Theory of Predicting Crop Response to Non-Limiting Nitrogen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
Advertisements

Current Nitrogen Fertilization Strategies for Corn in Nebraska Richard Ferguson Bob Caldwell.
Determine seeding rate and hybrid effects on: Phenotypical and physiological plant measurements Canopy and leaf sensor measurements A goal in precision.
O K L A H O M A S T A T E U N I V E R S I T Y Nitrogen Management for Wheat and Corn, What you Shouldn’t Do.
Comparison of Active Optical Sensors
GreenSeekerTM Variable Rate Applicator Equipment and Applications
A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management.
Economics of Precision Agriculture, What Technologies are Being Adopted and Why Danny Dallas Soil 4213.
Operating the Oklahoma State Univ. Ramp Mobile Analysis V2.0.
New Technology and Strategies for Nitrogen Management.
GreenSeeker® Handheld Crop Sensor
Geographic Information Science
Determining the Most Effective Growth Stage in Corn Production for Spectral Prediction of Grain Yield and Nitrogen Response Department of Plant and Soil.
Use of By-Plot CV’s for Refining Mid-Season Fertilizer N Rates Daryl Brian Arnall Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State University.
Sensor-based Nitrogen Application – Converting Research to Practicality Brent Rendel Rendel Farms Miami, Oklahoma.
 Several Sensor Based N Rate Calculations exist.  There are two distinct approaches to N rate calculations.  Use of Yield Prediction and Response 
Use of Alternative Concepts for Determining Preplant and Mid-Season N rates.
2013 NUE Conference Des Moines, Iowa August 5-7 Jacob T. Bushong.
Active-Crop Sensor Calibration Using the Virtual-Reference Concept K. H. Holland (Holland Scientific) J. S. Schepers (USDA-ARS, retired) 8 th ECPA Conference.
GreenSeeker Sensor Brian Arnall Precision Nutrient Management Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State University.
A Simplified Linear Transformation to Calculate N Application Rates in Corn and Wheat.
GreenSeeker ® Applicator Mounted Crop Vigor Sensors.
Development of a SBNRC Calculator for Cotton D. Brian Arnall Oklahoma State University W. Raun, J. Solie, M. Stone, R. Taylor, O. Walsh, D. Edmonds, C.
Enhancing Sorghum Yield and Profitability through Sensor Based N Management Dave Mengel and Drew Tucker Department of Agronomy K-State.
Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Wade Thomason,
Automated Calibration Stamp Technology for Improved In-Season Nitrogen Fertilization K. Freeman, R. Teal, C. Mack, K. Martin, B. Arnall, K. Desta, J. Solie,
2012 Optical Sensing Nitrogen Management Group August Fargo, North Dakota.
Precision Ag and Conservation Precision Ag Technologies are most often developed to increase efficiency and decrease input cost However, they provide great.
Refinement of the Missouri Corn Nitrogen Algorithm Using Canopy Reflectance Newell Kitchen, Ken Sudduth, and Scott Drummond USDA-Agricultural Research.
Generalized Algorithm for Variable Rate Nitrogen Application on Cereal Grains John B. Solie, Regents Professor Biosystems and Agri. Engineering Dept. William.
Precision Agriculture an Overview. Precision Agriculture? Human need Environment –Hypoxia –$750,000,000 (excess N flowing down the Mississippi river/yr)
No-till Oklahoma Optimizing Nitrogen Fertilizer Through Use of Optical Sensors Brian Arnall Oklahoma State University
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution Resolution for Sensing/Soil Sampling And Yield Measurements.
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution What is it? How do we describe it? What does it imply for precision management?
Generalized Algorithm Tying the Loose Threads August 2013.
Demonstration of In-Season Nitrogen Management Strategies for Corn Production John Sawyer John Lundvall Jennifer Hawkins Department of Agronomy Iowa State.
Sensor Based Technologies in Mexico CIMMYT (Dr. Ivan Ortiz-Monasterio ) Oklahoma State University (Yumiko Kanke)
Three Alternative Nitrogen Management Strategies for Cereal Grain Production Brian Arnall Brian Arnall Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State.
Nutrient Management: Ways to Save Money, From Simple to High Tech Brian Arnall Precision Nutrient Management Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma.
Generalized Algorithm for Variable Rate Nitrogen Application on Cereal Grains John B. Solie, Regents Professor Biosystems and Agri. Engineering Dept. William.
NFOA for Wheat and Corn. Yield Potential Definitions INSEYIn Season Estimated Yield = NDVI (Feekes 4 to 6)/days from planting to sensing (days.
Dave Mengel, Kansas State University Multi-State Winter Wheat Sensor Project,
O K L A H O M A S T A T E U N I V E R S I T Y E VOLUTION OF N ITROGEN R EFERENCE S TRIPS.
Oklahoma State University Precision Agriculture / Soil Fertility / Soil Nutrient Management Why should Nitrogen Use Efficiencies be improved? What technologies.
Drew Tucker and Dave Mengel KSU Agronomy An update on Kansas sensor based N recommendations.
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Laboratory for Agriculture and Environmental Studies Sensor Based Variable Rate N Management in Mid-Atlantic.
Regional Project Objectives  To evaluate the performance of sensor-based N recommendation algorithms across a wide range of soil and climate conditions.
Exploratory Research in Corn
Variable Rate Nitrogen
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
Nutrient Management: Ways to Save Money, From Simple to High Tech
Evaluation of the Yield Potential Based NFOA for Cotton
Development of a Response Index for Corn
Sensor Algorithms.
Precision Agriculture an Overview
Precision Agriculture
Sensing Resolution in Corn
Stewart Reed Oklahoma State University
G. V. Johnson and W. R. Raun Dept. Plant & Soil Sciences
Redball NUE Conference August 9, 2007
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Dave Franzen – North Dakota State University
A Simplified Linear Transformation to Calculate N Application Rates in Corn and Wheat In South east NE and NW Missouri a strong interest has developed.
REVIEW.
Determining Nitrogen Application Rates with SBNRC and RAMP Calculator
Annual ASA Meeting, Indianapolis
UNL Algorithm for N in Corn
Objective: To discuss the current regional project and identify improvements needed for conducting future collaborative sensor-based research.
Late-Season Prediction of Wheat Grain Yield and Protein
Tastes Great. Less Filling
Presentation transcript:

Theory of Predicting Crop Response to Non-Limiting Nitrogen

What do N Rich Strips Say About N Rate Algorithms? + Quite a Bit of Geostatistics

What do N Rich Strips Say About N Rate Algorithms? – Part II, with a little geostatistics

Nitrogen Rich Strip Apply one Non-Limiting Nitrogen strip across the field between preplant fertilization and shortly after emergence. Use this as a reference strip to determine N rate. Concept first proposed in 1994 by Dr. James Schepers

NRich (N Reference) Strip Enables Paired Comparison of Field Practice N Fertility and Non-Limiting N Fertility Paired sampling of N Rich and Field Rate NDVI from either IKONIS or GreenSeeker imagery Measure Nrich NDVI and calculate expected yield Measure Field Rate NDVI

How Should We Interpret RINDVI In 2007, we examined RI NDVI indirectly by transforming the data to potential yield This year, I will examine R INDVI directly and compare measured RI to RI predicted by the OSU algorithm The goal of this is to: – Better understand the relationship between FpNDVI and RI NDVI – provide a method for evaluating algorithms based on measured paired comparisons of vegetative growth through part of the season

Model of R INDV for three crops and 6,216 data points

RI Model for Wheat

Wheat RI Model from Experimental Data

Location and Year Effects on RI

Comparison of RI Curves Constructed from NRich Strips and Field Experiments

RI NDVI Corn Model Calculated from Field Averages of FpNDVI and NRich NDVI

Yield Potential Model for All Crops Wheat Data Shown in Graph

Response Index Theory for Fertilizer N Response

Comparing RI NDVI Model to OSU Model ?

Comparison of OSU Topdress Rate to RI NDVI Model Topdress Rate ?

Measure of undetermined small scale variability and sampling error. Semivariogram Distance “range” where data is spatially related. Overall sample variance. Indication of spatial strength. Region where samples remain correlated (i.e. integral scale) or region of high relatedness Integral Scale

Results Intermediate Scale Sensing or Sampling Data TypeDateNuggetNugget:Sill Range (m) Lag Size (m) Lag No. Integral Scale (m) Model Error (RMSS) Model Error (SME) Yield (bu/acre) Yield (bu/acre) Yield (bu/acre) NDVI GreenSeeker™ 18-Dec NDVI GreenSeeker™ 17-Mar NDVI GreenSeeker™ 6-Apr NDVI GreenSeeker™ 4-Mar NDVI GreenSeeker™ 1-Mar NDVI GreenSeeker™ 16-Mar Soil Test NO 3 -N 0-15cm 15-Aug Soil Test NO 3 -N 15-30cm 15-Aug Soil Test P15-Aug Soil Test K15-Aug Soil Test pH15-Aug Soil Test TSS15-Aug Soil Test OM15-Aug Soil EC Veris 0-30cm Soil EC Veris 0-91cm

Recommendations for Measuring RI NDVI Pair your farmer practice treatment and your NRich treatments in your experiment design or (in the case of statistical purists) insert an extra farmer practice treatment which is paired with your NRich treatments. To maximize spatial relatedness, your sensor measurements from the two treatments should be spaced no more than three to four meters apart. At greater distances, relatedness declines and variability (error) in the value of RI increases. Remember that beyond the range measurements can be highly related by chance. Between the integral scale and the range, the odds of the measurements being highly related declines rapidly.

Conclusions Paired comparisions between field N rate and non- limiting N rate along an NRich strip define the relationship between the existing and optimum N application rate. All algorithms purporting to determine N application rate must account for the relationships between FpNDVI and NRich NDVI defined by the NRich strip. These relationships vary from year to year and location to location. The Power/Cosh model appears to accurately predict the NDVI Response Index as a function of FpNDVI.