What’s your friend up to? Subrecipient Monitoring Issues Tom Egan, MIT OSP Jeannette Gordon, Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight OPERA, OER, NIH.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
A-133 Compliance & Audit Readiness Presented By: Tracy Jackson and Susan Cook.
OMB Circular A-133 Audits of States, Local Governments and Non-Profit Organizations CReATE May 2013 Cathi Bass, Grants Compliance Manager Sponsored Research.
1 Guidance for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 By David G. Bullock, Partner Macias Gini & O’Connell LLP.
Rules Governing Sponsored Projects (aka OMB Circulars) Presented by Beverly Blakeney, Diane Cummings and Julie Macy.
Workshop Outline Building Blocks – Definitions Proposal Stage Lunch Break Subawards Subcontracts.
4/28/20151 Presented by: Anne Taylor, NECTAC David Steele, OSEP OSEP Part C Fiscal Management Verification: What Is It And How Do I Prepare For It?
Compliance Issues Mr. Rashawn Farrior ATE Financial Management Grant Workshop October 23, 2012 Hosted by: American Association of Community Colleges.
Subrecipient Monitoring CCIA Spring Conference Sheena Tran, Rancho Santiago CCD Tania Walden, Los Rios CCD Tracy Young, Coast CCD May 2013.
Subawards and Subcontracts Sponsored Projects Training Program October 17 th, 2011 Renee Hunt, Julie Macy & Dawn Pelkey.
Subrecipient Monitoring Webcast Presenters Pat O'Rourke, Irene St. Croix, Bridget Ware Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services.
1 Subgrants vs. Subcontracts TAA-CCCT Grants November 16, 2011.
Subcontracts Procedures and Federal Regulations Susan Tompkins George Walueff.
Subrecipient Monitoring OFFICE OF RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION 2010.
Subcontracts 101 By Mitali Ravindrakumar USC Collaboration between Parties Perform Subcontractor Analysis Sponsor - Fund Project/Subcontr act Negotiate.
CReATE Presented by: Marcy Friedle, Grants Compliance Analyst.
Subawards and Subrecipient Monitoring
Dionysios Karamalikis November 9,  Award Identification—At the time of the award, identifying to the sub-recipient the federal award information.
 August 14, 2012 Office of Extramural Research National Institutes of Health, HHS Scarlett Gibb, Customer Relationship Manager, eRA Commons Kathy Hancock,
Internal Controls Protect resources against waste and fraud Ensure accuracy and reliability Secure compliance Evaluate the level of performance in all.
“The mission of the Sub-recipient Monitoring Section is to monitor, assess, and assist Sub-recipients to successfully implement and complete Grant Program.
MODULE 8 MONITORING INDIANA HPRP Training 1. Role of Independent Financial Monitors 2 IHCDA is retaining an independent accounting firm to monitor its.
Grants & Contracts Support Group December 10, 2008 Subrecipient and Vendor Determination Checklist.
1 SUBAWARDS: CONTRACTING FOR SPECIAL CASES AND COMPLEXITIES April 28, 2008 NCURA Region VI & VII 2008 – Portland, OR Panelists: Derrick Lin, Senior Contract.
ARRA FUNDING UPDATE Unprecedented Number of Proposals JIT Requests Extraordinary Reporting Requirements Unique Administrative Characteristics OMB Implementing.
Audits of Federal Awards AGA-Olympia October 20, Brad White, SAO.
Collaborating with Others? If so, why and how? OSP AWARENESS MARCH 5, 2015 OSP.SYR.EDU
Foundation Financial Services Post Award Nancy Gomez Post Award Analyst.
2013 INBRE Project Subaward Management Barbara Bunge MSU Subaward Manager (406)
Monitoring & Oversight Adult Education and Literacy (AEL) Programs Brenda B. Williams Project Manager Texas Workforce Commission Regulatory Integrity Division.
Presented by Raaj Kurapati and Charlene Hart. Introduction  The Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 was enacted to streamline and improve the effectiveness.
UT-Arlington Accounting CPE Day August 13, 2014 SEFA Preparation and Subrecipient Monitoring.
Subrecipient Monitoring Under the Office of Management and Budget’s Circular A-133 Presented to the American Association of State Highway and Transportation.
The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards The OMB SuperCircular Information for FTA Grantees.
Recipe for Success in Subcontracting Crystal Miller and Elizabeth Fowlkes.
Subawards and the Uniform Guidance Research Reps Meeting 17 March 2015.
Risk and Subaward Management under the Uniform Guidance U.S. Department of Education.
Subrecipient Monitoring NCURA Regional Conference April 25, 2007 Jeri Muñiz Director, Sponsored Projects University of California, Irvine Csilla M. Csaplár.
Close-Outs Presented by Stacy Tedder NOAA Grants Management Division January 31,
Office of Sponsored Programs All rights reserved GTRC The New OSP Request for Subaward & Subrecipient Monitoring Course Dana Simpson: Contracting Officer,
Lifecycle of a Subaward: Making the Connection between Departmental and Central Responsibilities Dennis J. Paffrath, Assistant Vice President, SPA University.
“Surviving an Audit” Al Willie, Office of Internal Audit
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
Audit and Audit Resolution Presented by Wendy Spivey ADECA Audit Manager.
Daily Management of Awards Jennifer Crockett Jennifer Crockett, Director, Sponsored Projects Finance, Columbia University Tamara Hill Tamara Hill, Manager,
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
Agency Roundtable Discussion: Subrecipient Monitoring.
Financial Conflict of Interest: We Met the Deadline for the PHS Regulations...Now What? Brenda Seiton, Assistant Vice President for Research Administration,
Sponsored Project Administration Fall 2012 CERTIFICATION PROGRAM Sponsored Project Lifecycle Introduction Overview Creating a Project Budget Compliance.
Section 68 – What are your Sub- Recipients up to? (Sub-Recipient Monitoring – State Perspective) Wednesday, May 23, :30-2:45 Cindy Jarvis, Assistant.
Jaimie Lewis Omnitrans San Bernardino, California SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING.
A risk assessment is the process of identifying potential hazards an organization may face and analyzing methods of response if exposure occurs.
1 Subcontracting under your TAACCCT Grant TAA-CCCT Round 2 Grantees April 10, 2013 On Track with Trade Adjustment Assistance Community College and Career.
PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MEMORANDUMS OF AGREEMENT PROCESS Amy Monroe, Procurement Teri Mason, Budgets Thelma Hawkins, Grants Management Karen Wirth,
Juanita Syljuberget Alabama Cooperative Extension System May 23, 2012.
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
Subrecipient Monitoring
SUBRECEPIENTS POST-AWARD PROCEDURES
Subaward - 2 CFR A formal legal agreement between your institution and another legal entity An award provided by a pass-through entity (PTE) to.
The Administration of Subrecipient Agreements
Overview of Consultants in Sponsored Projects (OSR)
Managing Outgoing Subawards April 18, 2017
Subaward Life Cycle 10/24/17.
The Importance of Subrecipient Monitoring
Outgoing Subs Understanding Subawards and Subcontracts
Subrecipient vs. Contractor Determinations
Subrecipient Monitoring
Managing Federal grants
Uniform Guidance and Grants Accounting
Presentation transcript:

What’s your friend up to? Subrecipient Monitoring Issues Tom Egan, MIT OSP Jeannette Gordon, Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight OPERA, OER, NIH Sally Tremaine, Quinnipiac University

SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING ISSUES OMB Compliance Requirements OMB Compliance Requirements Subrecipient Monitoring Classes Subrecipient Monitoring Classes Subrecipient Monitoring Approaches Subrecipient Monitoring Approaches A-133 Audit Report Review A-133 Audit Report Review Subrecipient Monitoring -- Financial Subrecipient Monitoring -- Financial Subrecipient Monitoring -- Technical Subrecipient Monitoring -- Technical

QUESTIONS What are the OMB compliance requirements? What are the OMB compliance requirements? How do you evaluate “risk”? How do you evaluate “risk”? How do you monitor subrecipients? What monitoring activities can or should you do? How do you monitor subrecipients? What monitoring activities can or should you do? How do you measure or ensure compliance by subrecipients? How do you measure or ensure compliance by subrecipients?

DEFINITION OF SUBAWARD Financial assistance, or procurement, or contract made by a recipient to an eligible subrecipient Financial assistance, or procurement, or contract made by a recipient to an eligible subrecipient Includes any financial assistance when provided by legal agreement, even if the agreement is called a contract Includes any financial assistance when provided by legal agreement, even if the agreement is called a contract Does not include the purchase of goods and services Does not include the purchase of goods and services

DEFINITION OF SUBRECIPIENT The legal entity to which a subaward is made and which is accountable to the recipient for the use of funds provided. The legal entity to which a subaward is made and which is accountable to the recipient for the use of funds provided. See agency implementations of A-110 to determine what type of entity can be a subrecipient. See agency implementations of A-110 to determine what type of entity can be a subrecipient. Note guidance on distinguishing between subrecipient and a vendor. Note guidance on distinguishing between subrecipient and a vendor.

SUBAWARD AGREEMENTS Funding from a prime recipient to a subrecipient to carry out specific program activities. Funding from a prime recipient to a subrecipient to carry out specific program activities. May be termed a subgrant from an assistance award May be termed a subgrant from an assistance award May be termed a subcontract from a procurement award May be termed a subcontract from a procurement award The term “subrecipient” and “subawardee” are used interchangeably. The term “subrecipient” and “subawardee” are used interchangeably.

QUESTION What are the OMB requirements for subrecipient monitoring? What are the OMB requirements for subrecipient monitoring?

SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING OMB Compliance Requirements: Attachment M Subrecipient Monitoring The March 2004 Compliance Supplement was revised to clarify OMB’s expectations related to subrecipient monitoring. Annual request for subrecipient’s A-133 report is not sufficient. Annual request for subrecipient’s A-133 report is not sufficient. On-going review and oversight are expected and may include: On-going review and oversight are expected and may include: -Reviewing financial and performance reports -Reviewing financial and performance reports -Performing site visits to review information and observe operations -Regular contact and appropriate inquires

QUESTION How do you evaluate “risk”? How do you evaluate “risk”?

Subrecipient Monitoring: Classes Four “Classes” of Subrecipients Not-for-profits with Federal expenditures in excess of $500,000 Not-for-profits with Federal expenditures in excess of $500,000 Not-for-profits with Federal expenditures less than $500,000 Not-for-profits with Federal expenditures less than $500,000 Non-US-based entities Non-US-based entities For-profit entities For-profit entities

Subrecipient Monitoring: Approaches Factors such as the size of awards, percentage of the total program's funds awarded to subrecipients, and the complexity of the compliance requirements may influence the extent of monitoring procedures Factors such as the size of awards, percentage of the total program's funds awarded to subrecipients, and the complexity of the compliance requirements may influence the extent of monitoring procedures “Monitoring activities may take various forms …” “Monitoring activities may take various forms …” Risk-Based Approach Risk-Based Approach

Subrecipient Monitoring: Not-for-profits > $500,000 Well-defined in OMB Circular A-133 Well-defined in OMB Circular A-133 Review of the entity’s A-133 Audit Review of the entity’s A-133 Audit Options – Web, Report, confirmation Options – Web, Report, confirmation Look for items that affect subrecipients Look for items that affect subrecipients Significant items not directly affecting subrecipients should be investigated Significant items not directly affecting subrecipients should be investigated When identified, issues should be resolved in a timely manner When identified, issues should be resolved in a timely manner

Subrecipient Monitoring: Not-for-profits < $500,000 Entities receiving less than $500,000 in total Federal monies are not required to receive an A-133 audit Entities receiving less than $500,000 in total Federal monies are not required to receive an A-133 audit Prime recipient should require the subrecipient to confirm in writing that they did not receive over $500,000 Prime recipient should require the subrecipient to confirm in writing that they did not receive over $500,000 May be done with a confirmation May be done with a confirmation

Subrecipient Monitoring: Non-US-based & For-profits Prime should perform a risk assessment before award is granted Prime should perform a risk assessment before award is granted Key policies governing internal controls should be examined Key policies governing internal controls should be examined Visit to the subrecipients place of work to assess control environment Visit to the subrecipients place of work to assess control environment Other audits and reporting Other audits and reporting Development of a plan to monitor Development of a plan to monitor Remember – this is based upon Risk Remember – this is based upon Risk

QUESTION What tools can you employ to help monitor subrecipients? What tools can you employ to help monitor subrecipients?

Subrecipient Monitoring: A-133 Audit Report Review Research and review results of subrecipient’s OMB Circular A-133 audit reported in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. Information presented within the Clearinghouse is relied upon as sufficient evidence of compliance with the provisions of OMB Circular A-133 if the organization: Research and review results of subrecipient’s OMB Circular A-133 audit reported in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. Information presented within the Clearinghouse is relied upon as sufficient evidence of compliance with the provisions of OMB Circular A-133 if the organization: Receives an unqualified opinion on the financial statements Receives an unqualified opinion on the financial statements Receives an unqualified opinion on internal controls Receives an unqualified opinion on internal controls Has no material weaknesses reported Has no material weaknesses reported Has no reportable conditions related to Federal awards Has no reportable conditions related to Federal awards

FEDERAL AUDIT CLEARINGHOUSE

Subrecipient Monitoring: A-133 Audit Report Review

For subrecipients not listed in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the Research Administrator should make inquiries by forwarding a confirmation request letter to determine whether an audit was required and, if so, the status of the audit. Retain copy of inquires and make subsequent inquiries as needed to acquire audit information.

