VBF H- > ττ- > lept had Electron Channel 10.0.4 Analysis Jaspreet Sidhu 27-10-05.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Discovery of a standard model Higgs boson using vector boson fusion at the LHC Craig Buttar University of Sheffield Collaborators: G.Azuelos, V.Cavasinni,
Advertisements

Full Production Analysis so far… Saminder Dhaliwal 24 th August 2005.
Current limits (95% C.L.): LEP direct searches m H > GeV Global fit to precision EW data (excludes direct search results) m H < 157 GeV Latest Tevatron.
QCD Background… and the Resolution Saminder Dhaliwal August 30 th 2005.
Implementation of e-ID based on BDT in Athena EgammaRec Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (with T. Dai, X. Li, A. Wilson, B. Zhou) US-ATLAS.
Higgs Searches using Vector Boson Fusion. 2 Why a “Low Mass” Higgs (1) M H
Missing E T Reconstruction in the ATLAS Calorimeter Calor 2006, Chicago June 5th - 9th, 2006 For the ATLAS Jet/E T Miss Group Ambreesh Gupta, University.
Fully reconstructed SM 130 GeV Higgs  in the lepton+hadron channel First look at the samples Catalin, Kevin, Tony Univ. of Illinois.
Trigger studies of SM 130 GeV Higgs  in the lepton+hadron channel First pass at estimating trigger efficiency Higgs mass reconstruction Catalin Ciobanu,
Warped extra dimensions lepton signatures in ATLAS O.K. Baker Hampton University (K. McFarlane, V. Vassilakopoulos, T. Shin) SUSY05.
10/14/20051 Tau reconstruction and H/A →  H/A →  MC events: PYTHIA ⇒ OSCAR ⇒ DIGI (mass 120 GeV ?) 10k events overnight DIGI ⇒ DST: crashes DIGI ⇒
L. Perera LPC physics meeting 11/17/ Search for H/A →  Lalith Perera Rutgers University for Rutgers CMS Group Amit Lath, Keith Rose, Sunil Somalvar,
Validation of DC3 fully simulated W→eν samples (NLO, reconstructed in ) Laura Gilbert 01/08/06.
1 Annual Report Zongru Wan Rutgers  Proton/antiproton collisions at Fermilab  CDF detector  Tau’s - physics, decay and reconstruction  Exercise: tau.
1 introduction sample: W’  tb  Wbb  eνbb/μνbb generator: PYTHIA five samples with W’ mass: 300GeV, 500GeV, 1000GeV, 1500GeV, 2000GeV number of events.
1 Andrea Bangert, ATLAS SCT Meeting, Monte Carlo Studies Of Top Quark Pair Production Andrea Bangert, Max Planck Institute of Physics, CSC T6.
1 A Feasibility Study for a Strange Sea Asymmetry Analysis at ATLAS: update II Laura Gilbert and Jeff Tseng 13/12/07.
FTK update H→  Tony, Catalin By speeding up/adding rejection at LVL2, we can have a higher rate coming in from LVL1. Therefore some of the LVL1 threshold.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
Lepton efficiency & fake rate Yousuke Kataoka University of Tokyo Content definitions of leptons p2 efficiency and fake rate for SU3 ( ) p3, p4.
19/07/20061 Nectarios Ch. Benekos 1, Rosy Nicolaidou 2, Stathes Paganis 3, Kirill Prokofiev 3 for the collaboration among: 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik,
Akimasa Ishikawa (Tohoku University)
F. Ahmadov Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia Institute of Physics, ANAS, Baku, Azerbaijan 41th ITEP Winter School of Physics February.
25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.
Measurement of the branching ratios for Standard Model Higgs decays into muon pairs and into Z boson pairs at 1.4 TeV CLIC Gordana Milutinovic-Dumbelovic,
Study of Standard Model Backgrounds for SUSY search with ATLAS detector Takayuki Sasaki, University of Tokyo.
Simone Gennai SNS, INFN-Pisa1 Radion searches in CMS A first look to  hh G. Dewhirst, L. Fano, S. Gennai, S. Nikitenko.
FIMCMS, 26 May, 2008 S. Lehti HIP Charged Higgs Project Preparative Analysis for Background Measurements with Data R.Kinnunen, M. Kortelainen, S. Lehti,
