BU CIRTL Needs Assessment and Resource Allocation Process Part II Bennett Goldberg and Kathryn Spilios.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CIRTL Event Grids Summary of Findings Rique Campa & Justin Micomonaco CIRTL Network Meeting Tuesday October 27, 2009.
Advertisements

CIRTL Network Meeting: Overview Ann Austin Texas A&M University June 3, 2009.
1 Designing a training programme Module 6 Sessions 9&10.
Best Practise in Using Finance Simulations in UK Higher Education By: Neil Marriott and Siew Min (Amy) Tan.
A GUIDE TO CREATING QUALITY ONLINE LEARNING DOING DISTANCE EDUCATION WELL.
Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
Common Core 3.0 Update Project Overview and Status Timeline for Completion Evaluation.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
C2I: Connect to Implement Empowering Youth to Grow Ideas into Jobs.
E-Portfolios for Students
Project Funded by: E-Outcomes Assessment Project: Technology Linking Assessment & Learning Luvai Motiwalla, Steven Tello & Kathryn Carter College of Management.
Strategic Planning: The Environmental Scan 1.
Check-in on Curriculum Progress Next Steps.  Brings all of the pieces together.  Transparency  Creates curriculum conversation  A tool for the journey.
Driving Better Outcomes: Aligning State Investments With Completion Needs Typology & Principles to Inform Outcomes-Based Funding Models Presented by: Martha.
The Vision Implementation Project
Striving for Quality Using continuous improvement strategies to increase program quality, implementation fidelity and durability Steve Goodman Director.
Getting Started in Service Learning Lemons to Lemonade Program Alex’s Lemonade Stand Foundation 2009.
Wisconsin Extended Grade Band Standards
THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK Information Technology Strategy & 5 Year Plan.
Time Mastery Profile ® The Time Mastery Profile ® helps people understand how they think about and use their time. This understanding is the foundation.
Week 4 – Getting Ready for Online Survey or School ‘snapshot’
1 Linked Learning Summer Institute 2015 Planning Integrated Units.
Sharing in Leadership for Student Success DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod, UWM Beth Schefelker, MPS 18 April 2008.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Strategic Planning: Developing Strategic Initiatives 1.
Iowa Core I-CAT Process Teacher Session Sue Updegraff Keystone AEA 1.
Joint Information Systems Committee Session 2: Linking Assessment and Learning 20/10/2015 | | Slide 1 What sort of things would you do if you wanted to.
Quality Assessment July 31, 2006 Informing Practice.
FLAGSHIP STRATEGY 1 STUDENT LEARNING. Student Learning: A New Approach Victorian Essential Learning Standards Curriculum Planning Guidelines Principles.
CIRTL Network Data Collection 3/2/2013. Institutional Portrait: Purpose Consistency with the TAR principle Accountability: – Helps us all monitor Network.
Montgomery County ESC Phase II: SLO Training.  In order to show growth you need to have a consistent framework between the pre- and post-assessments.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
SEEC SUMMER PD Day 2: Content Area Groups Wireless Access Username: wirelessguest Password: wireless seec.nefec.org.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
Agenda  What is the Time Mastery Profile ® ? What is the Time Mastery Profile ® ?  Basic Insights Basic Insights  New Features in the Time Mastery Profile.
Developing a Monitoring and Evaluation Framework: Insight into internal stakeholder learnings Beth Ferguson AES Conference Sydney 2 September 2011.
Hunter Trainers & Assessors Network (HTAN) Facilitator HTAN Recognition Network – Sue Flindell.
CIRTL Network Administrative Meeting Wednesday, September 2, :00-1:00 ET/ 11:00-12:00 CT /10:00-11:00 MT/ 9:00- 10:00PT This meeting will be recorded.
Assessing student learning in Delta’s Diversity in the College Classroom: Achievement Gap course Don Gillian-Daniel University of Wisconsin-Madison.
CIRTL Network Administrative Meeting 11:00-12:00 ET/ 10:00-11:00 CT/ 9:00-10:00 MT / 8:00-9:00 PT This meeting will be recorded.
Teacher Professional Learning and Development Presentation for PPTA Curriculum Workshops 2009.
Cross-Network LC Contributions Fall 2013 Proposed Category 1 Offerings – Fall Semester Flipping - A “New” Generation for Active Learning (Pittsburgh: 4+
Learning Management System
CIRTL Network Meeting October,  To guide program development and evaluation  To identify the purposes of specific programs to participants and.
Footer to be inserted here 1 ASSESSMENT of REFLECTION in Participation Units Theresa Winchester-Seeto & Marina Harvey with Debra Coulson & Jacqueline Mackaway.
What are Learning Outcomes and how to create good Learning Outcomes
D1- Leveraging PBIS Implementation Leader Presenters: Rob Horner, University of Oregon Caryn Ward, University of North Carolina (SISEP) Key Words:
Innovation Ecosystems Fellowship Overview
Faculty Development: Preparing Clinical Nursing Instructors
The University of the Future: Preparing for Curriculum Refresh
ED 690: Reflecting, Writing, and Reviewing the PDP
2016 CEEDAR Cross-State Convening
Creating Priority Objectives
CEA Case Study Marianne Farrugia.
13th Governing Council of SIAP 4-5th December,2017 Chiba, Japan
Implementing the Specialized Service Professional State Model Evaluation System for Measures of Student Outcomes.
Who do you think they are?
IEEE EAB Strategy 19 June 2011 New Brunswick, NJ.
Building Knowledge about ESD Indicators
A3 – Improving State Level Supports and Stakeholder Engagement through Effective Evaluation Kim Gulbrandson, Justyn Poulos – Wisconsin RtI Center Key.
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Part B: Evaluating Implementation Progress and Impact of Professional Development Efforts on Evidence-Based Practices   NCSI Cross-State Learning Collaboratives.
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Hannah Clarke, sparqs Steph Kirkham, sparqs
The National Approach to Professional Learning
How inclusive is my module... and yours?
Selecting Evidence to Demonstrate Teaching Effectiveness
SE DCS Peer challenge Workshop Day 2 pm
Wide Ideas Idea Management Software Idea Management Process
Presentation transcript:

BU CIRTL Needs Assessment and Resource Allocation Process Part II Bennett Goldberg and Kathryn Spilios

BU CIRTL Next Steps  Common outcomes, high value Network needs  Overall results and rankings of CN activties  Cost-Priority matrix  Breakout Discussion – two questions:  How valid are these results? What new data would you need?  Are these results actionable?  Report out, reflect on process  Discuss resourcing new common needs  Vote later this morning - allocation

BU CIRTL Our Common Network Needs  Curate/repository of courses/workshops 4  Mentor Database across Network for TAR 2  Curate/repository of MOOC and TAR 2  Curate/Repository of Assessment 2  Train the Trainers 2  Regional Meetings/Mentoring 2  Marketing and Advertising 2 All had med to high priorities, low to med costs

BU CIRTL Cost vs Priority

BU CIRTL Overall results

BU CIRTL Breakouts 1. How valid are these results? What new data would you need? 2. Are these results actionable? 15 min….

BU CIRTL Validity? One table’s statement: Spent the time, gap analysis, five groups…. These results are valid, representing the opinions of the people in the room and our advocacy for those not represented.

BU CIRTL Our Common Network Needs  Curate/repository/wrapping of courses/workshops 4  Mentor Database across Network for TAR 2  Curate/repository of MOOC and TAR 2  Curate/Repository of Assessment 2  Train the Trainers 2  Regional Meetings/Mentoring 2  Marketing and Advertising 2 All had med to high priorities, low to med costs By show of hands, does the CIRTL Network want to work now to resource these activities:

BU CIRTL Short courses and workshops  Teaching with Technology  Subject Specific Short course - Teaching Intro Chem 2  Teaching statement/philosophy  Online workshops w/ pre- and post

BU CIRTL Additional Network Needs  Connect to PUI's  Expertise database for matching  Eval and Research on Network  More TAR sessions  Develop Assessment Questions linked to CIRTL Learning Outcomes  CIRTL Writes Hybrid Courses; Local Wrapper  CIRTL Youtube Channel

BU CIRTL Goals: 1.Engage in gap analysis (done…) 2.Combine into needs assessment chart - now 3.Begin to allocate network resources for all CIRTL cross-network activities - tomorrow 4.Reflect on the process – double loop learning To align cross-network activities, existing and future, to the local and cross-network goals and to resource these needs.

BU CIRTL Cost, Impact, Priority  Cost: On a scale, high to low, and relative to other activities, the cost is the effort to produce the activity.  Impact: On a scale, high to low, and relative to other activities, the impact is the combined value of the activity toward achieving local and cross-network goals.  Priority: On a scale, high to low, and relative to other activities, the priority is a subjective measure of which cross-network activities are more important to resource than others.

BU CIRTL Framework Principles  Transparency – the process, assessment matrix, and institution’s contributions will be published on the CIRTL website.  Inclusiveness – the process includes all voices at all steps.  Data driven – the outcomes of all network activities, opinions of activity providers and participants will drive decisions through actionable data.

BU CIRTL Sequence of actions in needs/resource framework PURPOSE: to reach a collective (not necessarily a consensus) understanding and prioritization of the needs of the CIRTL network 14 Needs assessment, resource costs and activity prioritization Resource description, categorization, and valuation. Mapping resources to needs Data collection and feedback CURRENT RESOURCES: the time, effort, and skill set of the Institutional Leaders and their local teams who contribute to cross-network activities MAPPING: uses existing CIRTL Network model of category contributions; allows local institutional choice and optimized collective choices DATA: outcomes of Network goals and the value to those providing the activity. Data should be actionable - an activity is so valuable we offer it more often; or an activity is so valueless we decide not to resource it.

BU CIRTL Your challenge  5 breakouts with 4+ institutions each  Stage 1: Discussion of Cross-Network (CN) activities and data  Stage 2: Evaluate cost, impact, and priority of CN activities  Stage 3: Each institution takes turn presenting a proposed CN resource/activity from their gap analysis. Fill in the Needs Chart.  Stage 4: Engage in a a discussion and evaluate cost, impact and priority of newly posted activities.

BU CIRTL Your challenge  5 breakouts with 4+ institutions each  Stage 1: Discussion of of Cross-Network (CN) activities  Stage 2: Evaluate cost, impact, and priority of CN activities  Stage 3: Each institution takes turn presenting a proposed CN resource/activity from their gap analysis. Fill in the Needs Chart.  Stage 4: Engage in a a discussion and evaluate cost, impact and priority of newly posted activities -- Group report from each breakout on major new resource need discussion, as well as thorny content or process issues (after breakout) -- Five different needs matrices combined to a single matrix, used to populate cost-priority matrix (evening) Tomorrow : Presentation of collective needs matrix, collective cost-priority matrix. -- Trial electronic voting by each institution on their priorities.