1 Simulations Purpose of the simulation codes Structure of the E866 simulation codes Issues of simulations for E906 Jen-Chieh Peng University of Illinois.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GEANT Simulation of RCS Vahe Mamyan Hall A Analysis Workshop December 10, 2003.
Advertisements

Monte Carlo Simulation of DY signal using standard Compass software: very preliminary results M. Chiosso Drell –Yan meeting, Dubna, 14/12/2006.
Plastic Scintillator Option for DB a simulation study by Maxim Gonchar, Yury Gornushkin and Dmitry Naumov JINR, Dubna, Russia Collaboration Meeting January.
Introduction of trigger system: E906 as an example Shiuan-Hal,Shiu 05/02/
Tentative flow chart of CMS Multi-Muon analysis 1 – DATASETS 2 - RESOLUTIONS 3 – FAKE RATES 4 – NUCLEAR INT MODEL 5 – IP TEMPLATES MODEL 6 – SAMPLE COMPOSITION.
Simulation Studies of a (DEPFET) Vertex Detector for SuperBelle Ariane Frey, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München Contents: Software framework Simulation.
Muon Identification Antoine Cazes Laboratoire de l’ Accelerateur Lineaire OPERA Collaboration Meeting in Frascatti Physics coordination meeting. October.
Detection of atmospheric muon bundles using ALICE detectors A. Fernández Tellez Universidad Autonoma de Puebla for the ALICE Collaboration VIII Simposio.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
25/03/2003Simulation Application for the LHCb Experiment CHEP March 2003 Presented by: W. Pokorski / CERN Authors: I. Belyaev, Ph. Charpentier,
Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,
High Level Trigger of Muon Spectrometer Indranil Das Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics.
TB & Simulation results Jose E. Garcia & M. Vos. Introduction SCT Week – March 03 Jose E. Garcia TB & Simulation results Simulation results Inner detector.
Monte-Carlo simulations and reconstruction for 12-degree ep-elastic Luminosity Monitor A.Kiselev OLYMPUS Collaboration Meeting DESY, Hamburg,
D 0  K -,  + reconstruction with CBM STS detector I.Vassiliev (GSI) CBM collaboration meeting 06-Oct-04 Simulation tools (cbmroot) & geometry Signal.
9/14/2001D0 Simulation Tasks Q.Li 1 Simulation Tasks Status Qizhong Li Fermilab Sept. 14, 2001 D0 Collaboration Meeting.
Measurement of through-going particle momentum by means of Multiple Scattering with the T600 TPC Talk given by Antonio Jesús Melgarejo (Universidad de.
A Reconstruction Algorithm for a RICH detector for CLAS12 Ahmed El Alaoui RICH Workchop, Jefferson Lab, newport News, VA November th 2011.
Medium heavy Λ hyper nuclear spectroscopic experiment by the (e,e’K + ) reaction Graduate school of science, Tohoku University Toshiyuki Gogami for HES-HKS.
HARP for MiniBooNE Linda R. Coney Columbia University DPF 2004.
E906/Drell-Yan: Monte Carlo, Data Acquisition and Data Analysis Paul E. Reimer Expected Rates and Monte Carlo (WBS 2.5.1) Data Acquisition (WBS 2.4) –CODA.
Jornadas LIP 2008 – Pedro Ramalhete. 17 m hadron absorber vertex region 8 MWPCs 4 trigger hodoscopes toroidal magnet dipole magnet hadron absorber targets.
1 Realistic top Quark Reconstruction for Vertex Detector Optimisation Talini Pinto Jayawardena (RAL) Kristian Harder (RAL) LCFI Collaboration Meeting 23/09/08.
SHMS Optics Studies Tanja Horn JLab JLab Hall C meeting 18 January 2008.
BeamCal Simulations with Mokka Madalina Stanescu-Bellu West University Timisoara, Romania Desy, Zeuthen 30 Jun 2009 – FCAL Meeting.
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
R.T. Jones, Newport News, May The GlueX Simulation Framework GEANT4 Tutorial Workshop Newport News, May 22-26, 2006 R.T. Jones, UConn Monte Carlo.
Impact parameter resolution study for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
Z boson mass reconstruction Caroline Steiblin Prof. Al Goshaw Dr. Andrea Bocci Duke University 1.
Experience With CBM Muon Simulation Partha Pratim Bhaduri.
A search for deeply-bound kaonic nuclear states in (in-flight K -, N) reaction Hiroaki Ohnishi RIKEN.
Status of CBM muon studies I.Vassiliev, S.Gorbunov, I. Kisel and A.Kiseleva 16-Oct-06 Motivation Simulation tools cbmroot2 v06 Signal and background simulations.
Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Don Lincoln Fermilab on behalf of the DØ Collaboration Don Lincoln.
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
The CMS Simulation Software Julia Yarba, Fermilab on behalf of CMS Collaboration 22 m long, 15 m in diameter Over a million geometrical volumes Many complex.
Trigger rate studying Shiuan-Hal,Shiu. Introduction  Because the DAQ data taking rate only have 1000Hz, we must confirm the trigger rate will not higher.
A. BHASIN ALICE offline Software Week 13th June 2002 Dimuon High Lelvel Trigger (DHLT) ● Goals ● FM Algorithm ● Proposal for a new Algorithm.
HFT-prototype BUR considerations (Quantitative) What physics is possible in Run-13 assuming some (prototype) sectors are there? Relates to how long would.
Impact parameter resolutions for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
The method of the low-energy antiproton identification by stopping in the coordinate- sensitive PAMELA calorimeter 1 Svetlana Rodenko (MEPhI) Moscow International.
Pad design present understanding Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel-Aviv Sep.05 1.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
Muon detection in NA60  Experiment setup and operation principle  Coping with background R.Shahoyan, IST (Lisbon)
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
Ivan Vitev & The First Precise Determination of Quark Energy Loss in Nuclei Ivan Vitev (PI), Ming Liu (Co-PI), Patrick McGaughey, Benwei Zhang T-16 and.
1 Fast Pixel Simulation Howard Wieman, Xiangming Sun Lawrence Berkeley Lab.
CBM-Meet, VECC July 21, Premomoy Ghosh CBM – MUCH Simulation for Low-mass Vector Meson Work done at GSI during June 2006.
1 Occupancy, Rate Effects & Combinatorial Background By Rusty Towell January 8, 2009.
Dec. 1, 2005S. Sawada / J-PARC-HS051 Dimuon measurement at J-PARC (LoI-15: Physics of high-mass dimuon production at the 50-GeV Proton Synchrotron) Shin’ya.
1 NCC Task Force Richard Seto NCC Task Force Meeting Jan 8, 2007 BNL.
IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 1 IHEP/Protvino Group: Igor Azhgirey Igor Bayshev Igor Kurochkin + one post-graduate student Tools:
Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.
TeV muons: from data handling to new physics phenomena Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2009 Varna, September 07-14, 2009.
1 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Background radiation studies using Geant4.
STAR Simulation. Status and plans V. Perevoztchikov Brookhaven National Laboratory,USA.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
Tau31 Tracking Efficiency at BaBar Ian Nugent UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA Sept 2005 Outline Introduction  Decays Efficiency Charge Asymmetry Pt Dependence.
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
Object-Oriented Track Reconstruction in the PHENIX Detector at RHIC Outline The PHENIX Detector Tracking in PHENIX Overview Algorithms Object-Oriented.
Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.
ΜTPC Reconstruction Status Report (…mostly a late night / weekend project … ) D. A. Jensen March 1, 2007.
Hough-4-14.
The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector
SoLID Simulation Zhiwen Zhao 2016/08/27.
Central Exclusive DiMuon Production
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
Low mass dimuon acceptance
Samples and MC Selection
Presentation transcript:

1 Simulations Purpose of the simulation codes Structure of the E866 simulation codes Issues of simulations for E906 Jen-Chieh Peng University of Illinois Fermilab E906 Software Meeting Los Alamos, January 8, 2009 Outline

2 To optimize the design and data-taking of the experiment –Simulate signals and backgrounds to optimize the design of the spectrometer and detectors. –Simulate the acceptance for various physics processes for optimal setting of the spectrometer configuration. –Determine the triggers to optimize the signal/background ratios for various physics. To optimize the data analysis –Good agreement between the analysis of M-C data and real data is necessary for optimizing the various cuts and analysis algorithm. –Efficiency and spectrometer acceptance are often required for extracting the final physics results. Purpose of the simulation codes

3 Read in the survey files for the spectrometer and detectors, and the efficiency and field map files identical to those for the analysis code. Select a physics process to be simulated –Drell-Yan, J/Psi, open-charm, B-meson, di-hadron, like- sign dimuons, single muons, etc. “Swim” the particles through the spectrometer and the detectors, taking into account the multiple scattering and energy loss effects. For each event surviving all aperture cuts, convert hits on various detectors into a format identical to that of real data. –Additional hits on the detectors can be added using real data to simulate realistic background hits A Monte-Carlo data file is generated with identical structure as the real data. This M-C can then be analyzed by the reconstruction code. Features of the E605/772/789/866 simulation code

4 MONTEC –The main program to control the flow of the simulation code –(MAIN, INIT, BEGRUN, SPILL, EVENT, ENDRUN, FINI, etc.) SURVEY –Read in the survey files for target, spectrometer, and various detectors –(READBM, READTG, READHD, READPL, READEFF, etc.) KINGEN –Event generator for various physics –(KINGEN, KINCONVRT, LORENZ, PTRES, XFRES, BDECAY, etc.) SWIMMER –Swim the tracks through the spectrometer and detector planes –(BEAMANG, TARGPT, TARGSCAT, SWIM, ELOSS, CHAMBERS, COUNTERS, etc.) MAGSWIM –Swim tracks through the magnets (bending, energy loss and multiple scattering through thick absorbers, etc.) –(MAGSWIM, BSM12, BSM3, NFLPFLD, DEC24, DEPB15, etc.) PACK –Converts hits on hodos and chambers to look like real data –(PACK, HODHIT, PWCWIR, PAKCRS, PAKTDC, PAKTRG, etc.) Main components of the E605/772/789/866 simulation code

5 KINGEN –We have been using simple parametrizations for the XF and PT distributions, or tables based on separate QCD calculations. SWIMMER –We do not use GEANT to swim the tracks. Everything is written by users. MAGSWIM –Energy loss distributions in the absorbers are calculated using the code by Voss, and the results are tabulated as tables. More on the E605/772/789/866 simulation code

6 Entirely new survey files and field maps need to be generated. Energy loss of lower energy muons is needed. Suitable parametrizations for events at 120 GeV proton energy need to be provided. Relatively little flexibility for the spectrometer configurations. Some overlap between the simulation and analysis codes (survey, for example). Parallel effort is required for the simulation and the analysis codes. Some remarks on the E906 simulation