Evaluation Planning Checklist (1 of 2) Planning Checklist Planning is a crucial part of the evaluation process. The following checklist (based on the original.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bridging the gap between good practice principles and research study realities. Using case studies to build descriptors of the public involvement role.
Advertisements

Achieve Benefit from IT Projects. Aim This presentation is prepared to support and give a general overview of the ‘How to Achieve Benefits from IT Projects’
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
The Power of Collaboration Models of Collective Impact
SMI Stakeholder Event, 7 th March, 2013 SMI Education and Training start and finish group: SMI workforce development: Service innovation and transformation.
Child Safeguarding Standards
What You Will Learn From These Sessions
Evaluation at The Prince’s Trust Fire Service Prince's Trust Association meeting 18 th February 2010 Subtitle.
In Europe, When you ask the VET stakeholders : What does Quality Assurance mean for VET system? You can get the following answer: Quality is not an absolute.
NICE and NICE’s equality programme in 2012 Nick Doyle Clinical and public health analyst.
Wales Accord on the Sharing of Personal Information (WASPI)
INTEGRATING BENEFICIARY FEEDBACK INTO EVALUATION- A STRUCTURED APPROACH Presentation to UKES Conference May 2015 Theme: Theory and practice of inclusion.
Action Implementation and Monitoring A risk in PHN practice is that so much attention can be devoted to development of objectives and planning to address.
Action Writing Action Statements Writing action statements is the first step in the second (action) stage of the public health nutrition (PHN) intervention.
Challenge Questions How good is our operational management?
Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Clinical Audit How to make it work Clinical Audit Department Last revised July 2009.
AnalyseDesignDevelopImplementEvaluate ADDIE - Model.
School Development Planning Initiative “An initiative for schools by schools” Self-Evaluation of Learning and Teaching Self-Evaluation of Learning and.
4. Quality Management System (QMS)
Introduction to Standard 2: Partnering with consumers Advice Centre Network Meeting Nicola Dunbar October 2012.
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Creating a service Idea. Creating a service Networking / consultation Identify the need Find funding Create a project plan Business Plan.
Needs Analysis Session Scottish Community Development Centre November 2007.
Sense of Initiative and Entrepreneurship This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This [publication] communication reflects.
Scottish Government funded Projects: Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning (MEL) … and reporting 4 September 2013.
Embedding Research in Practice Judy Lawrence RD PhD
Involving the Whole Organization in Creating or Restructuring a Volunteer Program Louise DeIasi DeCava Consulting.
Impact assessment framework
Training of Process Facilitators Training of Process Facilitators.
Medical Audit.
The Audit Process Tahera Chaudry March Clinical audit A quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and outcomes through systematic.
National Support Team: Findings from the first 2 years Katrina Stephens Associate Delivery Manager, Alcohol Harm Reduction National Support Team, Department.
Bowel Screening Project Overview Rhys Blake Head of Business and Service Development.
Workshop 6 - How do you measure Outcomes?
Grundtvig Learning Partnership Project TeachingFlex.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Refining the Program Intervention Based on Research.
Copyright  2005 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Australian Human Resources Management by Jeremy Seward and Tim Dein Slides prepared by Michelle.
Developing a Sustainable Procurement Policy and Strategy EAUC – EAF Programme.
Alain Thomas Overview workshop Background to the Principles Definitions The National Principles for Public Engagement What.
SEN and Disability Reform Partner Supplier briefing event December 2012.
Development Impact Evaluation in Finance and Private Sector 1.
This work is part of the Joint Action on Improving Quality in HIV Prevention (Quality Action), which has received funding from the European Union within.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
This was developed as part of the Scottish Government’s Better Community Engagement Programme.
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
Regional Advisory Group Department of Education. Purpose of the Regional Advisory Group The purpose of the RAG is to provide advice to ELBs/YCNI, which.
Developing Monitoring & Evaluation Frameworks: Process or Product? Anne Markiewicz.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
AssessPlanDo Review QuestionYesNo? Do I know what I want to evaluate and why? Consider drivers and audience Do I already know the answer to my evaluation.
12. Reporting Template The template below outlines the key information you need to provide within your evaluation report. Note: use this as a guide as.
4 th Biennial SAMEA Conference Meaningful Evaluation: Improving Use and Results Evaluation of Teacher-Directed ICT Initiatives Presenter Mokete Mokone.
TACKLING AN ENGAGEMENT CHALLENGE TOGETHER Worksheets and templates.
