Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA 02139 V 617.253.2127 F 617.253.8292.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rapid prototyping of GLOBK solutions Lecture 11
Advertisements

Overview of Real-Time GPS Operations in Menlo Park RTGPS integrated system consists of the following three modules: 1. Data Acquisition: Telemetry monitoring.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 19 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | A | Cambridge MA V F.
04/22/02EGS G STABILITY OF GLOBAL GEODETIC RESULTS Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;
IAG Sub-Commission 1.3c Regional Reference Frames for North America 1 Regional Reference Frames for North America Current Status & Future Plans of Regional.
3. Geocentre and scale Comparison of weekly and daily IGS reference frames: the first year Peter J Clarke, School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences,
VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna Vie_LSM Kamil Teke and Johannes Böhm.
Seasonal Position Variations and Regional Reference Frame Realization Jeff Freymueller Geophysical Institute University of Alaska Fairbanks.
2-3 November 2009NASA Sea Level Workshop1 The Terrestrial Reference Frame and its Impact on Sea Level Change Studies GPS VLBI John Ries Center for Space.
“Real-time” Transient Detection Algorithms Dr. Kang Hyeun Ji, Thomas Herring MIT.
EPN LAC Workshop 2008 Frankfurt Main, Germany, October, 2008 ASI Local Analysis Center Report C. Ferraro, Telespazio/CGS Matera R. Pacione, e-GEOS/CGS.
Better Positions and Improved Access to the National Spatial Reference System  Multi-Year CORS Solution  National Adjustment of 2011  New NGS Datasheet.
Laser Ranging Contributions to Earth Rotation Studies Richard S. Gross Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91109–8099,
SOPAC's Instantaneous Global Plate Motion Model: Yehuda Bock, Linette Prawirodirdjo, Peng Fang, Paul Jamason, Shimon Wdowinski (TAU, UMiami) Scripps Orbit.
Workshop, Miami, June 2008 ITRF2005 residuals and co-location tie issues Zuheir Altamimi IGN, France Some features of ITRF2005 residuals ITRF2005 vs IGS05.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, June 2008 Comparison of GMF/GPT with VMF1/ECMWF and Implications for Atmospheric Loading Peter Steigenberger.
1 North American Reference Frame (NAREF) Working Group Mike Craymer Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada 2nd SNARF Workshop Montreal, May.
SRI Seminar 2005 Time series of GPS stations For reference, monitoring and geophysics Günter Stangl Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying.
NGS GPS ORBIT DETERMINATION Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic.
The IGS contribution to ITRF2013 – Preliminary results from the IGS repro2 SINEX combinations Paul Rebischung, Bruno Garayt, Xavier Collilieux, Zuheir.
Applications for Precision GPS: Seismology, Volcanic Eruptions, Ice Sheet Dynamics, and Soil Moisture Kristine M. Larson Dept. of Aerospace Engineering.
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F
AGU Fall meeting Quality assessment of GPS reprocessed Terrestrial Reference Frame 1 IGN/LAREG and GRGS 2 University of Luxembourg X Collilieux.
GPS: “Where goeth thou” Thomas Herring With results from Jen Alltop: Geosystems Thesis Katy Quinn: Almost graduated Ph.D
First SNARF Workshop: Introduction Stable North America Working Group UNAVCO Inc., 27 Jan 2004 Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno.
SNARF: Theory and Practice, and Implications Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT
Testing intraplate deformation in the North American plate interior E. Calais (Purdue Univ.), C. DeMets (U. Wisc.), J.M. Nocquet (Oxford and IGN) ● Is.
Generating velocity solutions with GLOBK T. A. Herring R. W. King M. A. Floyd Massachusetts Institute of Technology GPS Data Processing and Analysis with.
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F
Sunil Bisnath and David Dodd Hydrographic Science Research Center, Department of Marine Science, University of Southern Mississippi USCG C2CEN Meeting.
Earth Sciences Sector SLIDE 1 NAREF & CBN Velocity Solutions for a New Version of SNARF Mike Craymer Joe Henton Mike Piraszewski 8th SNARF Workshop AGU.
RECENT ENHANCEMENTS TO THE CDDIS IGS Network Systems Workshop November 2-5, 1998 Annapolis, MD Carey E. Noll Manager, CDDIS NASA GSFC Greenbelt, MD.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 24 Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;
1 NAREF Analysis & ITRF2004 Densification Mike Craymer, Joe Henton Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada 3rd SNARF Workshop Santa Ana Pueblo,
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room
Recommendation 1 The IGS shall develop a standard protocol for exchanging information about IGS stations. The associated machine-readable database should.
1/16 ITRF2008-P: Some evaluation elements and impact on IGS RF products Paul Rebischung, Bruno Garayt, 16 April 2010 ITRF2008-P: SOME EVALUATION ELEMENTS.
Reference Frame Theory & Practice: Implications for SNARF SNARF Workshop 1/27/04 Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno.
International Workshop on Laser Ranging, October 2008, Poznań (Poland) Quality assessment of the ILRS EOP „Daily” Product G. Bianco Agenzia Spaziale.
Application of a North America reference frame to the Pacific Northwest Geodetic Array (PANGA) M M Miller, V M Santillan, Geodesy Laboratory, Central Washington.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, June 2008 Current Status of the IGS Reprocessing Peter Steigenberger Technische Universität München Gerd.
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F
05/12/1005/08/ Lec Lec Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 23 Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;
PBO Frame Definition using SNARF Version 1.0 Tom Herring MIT.
Error Modeling Thomas Herring Room ;
5/18/2994G21D-04 Spring AGU Realization of a Stable North America Reference Frame Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary, Sciences,
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 09 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Workshop, Miami, June 2008 IGS Contribution to ITRF Zuheir Altamimi & Xavier Collilieux IGN, France.
12/12/01Fall AGU Vertical Reference Frames for Sea Level Monitoring Thomas Herring Department of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Sciences
Aug 6, 2002APSG Irkutsk Contemporary Horizontal and Vertical Deformation of the Tien Shan Thomas Herring, Bradford H. Hager, Brendan Meade, Massachusetts.
Armasuisse Swiss Federal Office of Topography swisstopo Determination of Tectonic Movements in the Swiss Alps using GNSS and Levelling E. Brockmann, D.
IGS08, Miami, June 2-6, 2008 Combination of the Analysis Centers Reprocessed “SINEX” Solutions Rémi Ferland Geodetic Survey Division.
1/16 35th IGS Governing Board Meeting December 13, 2009 – San Francisco TRANSITION OF THE IGS REFERENCE FRAME COORDINATION FROM NRCAN TO IGN - STATUS AND.
Importance of SLR in the Determination of the ITRF Zuheir Altamimi IGN, France Geoscience Australia, Canberra, August 29, 2005 SLR Strength: its contribution.
Canada’s Natural Resources – Now and for the Future Reference Frames Panel Discussion M. Craymer Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada IAG.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Menlo Park GPS data processing and archiving J.L. Svarc, J.R. Murray, Fred Pollitz, Scott Haefner,
IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Status and Future of the IERS Combination Efforts Markus Rothacher GeoForschungsZentrum.
IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Strategies for Weekly Routine Generation of Combined IERS Products Markus Rothacher.
Contemporary Horizontal and Vertical Deformation of the Tien Shan
GLOBK Velocity Solutions
Analysis Center + Reference Frame Working Group
NRCan Velocity Fields & Comparisons to Some Plate Motion Estimates
Troposphere Working Group
Reference Frame Working Group
SNARF Ver 2.0 Construction
Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks
Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks
Reference Frame Working Group Report
Combination of reprocessed orbit, clock and ERP products
Presentation transcript:

Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F | RNAAC combinations in the IGS Thomas Herring, Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT

Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F | OVERVIEW Regional densification SINEX files generated since GPS week 860 (June 96). (Global SINEX since week 819 (September 95). Up to eight different regional analyses have been submitted: ASI (Spain), AUS (Australia), GIA (Alaska), GSI (Japan), SIR (S. America), NAR (NAREF), EUR (EUREF), PGC (Canada) Analysis Procedure Comparison with PBO analysis mehod Future developments. 06/05/08IGS ACWS TAH RNAAC2

Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F | Procedures RNAAC solutions are run with a 4-week (originally), then 5-week and most recently 6-week delay after generation of IGS final products (these lags have become a problem) Most common contributors have been EURef, SIRGAS and GSI. Recently on GSI coming in on time. Largest contributor was NAREF but they stopped after week 1400 due to phase-center model implementation. GNAAC is IGS AC combination (compared with Remi Ferland’s official combination). All sites included. RNAAC is regional solutions combined with GNAAC solution. 06/05/08IGS ACWS TAH RNAAC3

Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F | Method Most recent (since week 1396). –SINEX indicates that only loose constraints applied (GSI, EUR and SIR) so we add rotation and translation covariance to loosen solution –Each center is combined with GNAAC solution and chi- squared/f of combined used to determine scale factor for covariance matrix. This method can have problems when only a small number of common stations. Rescaling factors are closer to unity than GNAAC solutions. –RNAAC solutions are combined with GNAAC and system aligned to IGS05. –RMS of change in the position of the stations in the GNAAC solution computed to see impact of RNAAC –SINEX file of combined solution submitted to CDDIS with summary file. 06/05/08IGS ACWS TAH RNAAC4

Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F | RNAAC Stations (Red), GNAAC (Black) 06/05/08IGS ACWS TAH RNAAC5 Certain areas are still not be densified.

Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F | Number of sites in solutions 06/05/08IGS ACWS TAH RNAAC6

Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F | RNAAC Impact 06/05/08IGS ACWS TAH RNAAC7 RMS of change in global sites when RNAAC solutions added

Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F | Recent impact (post week 1400) 06/05/08IGS ACWS TAH RNAAC8 Figure also shows recent lose of contributing solutions

Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F | 2/11/2008PBO seminar9 PBO GPS Data Analysis ACs (NMT and CWU) are routinely generating PBO GPS data products –Rapid Sinex files: 24 hour latency –Final Sinex files: 6-13 day latency, weekly run started after IGS final products become available –Supplemental Sinex files: 12-week latency, weekly run. Includes missed sites and a 3-4 tie sites from final runs to link network. Tests show performance similar to finals. Bias fixing not quite so good due typically to wider site spacing. –Supplemental runs also add sites to original final submission (until re- processing generates new set of final runs). –SINEX and RMS files ftp’d to MIT –Recently campaign processing (Bob Smith) added to processing first as an additional run similar to the supplemental runs and once caught up, included in the supplementals. –Added USGS processing of SCIGN sites (SCEC funding). Results appear in combined product.

Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F | 2/11/2008PBO seminar10 PBO Combination Analysis ACC: –Rotates, translates, and scales each AC to PBO SNARF reference frame; check and correct meta data (when possible) –Combine AC results and transforms combined product to PBO SNARF (Stable North America Reference Frame) –Outlier checks and report generated that is ed to –SINEX and time-series files sent to UNAVCO via LDM –The PBO realization of SNARF is updated about once-per-year: Requires re-submission of all frame defined sinex files and time series files. Latest version At 6-month intervals updates are made for new stations. (Reference frame sites are not updated in these incremental updates and thus the time series and SINEX do not need release.

Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F | 2/11/2008PBO seminar11 PBO SNARF Reference Frame 254 sites used to estimate daily rotation, translation and scale onto the North America Frame. Outlier detection during estimation. Red: IGS reference sites Yellow PBO/ Nucleus sites Here we align to IGS rather than merge with GNAAC (Time scale difference PBO daily not weekly).

Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F | 2/11/2008PBO seminar12 WRMS daily scatter: PBO Sites Daily RMS Scatters Combined solution for PBO Sites Median North 1.1 mm Median East 1.4 mm Median Height 3.9 mm Results from 2004 to present Linear trends removed. Total 691 sites

Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F | RNAAC Statistics 06/05/08IGS ACWS TAH RNAAC13 Weekly WRMS Scatters Regional solution Median North 1.5 mm Median East 1.5 mm Median Height 5.9 mm Results are for post-Week 1400 Total 352 sites (need at least 50 weeks)

Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F | GNAAC Statistics 06/05/08IGS ACWS TAH RNAAC14 Weekly WRMS Scatters Global solution Median North 1.2 mm Median East 1.4 mm Median Height 4.1 mm Results post week 1400 Total sites 275 (need at least 50 weeks)

Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F | 2/11/2008PBO seminar15 RMS scatters for Nucleus sites (purple) and PBO sites (yellow), RMS scatter > 3 mm (black, 1mm).Red circle shows 1 mm RMS scatter

Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F | Prospects Recently few RNAAC solutions being submitted. Maybe for regional centers access to IGS reference through orbits and local IGS stations is adequate. This procedure adopted by PBO and allows common- mode error to be reduced in regional time series. PBO generates and makes openly available SINEX files of solutions which can be merged with global GPS networks if desired. Maybe there is no need for IGS to generate weekly RNAAC solution (operators can do themselves) There is a need for availability of non-constrained SINEX files from regional analysis that can be merged for densification of ITRF. 06/05/08IGS ACWS TAH RNAAC16