J. Redemann 1, B. Schmid 1, J.A. Eilers 2, R. Kahn 3, R.C. Levy 4,5, P.B. Russell 2, J.M. Livingston 6, P.V. Hobbs 7, W.L. Smith Jr. 8, B.N. Holben 4 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GEO-CAPE COMMUNITY WORKSHOP MAY Vijay Natraj 1, Xiong Liu 2, Susan Kulawik 1, Kelly Chance 2, Robert Chatfield 3, David P. Edwards 4, Annmarie.
Advertisements

Quantifying aerosol direct radiative effect with MISR observations Yang Chen, Qinbin Li, Ralph Kahn Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology,
The Averaging Kernel of CO2 Column Measurements by the Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO), Its Use in Inverse Modeling, and Comparisons to AIRS, SCIAMACHY,
Satellite Remote Sensing of Surface Air Quality
An Introduction to Using Angular Information in Aerosol Remote Sensing Richard Kleidman SSAI/NASA Goddard Lorraine Remer UMBC / JCET Robert C. Levy NASA.
PACE AEROSOL CAL/VAL Cameron McNaughton Golder Associates Ltd.
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
Aircraft spiral on July 20, 2011 at 14 UTC Validation of GOES-R ABI Surface PM2.5 Concentrations using AIRNOW and Aircraft Data Shobha Kondragunta (NOAA),
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
NASA Ames: P. Russell, J. Redemann, S. Dunagan, R. Johnson, J. Zavaleta PNNL: B. Schmid, C. Flynn, E. Kassianov NASA GSFC: AERONET Team A collaboration.
First Flight of NASA’s Coastal and Ocean Airborne Science Testbed (COAST) L. Guild 1, J. Dungan 1, M. Edwards 1, P. Russell 1, J. Morrow 2, S. Hooker 3,
Lidar Intercomparion Study with Airborne Aerosol Optical Measurements near Tokyo on April 23, 2001 Toshiyuki Murayama Tokyo University of Mercantile Marine,
Mainly sampled Asian outflow in the Alaska phase local forest fire smoke in the Canada phase We expect these phases to represent the two extremes among.
Orbit Characteristics and View Angle Effects on the Global Cloud Field
Summer Institute in Earth Sciences 2009 Comparison of GEOS-5 Model to MPLNET Aerosol Data Bryon J. Baumstarck Departments of Physics, Computer Science,
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
A Progress Report on Combining MODIS and CALIPSO Aerosol Data for Direct Radiative Effect Studies Jens Redemann, Qin Zhang, Philip Russell, John Livingston,
Trace gas and AOD retrievals from a newly deployed hyper-spectral airborne sun/sky photometer (4STAR) M. Segal-Rosenheimer, C.J. Flynn, J. Redemann, B.
Aerosol Optical Depths from Airborne Sunphotometry in INTEX-B/MILAGRO as a Validation Tool for the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) on Aura J. Livingston.
The combined use of MODIS, CALIPSO and OMI level 2 aerosol products for calculating direct aerosol radiative effects Jens Redemann, M. Vaughan, Y. Shinozuka,
GOES and GOES-R ABI Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) Validation Shobha Kondragunta and Istvan Laszlo (NOAA/NESDIS/STAR), Chuanyu Xu (IMSG), Pubu Ciren (Riverside.
4STAR: Spectrometer for Sky-Scanning, Sun-Tracking Atmospheric Research Development and Results from First Test-flights A collaboration involving: PNNL:
Applications of Satellite Remote Sensing to Estimate Global Ambient Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations Randall Martin, Dalhousie and Harvard-Smithsonian.
T2 T1 (biomass burning aerosol) (dust) Findings (1) OMI and AATS AOD retrievals have been analyzed for four spatially and temporally near-coincident events.
Jetstream 31 (J31) at Mid-Campaign in INTEX-B/MILAGRO: Science Goals, Payload, Example Results, Assessment Phil Russell, Jens Redemann, Brian Cairns, Charles.
Figure 1. (left) Direct comparison of CCN concentration adjusted to 0.4% supersaturation and 499 nm AOD, both observed from ≤1 km altitudes during ARCTAS.
The Second TEMPO Science Team Meeting Physical Basis of the Near-UV Aerosol Algorithm Omar Torres NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Atmospheric Chemistry.
Characterization of Aerosols using Airborne Lidar, MODIS, and GOCART Data during the TRACE-P (2001) Mission Rich Ferrare 1, Ed Browell 1, Syed Ismail 1,
QA filtering of individual pixels to enable a more accurate validation of aerosol products Maksym Petrenko Presented at MODIS Collection 7 and beyond Retreat.
Modelling the radiative impact of aerosols from biomass burning during SAFARI-2000 Gunnar Myhre 1,2 Terje K. Berntsen 3,1 James M. Haywood 4 Jostein K.
UV Aerosol Product Status and Outlook Omar Torres and Changwoo Ahn OMI Science Team Meeting Outline -Status -Product Assessment OMI-MODIS Comparison OMI-Aeronet.
Livingston et al. EGU General Assembly April 2007 Comparison of airborne sunphotometer and satellite sensor retrievals of aerosol optical depth during.
4STAR: Spectrometer for Sky-Scanning, Sun- Tracking Atmospheric Research Results from Test-flight Series PNNLNASA AmesNASA GSFC B. SchmidS. DunaganS. Sinyuk.
Redemann, ICARTT workshop, Durham, NH, Aug.9-12, 2005 Airborne measurements of spectral direct aerosol radiative forcing - a new aerosol gradient method.
Airborne sunphotometer (AATS-14) measurements in ARCTAS - first insights into their combined use with satellite observations to study Arctic aerosol radiative.
Aerosol Optical Depth Measurements by Airborne Sun Photometer in SOLVE II: Comparisons to SAGE III, POAM III and Airborne Spectrometer Measurements* P.
NASA’s Coastal and Ocean Airborne Science Testbed (COAST) L. Guild 1 *, J. Dungan 1, M. Edwards 1, P. Russell 1, S. Hooker 2, J. Myers 3, J. Morrow 4,
4STAR: Spectrometer for Sky-Scanning, Sun-Tracking Atmospheric Research A collaboration involving: PNNL: Connor J. Flynn, B. Schmid, E. Kassianov NASA.
NASA’s Coastal and Ocean Airborne Science Testbed (COAST) L. Guild 1, J. Dungan 1, M. Edwards 1, P. Russell 1, J. Morrow 2, S. Hooker 3, J. Myers 4, R.
J31 Data Workshop 9-10Mar05 Validation of Satellite Aerosol Optical Depth by AATS-14 during ICARTT 2004 NASA Ames Airborne Sunphotometer Team Presented.
Jetstream 31 (J31) in INTEX-B/MILAGRO. Campaign Context: In March 2006, INTEX-B/MILAGRO studied pollution from Mexico City and regional biomass burning,
Characterization of GOES Aerosol Optical Depth Retrievals during INTEX-A Pubu Ciren 1, Shobha Kondragunta 2, Istvan Laszlo 2 and Ana Prados 3 1 QSS Group,
Direct aerosol radiative effects based on combined A-Train observations Jens Redemann, Y. Shinozuka, J. Livingston, M. Vaughan, P. Russell, M.Kacenelenbogen,
MAXDOAS observations in Beijing G. Pinardi, K. Clémer, C. Hermans, C. Fayt, M. Van Roozendael BIRA-IASB Pucai Wang & Jianhui Bai IAP/CAS 24 June 2009,
AEROCOM AODs are systematically smaller than MODIS, with slightly larger/smaller differences in winter/summer. Aerosol optical properties are difficult.
Review of PM2.5/AOD Relationships
Aerosol optical properties measured from aircraft, satellites and the ground during ARCTAS - their relationship to aerosol chemistry and smoke type Yohei.
Airborne Sunphotometry and Closure Studies during the SAFARI-2000 Dry Season Campaign B. Schmid BAER/NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA.
Airborne Sunphotometry and Closure Studies in the SAFARI-2000 Dry Season Campaign B. Schmid 1, P.B. Russell 2, P.Pilewskie 2, J. Redemann 1, P.V. Hobbs.
AATS-14 measurements during COAST J. Livingston R. Johnson M. Kacenelenbogen C. Chang P. Russell.
Redemann, ICARTT J-31 data workshop, Boulder, CO, Mar. 9-10, 2005 Aerosol horizontal structure – variability Jens Redemann (BAER Institute) + J-31 team.
Phil Russell 1, John Livingston 2, Beat Schmid 3, Jens Redemann 4, Stephanie Ramirez 4, Qin Zhang 4 and many other contributors 10 Years of Studies Comparing.
Spectral Absorption by Aerosols in the ACE Asia Region R.W. Bergstrom 1, P. Pilewskie 2, J. Pommier 1, M. Rabbette 1,P. B. Russell 2, B. Schmid 1, J. Redemann.
Jetstream-31 (J31) in ITCT-INTEX (Intercontinental Transport and Chemical Transformation- Intercontinental Chemical Transport Experiment) J31 GOALS in.
NASA’s Coastal and Ocean Airborne Science Testbed (COAST) L. Guild 1, J. Dungan 1, M. Edwards 1, P. Russell 1, J. Morrow 2, S. Hooker 3, J. Myers 4, R.
Spectrometer for Sky-Scanning, Sun-Tracking Atmospheric Research (4STAR) Earth Science Division - NASA Ames Research Center 2006 A concept for a sun-sky.
Horizontal variability of aerosol optical properties observed during the ARCTAS airborne experiment Yohei Shinozuka 1*, Jens Redemann 1, Phil Russell 2,
INSIGHTS FROM CAR AIRBORNE MEASUREMENTS DURING INTEX-B (Mexico) FOR SATELLITE VALIDATION C. K. Gatebe, 1,2 Michael D. King, 2 G.T. Arnold, 1,3 O. Dubovik,
Global Air Pollution Inferred from Satellite Remote Sensing Randall Martin, Dalhousie and Harvard-Smithsonian with contributions from Aaron van Donkelaar,
A Study of Variability in Tropical Tropospheric Water Vapor Robert L. Herman 1, Robert F. Troy 2, Holger Voemel 3, Henry B. Selkirk 4, Susan S. Kulawik.
The study of cloud and aerosol properties during CalNex using newly developed spectral methods Patrick J. McBride, Samuel LeBlanc, K. Sebastian Schmidt,
Aerosol optical properties measured from aircraft, satellites and the ground during ARCTAS - their relationship to CCN, aerosol chemistry and smoke type.
Studying the radiative environment of individual biomass burning fire plumes using multi-platform observations: an example ARCTAS case study on June 30,
Jens Redemann 1, B. Schmid 1, J. M. Livingston 2, P. B. Russell 3, J. A. Eilers 3, P. V. Hobbs 4, R. Kahn 5, W. L. Smith Jr. 6, B. N. Holben 7, C.K. Rutledge.
Daytime variations of AOD and PM2
NPOESS Airborne Sounder Testbed (NAST)
G. Myhre, F. Stordal, M. Johnsrud, A. Ignatov, M. I. Mishchenko, I. V
Using dynamic aerosol optical properties from a chemical transport model (CTM) to retrieve aerosol optical depths from MODIS reflectances over land Fall.
Global Climatology of Aerosol Optical Depth
Assessment of Satellite Ocean Color Products of the Coast of Martha’s Vineyard using AERONET-Ocean Color Measurements Hui Feng1, Heidi Sosik2 , and Tim.
Presentation transcript:

J. Redemann 1, B. Schmid 1, J.A. Eilers 2, R. Kahn 3, R.C. Levy 4,5, P.B. Russell 2, J.M. Livingston 6, P.V. Hobbs 7, W.L. Smith Jr. 8, B.N. Holben 4 1 Bay Area Environmental Research Institute, Sonoma, CA 2 NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 3 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA 4 NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 5 Also at Science Systems and Applications Inc., Lanham, MD 6 SRI International, Menlo Park, CA 7 University of Washington, Seattle, WA 8 NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA Suborbital measurements of spectral aerosol optical depth and its variability at sub-satellite-grid scales in support of CLAMS, 2001(off the central US East coast)

Contents 1.Motivation for studying spatial variability in AOD 2.AATS-14 aboard the UW CV Comparisons of airborne AATS-14 to ground- based AERONET Cimel sunphotometer at COVE: implications for satellite and model validation 4.Spatial statistics of AOD off the US East Coast 5.Summary

Motivation 1) How comparable is a measurement at a single point in space and time to 2) What is the best strategy for validating a spatially averaged model- or satellite- derived quantity? a satellite/model grid box around it? a satellite/model grid box Δx and Δt away from it? another point measurement Δx and Δt away from it?

AATS-14 aboard the UW CV Measures direct solar beam nm 2.Yields: aerosol optical depth + aerosol extinction when A/C flies profiles columnar water vapor (ozone)+ water vapor (ozone) concentration when A/C flies profiles 3.Size: Telescope dome 8" OD (hemisphere) atop 5" H pedestal. (Total H: 9" above A/C skin), Inside A/C: 12" D x 18" H cylinder. 4.Weight: lbs

Suborbital measurements of AOD - spatial vs. temporal variability: Temporal: Long-term Temporal: Short-term Spatial resolution Ground-based (e.g., AERONET) yesyes (15 min.)no Ship-based sunphotometer yes no?? Aircraft-based TDDR nopossibleyes 45 sec. ~ 3- 4 km Aircraft-based AATSnopossibleyes 2 sec. ~ m

Location of nine low-level flight legs of the Convair-580 research aircraft in CLAMS. Green points mark locations of successful AATS-14 retrievals of AOD at flight altitudes below 80 m. Chesapeake Lighthouse

Statistics of AERONET vs. AATS-14 at COVE, July 10 – Aug.2, 2001

Chesapeake Lighthouse Dependence of mean AOD on averaging area around COVE km 17km 6km

Dependence of mean AOD on averaging area around COVE - 2

Location of nine low-level flight legs of the Convair-580 research aircraft in CLAMS. Green points mark locations of successful AATS-14 retrievals of AOD at flight altitudes below 80 m. Chesapeake Lighthouse

Spatial variability in AODs (0.354, 0.499, and µm) Absolute differenceRelative difference [%] Characteristic length scale (CLS) for AOD: CLS  15-20km

Convair-580 flight tracks relative to the location of MODIS level 2 (MOD02_L2) aerosol retrieval boxes

Wavelength [m] AOD Comparison of spectral AODs derived from AATS-14 and MODIS (MOD04_L2)

MISRMODIS Scatter plot of AATS-14 and regional mean MISR AOD (standard algorithm, left) and MODIS level 2 AOD (10x10km, nadir, right)

Summary 1.Comparisons between airborne AATS-14 in the vicinity of and AERONET Cimel derived AOD’s directly at the Chesapeake Lighthouse show good agreement. 2.Mean AODs in the vicinity of the Chesapeake Lighthouse (COVE) vary by as much as 28% when averaged over satellite-grid size areas (17 and 50km radius) in one third of the studied cases. 3.At UV and mid-visible wavelengths, the largest absolute gradients in AOD were per 50 km horizontal distance. In the near IR, analogous gradients rarely measured Relative AOD variability during low-level legs of 11 research flights was in average ~30% over distances of ~50 km. 4.MODIS-AATS-14 comparisons are weakly correlated (r 2 =0.53). However, 70% of MODIS AODs are within pre-launch uncertainty estimates. 5.MISR-AATS-14 comparisons are strongly correlated (r 2 =0.94). There remains a constant offset of ~0.06. Resolution of the offset problem promises to bring MISR and AATS-14 into very good agreement. 6.A good way to validate a model or satellite AOD product is to assess and stay within the characteristic aerosol length scale (CLS, 15-20km in CLAMS), which is likely to be a function of time and validation site itself. Acknowledgements NASA EOS validation program (M. King) NASA Radiation Science Program (D. Anderson) NASA New Investigator Program (M.-Y. Wei)