Cryogenics for SuperB IR Magnets J. G. Weisend II SLAC National Accelerator Lab.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Advertisements

Mar 13, Low-energy RHIC electron Cooler (LEReC) CRYOGENICS Mar 13, 2014.
Cryogenic Experts Meeting (19 ~ ) Helium distribution system for Super-FRS dipoles and multiplets MT/FAIR – Cryogenics and Magnets Y. Xiang,
Design pressure issues of Super-FRS dipole CrYogenic Department in Common System (CSCY), GSI, Darmstadt Yu Xiang, Hans Mueller* * Primay Beam Magnet Technology.
1 Update on Focus Coil Design and Configuration M. A. Green, G. Barr, W. Lau, R. S. Senanayake, and S. Q. Yang University of Oxford Department of Physics.
1 Superconducting Magnets for the MICE Channel Michael A. Green Oxford University Physics Department Oxford OX1-3RH, UK.
1 Infrastructure at RAL Iouri Ivaniouchenkov, RAL MICE Collaboration CERN, 29 March 2003.
MICE Hydrogen System Design Tom Bradshaw Iouri Ivaniouchenkov Elwyn Baynham Columbia Meeting June 2003.
TOTEM Collaboration Meeting, Feb. 2005, F. Haug, CERN Cooling System for TOTEM Friedrich Haug and Jihao Wu Cryogenics for Experiments CERN TOTEM Collaboration.
Fcal upgrade for sLHC: Cryogenics modifications – TE-CRG/ C.Fabre 1 ATLAS FCal Upgrade for sLHC: Modifications to the Calorimeter Cryogenic.
LARP LQX and MQX Magnets Cryogenic Testing at Fermilab’s Industrial Building 1 Roger Rabehl Technical Division/Test & Instrumentation Department.
R&D Status and Plan on The Cryostat N. Ohuchi, K. Tsuchiya, A. Terashima, H. Hisamatsu, M. Masuzawa, T. Okamura, H. Hayano 1.STF-Cryostat Design 2.Construction.
MQXF Cold-mass Assembly and Cryostating H. Prin, D. Duarte Ramos, P. Ferracin, P. Fessia 4 th Joint HiLumi LHC-LARP Annual Meeting November 17-21, 2014.
ESS Cryogenic Distribution System for the Elliptical Linac MBL/HBL - CDS requirements Preliminary Design Review Meeting, 20 May 2015, ESS, Lund, Sweden.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
SCU Layout Concept - Minimal Segmentation Joel Fuerst (ANL) SCU 3-Lab Review Meeting Dec. 16, 2014.
CRYOGENICS FOR MLC Cryogenic Cooldown Scheme Eric Smith External Review of MLC October 03, October 2012Cryogenics for MLC1.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Roberto Than CRYOGENICS SYSTEM.
Hydrogen system R&D. R&D programme – general points Hydrogen absorber system incorporates 2 novel aspects Hydrogen storage using a hydride bed Hydrogen.
MICE CC Test Status Ruben Carcagno 11/06/13 1. Cooldown Coil Temperature (calculated average in each of 8 coil segments) SC Transition (voltages across.
ERL: G-5/e-Gun Cryogenic & Pressure Safety Committee Review ERL G-5/e-gun Beam Line Vacuum Failure Analysis April 24, 2009.
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Status and Schedule Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE RAL October 20, 2008.
Hall D Target System Review J. FochtmanSeptember 28,2011 Preliminary Design Work.
N.Delruelle, 22th-26th September 2008 Cryogenics Operations 2008, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland 1 CRYOGENICS OPERATIONS 2008 Organized by CERN Design choices.
Shrikant_Pattalwar TTC 2015 Dec 1, 2015 SLAC 1 Horizontal Tests in a Vertical Cryostat Shrikant Pattalwar STFC Daresbury Laboratory UK.
C.KotnigFCC Design Meeting FCC Beam Screen cooling Claudio Kotnig.
9/17/07IRENG071 Cryogenic System for the ILC IR Magnets QD0 and QF1 K. C. Wu - BNL.
Process Definition of the Operation Modes for Super-FRS Magnet Testing CSCY - CrYogenic department in Common System, GSI, Darmstadt Y. Xiang, F. Wamers.
4/27/06 1 US LHC ACCELERATOR RESEARCH PROGRAM brookhaven - fermilab – berkeley - slac US LARP Inner Triplet Cryogenics and Heat Transfer LARP Collaboration.
1 Small Coolers for MICE Michael A. Green University of Oxford Department of Physics Oxford OX1 3RH, UK MICE Collaboration Meeting RAL.
Cryostat & LHC Tunnel Slava Yakovlev on behalf of the FNAL team: Nikolay Solyak, Tom Peterson, Ivan Gonin, and Timergali Khabibouline The 6 th LHC-CC webex.
The integration of 420 m detectors into the LHC
Cryogenic Summary - K. C. Wu Testing D2L102 in MAGCOOLJune, 02 Difference between D2L102 and D2L101 Operating Summary Cooldown to 100 K and 6 K Test Condition.
Cryogenic Cooling Schemes for the SPL U. Wagner TE-CRG.
Cryogenic scheme, pipes and valves dimensions U.Wagner CERN TE-CRG.
Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.
8/29/07K. C. Wu - Brookhaven National Lab1 Major Components in ILC IR Hall Interchangeable Detectors.
Experimental study on heat transfer through a few layers of multilayer insulation from 300 K to 4.2 K Zhanguo Zong, Norihito Ohuchi, Kiyosumi Tsuchiya,
May 31, 2010Bill Wisniewski1 Mechanical Integration Issues.
Page 1 CRYOMODULE 650 (TESLA Style) Stand Alone Tom Peterson and Yuriy Orlov Collaboration Meeting 25 Jan 2011.
Shrikant_Pattalwar ICEC 26, March 7-11, 2016, Delhi 1 Horizontal Tests in a Vertical Cryostat Shrikant Pattalwar STFC Daresbury Laboratory UK.
Development of Cryo-Module Test Stand (CMTS) for Fermi Lab (R.L.Suthar, Head,CDM, BARC) Cryo-Module Test stand (CMTS) is a very sophisticated equipment.
SuperB Experimental hall General considerations on the Babar experimental area Preliminary space requirements hall proposal. A floor plan. Specification.
ESS | Helium Distribution | | Torsten Koettig Linac – Helium distribution 1.
SIS 100 Vacuum chamber Recooler String system Components
Final Design Cryogenic and mechanical configurations
Final doublet: future activity plan
Existing Prototype Test Facility (PTF) and planned Series Test Facility Schroeder, Claus Cryo-Review Darmstadt
Process Simulation for the LCLS-II Cryogenic Systems
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
at STFC Daresbury laboratory
Cryogenic behavior of the cryogenic system
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
Status of work on the cryostat design
Progress and Issues with VTS Upgrade
Project X: Cryogenic Segmentation Issues
BDS Cryogenic System RDR Status and EDR Plans
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
Hollow e- lens, Cryogenic aspects
Small Coolers for MICE MICE Collaboration Meeting RAL Michael A. Green
Horizontal Tests in a Vertical Cryostat
Mathew C. Wright October 2016
Generic Cryo HX Options
Cooling aspects for Nb3Sn Inner Triplet quadrupoles and D1
ILC Experimental Hall Cryogenics An Overview
Cooling aspects for Nb3Sn Inner Triplet quadrupoles and D1
Cryogenic behavior of the magnet
Magnetic shielding and thermal shielding
IR Beam Transport Status
Conceptual design of the Cryogenic System of Comprehensive Research Facility for Key Fusion Reactor Core Systems Liangbing Hu Sep.4.
Presentation transcript:

Cryogenics for SuperB IR Magnets J. G. Weisend II SLAC National Accelerator Lab

Top Level Design Goals Operate magnets reliably and safely. Allow safe operations during off normal conditions such as: quench, venting and vacuum failures Operate magnets reliably and safely. Allow safe operations during off normal conditions such as: quench, venting and vacuum failures Meet space requirements Meet space requirements Use excess capacity of existing Babar cryoplant for cooling Use excess capacity of existing Babar cryoplant for cooling Provide for sufficient travel of magnets while cold to allow access to vertex detector Provide for sufficient travel of magnets while cold to allow access to vertex detector Permit warm beam tubes Permit warm beam tubes Allow warmup / cooldown of IR magnets independent of central solenoid Allow warmup / cooldown of IR magnets independent of central solenoid

Proposed Solution Bundle magnets into 2 separate cryostats (QD0H,QD0L, Q5,S1) and (QF1H,QF1L, S2) and bath cool with pressurized He II (1.9 K, 1 Bar) Bundle magnets into 2 separate cryostats (QD0H,QD0L, Q5,S1) and (QF1H,QF1L, S2) and bath cool with pressurized He II (1.9 K, 1 Bar) Advantages: Advantages: Larger combined cryostats allows room for 80 K thermal shield, MLI and lower heat leaks Larger combined cryostats allows room for 80 K thermal shield, MLI and lower heat leaks Piping is simpler than trying to force flow cool individual magnets Piping is simpler than trying to force flow cool individual magnets 1.9 K operation allows for higher performance magnets either now or in the future 1.9 K operation allows for higher performance magnets either now or in the future Pressurized He II eliminates boiling inside the magnet bath – heat transfer done via internal convection (no net mass flow) Pressurized He II eliminates boiling inside the magnet bath – heat transfer done via internal convection (no net mass flow) Can be connected to existing BaBar refrigerator Can be connected to existing BaBar refrigerator

Proposed Solution Advantages: Advantages: Significant experience with He II systems at other labs – CERN, FNAL, Jlab, DESY Significant experience with He II systems at other labs – CERN, FNAL, Jlab, DESY Adds to He II cryogenic experience at Super B home institution (Italy) Adds to He II cryogenic experience at Super B home institution (Italy) Disadvantages: Disadvantages: More complicated & expensive feedbox More complicated & expensive feedbox Possible leaks into subatmospheric piping – can be addressed by good QA program Possible leaks into subatmospheric piping – can be addressed by good QA program Design alternatives are: Design alternatives are: Distributed HE II HX - more heat transfer but results in 2 phase flow in cryostats Distributed HE II HX - more heat transfer but results in 2 phase flow in cryostats Boiling He bath at 4.2 K Boiling He bath at 4.2 K

He II Internal Convection No net mass flow No net mass flow Extremely effective heat transfer mechanism Extremely effective heat transfer mechanism Q VnVn VsVs THTH TLTL

Insert 3D Model

Vertex Detector Access Scheme

Cooling Limits & Estimated Heat Loads Available cooling from refrigerator at Available cooling from refrigerator at 1.9 K: ~ 3.5 g/s ~ 77 W Internal Convection Heat Transfer Limit per side assuming a 2.5 “ ID line – 24 W Internal Convection Heat Transfer Limit per side assuming a 2.5 “ ID line – 24 W Estimated Heat loads per side: Estimated Heat loads per side: Conduction - 16 W (assumes 8 2 W each) Conduction - 16 W (assumes 8 2 W each) Thermal radiation ~ 2 W Thermal radiation ~ 2 W LDI/DT – TBD LDI/DT – TBD Ionizing radiation - TBD Ionizing radiation - TBD

Next Steps Finish conceptual design including: Finish conceptual design including: Iterate with magnet design – more detailed design of supports Iterate with magnet design – more detailed design of supports Finalize connections to BaBar refrigerator Finalize connections to BaBar refrigerator More detailed safety analysis More detailed safety analysis More detailed heat leak analysis including LdI/dt and ionizing radiation load (if any) More detailed heat leak analysis including LdI/dt and ionizing radiation load (if any) Description of operating modes Description of operating modes Layout of control system – make use of existing Babar cryocontrols? Layout of control system – make use of existing Babar cryocontrols? Conceptual design review (Summer 2010) Conceptual design review (Summer 2010) Detailed design work Detailed design work Preliminary and Final design reviews (Start in late fall 2010) Preliminary and Final design reviews (Start in late fall 2010) Construction and commissioning Construction and commissioning