DPF2000, 8/9-12/00 p. 1Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityHiggs Searches in Run II at CDF Prospects for Higgs Searches at CDF in Run II DPF2000.
30/Jul/20101 Research of Z generation Ken-ichiro KOIKE.
Trigger validation for Many thanks to Long Zhao, Chihiro Omachi, Julie Kirk, Giovanni Siragusa, Patricia Conde Muiño, Andreas Reinsch, Olya Igonkina,
Physics at LHC Prague, 6-12 July, 2003 R. Kinnunen Helsinki Institute of Physics A/H ->  and H + ->  in CMS R. Kinnunen Physics at LHC Prague July 6.
Higgs Reach Through VBF with ATLAS Bruce Mellado University of Wisconsin-Madison Recontres de Moriond 2004 QCD and High Energy Hadronic Interactions.
INCLUSIVE STANDARD MODEL HIGGS SEARCHES HIGGS SEARCHES WITH ATLAS Francesco Polci LAL Orsay On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration. SUSY08 – Seoul (Korea)
Software offline tutorial, CERN, Dec 7 th Electrons and photons in ATHENA Frédéric DERUE – LPNHE Paris ATLAS offline software tutorial Detectors.
Study on search of a SM Higgs (120GeV) produced via VBF and decaying in two hadronic taus V.Cavasinni, F.Sarri, I.Vivarelli.
SEARCH FOR AN INVISIBLE HIGGS IN tth EVENTS T.L.Cheng, G.Kilvington, R.Goncalo Motivation The search for the Higgs boson is a window on physics beyond.
Electron Calibration and Performance ( ) N. Benekos (MPI), R. Nikolaidou (Saclay), S. Paganis (Sheffield) Contributions from: A. Farbin (CERN) +
1 Pythia versus Alpgen for W+jets (High Mass Dibosons work) Sarah Allwood 07/12/06.
Hggs-D meeting MPI 11/20061 Higgs Physics – Activities in Bonn/Siegen Jörn Große-Knetter ATLAS-Higgs-D Treffen München,
Search for Higgs portal Dark matter Tohoku Ayumi Yamamoto 11/5 2011/11/51.
VBF H- > ττ- > lept had Electron Channel Jaspreet Sidhu ATLAS Toronto meeting
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
HEP Conference 1 NMSSM Higgs Search Search for neutral NMSSM Higgs Studies at 10 TeV, and with the TeV Jehad Mousa University of.
10 January 2008Neil Collins - University of Birmingham 1 Tau Trigger Performance Neil Collins ATLAS UK Physics Meeting Thursday 10 th January 2008.
University of Iowa Study of qq->qqH  qq ZZ Alexi Mestvirishvili November 2004, CMS PRS Workshop at FNAL.
Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.
Z  BF using  hadronic events Silke Duensing Aug 8th, 2003.
Search for Invisible Higgs Decays at the ILC Ayumi Yamamoto, Akimasa Ishikawa, Hitoshi Yamamoto (Tohoku University) Keisuke Fujii (KEK)
Atautau  lh Carlos Solans TileCal Valencia meeting 20th September 2007.
Current Status of e-ID based on BDT Algorithm Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan (with X. Li, T. Dai, A. Wilson, B. Zhou) BNL Analysis Jamboree March.
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
Marcello Barisonzi First results of AOD analysis on t-channel Single Top DAD 30/05/2005 Page 1 AOD on Single Top Marcello Barisonzi.
Anna Kaczmarska Tau Workshop, Copenhagen, /16 Z → ττ (electron, τ –had) analysis with mc08 data Anna Kaczmarska IFJ-PAN Cracow Elżbieta Richter-Wąs.
Status of the Higgs to tau tau analysis Carlos Solans Cristobal Cuenca.
RD. Schaffer, L. Iconomidou Fayard, D. Fournier
on top mass measurement based on B had decay length
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
Higgs → t+t- in Vector Boson Fusion
Update of Electron Identification Performance Based on BDTs
Implementation of e-ID based on BDT in Athena EgammaRec
Fake Jet Rejection: Sum Jt
Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835
tth, (h→bb) with EventViews
Status of the H4l CSC Note (HG2)
Performance of BDTs for Electron Identification
Experimental and theoretical Group Torino + Moscow
Northern Illinois University / NICADD
Presentation transcript:

VBF H- > ττ- > lept had Electron Channel Analysis Jaspreet Sidhu

Data Set Generation + Simulation – Release – Rome layout, with TRT simulation Digitization + Reconstruction – Release – Default reconstruction parameters Electrons, tau’s…, jets – R=0.4 Cone algorithm for jets – AOD objects - Pythia & Tauola Production H-> ττ, VBF mode Events (after filtering) M H = 115GeV τ-> e, τ-> h (σ x BR) = 390 fb

Electron Filter Use Single High Pt Electron Filter No Filter 1000 events 366 electrons Filter pt >15GeV |  | < electrons  = 12.6%  VBF Higgs events (after filtering)  release for simulation  for digitization w/o pile-up

Full simulation Elec ID Elec ID ( 3 Basic Cuts) cut 1: hasTrack() & pT >20GeV cut 2 : egamma object Comparison of 3 ElecID cuts at Cut 3 cut 3a : isEM ==0 ( using all the flags including TRT ) cut 3b: epiNN >0.8 cut 3c: likelihood > 0.8 Stronger Elec ID cuts cut 4: Et cone<10GeV in R=0.45 cut 5: 0.8 < E/p <1.4

Electron Reconstruction Efficiency # elec  (%) Truth20,000 No Cuts (candidates) 193,146 Cut 146,761 Cut 221,877 isEM (all flags) 13, % epiNN > 0.818, % likelihood() >0.816, %

Stronger Elec ID Cuts EoverPEtCone Higgs Dijets

Harder Cuts: Isolation and E/p # elec  (%) isEM13, % Isolation (EtCone<10GeV) 13, % E/p (0.8< E/P <1.4) 11, % epiNN18, % Isolation13, % EoverP10, % likelihood >0.816, % Isolation14, % E/p11, %

isEM PtEta After Hard Elec Cuts

epiNN PtEta After Hard Elec Cuts

Likelihood Eta Pt After Hard Elec Cuts

Dijet Rejection – Best algorithm:isEM (refer to Saminder’s Work) - Using isEM rather than likelihood as the 3 rd level cut only reduces Electron Identification by 3.3%. - By using Harder ElecID cuts can reject 87% of background CutsHiggs # elec Dijets # elec isEM13, Isolation13,40999 E/p11,163 (  =80.4%) 39 (  =13.0%)

Taujet Identification Taujet is essentially a narrow jet in the detector Taujet Id Cuts cut 1: abs(charge)==1 cut 2: NumTrack ==1 or 3 cut 3: likelihood > 4 cut 4: pt >40 GeV

Taujet Reconstruction Efficiency # Taujets Truth20,000 No Cuts (candidates) Cut Cut Cut Cut 4 (  = 30.5 %)

Taujets Eta Pt After Cut 4 After Cut 3

Higgs Reconstruction Use Identified Electrons and Taujets and reconstruct the Invariant Mass of the Tau System Use Collinear Approximation Using the missing transverse momentum and assuming Tau decay products are collinear with original Tau, solve 2 linear equations for missing neutrinos, can reconstruct the Tau’s and hence the Invariant mass of the whole system(Higgs Mass)

Higgs Reconstruction Reconstruct 6062 events Efficiency of Reconstruction  = 30.31% Mean =106.2Gev  =14.9 Gev

Higgs Reconstruction (with hard elecid cuts) Reconstructed 6062 events Efficiency of Reconstruction  = 24.7% Efficiency drop = 5.6% Mean =106.2Gev  =14.7 Gev

Fake Higgs 6 Fake Higgs reconstructed from 201,700 events Fake rate  = % With Hard Electron cuts 2 Fake Higgs Reject 66.7% fake higgs 2 Fake Higgs

Summary Electron Identification Efficiency (  =69.5%) With Harder Cuts (  =55.8%) Dijet Rejection ( Can Reject 87% of electrons) Tau Identification Efficiency (  =30.5%) Higgs Reconstruction Efficiency (  =30.31%) With Harder Elec Id Cuts (  =24.7%) 6 Fake Higgs (  =0.0029%) With Harder Elec Id Cuts (Can reject 66.7% ) Next Step : Reconstruction with pile up and Trigger simulation