CIFOR Guidelines for Foodborne Disease Outbreak Response and the CIFOR Toolkit: An Overview New York Integrated Center of Food Safety Center of Excellence.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Essential Service #6 :. Refresher: Why learn about Essential Services? Improve quality and performance. Achieve better outcomes – improved health, less.
Advertisements

National Public Health Performance Standards Program Orientation to the Essential Public Health Services.
MSCG Training for Project Officers and Consultants: Project Officer and Consultant Roles in Supporting Successful Onsite Technical Assistance Visits.
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
2010 Food Safety Epidemiology Capacity Assessment CSTE Annual Conference June 13, 2011 Lauren Rosenberg, MPA Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists.
Sustainability Planning Pat Simmons Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services.
Rethinking Public Health Surveillance for the Future Perry F. Smith CSTE Annual Conference Pittsburgh, PA June 13, 2011.
Developing a Basic Program Budget Harkmore Lee, CALCASA.
Minnesota Laboratory System for Public Health (MLS-PH) Purpose and Description 1.
Community Health Assessments: Requirements and Models April 25, 2013 Gianfranco Pezzino Senior Fellow Kansas Health Institute.
DR. CHRISTINA RUNDI MINISTRY OF HEALTH, MALAYSIA.
Session V: Programme Roles and Responsibilities
Introduction to the State-Level Mitigation 20/20 TM Software for Management of State-Level Hazard Mitigation Planning and Programming A software program.
Produce Safety Rule Phase 2 Workgroup 1.
1 Webinar on: Establishing a Fully Integrated National Food Safety System with Strengthened Inspection, Laboratory and Response Capacity Sponsored by Partnership.
The National Academies’ Board on Life Sciences Dr. Frances Sharples Director National Research Council National Research Council.
PHAB Slide Set 2013 The slides in this set are made available for use in presentations and educational sessions by health departments. The information.
Peter Defranceschi ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability An Introduction European Commission GPP Training Toolkit.
 Planning provides the foundation for conservation district programs and operations.  The planning process broadly defines the vision of the future.
Kirk Smith MN, Carina Blackmore FL, John Dunn TN, Alicia Cronquist CO, Bill Keene OR Dale Morse & Don Sharp CDC CSTE Annual Meeting June 12, 2013 National.
A Forum on Comprehensive Community Initiatives How Federal Agencies Can Foster Systems Change to Improve the Lives of Youth and Families Welcome to.
Toolkit to Promote the Use of the CIFOR Guidelines Jeanette Stehr-Green, MD CSTE Consultant June 13, 2011.
ORIENTATION SESSION Strengthening Chronic Disease Prevention & Management.
APHL Update – FDA Cooperative agreement. The Association of Public Health Laboratories (APHL) has been actively working towards meeting the deliverables.
Module 3 Develop the Plan Planning for Emergencies – For Small Business –
Performance Standards: Opportunities for Quality Improvement for Maternal and Child Health Dennis Lenaway, PhD, MPH Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
NumericNoExplosionAnswer.
1 Workforce Development: The Role of a Board of Health National Association of Local Boards of Health, 10th Annual Conference July 11, 2002 J. Fred Agel,
Import Safety Cathy Sauceda Director Import Safety Branch and Interagency Requirements Division Office of International Trade January 2010.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Developing and Implementing a Successful Workforce Development Plan Ron Bialek, President, Public Health Foundation John Moran – Senior Quality Advisor,
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases Centers for Disease Control June 14, 2011 : The Food Safety Modernization Act: Implications.
National Public Health Performance Standards Program Overview Presentation.
Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 National Training and Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreements (NCA) Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) HRSA Objective.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
1 Operations Academy Senior Management Program Next Offering September 16-26, 2008.
1 HRSA ESAR-VHP Legal and Regulatory Issues Project 10 Steps to Legal Technical Assistance James G. Hodge, Jr., J.D., LL.M. Associate Professor, Johns.
State trainings to improve outbreak response using the CIFOR Guidelines for Foodborne Disease Outbreak Response CSTE Annual Conference June 5, 2012 Lauren.
Public Health Performance Standards District System Assessment Karen O’Rourke, MPH Joan Orr, CHES 2009.
Guide for Rural Local Officials Evaluating Your Input into the Statewide Transportation Planning Process Developed by the National Association of Development.
Emergency Management Training and Education System Protection and National Preparedness National Preparedness Directorate National Training and Education.
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
CIFOR Council to Improve Foodborne Outbreak Response CIFOR Guidelines and CIFOR Toolkit Donald J. Sharp, MD, DTM&H Food Safety Office National Center for.
1 EMS Fundamentals An Introduction to the EMS Process Roadmap AASHTO EMS Workshop.
Performance Management A briefing for new managers.
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BOARD TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD TRB’s Vision for Transportation Research.
1 Operations Academy Senior Management Program Next Offering October 18-28, 2016.
California Department of Public Health / 1 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH Standards and Guidelines for Healthcare Surge during Emergencies How.
A Framework for Assessing Needs Across Multiple States, Stakeholders, and Topic Areas Stephanie Wilkerson & Mary Styers REL Appalachia American Evaluation.
PP 620: Public Policy and Health Administration Unit One Seminar Kris R. Foote, J.D., M.P.A., M.S.W. Kaplan University.
Lesson 3 Page 1 of 24 Lesson 3 Considerations in Planning Public Health Surveillance.
Critical Program Movement: Integration of STD Prevention with Other Programs Kevin Fenton, MD, PhD, FFPH Director National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis,
South Dakota Department of Health
APHL Workforce Development Programs and Resources
CIFOR Toolkit: An Overview of Focus Area 3 – Communication
CIFOR Guidelines for Foodborne Disease Outbreak Response and the CIFOR Toolkit: Focus Area 7: Epidemiology Investigation New York Integrated Center of.
CIFOR Guidelines for Foodborne Disease Outbreak Response and the CIFOR Toolkit: Focus Area 9: Laboratory Investigation New York Integrated Center of Food.
Council to Improve Foodborne Outbreak Response (CIFOR) Update
CIFOR Guidelines for Foodborne Disease Outbreak Response and the CIFOR Toolkit: Focus Area 5: Pathogen-Specific Surveillance New York Integrated Center.
CIFOR Toolkit: An Overview of Focus Area 2 – Necessary Resources
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
CIFOR Toolkit: An Overview of Focus Area 2 – Necessary Resources
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
CDC/WHO Visit to Dubai, UAE February 17-25, 2014
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Strategic Plan Implementation July 18, 2018
Response Teams – Planning and Preparation
CIFOR Toolkit Focus Area 11: Food Recall
CIFOR Guidelines for Foodborne Disease Outbreak Response and the CIFOR Toolkit: Focus Area 6: Initial Steps of an Investigation New York Integrated Center.
Presentation transcript:

