1 Transportation Impact Fees and Street Maintenance Fees Presented to the City Council by the Planning and Development Department January 21, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
City of North Liberty North Liberty Area Development Corporation University of Iowa Community Credit Union Economic Development Partnership Project October.
Advertisements

City of Johannesburg Department of Finance and Economic Development Office of the Budget and Financial Planning Medium Term Budget 2006/2007.
FISCAL ACCOUNTABILITY OF STATE GOVERNMENT Presentation Prepared for the Appropriations Committee and the Finance, Revenue, and Bonding Committee by the.
PROPOSITION 218 IMPACTS ON UTILITY USER FEES Case Study City of Dixon Sewer Rate Repeal of 2007.
GFOAz May 11, 2007 The ABC’s of Municipal Financing.
Water Rates Utility Rates & SDCs Presentation to the West Linn City Council October 5, 2009.
Presented by: David Crowe – Chief Economist October 25, 2013 Lee County, Florida Home Building Impact in Lee County, Florida.
Colorado Transportation Finance and Implementation Panel Overview Fort Morgan,Colorado September 13, 2007.
Background Why Plan For Transportation? Facts You Should Know Expectations Projects and Costs Conclusions/ Next Steps.
JOINT LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE HEARING SENATE BUDGET and FISCAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Delivering Energy Savings for California AMERICAN RECOVERY & Karen.
+ Proposed Lockwood Targeted Economic Development District 2015 Yellowstone County.
2013 Mequon Development Survey: Results Summary Prepared by Center for Urban Initiatives and Research at UW-Milwaukee.
Nebraska Investment Finance Authority © 2007 Tax Credit Basics.
Considering Tax-Supported Debt May 10, 2004 Presentation to City Council Roger Rosychuk Corporate Services Department.
Alachua County Mobility Plan Southwest Alachua County Transportation Improvement District Jonathan B. Paul, AICP, MA 2 Jeffrey L. Hays Chris Dawson, AICP.
Context Report and Long Range Financial Plan Presentation to City Council May 11, 2004 E D M O N T O N.
Document 51 1 Lansdowne Partnership Plan Business Model Document 5.
PUBLIC HEARING: Development (Impact) Fees - Land Use Assumptions & Infrastructure Improvement Plan Reports June 30, 2014.
Tools for Redevelopment Courtney Knight Managing Director, Redevelopment Revitalizing Atlanta 1.
Development (Impact) Fee Program Changes to Comply with State Law Mayor and Council Study Session June 3, 2014.
Presented by: Elliot F. Eisenberg, Ph.D. September 25, 2012 Williston, ND THE LOCAL AREA IMPACT OF HOME BUILDING IN WILLIAMS, COUNTY NORTH DAKOTA.
Reduction and Deferral of Impact Fees Board of County Commissioners Discussion Item March 29, 2011.
Preservation of Employment Land Item: 4.5 Item 4.5 Item # 4.5 Item 4.5 Laurel Prevetti, Assistant Director Department of Planning Building and Code Enforcement.
2014 Budget Department Presentations Infrastructure Funding Options.
Overview of 2011 proposed budget.  Defunded Five Positions  Maintained Service Levels  Continued Infrastructure Improvements  Cut spending early to.
School Closure Moratorium Committee September 27, 2011.
Sunshine Coast Regional District Development Cost Charges July 3, 2014 Infrastructure Services Committee Bob Twerdoff.
3TB Project Review Tax Increment Financing (“TIF”) Overview January 25, 2013.
St. Johns County Association Roundtable June 8, 2015 Jesse Dunn Assistant Director OMB St. Johns County BCC Fiscal Year 2016: Separate Challenges Looking.
Julie Conroy, AICP, Senior Environmental Planner Metropolitan Area Planning Council.