HSC Provide information about health and social care or children and young people’s services EDUC8TIONS LTD.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Mandy Williams, Participation Cymru manager
Evidencing that it works Capturing carers’ personal outcomes in Midlothian Eibhlin McHugh, Director of Communities and Wellbeing, Midlothian Council Julie.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
OUR FOCUS FOR 2011 TO 2012 The CfWI produces quality intelligence to inform better workforce planning, that improves people’s lives.
Service Evaluation Toolkit for Health and Social Care Commissioners Avon Primary Care Research Collaborative 2015.
SEN, disability and the EYFS
Resource 1. Involving and engaging the right stakeholders.
Research Into Practice
Unit 6 Research Project in HSC Unit 6 Research Project in Health and Social Care Aim This unit aims to develop learners’ skills of independent enquiry.
AXIS critical Appraisal of cross sectional Studies
Assess Plan Do Review Resource 1. Resources
Resource 1. Evaluation Planning Template
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation Planning Checklist (1 of 2) Planning Checklist Planning is a crucial part of the evaluation process. The following checklist (based on the original APCRC checklist) has been designed to help with the process of carefully planning your evaluation, outlining the key steps going forward. IdentifyQuestions to ask Study type1.Is this a service evaluation or research? Project Governance 2.Who will take responsibility for getting the evaluation off the ground and oversee its delivery? 3.Who will write the evaluation plan, identify the required resources and engage stakeholders? 4.Do you need an advisory or steering group? Project resources 4.What resources are available to support this evaluation? What resources do you think you might need / how much might it cost? Who might fund the evaluation? 5.What level or type of evaluation do you need? Support for the project: All Stakeholders 9.Who are your key stakeholders? 9.Who needs to be informed? 10.Who do you need to involve in the evaluation planning, delivery and dissemination? 10.Who has skills, experience and expertise to support you with your project? i.e. Patient and public involvement, equalities, communications and engagement, evaluation leads in your own or partner organisations Support for the project: Service User Involvement 14.How will you involve service users, patients, carers and the public in your evaluation? Consider this in terms of the design, delivery (data collection) and dissemination (communicating your findings). Context: Evidence Base 19.What is the evidence base for the planned service, service change, pilot? 20.How have similar services been evaluated in the past? Context: Understanding the Service 19.Is it clear who the service is for? (population group, needs and characteristics) 20.Is it clear what the desired intermediate and long term outcomes are and how the activities of the service or intervention will lead to these? Scope of the project 19.Have you agreed with your stakeholders the purpose of the evaluation? 20.Are you clear what the evaluation will focus on? 21.Is it clear why you are conducting an evaluation?

Step 5: Evaluation Plan IdentifyQuestions to ask Aims and Objectives of the evaluation 23.Have you engaged your stakeholders to help you identify your evaluations aims (why you are doing this evaluation) and objectives (what you are trying to achieve)? 24.Are your aims and objectives SMART? Evaluation approach 25. What evaluation approach or method are you planning to take? 26.Do you need to commission an external evaluation? Data requirements 26.What information and data do you already have available to support your evaluation? 27.What additional data collection do you need to undertake to be able to answer the aims and objectives of your evaluation? Data Collection, Analysis and Reporting 26.What data do you need to collect? Will your data collection tools work? Are there any validated tools that can help? Who will collect the data? 27.How will you analyse the data? Who will analyse the data? 28.How and who will write up the findings? 29.Have you identified any training needs to support these activities? Timescales, responsibilities and resources 28.What are the timescales for the evaluation and the data collection? 29.Who will be responsible for each of these? 30.Do you need any additional resources or funding? Information Governance 30.Have you reviewed your organisational policies on Information Governance including data protection, storage and use to ensure that your evaluation plan complies or sort advice from your information governance lead? 31.Have you sought relevant permissions to undertake the service evaluation? Ethical implications 32.Have you considered the impact of your evaluation on the participants and the service? 33.Have you put adequate safeguards in place to protect the participants in your study? Including gaining consent and feeding back findings. Recommendations and action planning 34.Have you agreed your recommendations and how you are going to implement them? 35.Have you developed your action plan? Sharing the findings 35.How are you going to feedback the findings from your evaluation to your stakeholders? 36.Have you developed a communication plan to share your findings and recommendations? Are you still doing an evaluation? 29. Once you have planned your evaluation recheck whether you are doing a service evaluation or research to ensure that you have the appropriate permissions and approvals for starting the project. Evaluation Planning Checklist (2 of 2)