Proposed Regulation to Restrict Idling of Diesel-Powered Vehicles Environmental Quality Board Harrisburg, Pennsylvania October 16, 2007 Thomas K. Fidler,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Air Quality Division Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality.
Advertisements

Clean Air Act (CAA) -Drafted in 1963 and amendments added in 1965, 1970, 1977, and Legislation on a national level -Regulated by the Federal Government.
Surface Mine Safety Regulation 25 PA Code Chapter 209.
Air pollution is caused by emissions of particulate matter and harmful gases.the most common air pollutants are: Suspended particulates Sulphur dioxide.
Mobile Source P2: Vehicle Idle Reduction Mike Moltzen EPA Region 2 Great Lakes Regional Pollution Prevention Roundtable Summer Conference New York City,
School Bus Idling Implementation Report Public Meeting Fresno, California October 28, 2004 California Environmental Protection Agency AIR RESOURCES BOARD.
1 Proposed Rulemaking to Implement Provisions of the Federal Clean Air Interstate Rule Environmental Quality Board Meeting Harrisburg, PA February 20,
Robert Tekniepe Clark County Department of Air Quality and Environmental Management Air Quality Forum November 14, 2006 Clean Diesel Strategies.
Regulations to Restrict Idling of Diesel-Powered Vehicles Philadelphia Diesel Difference June 18, 2007 Arleen Shulman Bureau of Air Quality, Pennsylvania.
California Air Quality Governance Bart Croes, Chief Research Division
Legislative and Regulatory Overview Diesel Engine Emission Legislation & Compliance Illinois Equipment Distributors October 14, 2009 Bob Jones SES, Inc.
NYSED 2008 Anti-Idling for School Buses1 N.Y.S. Anti-Idling Law & Regulation Chapter 670 Law of 2007 bans idling of school buses on or adjacent to school.
Ohio’s Clean Diesel School Bus Retrofit Grant Program Winner of a 2008 Leadership Award from the.
Transportation and Air Quality in the Treasure Valley.
Idling Reduction Basics for Fleets Coalition Name Presenter: Date:
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
Overview of the California Air Resources Board Bart Croes, Chief Research Division
Thomas K. Fidler Deputy Secretary for Waste, Air and Radiation Management Department of Environmental Protection Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Proposed.
The Clean Air Act Michael Stewart. The Clean air act ●The original Clean Air Act was drafted in 1963 and was amended in 1965,1970, 1977, and ●The.
David A. Ramirez Area Director for Border and Permian Basin Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Border to Border Transportation Conference November.
Cleaning Up School Bus Fleets: Less Fumes, Same Zoom… A presentation of the Southeastern Pennsylvania Clean School Bus Coalition. Eric Cheung, Clean Air.
Founded 1989 “Hybrid” transportation provider 150+ Vehicles in Fleet 97% of Miles Driven are “GREEN” Largest Private “GREEN” Fleet in United States. About.
National Clean Diesel Campaign Clean Diesel Programs: Overview Halida Hatic U.S. EPA New England April 7, 2008.
Ohio’s Clean Diesel School Bus Retrofit Grant Program Winner of a 2008 Leadership Award from the.
Air Quality and Conformity Issues James M. Shrouds, Director Office of Natural and Human Environment Federal Highway Administration AASHTO SCOE Meeting.
Welcome to the Idling-Reduction Workshop. Small Business Environmental Assistance Program Provides air-focused technical assistance to Kansas small- and.
PUBLIC WORKSHOP STATEWIDE DIESEL ENGINE IDLE REDUCTION STANDARD August 23, 2007 Department of Environmental Protection Division of Air Resource Management.
PUBLIC WORKSHOP DIESEL ENGINE IDLE REDUCTION STANDARD March 19, 2008 Department of Environmental Protection Division of Air Resource Management.
GENERAL CONDITIONS: ARTICLE 39 DIESEL VEHICLE EMISSIONS CONTROL GENERAL CONDITIONS: ARTICLE 39 DIESEL VEHICLE EMISSIONS CONTROL Connecticut's Diesel Reduction.
Updated 11/14/11 Carolyn Watkins, Office of Environmental Education Carolina Prado, Division of.
It’s a Good Idea to Shut It Down: Reducing Unnecessary Idling School Bus Driver “Reduce Idling” Training North Carolina DMV June 2005 Save Fuel and Breathe.
California Experience in Converting Vehicles to Alternative Fuels New Delhi, India May 2001 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Air Resources Board.