CIFOR Guidelines for Foodborne Disease Outbreak Response and the CIFOR Toolkit: An Overview New York Integrated Center of Food Safety Center of Excellence – May 24, 2016 Daniel Kuhles, MD, MPH, Director Bureau of Communicable Disease Control New York State Department of Health

2 Background First in a series of monthly webinars from the New York Integrated Center of Food Safety Center of Excellence (CoE) –Sessions will cover each of the 11 CIFOR Toolkit Focus Areas –Supplementary sessions will be devoted to assist states that wish to complete internal evaluations using the metrics and target ranges developed for the 16 CIFOR performance measures. –Additional topics will focus on emerging issues in food safety including culture ‐ independent diagnostic testing, antimicrobial resistance, and advanced molecular detection/whole genome sequencing. –All webinars will be recorded and available through the CoE website at

3 Objectives Define CIFOR and it’s mission and vision Understand the goal of the CIFOR Guidelines Understand how the CIFOR Toolkit can help agencies/jurisdictions improve their response to foodborne outbreaks Understand the basic process of prioritizing Focus Areas Understand the process of examining priority Focus Areas

4 What is CIFOR? Council to Improve Foodborne Outbreak and Response Vision: Local, state and federal partners collaborating effectively to reduce the burden of foodborne illness in the United States Mission: To improve methods at the local, state, and federal levels to detect, investigate, control, and prevent foodborne disease outbreaks

5 CIFOR Organization The CIFOR Council is made up of various food safety public health partners –Governance committee includes ASTHO, APHL, CDC, CSTE, FDA, NACCHO and NEHA CIFOR has several workgroups that focus on various projects and ensure participation of the larger foodborne outbreak response community including: –Guidelines/Toolkit –Law project –Metrics project (Performance Measures)

6 CIFOR Guidelines

7 Comprehensive description of foodborne disease outbreak response –Describes the major functions that should occur before, during and after a foodborne disease outbreak Developed by representatives from local, state and federal level with expertise in epidemiology, environmental health, food regulation, and laboratory sciences Released in 2009; revised in 2014

8 CIFOR Guidelines Sections Fundamental concepts of public health surveillance, response and control –Planning and preparation –Surveillance and outbreak detection –Investigations of clusters and outbreaks –Control measures Special considerations for multijurisdictional outbreaks Performance measures for foodborne disease programs Legal considerations for the surveillance/control of foodborne disease

9 CIFOR Guidelines Challenges Lengthy document A wide range of recommended practices Implementation of any particular recommendation depends on both –Agency factors (staff expertise, organizational structure, and resources) –Outbreak-specific factors (agent, number of cases, likely source of exposure)

10 CIFOR Toolkit

11 CIFOR Toolkit A stepwise process (and supporting worksheets) to help agencies and jurisdictions: –Better understand current foodborne disease outbreak response activities in their agency/jurisdiction –Become more familiar with the CIFOR Guidelines and recommended practices –Identify specific CIFOR recommendations and activities that will improve the agency’s/jurisdiction’s performance during future foodborne disease outbreak responses –Make plans to implement those activities

12 Target Audience Staff in local and state public health, environmental health, and food regulatory agencies and laboratories Ideally, the Toolkit will be used by an interdisciplinary workgroup within a jurisdiction with knowledge and practical experience in –Epidemiology –Environmental health –Food regulation –Laboratory science –Communication

13 Toolkit Materials Worksheets that help users get started with the process, identify areas in need of improvement, and support the examination of CIFOR recommendations specific to the program’s/agency’s/jurisdiction’s needs List of tips for facilitators Sample work sheets to demonstrate how they are used Participant evaluation form to provide feedback on the process

14 Preparing to Use the Toolkit Identify program, agency, or jurisdiction for which decisions will be made Brief decision-makers from program, agency, or jurisdiction Select workgroup to use Toolkit Identify support staff (e.g., a facilitator and a recorder) Make sure participants are familiar with CIFOR Guidelines Assemble the necessary supporting materials Decide on a time frame for completing the process

15 Toolkit Tracks and Focus Areas

16 Prioritization of Focus Areas A critical step in using the Toolkit May be done by the full workgroup or a smaller group of decision makers Concentrate on the prioritized Focus Areas during the remainder of the process Prioritizing Focus Area 1, “Relationships with relevant agencies and organizations”, is recommended

17 How to Prioritize Focus Areas Review Focus Area Worksheets –Lists “keys to success” for each Focus Area –Activities, relationships, and resources that are felt to be critical to achieving success in that Focus Area Determine what “keys to success” are already in place –Can also use worksheet to determine which keys to success are partially or fully in place Undertaken by key staff with expertise, practical experience

18

19

20

21 After Reviewing Keys to Success Determine if keys to success are already in place –If only a few of the keys to success are in place, it could mean the Focus Area needs work. Consider priorities in other capacity development or quality assurance initiatives Review past foodborne outbreak response experiences

22 Examination of Priority Focus Areas Step-by-step worksheets for all 11 Focus Areas –Describe current activities –Prioritize CIFOR recommendations to address needed improvements –Make plans to implement recommendations

23 Examination of Priority Focus Areas – Step 1 Describe your current activities and procedures in the Focus Area and identify areas in need of improvement –Consider existing activities and keys to success –Identify those which might need work to improve your program’s/agency’s/jurisdiction’s response to foodborne disease outbreaks –Review outbreak investigation after-action reports and summaries of debriefings to help in this effort

24 Examination of Priority Focus Areas – Step 2 Prioritize CIFOR recommendations to address needed improvements –Refer to the CIFOR Guidelines related to the Focus Area using the links on the worksheet Rank CIFOR recommendations to address targets –Likely impact on foodborne diseases –Ease of implementation –Dependent on other factors

25 Examination of Priority Focus Areas – Step 3 Make plans to implement selected CIFOR recommendations –Identify who will take the lead to implement each recommendation and set timeframe –Identify factors that could positively or negatively influence full implementation –Set a date to check-in on progress Incorporate the recommendation into your standard operating procedures so the activity will be continued into the future

26 Samples of Completed Worksheets

27 Example: Focus Area 3 – Communication

28 Prioritization of CIFOR Recommendations

29 Planning to Implement Change

30 Uses of the CIFOR Toolkit: Examples from the field

31 Toolkit Tips for Facilitators

32 Participant Evaluation Form

33 Helpful Tips for Using the Toolkit Don’t get distracted by the volume Be clear on the process Keep moving – don’t get caught up in too much detail Focus on a few realistic changes End with specific action plans with time frames and responsible persons Appoint a facilitator and a recorder for each discussion

34 Why Should My State Use the Toolkit? Improve overall foodborne outbreak investigation and response Enhance partnerships with agencies/partners in foodborne outbreak investigations Identify areas needing improvement that may have gone unrecognized

35 Where to Find the CIFOR Products Online at: Paper copies are also available from CSTE –Contact Dhara Shah at Examples of CIFOR product use by other states:

36 Next Scheduled NY CoE CIFOR Webinars Thursday, June 9, 2-3 PM –Focus Area 1: Relationships with Relevant Agencies and Organizations Wednesday, July 27, 2-3 PM –Focus Area 2: Necessary Resources Course announcement and link to register is posted on the DOH Learning Management System (LMS):

37 NY CoE Food Safety Symposium Cornell University, Ithaca, NY from July 19-21, 2016 REMINDER TO REGISTER! Each participant from your state (maximum of 3) is required to register for the symposium by June 17, 2016 using the following link: There is no registration fee associated with the symposium

38 Resources Comments or questions for NY CoE can be directed to: Paula Huth, NY CoE Program Coordinator or Integrated Food Safety CoE Websites: NY CoE: CDC: