Day Two: February 25, 2014 8:30-3:00. Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Smarter Balanced Assessment a Closer Look Level 1 Part 6.
Advertisements

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Elementary Principals CCSS Update Robyn Seifert & Rita Reimbold April 10, 2013.
Welcome to Smarter Balanced Math Assessment Claims EDUCATIONAL SERVICE CENTER - NORTH LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Spring 2014 Facilitator Name.
CCSS/SBAC Update Sara Shore 1. SBAC Pilot Test Feb 20- May 10 Volunteer window closes Jan BalancedPilothttps://
Iowa Core Leadership Session 1 for Welcome!!
Understanding the Smarter BalanceD Math Summative Assessment
Robyn Seifert February 6,  smarterbalanced.org  K-12 EDUCATION  Administrators 2.
Strengthening Mathematics Instruction Cognitive Complexity and Instructional Strategies Dr. Vicki Jim
Welcome Dana Families! Dena Hause Dana Middle School Back to School Night September 25, 2014.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium. Structure of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics Research-based learning progressions Internationally.
Leadership Academy NMC Hagerty Center August 22, 2012.
M-Step Math Prep Grades 3-5 February 25, 2015 KRISTI HINEMAN, TRISH DUNN, MARIANNE SROCK,
ESCN – Principal Meeting Secondary Mathematics January 21, 2015.
M-Step Math Prep Grades 3-5 March 3, 2015 KRISTI HINEMAN, TRISH DUNN, MARIANNE SROCK,
Career and College Readiness (CCR) NGSS, CCSS ELA/Literacy, CCSS Mathematics, MMC K-12 Science Framework and NGSS Review in Terms of CCR 1.
Common Core State Standards: Overview of CCSS Mathematics CSU STEM Conference March 14, 2014 Ivan Cheng CSU Northridge.
SMARTER BALANCED QUESTION TYPES OVERVIEW TEXT TXT EXT Assess a broad range of content. Scoring is objective, fast, and inexpensive to score. Difficult.
© 2013 Boise State University1 What the Shifts in the Standards Mean for Learning and Instruction Michele Carney, PhD Spring 2014.
Evaluating Student Growth Looking at student works samples to evaluate for both CCSS- Math Content and Standards for Mathematical Practice.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Parent Information Session Colchester Public Schools 1.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium A Peek at the Assessment System 1 Rachel Eifler January 30, 2014.
2014 Summer Session Day 1. Today’s Agenda Stipends SCECH’s Sign-in and out! Moodle
Math Practices (Part I) November 2, 2012 Maricela Rincon, Professional Development Specialist
Strategies for Teaching, Supporting and Assessing Students’ Understanding and Development of Algebra and Function Concepts, Operations and Skills Leading.
 Connecting to the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics- Assessment Tools for Student Success Anton Jackson, OSPI Sandy Christie, Puget Sound ESD.
Common Core State Standards
 Connecting to the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics- Assessment Tools for Student Success Anton Jackson, OSPI Sandy Christie, Puget Sound ESD.
Warm-Up Discuss homework at your table: TTLP Thinking Through a Lesson Protocol Resource Inventory (what do you use?) Focal Student Update 1.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Exploring Claim 2, 3, and 4 This material was developed for.
Warm-Up Discuss homework at your table: TTLP Thinking Through a Lesson Protocol Resource Inventory (what do you use?) Focal Student Update Growth Mindset.
Task Analysis Connecting Math and Science through class discussions.
September 5, 2013 Teresa Lightle, Butte County Office of Education CA Common Core State Standards for.
NEW STANDARDS FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY Connecticut Common Core Standards.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Integrating the Standards for Mathematical Practice with the Standards for Mathematical Content Part One – K-5 Math Oct. 23,
Implementing the CCSS 3 rd – 5 th Grade Kristin Frang, Mathematics Consultant.
CCSS Mathematics Fellows SUE BLUESTEIN ESD112 REGIONAL MATHEMATICS COORDINATOR.
ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON MIDDLE LEVEL PRINCIPALS WINTER MEETING -- JANUARY 24, 2015 Leveraging the SBAC System to Support Effective Assessment Practices.
Welcome to the SCMP 2 Grades 3-5 Fall Content Day.
The 8 Standards for Mathematical Practice in the Common Core State Standards Names Here Content Created by June Apaza and Vicki Kapust.
2014 Summer Session Day 1. 3 Day Goals Planning: Writing Assessment Items and Choosing a 3 Act Task Create a 3 Act Task.
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
WALNUT HIGH SCHOOL CAASPP INFORMATION NIGHT How to Understand Your Child’s report
Welcome Principals Please sit in groups of 3 2 All students graduate college and career ready Standards set expectations on path to college and career.
S MARTER B ALANCED A SSESSMENT S UMMARY June 17, 2013.
“Charting the Course Together” Implementing the Common Core State Standards -Mathematics- Indiana Room Math Leadership Teams December 8, 2014.
SBAC Claim 1: Concepts and Procedures Students can explain and apply mathematical concepts interpret and carry out mathematical procedures with precision.
SBAC Claims > Targets > CCSSm Standards Understanding the assessment scheme Module 3, 22 October 2015.
Walnut Valley Unified School District “Understanding Your Child’s 2015 CAASPP Report” California Assessment and Accountability System Performance and Progress.
Smarter Balanced 103: Item Types and Instructional Implementation Rachel Aazzerah Science & Social Science Assessment Specialist
KLC Meeting Explore the two samples provided considering the following questions: What are some of the possible similarities you see in how you.
Assessment in Common Core. Essential Questions How is CAASPP different than STAR? How is SBAC different than CST? What do students have to know and be.
SBAC-Mathematics November 26, Outcomes Further understand DOK in the area of Mathematics Understand how the new SBAC assessments will measure student.
MTSS District Coaches Network March 22, 2013 Lea McAllister Marianne Srock.
MATHEMATICS YEAR TWO LEADERSHIP SERIES IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES TO ENGAGE STUDENTS AND RAISE ACHIEVEMENT FEBRUARY 19, MARCH 26, MAY 21, 2014.
June 25,  Overview of Sessions  Session 1: Instructional Shifts  Session 2: Assessment of the CCSS-M  Session 3: Student Goal Setting  Session.
CCSS & Smarter Balanced Mathematics: Key Shifts to Claims tinyurl.com/UPK5math University of Portland Brian Graham Camas School District TOSA M.Ed.
Math and the SBAC Claims
Session 4 Objectives Participants will:
Presentation transcript:

Day Two: February 25, :30-3:00

Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the CCSS-M  Understand the DOK of the CCSS-M  Design summative assessments that meet the focus, coherence and rigor of the CCSS-M in their respective content areas to mimic those that students will be expected to take in 2015  Raise student achievement through designing instruction that prepares students for success on the summative assessment

 Session One Goals  Develop an understanding of the CCSS-M and how they will be assessed beginning in spring 2015  Understand the components of the SBAC in relation to mathematics assessment  Understand the DOK in the CCSS-M and SBAC requirements  Examine prototype items to use as examples in developing items for your courses  Create at least one performance/task item to pilot in your course prior to Feb. 25

  Since the Last Session:  These are the things that I understand ……..  These are the things I am wondering about……..  These are things I would like to know more about……  I believe one of the challenges of accomplishing the goals of this series is…….. Formative Assessment and Questions

5 Standards for Mathematical Practice William McCallum Standards for Mathematical Practice Tucson, April 2011

SBAC Content Specifications for the Summative Assessment of the CCSS for Mathematics, Review Draft December 9, 2011 Claims for Mathematics Summative Assessment Claim #1 Concepts &Procedures “Students can explain and apply mathematical concepts and interpret and carry out mathematical procedures with precision and fluency”. Claim #2 Problem Solving “Students can solve a range of complex well-posed problems in pure and applied mathematics, making productive use of knowledge and problem solving strategies.” Claim #3 Communicating and Reasoning “Students can clearly and precisely construct viable arguments to support their own reasoning and to critique the reasoning of others.” Claim #4 Modeling and Data Analysis “Students can analyze complex, real-world scenarios and can construct and use mathematical models to interpret and solve problems.”

SBAC Basics: Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Measure of Cognitive Rigor The level of task complexity. Level 1: Recall and Reproduction  Requires eliciting information such as a fact, definition, term, or a simple procedure, as well as performing a simple algorithm or applying a formula. Level 2: Basic Skills and Concepts  Requires the engagement of some mental processing beyond a recall of information. Level 3: Strategic Thinking and Reasoning  Requires reasoning, planning, using evidence, and explanations of thinking. Level 4: Extended Thinking  Requires complex reasoning, planning, developing, and thinking most likely over an extended period of time.

Cognitive Rigor Matrix

 Classroom Experiences Please share what you have worked on in your classroom since we last met in regards to implementing the CCSS-M and/or assessments

15 minutes

Initial ALD’s (Math – Grade 11)

ITEM OVERVIEW

 Smarter Balanced Proto-type Items SAMPLE ITEMS  vimprove/assess/sbac. html vimprove/assess/sbac. html PRACTICE TESTS  t.org/Practice_Test/def ault.html t.org/Practice_Test/def ault.html

  Think of an assessment you already use:  Collaborate on how the mathematics standards (content and practice) are addressed in the course(s)  Where does this fit in the curriculum?  How might you enhance the assessment to meet the rigor of what will be expected of students in 2015?  How will the assessment be used? (Summative at what point? Course(s)?)  Use the template provided for your work  What resources will students need?  Will you need to create a rubric to assess the work? Constructing Items

Template

esigning-rubrics esigning-rubrics

  Tweak your next benchmark assessment to reflect what students may expect to see on the spring 2015 mathematics assessment  Integrate instruction with your partner(s)  How does the math content integrate with the CTE content?  How do we strengthen these connections?  We would like to collect these assessments, so please use the template as a guide for your work Goals for Session 2

Share our progress at 2:30!

 Session 3 – March Please complete the survey on Moodle before you leave! DO NOT take March 25 off your calendars until you receive an alternate date!

Please Provide Feedback BEFORE you leave: 6/24/2016