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Financing Plan Highlights Citizens’ Charter Review Task Force May 15,2007 Pavement Management Report Financing Plan Presenter:
What’s Up with Affordable Housing in Seattle? SF Housing Action Coalition Regulatory Committee.
Community Development Department DEVELOPMENT FEE STRUCTURE.
Yed PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT OF THE HONEYWELL MORRIS TOWNSHIP HEADQUARTERS CAMPUS Prepared by Biggins Lacy Shapiro & Company.
Impact Fee Updates Board of County Commissioners Public Hearings October 30, 2012.
Implementing SB 1525: An Update Cheyenne Walsh Squire Sanders (US) LLP Government Finance Officers Association of Arizona Winter Conference Prescott, Arizona.
Single Family Housing Development Program A Briefing to the Housing Committee Housing/Community Services Department November 2, 2015.
1. FY Proposed Budget Jamie Justice, Town Manager & Piet Swart, Finance Director April 26, 2016 Fiscal Year Proposed Budget 2.
H ONIGMAN Leveraging Michigan Brownfield Incentives with Other Development Incentives Richard A. Barr Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP Detroit, Michigan.
1 Homestead Exemption Presented to the City Council by Horatio Porter, Budget Officer January 21, 2010.
Christopher M. Quinn, MACC, CPA, CFE, CGFO, CGMA Finance Director Tuesday, May 3 rd, 2016.
Housing Demand Ned Murray, Ph.D., AICP FIU Metropolitan Center November 13, 2012.
Works and Transport Sector Overview of 2016/17 Grant and Budget Guidelines Ministry of Works and Transport and Uganda Road Fund.
PRESENTED AND PREPARED BY CITY OF MISSOULA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.
James M. Poling Brownfields Administrator Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control Brownfields 2011 Sustainable Communities Start Here.
1 Economic Development Program Agreement Sundance Square Central Plaza Robert Sturns Housing and Economic Development Department April 10, 2012.
City and County of San Francisco 1 Five Year Financial Plan Update FY through FY Joint Report by the Controller’s Office, Mayor’s Budget.
PUBLIC WORKS FY 2012 Proposed Budget May 24, 2012.
Top 10 Frequently Asked Annexation Questions.
1 FY BUDGET PRESENTATION Board of Estimate and Taxation February 9, 2015.
CITY OF MENIFEE, CA. FY General Fund Mid-year Review Other Funds Mid-year Review National, State and Local economic conditions FY Budget Planning.
Public Hearing: Fiscal Year 2017 Recommended Operating Budget City Council Meeting, May 9, 2016 Item 7.
1 Presented to the City Council by Horatio Porter, Budget Officer September 15, 2009 Overview of FY2010 Budget.
City of Sequim Long Range Financial Plan City Council Study Session June 27, 2011.
2018 Preliminary Tax Levy Preliminary tax levy must be certified to the County by end of September for property tax statements mailed in late November.
Community Dialogue about The NuCLEus Project
Presentation Outline Background Land Use Scenarios Revenues Costs
Commercial Linkage Fee Research
City of richmond FY mid-year budget review
Allens Inc Incentives Agreement
Strategic Revenue & Expenditure Discussion
Christopher M. Quinn, MACC, CPA, CFE, CGFO, CGMA
Skillman Corridor TIF District
City of Richmond, California FY Draft Budget
East Greenwich School District
Updates to the Traffic Reduction and Transportation Improvements Fee (TR/TIF) City Council July 24, 2017.
BUDGET WORKSHOP February 15, 2017.
Work Session Follow UP Aug. 23, 2018.
Funding the Town’s Transportation Infrastructure Improvement Plan (IIP) – An Initial Discussion of Impact Fees Town Council Meeting March 1, 2017.
Franchise Fee Informational Meeting
Presentation transcript:

1 Transportation Impact Fees and Street Maintenance Fees Presented to the City Council by the Planning and Development Department January 21, 2010

2 Purpose of Today’s Meeting Refresh the City Council on the recommendations from the City Manager’s Committee on Infrastructure Funding Receive feedback on City Council policy options

3 Underlying Principles of Study Maintenance of economic competitiveness – Avoid the “tipping point” Equity – Apportion costs among beneficiaries of the infrastructure Efficiency – Funding mechanism that allows efficient delivery of projects

4 Key Findings Property Tax & Debt Financing –Per capita property tax rates and expenditures high –Share of tax allocated to debt much lower Development Costs: At or below the median of comparable cities Occupancy Costs: –Residential costs near the median of comparable cities –Non-residential costs higher than most comparable cities Economic impacts –Transportation investments generate net benefits to the local economy under all scenarios

5 I. Transportation Impact Fees 36% 27% 50% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Existing Proposed Residential Commercial & Industrial All

6 Grace Periods Granted to all building permits associated with a plat that was filed before the impact fee effective date –One year from the effective date of the ordinance or –Two years from plat approval, whichever is longer. Resulted in an impact fee exemption on 97.8% of all building permits since July 1, 2008.

7 Smoothing Recommend 50% smoothed rate for North, West, and South ($3,005 single- family equivalent) Recommend retaining $2,000 single-family equivalency rate for East

8 Scenarios (North, South, and West except AA and W) Current50% Single-Family (per unit) $2,000$3,005 Apartment (per unit) $1,228$1,845 Day Care (per 1,000 sf) $6,851$13,725 Sit-Down Restaurant (per 1,000 sf) $2,485$4,978 Drive-Thru Fast Food (per 1,000 sf) $10,267$20,568 Grocery Store (per 1,000 sf) $5,324$10,666 Drug Store (per 1,000 sf) $3,502$7,016 General Office (per 1,000 sf) $2,015$4,036

9 Discount for Locating on Existing Arterials (North, South, and West except AA and W) 27%/36% Collect. 15% Disc. 50% Collect. 50% Disc. Single-Family (per unit) $ 2,000$1,700$ 3,005$ 1,502 Apartment (per unit) $ 1,228$1,044$ 1,845$ 922 Day Care (1,000 sf) $ 6,851$5,824$13,725$ 6,862 Restaurant (1,000 sf) $ 2,485$2,112$ 4,978$ 2,489 Drive-Thru Rest. (1,000 sf) $10,267$8,727$20,568$10,284 Grocery Store (1,000 sf) $ 5,324$4,526$10,666$ 5,333 Drug Store (1,000 sf) $ 3,502$2,977$ 7,016$ 3,508 General Office (1,000 sf) $ 2,015$1,713$ 4,036$ 2,018

10 Sample Fees – General Office Current: 27% collection rate: $60,540 15% discounted rate: $51,390 Proposed: 50% collection rate: $121,080 50% discounted rate: $60,540 Typical area: 30,000 sf

11 Sample Fees – Drive-Thru Fast Food Current: 27% collection rate: $30,801 15% discounted rate: $26,181 Proposed: 50% collection rate: $61,704 50% discounted rate: $30,852 Typical area: 3,000 sf

12 Sample Fees - Daycare Current: 27% collection rate: $27,404 15% discounted rate: $23,296 Proposed: 50% collection rate: $54,900 50% discounted rate: $27,448 Typical area: 4,000 sf

13 Sample Fees – Grocery Store 27% collection rate: $319,440 15% discounted rate: $271,560 50% collection rate: $639,960 50% discounted rate: $319,980 Typical area: 60,000 sf

14 Discounts for Extraordinary Investment Discount rate of 15-50% Minimum capital investment of $15 million –Fort Worth Chamber and Housing and Economic Development suggest reducing this threshold to $10 million Creation of 100 jobs –Minimum salary of twice minimum wage, plus benefits Other tools: –Tax abatements –Tax Increment Finance Districts –Triple Freeport

15 II. Transportation Utility Create Transportation Utility with monthly fee assessed on all land uses that generate trips on the road infrastructure Use proceeds to supplement General Fund commitment to street maintenance and to provide for existing capacity deficiencies Assumes impact fee revenue and increasing taxes from growing tax base funding new capacity needs

16 Sample Collection Rates Single-family residence $5.50 Multi-family residence $3.38 Office / 1,000 sf$7.39 Retail / 1,000 sf$10.33 Industrial / 1,000 sf$4.46 Annual Revenue for Street Maintenance $31M

17 Relative Cost of Street Maintenance Fee

18 Development Costs - Existing Fort Worth Percent of Median Single Family (n = 4) Multi- Family (n = 4) Retail (n = 5) Office Central (n = 12) Office Outer (n = 12) Indus- trial (n = 12) Infrastruc- ture & Fees 104%91%100%85%111%83% Infrastruc- ture, Fees & Bldg Costs 101%100%99%97%98%97% Occupancy Costs 98%106%120%181%177%117%

19 Development Costs With Revenue Options Fort Worth Percent of Median Single Family (n = 4) Multi- Family (n = 4) Retail (n = 5) Office Central (n = 12) Office Outer (n = 12) Indus- trial (n = 12) Infrastruc- ture & Fees 105%103%146%85%154%86% Infrastruc- ture, Fees & Bldg Costs 101% 102%97%99%97% Occupancy Costs 101%103%123%183%174%126%

20 Revenue Estimates for Recommendations 10-yr. revenue Unfunded Transportation Infrastructure ($1,311 million) Increase Impact Fee to 50% of Maximum $ 83 million Debt Capacity – Increase Share to 90%$ 104 million Transportation User Fee$ 494 million Public Improvement DistrictsN/A Deferred Improvements and Maintenance ($ 630 million) Funds 52% of the gap

21 10-Year Transportation Improvements Plan With Revenue Options Infrastructure Needs Projected Revenues $ Million Impact Fee - Increase Transportation User Fee Debt Capacity - Incr. Share Unfunded Existing Sources Ongoing Maintenance New Development Needs Capacity Deficiencies Deferred Maintenance Projected Cost Revenues

22 Next Steps Respond to questions regarding the policy options Complete studies and develop ordinances related to impact fees and transportation utility Continue dialogue with Development Advisory Committee for technical assistance Public hearings as specific ordinances considered as early as October