Subrecipient Monitoring: A-133 Audit Report Review MIT’s response to subrecipient’s audit status query

Subrecipient Monitoring: A-133 Audit Report Review For the subrecipients that are not subject to an OMB circular A-133 audit, employ the most cost-effective method of monitoring.

Subrecipient Monitoring : A-133 Audit Report Review MIT’s request for more detailed information regarding the subrecipient’s audit findings and/or reportable conditions

Subrecipient Monitoring: Subrecipient Info Gathering Letter

Subrecipient Monitoring: A-133 Audit Report Review For subrecipients that are identified with a reportable condition, gain an understanding of relevant findings or questioned costs stated in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and/or request a copy of the subrecipients A-133 report with all appendices. For subrecipients that are identified with a reportable condition, gain an understanding of relevant findings or questioned costs stated in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and/or request a copy of the subrecipients A-133 report with all appendices.

Subrecipient Monitoring: A-133 Audit Report Review Evaluate for materiality any findings or questioned costs. Evaluate for materiality any findings or questioned costs. Consider the impact of any corrective action plan as well as other related actions undertaken by subrecipient management. Consider the impact of any corrective action plan as well as other related actions undertaken by subrecipient management. Notify the proper administrative departments of those findings and questioned costs determined to have a material impact on Federal awards. Notify the proper administrative departments of those findings and questioned costs determined to have a material impact on Federal awards.

QUESTION What are the roles for What are the roles for Principal Investigator Principal Investigator Department Administrator Department Administrator OSP OSP

Subrecipient Monitoring: FINANCIAL Track subrecipient allocations separately Track subrecipient allocations separately Process for review and approval of invoices Process for review and approval of invoices PI for programmatic PI for programmatic OSP for administrative/financial OSP for administrative/financial Reimbursement for disallowances Reimbursement for disallowances Verify cost sharing commitments Verify cost sharing commitments

Subrecipient Monitoring: TECHNICAL Scientific progress Scientific progress Invention reports Invention reports Timely submission of deliverables Timely submission of deliverables Final reports Final reports

REFERENCE DOCUMENTS OMB Circular A-21 OMB Circular A-21 OMB Circular A-110 OMB Circular A-110 OMB Circular A-133 OMB Circular A-133 FDP Subrecipient Template FDP Subrecipient Template Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA)

GLOSSARY FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE – Provides support or stimulation to accomplish a public purpose. Award is grant or cooperative agreement. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE – Provides support or stimulation to accomplish a public purpose. Award is grant or cooperative agreement. PROCUREMENT – Purchase of goods and services to accomplish a government purpose; services can include research. Award is a contract. PROCUREMENT – Purchase of goods and services to accomplish a government purpose; services can include research. Award is a contract. OTHER TRANSACTIONS – Process to acquire research or goods where, by statute, the normal regulations (A-21, A-110, Bayh-Dole) do not apply. OTHER TRANSACTIONS – Process to acquire research or goods where, by statute, the normal regulations (A-21, A-110, Bayh-Dole) do not apply.

GLOSSARY SUBRECIPIENT VS. VENDOR See OMB Circular A-133, __.210 See OMB Circular A-133, __.210 Subject to same audit standards as recipients Subject to same audit standards as recipients Payments received for goods and services are vendor agreements and not subject to audit as subrecipient agreements Payments received for goods and services are vendor agreements and not subject to audit as subrecipient agreements

GLOSSARY CHARACTERISTICS OF A VENDOR Provides goods and services within normal business operations and to many purchasers Provides goods and services within normal business operations and to many purchasers Operates in a competitive environment Operates in a competitive environment Provides goods and services ancillary to the operation of the federal program Provides goods and services ancillary to the operation of the federal program Not subject to compliance requirements of the federal program Not subject to compliance requirements of the federal program

QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS

WEB SITES FDP Homepage: thefdp.org/ FDP Subaward Demonstration Project: thefdp.org/Subawards_Forms.html Lists of Parties Excluded from Federal Procurement & Nonprocurement Programs Federal Audit Clearinghouse: harvester.census.gov/sac/ MIT Office of Sponsored Programs: web.mit.edu/osp/www web.mit.edu/osp/www NCURA: Financial Research Administration Neighborhood lists resources for subrecipient monitoring

CONTACTS Tom Egan: Tom Egan: Jeannette Gordon: Sally Tremaine: