a proposed upgrade or construction project to contribute to world leading science and the readiness of the upgrade or construction project to proceed to construction-and the same rating system. The assessment shall include a prioritization of the next three to five projects and be submitted to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress not later than 180 days after the enactment of this Act.” December 21, 2015 Charge letter from Director Murray to BESAC 2

The following are the two criteria to be considered in your evaluation: 1. The ability of a proposed facility or upgrade to contribute to world-leading science, noting in particular the relevance to the 2015 BESAC report "Challenges at the Frontiers of Matter and Energy: Transformative Opportunities for Discovery Science." Activities will be placed in one of three categories:( a) absolutely central; (b) important; and (c) don't know enough yet. 2. The readiness to proceed to construction, noting whether the concept has been thoroughly studied, the R&D performed to date is sufficient, the technical challenges can be met, and the extent to which the cost to build and operate the facility is understood. Concepts will be placed in one of three categories: (a)ready to initiate construction; (b) significant scientific/engineering challenges to resolve before initiating construction; ( c) mission and technical requirements not yet fully defined. December 21, 2015 Charge letter from Director Murray to BESAC 3

BESAC Process BESAC meeting February 11-12, 2016 –presentations by laboratory and facility directors Chi-Chang Kao Mike Witherell, Roger Falcone Peter Littlewood Thom Mason, Paul Langan –subcommittee formation (COI issues) BESAC subcommittee meeting April 14–16, 2016 –labs responded to multi-page request for information –each lab team participated in half-day presentation/discussion Subcommittee report was prepared with unanimous committee agreement 4

5

e.g. insertion devices top-off mode end-station developments robotics neutron guide designs enhanced methods for neutron polarization simultaneous simulations with measurements e.g. Multi-bend achromat lattice (MBA) large increase in neutron brightness 6

X-ray Facility Upgrades Advanced Photon Source Upgrade (APS-U) Advanced Light Source Upgrade (ALS-U) Linac Coherent Light Source II High Energy Upgrade (LCLS II-HE) 7

Storage Ring X-ray Sources 8

A Multibend Achromat Lattice has been implemented at MAX IV 9

Brightness Curves With and Without Upgrades 10

Accessing Extreme Environments Coherent Scattering and Imaging Opportunities Made Possible by APS-U 11

APS-U Committee Findings Criteria 1 APS-U is absolutely central to contribute to world-leading science Criteria 2 APS-U is ready to initiate construction The APS-U project is budgeted to deliver photons to the samples Necessary upgrades of APS beamlines are in the project Dark time is estimated at one year. APS should continue to enhance theory/simulation coupling to experiment 12

Advanced Light Source Upgrade 13 (Essentially fully coherent at 2 keV)

ALS with a Multibend Achromat Lattice 14

Opportunities with ALS-U 15

ALS Beamlines The ALS is working to upgrade existing beamlines so that they are compatible with and deliver the capabilities of ALS-U 16

ALS-U Committee Findings Criteria 1 ALS-U is absolutely central to contribute to world-leading science Criteria 2 ALS-U is ready to initiate construction The ALS is working to upgrade existing beamlines so that they are ALS-U capable. A more pro-active approach to involving the user community in the planning for necessary beamline and endstation updates is needed. Dark time is estimated at 12 months. A robust coupling between theory/simulation and experiment exists (e.g. CAMERA ) 17

X-ray Free Electron Lasers LCLS II-HE 18

19

20

LCLS II-HE Committee Findings Criteria 1 LCLS II-HE is absolutely central to contribute to world-leading science Criteria 2 LCLS II-HE is ready to initiate construction (anticipate limited down time beyond “normal” maintenance dark period) 21 The HE project could be accomplished during normal maintenance dark periods. So limited additional dark time is anticipated.

Neutron User Facilities SNS-PPU and SNS-STS 22

SNS --- A Major Science Success 23

At Present the SNS (FTS) is the Most Powerful Pulsed Neutron Source

The European Spallation Source (ESS) will turn on in

26 Rotating W target 1 of every 6 pulses to STS

SNS–PPU and SNS–STS Committee Findings Criteria 1: SNS-PPU and SNS-STS are both absolutely central to contribute to world-leading science Criteria 2: Significant scientific/engineering challenges to resolve before initiating construction for SNS-PPU and SNS-STS Consideration of options for the repetition rate and the ways to increase the average brightness of the STS. A detailed study of the feasibility of running the STS at 20 Hz rather than 10 Hz is warranted. ORNL is encouraged to establish a review panel to make a detailed evaluation and recommendations on the proposed designs. Such a panel should be charged with detailed analysis of the technical issues such as those related to the STS repetition rate and pulse length. While progress has been made in the lifetime of the first target, the development of a robust first target is essential to fully utilize the PPU. The ORNL should make the build-out of the experimental stations for the first target station a priority. Continue to strengthen the coupling of theory/computation with experiments. 27

28