Knowledge Practice & Coverage Survey (KPC) Overview & resources Moving from research objectives, questions, hypothesis to questionnaire design Day 3: Session.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Questionnaire for Individual Women: HIV/AIDS.
Advertisements

MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Questionnaire for Individual Women: Maternal and Newborn Health.
MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Overview of MICS4 Research Tools.
MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Training of the Field Staff.
MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop The MICS3 Evaluation.
HIV/AIDS knowledge and attitudes Core module asked to all women ages (includes MDG indicator 19b) Womens questionnaire.
Antenatal Care MICS3 Data Analysis and Report Writing.
Perinatal Mental Health in Colorado: What We Know and What We Can Do
Training Overview and Objectives Emergency Health and Nutrition Training.
Knowing if the RBF mechanism is working Incorporating Rigorous Impact Evaluation into your HRBF program Sebastian Martinez World Bank.
Introduction and Overview Jennifer Bryce Institute for International Programs Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health #CoverMNCH.
Increasing Utilization of Maternal Health Services through targeted Community Interventions in Malawi Anna Chinombo MSc. Nursing; Save the Children MCHIP.
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE OF GOAL ORIENTED ANTENATAL CARE AND ADHERENCE TO GOAL ORIENTED VISITS BY ANTENATAL CLIENTS 10 th SOMSA CONGRESS ST GEORGE.
METHODOLOGY FOR THE REVIEW/EVALUATION OF POLICY DOCUMENTS By Kwami DADJI, Health Officer HIV/AIDS, TB, Malaria & OID African Union Commission.
Understanding Maternal Death Reviews MDR Workshop Lucknow India June 17-18, 2010.
2015 TANZANIA DEMOGRAPHIC AND HEALTH SURVEY (TDHS)
Antenatal Care (ANC): Overview
Session 5: Conducting Focus Groups. Implementing Focus Groups 1 st Focus Group Session (30 minutes): –Group 2 = moderate Group 1 = respondent –Group 4.
Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey – Key Indicators Results.
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Data Interpretation, Further Analysis and Dissemination Workshop Overview of Data Quality Issues in MICS.
Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Power Point Slides by Ronald J. Shope in collaboration with John W. Creswell Chapter 13 Survey Designs.
Indonesia country office Household and health facility surveys in Indonesia Indonesia country team Jakarta, Indonesia.
Integration of postnatal care with PMTCT: Experiences from Swaziland
Community-led planning to improve maternal and newborn health in Tenkodogo district, Burkina Faso Perkins, Janet a, Capello Cecilia a, Sankara, Tougma.
Third Global Women Deliver Conference Kuala Lumpur - Malaysia, May 2013 PROMOTING RESPECTFUL MATERNITY CARE: The LAC country experiences LAC Caucus.
A syndrome of Irregular Enthusiasm: Increasing the Utilisation of Evaluation findings in the UPHOLD project BY Apollo Nkwake Visit
RESEARCH A systematic quest for undiscovered truth A way of thinking
Antenatal care MDG 5, Target 5b, Indicator 5.5
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Sampling: Overview MICS Survey Design Workshop.
Note to evaluator… The overall purpose of this presentation is to guide evaluators through the completion of step 7 of the UFE checklist and to “level.
Primer on Monitoring and Evaluation. The 3 Pillars of Monitoring and Evaluation  Identifying the Performance Indicators  Collecting information using.
I have no relevant financial relationships with the manufacturers of any commercial products and/or provider of commercial services discussed in this CME.
KEY INDICATORS SURVEY (KIS) TOOL. KIS Tool Objective Principally developed to meet M&E needs for data for small areas—regions, districts, project catchment.
Indicators Review of key indicators to be measured in the baseline assessment.
Healthy Futures Performance Measures Session. Session Overview Combination of presentation and interactive components Time at the end of the session for.
DHS, MICS, and EPI Surveys: An Overview of Information Captured.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Reproductive Health class#2 Safe motherhood. Women’s Health Key facts.
 The development of the perinatal assessment tool was a vital precursor leading to the addition of data collection of the perinatal population. Data collected.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
International SBCC Summit
1 Health Results-Based Financing Impact Evaluation Surveys Quality Assurance and Data Management Álvaro Canales, Beatriz Godoy, Juan Muñoz Sistemas Integrales.
Module 1: Program Planning Cycle (Role of Surveys and Linking Indicators to Plans) Outcome Monitoring and Evaluation Using LQAS.
Knowledge Practice and Coverage (KPC) 2013 Revision Process MCHIP BBL March 28, 2013 Baltimore Jennifer Winestock Luna.
South Sudan Integrated Service Delivery Program Building Capacity for Implementation and Supportive Supervision for PPH prevention Isabella Ochieng, PPH.
WHY IS THIS HAPPENING IN THE PROGRAM? Session 5 Options for Further Investigation & Information Flow.
2014 Kenya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS) Key Indicators Report.
USAID’s Child Survival and Health Grants Program Improves EBF, ORT, and Handwashing Practices Jennifer Yourkavitch, MPH; Jim Ricca, MD, MPH; Karen Fogg,
Knowledge Practice and Coverage (KPC) Revision Process June 3, 2014 Jennifer Winestock Luna.
Saving and improving lives in the world’s toughest places. Determined Behavior Change A comparative study of the application of Barrier Analysis methodology.
2015 Afghanistan Demographic and Health Survey (AfDHS) Key Indicators Report.
TOPIC:KNOWLEDGE ABOUT INDIVIDUALIZED BIRTH PLAN AND OBSTETRIC DANGER SIGNS AMONG MEN ATTENDING REPRODUCTIVE AND CHILD HEALTH CLINIC AT BUGURUNI HEALTH.
Supporting measurement & improvement of primary health care (PHC) at the facility and community levels Dr. Jennifer Adams, Deputy Assistant Administrator,
CSHGP Maternal Newborn Health Review Marge Koblinsky CORE Croup Fall Meeting October 11,
Definition of indicators Facilitators’ Workshop on District Health Performance Improvement Lilongwe, 25 th – 27 th March 2015.
A Discussion of Evidence Generated by CSHGP Grantees: Results from 13 Final Evaluations Submitted in 2010, and Implications for MCHIP and Other Global.
Sampling Overview and Resources: LQAS Day3: Session 9:30-10:00pm – Jennifer Luna Operations Research Workshop February 16, 2011.
Module 3: Selecting Locations and Respondents Outcome Monitoring and Evaluation Using LQAS.
2014 Kenya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS) Survey Methodology Follow along on
Support National Social Protection Strategy (NSPS) CARD/SPCU 1.
MEASURE Evaluation Data Quality Assurance Workshop Session 3 Introduction to Routine Data Quality Assessment.
Operations Research In MCH Programs: Measurement Challenges How MCHIP is working to Support PVOs CORE Spring Meeting, April 28, 2010 Wednesday 11:00-12:30.
Knowledge Practice and Coverage (KPC) 2013 Revision Process CORE Spring Meeting April 2013 Jennifer Winestock Luna.
Knowledge Practice and Coverage (KPC) Overview October 3, 2012.
Follow along on Twitter!
Chapter 33 Introduction to the Nursing Process
Discussion and Conclusion
Planning a Learning Unit
Module 5 The Climate Expert and your role as a consultant
Presentation transcript:

Knowledge Practice & Coverage Survey (KPC) Overview & resources Moving from research objectives, questions, hypothesis to questionnaire design Day 3: Session 10:30-11:30am – Jennifer Luna Operations Research Workshop February 16, 2011

Agenda  Brief overview of the KPC tool and resources  Description of analysis needed to move from research objectives, questions and hypothesis to questionnaire design  Small group exercise of applying this analysis to PVO studies

KPC  Developed by JHU / CSSP 1990  Based on 30x7 cluster methodology used by EPI program Developed 25+ years ago Rapid, lower cost methodology by visiting only 30 sites EPI methodology validated by computer simulation  Used by PVOs for CSHGP grants since 1991  Collected at baseline, mid-term and final  Same questions, indicators at baseline, MTE, FE

KPC Consists of:  12 modules (technical areas) Grantees select modules relevant to technical areas of project Within each module, grantees select questions and indicators relevant to interventions  Rapid CATCH questions and indicators All grantees collect this information regardless of technical interventions Currently 18 indicators  Key indicators Highly recommended for each technical area, included in modules

KPC  Targets mothers of children 0-23 months  Two standard sampling methodologies  30x10 cluster sample of 300 (coverage for entire project area)  LQAS sample of 95 (coverage for entire project area) or 19/supervision area to determine if target reached  Updated to be compatible with:  DHS; USAID priority indicators; LiST Tool; Common Evaluation Framework; MEASURE Evaluation; Malaria MERG; findings from SNL; future MCHIP findings

KPC 30x10 - Cluster  PPS used to select 30 clusters  In each cluster, 10 interviews conducted with mothers of children 0-23 months  Total of 300 interviews  One questionnaire with all indicators used  Sub-sets of these interviews analyzed for indicators with different denominators  ORT use for children w/diarrhea last 2 weeks, Denominator children w/diarrhea last two weeks  Births attended by skilled personnel, Denominator, all children 0-23 months  (May be too small to answer OR questions about sub-sets)  Information at the project area level, but not for sub-areas

Resources: MCHIP NGO/PVO support website (  Rapid CATCH (questionnaire, tabulation plan)  Key indicators  12 Modules (questionnaires, tabulation plans)  Documents useful for implementation:  Rapid Catch Requirements by Cycle  How to Write a Survey Report  Methodology and Sampling Appendix  Procedures for anthropometric measurement  KPC Field Guide

Resources: MCHIP NGO/PVO support website  Rapid Health Surveys Handbook (Public Health Institute) CORE website: (  KPC Trainer of Survey Trainers (TOAST)  LQAS trainers guides  LQAS protocol for parallel sampling  LQAS FAQs

Moving from objectives, research questions and hypotheses to questionnaire design

 List each piece of information separately for objectives, questions and hypotheses  ANC, skilled attendance at birth, appropriate response to newborn complications,  Find out if there is consistency of information needed for objectives, research questions and hypotheses.  If not re-write so that there is consistency

 What questions should you consider to determine if this piece of information should be in a survey?

Questions to ask about each piece of information 1.Is this appropriate to be collected through a household survey? 1. If not what is an alternative method for obtaining this information? 2.Is it well enough defined to be collected through a survey? 3.What is the target population to be interviewed for the information? 4.Is the event for which you want to collect information rare or common? 1. If it is rare, how large a sample size would you need to collect this information? 5.Will the project actually have an effect on the event you are measuring? 6.How complicated is it to collect the information through a survey?

 Check to see if an appropriate indicator is in KPC tool; if so use it  If the event is rare, try to develop an indicator that closely measures the same thing but is not so rare  Re-write indicators to avoid needing many sampling groups

 Consistency between information needed for objectives, research questions and hypothesis  Use language that directly links to information that is not complicated to measure  Use language that describes events, conditions, or outcomes on which the the project will have an effect

Moving from objectives, research questions and hypotheses to questionnaire design

Hypothesis CRS Nicaragua: Increasing awareness among men in regards to recognizing danger signs during pregnancy and newborn periods, and by motivating them to make joint decisions with their wives will result in boosting seeking care during obstetric and newborn emergencies in a timely manner and an increase in ANC, institutional deliveries; therefore improving maternal and newborn health.

Information needed for hypothesis 1.Men recognize danger signs during pregnancy 2.Men recognize danger signs during newborn period 3.Men make joint decisions with their wives 4.Care seeking during obstetrical emergencies 5.Care seeking during newborn emergencies 6.ANC 7.Skilled attendance at birth

Men make joint decision with their wives 1.Is this appropriate to be collected through a household survey?  If not what is an alternative method for obtaining this information? 2.Is it well enough defined to be collected through a survey? 3.What is the target population to be interviewed for the information?

Men make joint decision with their wives 4.Is the event for which you want to collect information rare or common?  If it is rare, how large a sample size would you need to collect this information? 5.Will the project actually have an effect on the event you are measuring? 6.How complicated is it to collect the information through a survey?

Care seeking during obstetrical emergencies 1.Is it well enough defined to be collected through a survey? 2.What is the target population to be interviewed for the information? 3.Is the event for which you want to collect information rare or common?  If it is rare, how large a sample size would you need to collect this information?

KPC indicators available for:  ANC:  % of mothers of children age 0-23 months who had four or more antenatal visits when they were pregnant with the youngest child  Skilled attendance at birth:  % of children 0-23 months whose births were attended by skilled personnel

Project defined indicator for:  Men make joint decisions with their wives  % of men that responded that the decision to seeking care during pregnancy was made with their wives.

Once ready to develop questionnaire  Write the questionnaire  If appropriate use KPC questions  Translate  Back translate  Adjust translation  Pre-test  Adjust questionnaire

Small group work WV CHS-URC AKF CFI CORE Mercy Corp CARE CRS Concern Worldwide IRD Africare HKI

Exercise: Evaluative phase  Starting point for is revised hypothesis  Objectives and research questions from evaluative phase they are included in the concept paper  Group helps each new grantee to complete questionnaire preparation process  Worksheet (4 steps)  Reference from Rapid Household Survey Handbook  Very short plenary discussion about the process