MI Shielding Machine Protection Credit D. Capista March 7,2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Laser Awareness (Non-User). 2 What is a laser? Laser is an acronym for Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation.
Advertisements

Commissioning the access system M. Gruwé Machine checkout workshop November 8 th 2007.
Radiation Safety & Compliance External Beam –Electrons (linacs) –Photons (linacs, Gamma Knife) –Protons (Summer 2013) Brachytherapy –Sealed Sources –Radiopharmaceuticals.
FIRE PUMP ELECTRICAL CONFIGURATIONS UNDER 600 VOLTS.
Industrial Radiography
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Presentation to ASAC R. Casey Radiation Shielding: Assumption and Design April 24, 2007.
M. Jimenez AT/VAC Room Temperature (LSS) Vacuum Systems M. Jimenez.
LFR plant assessment against a Fukushima-like scenario Technical Workshop to Review Safety and Design Aspects of European LFR Demonstrator (ALFRED), European.
PROBLEM: Radiation Dose Rate in IR2 When IR1 is Operating (and Vice Versa) Muon Dose Rate > 1 mRem/hr for 0.1% Collimated Halo.
Gauges and well logging
AGENDA INTRODUCTION CELLS AND COMPONENTS PV PERFORMANCE PV APPLICATIONS CODES AND STANDARDS EMERGENCY RESPONSE.
Management of emergencies in industrial radiography
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Review of May 29 Excursion Bob Casey.
Personal Radiation and Occupational Safety – CT Policy This policy is in both paper form in the lab’s compliance manual, and on a Power Point presentation.
Posting of Accelerator Enclosures Vashek Vylet and Keith Welch DOE Accelerator Workshop SLAC, August 17 – 19,
ALPHA Project Safety Assessment Document Vladimir Anferov.
ANALYTICAL X-RAY SAFETY User Training Centre for Environmental Health, Safety and Security Management.
Levels of safety Priorities for eliminating hazards in the workplace Eliminate the hazard through the machine design stage Apply safeguarding technology.
W. Sliwinski – eLTC – 7March08 1 LSA & Safety – Integration of RBAC and MCS in the LHC control system.
MICE Magnetic Field Mitigation Review Potential impact on ISIS of MICE Stray Magnetic Fields 24 th September 2013 Martin Hughes.
Getting Beam to NuMI (It’s a worry!) Peter Kasper.
SNS Integrated Control System SNS Timing Master LA-UR Eric Bjorklund.
NUMI NuMI Internal Review July 12, 2001 Infrastructure: Radiation Safety Page 1 Technical Components NuMI Beamline Radiation Safety Issues Radiation Safety.
August 05, Startup 2013 Machine Status:  Proton Source Commissioning and Studies RFQ Injector Line (RIL) Linac Booster  Main Injector Startup.
LER Workshop, CERN, October 11-12, 2006Detector Safety with LER - Henryk Piekarz1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Accelerator & Detector.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Redundancy Requirements for Critical Devices R. Casey August 8, 2007.
2 IMPACT - THE FIRE PERMIT = Hot Work Permit 3 Welcome ! This course is linked to the use of IMPACT, so it is assumed that: You know how to use IMPACT.
Overview: Primary Sensitivities Nov S. Childress Page 1 NuMI Overview: NuMI Primary Beamline Sensitivities NuMI requirements are for a very large.
Designing for Radiation Protection. Design Standards for Radiation Protection – Leakage Radiation.
Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA Slide 1 LANL Proposal for Hazard Assessment Beam Spill Criteria Charles Kelsey, Mike Baumgartner,
MI primer for NuMI users  Getting beam  TLG modules  Timelines  Beam intensity  NuMI kickers  Extraction bumps and last turn positions  Batch positions.
J. Donald Cossairt Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia, IL Operated by Fermi Research Alliance, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-07CH11359 with.
‘Review’ of the machine protection system in the SPS 1 J. Wenninger BE-OP SPS MPS - ATOP 09.
Accelerator Safety Workshop SLAC John Blaikie Health Physics Program Manager – SC Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy Access Control and.
"... To design the control system that effectively matches the plant requires an understanding of the plant rivaling that of the plant's designers, operators,
Friday July 27, 2007 Page 1 Shutdown 2007 ES&H Enclosure Access  Linac Remains Operational until August 13 th  Booster RWP’s and enclosure access keys.
Proton Source Improvement Workshop Cogging W. Pellico Dec 6&
EUROnu Costing Workshop May 2011 Beta-Beam Costing Exercise Elena Wildner, CERN 25/05/11 1 EUROnu Costing Workshop, CERN May 2011.
Fermilab AD E/E Support Department Fermilab’s Experience in Applying OSHA and NFPA 70E Requirements in Accelerator Power Supply Systems NFPA 70E Standard.
BooNE / NuMI Rad. Protection NBI 2002 S. Childress (FNAL) Radiation Protection for Mini-BooNE & NuMI 18 March, 2002 Mini-BooNE inputs from Peter Kasper.
Mike Scharfenstein LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 ES&H Overview p. 1 LCLS Ultrafast Science Instruments (LUSI) M. Scharfenstein.
CERN Jan 2006 Specific safety Issues for 2006 compared to 2004 P. Cennini AB Safety Requirement in case the Installation activities are going on.
CLIC Interlock System study: from Principle to Prototyping Patrice Nouvel TE-MPE-EP TE-MPE Technical Meeting : 22/03/2012.
August 12, Machine Status: 2013  Proton Source Commissioning and Studies RFQ Injector Line (RIL) Linac : Roof hatch installed Booster : Magnet.
NuMI PS Specs June 2001 S. Childress Page 1 NuMI NuMI requirements are for a very large fraction of the available Main Injector intensity over a period.
A. Shop Safety Awareness and Principles for Safety.
Personnel Safety Systems Stuart Birch Senior Engineer, Personnel Safety Systems November 6 th, 2014.
Fire Alarm Verification CAN/ULC-S561-03
5 July 2005T. Yasuda, Fermilab D0 Shift Captain Responsibilities Taka Yasuda Fermilab.
Maximum Credible Beam Loss in the Main Injector D. Capista January 26, 2012.
Radiation Protection Standards for Prompt Radiation Don Cossairt, Radiation Protection Manager, ESH&Q Section October 1, 2013.
Reliability and Performance of the SNS Machine Protection System Doug Curry 2013.
Primary Design Parameters July 13,2001 S. Childress Page 1 NuMI Besides design specifications driven by physics and Main Injector beam parameters, significant.
Shielding Design for LCLS Injector Operation – Phase one
Industrial Radiography
A. Shop Safety Awareness and Principles for Safety
Module 9 General Rules for Radiation Producing Machines
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
Radiation Safety Training Research & Analytical Machines Washington State University Radiation Safety Office.
AGENDA INTRODUCTION CELLS AND COMPONENTS PV PERFORMANCE
From AS :   Part 4— Commissioning, operation and asset management
Confined Space (Permit-required)
EET 323 – Electrical System Design Lecture 9: Grounding
2003 test beam with 25 ns bunched muons
AGENDA INTRODUCTION CELLS AND COMPONENTS PV PERFORMANCE
LEBT water cooling system
RSFs & categorisation 20 May, 2019.
Radiation Protection Handbook
Phenotyping Facility X-ray Awareness Training
Presentation transcript:

MI Shielding Machine Protection Credit D. Capista March 7,2010

Accident Analysis  Determine the most likely value of dNbeam/dt and its upper limit for each scenario. The upper limit compared with the most likely value may be useful to determine the uncertainty in the analysis.  Determine the most likely values of Δt beam and its upper limit for each scenario. The upper limit compared with the most likely value may be useful to determine the uncertainty in the analysis.  In all scenarios, any beam loss over 10% of full intensity (5E13), will most likely trip the machine in a single pulse.  A single point loss will trip with much less than 10% loss  There exists a case, in all scenarios, where due to equipment and administrative failures, the entire beam can be lost repeatedly for extended periods of time.

Accelerator Shielding Controls Credited Controls – Passive Controls Concrete, Steel, Earth, Radiation Fencing – Active Controls Radiation Safety System – Enclosure Interlocks – Radiation Monitors » Chipmunks, Scarecrows, Foxes Current philosophy requires a combination of Credited Passive and Active controls based on area occupancy. Question becomes how can we utilize the machine protection systems. Beam Loss Scenario Panel Meeting JEA

Pae 4 Defense-in-Depth Strategy Beam Loss Scenario Panel Meeting JEA Administrative Controls Credited Controls Risk Matrix Process Controls

Non Credited Controls Beam Loss Scenario Panel Meeting JEA Maximum Dose (D) Expected in 1 hour Controls D  1000 mrem Prior approval of SRSO required with control measures specified on a case-by-case basis. 500  D  1000 mrem Signs (DANGER -- High Radiation Area) and 8 ft. high rigid barriers with interlocked gates or doors and visible flashing lights warning of the hazard. Rigid barriers with no gates or doors are a permitted alternate. No beam-on access permitted. Radiological Worker Training required. 100  D  500 mrem Signs (DANGER -- High Radiation Area) and rigid barriers (at least 4' high) with locked gates. For beam-on radiation, access restricted to authorized personnel. Radiological Worker Training required. 5  D  100 mrem Signs (CAUTION -- Radiation Area) and minimal occupancy (duration of occupancy of less than1 hr). The Division/Section/Center RSO has the option of imposing additional controls in accordance with Article 231 to ensure personnel entry control is maintained. Radiological Worker Training required. 1  D  5 mrem Signs (CAUTION -- Controlled Area). No occupancy limits imposed. Radiological Worker Training required. 1 < D < 10 mremMinimal occupancy only (duration of credible occupancy < 1 hr) no posting D  1 mrem No precautions needed.

Accident Conditions with Machine Protection Beam Loss Scenario Panel Meeting JEA Maximum Dose (D) Expected in 1 hour Machine Controls D  1000 mrem 500  D  1000 mrem 100  D  500 mrem 5  D  100 mrem 1  D  5 mrem 1 < D < 10 mrem D  1 mrem 2 Machine Protection Controls 4 Machine Protection Controls Credited Controls Always required SRSO Approval Required with Control Measures Specified on a Case-by-Case Basis.

MI Machine Protection Controls  Main Control Room Occupied 24 hrs a day, 7 days a week by Operations. Machines are monitored by both operators and experts. Has several dedicated displays for monitoring accelerators such as the beam budget monitor.  Machine Timing ( Time Line Generator) Timing modules consist of a structure of clock events that cause accelerators to function in a defined manner. Timing modules are created by machine experts and approved for use by experts. Accelerator operators load approved modules for machine scenarios.  Beam Sync clock system Monitors accelerator clock structure and beam permits and determines whether or not to issue a beam transfer event. These beam transfer events will transfer beam from one machine to another. If the event does not occur, beam is sent to the abort.

MI Machine Protection Controls  Beam Permit system ( abort loop) Accepts digital inputs form devices and determines if beam can be present in the accelerator. The system will abort beam if the loop drops when beam present. MCR has abort buttons at most consoles.  Beam Switch Sum Box (BSSB) Monitors Accelerator clock structure, beam permits, and beam switch requests for beam and determines whether to start the acceleration process at the Preacc.  For a list of approved machine scenarios, clock definitions, and other documentation:

MI Machine Protection Controls  Orbit Control Beam orbit is monitored by operators / experts and smoothed to a desired set of positions using a console application program. In the MI8 beam line some of the positions, around the collimators, are automatically controlled with an autotune program running. For NuMI extraction, beam positions are verified, at high energy, before the extraction kicker is fired. If these positions are not correct, the beam is aborted and the beam permit will drop out.  Beam Loss Monitors One monitor is located no less than ever three magnets. If the integrated loss exceeds a limit on a cycle the abort is pulled at the end of the cycle by pulling the beam permit loop. If the instantaneous loss exceeds a limit during a cycle the beam is aborted by pulling the beam permit loop.

MI Machine Protection Controls  Power supply monitoring. All major power supplied in the ring and beam lines are connected to the beam permit system. In some cases these are digital on/off status and in other cases the flat top value is compared to a nominal value.  Vacuum system. The ion pumps are monitored by a local crate and if the vacuum pressure is too high, the vacuum valves are closed to protect the machine, and the beam permit is pulled.  Machine design and geometry. The MI has been designed in a way that makes it difficult to directly hit a component directly.