Proposed Rulemaking 25 Pa. Code Chapter 121. General Provisions Chapter 127 Subchapter E. New Source Review John Slade, Chief Division of Permits Bureau.
Updated 10/26/11 Carolyn Watkins, Office of Environmental Education Carolina Prado, Division of Air.
National Clean Diesel Campaign Upcoming Funding Opportunities Rosalva Tapia June 3, 2009 National Tribal Forum on Air Quality Management Conference 2009.
New Hampshire’s Idling Reduction Programs and State Funding Opportunities Presentation by Kathleen M. Brockett N.H. Department of Environmental Services.
Environmental Quality Board Harrisburg, PA October 16, 2007 Thomas K. Fidler, Deputy Secretary Office of Waste, Air and Radiation Management Feasibility.
Orange County Board of County Commissioners Chapter 15, Proposed Modifications to Article III Air Quality Control Environmental Protection Division June.
1 Improving Air Quality in the Metro. Washington Region Phil Mendelson, Chair Metropolitan Washington Air Quality Committee October 19, 2006.
California’s Efforts to Address Air Quality Impacts Related to Goods Movement Activities.
Idling Reduction Basics for Fleets San Francisco Clean Cities Coalition Presenter Date.
1 Consideration of Final Rulemaking Clean Air Interstate Rule Environmental Quality Board Meeting Harrisburg, PA December 18, 2007 Joyce E. Epps Director,
By Michelle Hoang Period 2 APES April 30, 2012 The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976.
Proposed Engine Manufacturer Diagnostic (EMD) System Regulation Mobile Source Control Division California Air Resources Board May 20, 2004 Sacramento,
Clean air act Drafted in 1963 Amended in 1963, 1965, 1970, 1977, 1990 It is national.
California On-Road In-Use Regulations. 2  The new requirements from the California Air Resources Board (CARB) are intended to improve air quality by.
Resource Management Planning Air Quality Brock LeBaron Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality
Proposed Airborne Toxic Control Measure to Limit School Bus Idling and Idling at Schools Public Workshop September 2002.
Literature Reviews One out of every four children in Harlem has asthma, according to a study released by the Harlem Hospital Center. Asthma is the number.
Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Safety Inspections A Decentralized Approach 1.
1 Diesel-Vehicles Emission Control in Japan Environmental Management Bureau, Ministry of the Environment, Japan Masayuki KOIWA.
Final Omitted Rulemakings Repeals: Employer Trip Reduction; Portable Fuel Container Requirements; and St. Joe Resources Company Emission Limits Environmental.
1 Mobile Sources Work Group Final Report - PM 2.5 SIP Brian Newbacher Dir. of Public Affairs, AAA Chair, Mobile Sources Work Group June 12, 2007 NOACA.
Anti-idling campaign Name? Transport Manager Name? Driver Trainer Insert company logo/picture.
Proposed Rulemaking: Additional RACT Requirements for Major Sources of NO x and VOCs (25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 129) Environmental Quality Board November.
Amendments to 25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 123: Final-form Rulemaking: Commercial Fuel Oil Sulfur Limits for Combustion Units Environmental Quality Board.
Report on the Mercury Emissions Petition Environmental Quality Board Meeting Harrisburg, Pennsylvania August 16, 2005.
1 Final Rulemaking - Chapter 245, Administration of the Storage Tank and Spill Prevention Program (Subchapters A-H) Environmental Quality Board Meeting.
Final Rulemaking: 25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 139 Measurement and Reporting of Condensable Particulate Matter Emissions Environmental Quality Board Meeting.
Petition to Adopt Regulations to Restrict Idling of Diesel-Powered Vehicles Environmental Quality Board Harrisburg, Pennsylvania January 17, 2006.
Environmental Quality Board May 16, 2007
Environmental Quality Board
The Air Pollution Control Act of 1955
Clean Air Act Litigation Update State Air Director Meeting May 2015
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
Consideration of Final Rulemaking
Final Amendments to the Municipal & Residual Waste Regulations
by: Christine Dao Per. 2 11/18/10
Highlights on Statewide Strategies Benefitting Communities
Presentation transcript:

Proposed Regulation to Restrict Idling of Diesel-Powered Vehicles Environmental Quality Board Harrisburg, Pennsylvania October 16, 2007 Thomas K. Fidler, Deputy Secretary Office of Waste, Air and Radiation Management

Background of Proposed Rulemaking The Clean Air Board of Central PA, Inc. (CAB) petitioned EQB in October EQB accepted the petition for study in January As a result of the study, in May 2007, EQB directed DEP to develop a statewide idling restriction regulation. Proposed rulemaking amends 25 Pa. Code Chapter 126 by adding new Subchapters F and G and adds new definitions to Chapter 121.

Benefits and Costs Idling restrictions would reduce a significant source of diesel pollution, affecting fine particulate matter (PM 2.5) and ozone. Pennsylvania continues to face challenges in attaining and maintaining standards for these pollutants. Exposure to toxic diesel emissions would be reduced in areas where such vehicles congregate. Statewide regulation of anti-idling allows operators to know where and when idling is restricted.

Benefits and Costs Saves industry money by reducing fuel costs. For long-haul trucking, initial capital costs of on- truck alternative technology can be a challenge: costs less than $1,000 to as much as $10,000 with some state assistance available. Electrified parking spaces available at 11 truck stops statewide and in all states adjacent to Pennsylvania.

Proposed Provisions Applicable to diesel-powered “commercial motor vehicles,” similar to definition in U.S. Department of Transportation regulation. In practice, highway vehicles over 10,000 pounds, including most freight trucks and buses. Not off- road vehicles. Idling restrictions would apply at locations where commercial diesel vehicles load, unload, or park. An idling limitation of 5 minutes in any 60-minute period unless exemptions apply.

Proposed Exemptions (Section ) Sleeper-berth trucks may idle in cold or hot temperatures until May 1, Alternative technology is available. Exemption does not apply if electrified parking spaces are available. Auxiliary power system and electrified parking spaces

Proposed Exemptions (con’t) Buses - allowed 15 minutes in 60 minute period when passengers onboard and no expiration of exemption.  During active loading and unloading (freight and passengers) if necessary.

Proposed Exemptions (con’t) Most included in EPA’s model law. When idling is necessary -- Work-related machinery On-road traffic Required for inspection Servicing To prevent health, safety emergency In an emergency or emergency training Armored vehicle School bus queuing in certain configurations Due to mechanical difficulties Also grandfathers alternative compliance plans for bus terminals.

Provisions for Diesel Engines Proposed regulation allows idling by main engines with very low nitrogen oxides if so labelled. ( (b)) engines cleaner than diesel-powered auxiliary power systems (APS), but drivers may still choose APSs for fuel savings. Requires APSs with trucks to route through main exhaust filter or have label showing APS is cleaner (Subchapter G).

Comments Requested Diversity of needs Requesting comment to fine tune exemptions Examples -- trucks without sleeper berths, queuing for load inspection

Implementation  DEP has authority for administrative penalties and summary offenses.  Since most idling is due to truck travel rest at truck/rest stops, targeted education campaigns in selected areas would be more effective in reducing idling emissions than responding to individual complaints.  DEP inspectors and state and local police would have the authority to enforce.

Air Quality Technical Advisory Committee recommended proposed rulemaking for EQB consideration at its July 26, 2007, meeting. Citizens Advisory Council recommended on July 17, Small Business Compliance Advisory Committee consulted on July 25, Committee Review

Recommendation Approve the proposed rulemaking for public review and comment with a 60- day public comment period and three public hearings. Thank you for consideration of the proposal.

Thank You Thomas K. Fidler Deputy Secretary, Office of Waste, Air and Radiation Management Kristen Campfield Office of Chief Counsel Arleen Shulman Bureau of Air Quality Joyce E. Epps Bureau of Air Quality