Welcome to the Winner’s Circle! Trends in Healthcare Compensation Arkansas Healthcare Human Resources Association April 1, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Market Pricing Organizations seek to offer market based pay rates in order to attract and retain competent employees There are two basic methods to recognize.
Advertisements

Compensation 101 Today’s lesson plan: Compensation How To Use Market Data To Support Your Compensation Philosophy.
COMPENSATION STRATEGIES FOR NONPROFITS October 30, 2008 Bay Area Nonprofit HR Network San Francisco, CA.
DENTON ISD Pay Study Design
Symposium on SALARY POLICY, SALARY SCALES, SALARY STRUCTURE
Fox, Lawson & Associates Compensation Study Summary Findings
Compensation Philosophy Performance-driven and market-referenced –We value high performance and compensate employees based on their contributions to the.
A Roundtable Discussion: Market Based Pay Structures for “Reality Based” Pay July 2005.
Pay For Performance: Managing Pay Systems Across Organizations
1 Strategic Staffing & Compensation Your NU Values Partner … “Committed to understanding and delivering value-added customer service that contributes to.
1 Compensation Update Lori Dougherty Director of Compensation December 8, 2009 Brandeis University pays competitive base market salaries as part of a total.
COMPENSATION.
COMPENSATION MANAGEMENT
Management Forum Presentation November 3, 2008 Lynne Gervais, Associate Vice-Principal Human Resources 1.
Non-Academic Staff Compensation Structure & Administration
Stephenville ISD Pay Study Design August 20, 2012 Ann R. Patton CCP Sr. Compensation Consultant.
Copyright ©2012 by Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.9- 1 Chapter 9 Compensation and Benefits Prepared by Joseph Mosca Monmouth University.
© 2007 Hay Group. All rights reserved. Salary Survey Report January 30, 2007 State of Kansas.
Total Rewards and Compensation
© 2010 McGraw Hill Ryerson 8-1 COMPENSATION Third Canadian Edition Milkovich, Newman, Cole.
Competitive Market Compensation Review July 2009 Project Overview.
Prentice Hall, Inc. © A Human Resource Management Approach STRATEGIC COMPENSATION Prepared by David Oakes Chapter 8 Building Market-Competitive.
Pay Structure Decisions
Pay, Compensation and Benefits
Staff Compensation Program – Phase 2 Internal Equity Adjustments October 2005.
Non-Academic Staff Compensation Program Employee Presentation 2013.
1 ACC FY07 Classification and Compensation Study.
Classification & Compensation Study Outside firm (BCC) was hired to perform: Classification Study Internal Equity Pay equity compliance Study.
By: Juan P. Garcia Organizational Research Services Director EMPLOYER OF CHOICE Total Rewards, Trends and Plan Design Take a Chomp Out of Your Comp!
Proactive Compensation: Getting Out From Behind The Eight Ball GSHHRA Conference June 12, 2014.
Collecting Market Data Presented to NPELRA April 15, 2002 Bruce G. Lawson, CCP Fox Lawson & Associates LLC (602)
© 2009 South-Western Cengage. All rights reserved. Chapter 7 Compensation Strategies and Practices.
Benchmarking Compensation & Benefits: How Do You Compare? Christina L. Greathouse, Ph.D. Strategic Performance Group April 30, 2008.
Compensating Employees Definition Objective Bases Types Determining Reward Job Evaluation Compensation Structure.
© 2015 Texas Association of School Boards, Inc. All rights reserved. January 29, 2015 Presented by: Ann R. Patton Managing Compensation Consultant Compensation.
-09/06/13, - Page 1 The Ohio State University - Classification and Compensation Talking Points - CONFIDENTIAL – for internal use only -  Compensation.
Agenda Review Major Changes from January 8 Presentation of Draft Preliminary Results Review Final Recommendations Other Progress to Date  
Chapter 5 Compensation & Benefits
Compease Staff Salary Administration Program. Compease - General A fully qualified and effective work force is essential to the College’s success Fundamental.
McGraw-Hill © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Budgets and Administration Chapter 18.
McGraw-Hill © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Budgets and Administration Chapter 18.
Chapter 9 Managing Compensation
Bruce Tingle, CCP and Michelle Karr, CCP UTSA. 29,000 students Second largest University in UT System 800 full time faculty 2,500 staff employees Annual.
Compensation Study Preliminary Results Overview Presented by: CBIZ Human Capital Services October 26, 2015.
OH 4-1 Agenda Choice for book review due today Articles reviews regarding Chapter 3 - Communication Test Your Knowledge Chapter 3 – page 68 of the Competency.
AFOA HR CONFERENCE 2015 Compensation 101
Advances in Human Resource Development and Management Course code: MGT 712 Lecture 12.
Classification and compensation Analysis Pilot Project MU Staff Job Title and Salary Study Implementation Update.
McGraw-Hill © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Management: Making it Work Chapter 18.
Agenda Study Process Outreach Summary Salary Quartile Analysis
CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION. Classification & Compensation Position Classification Career Banding / Broadbanding Competency Assessments PeopleAdmin.
11-1 McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. fundamentals of Human Resource Management 4 th edition by.
Compensation Study Preliminary Results Presented by: CBIZ Human Capital Services January 11, 2016.
Creating a Salary Structure 101
Human Resources Department Bridget Paris, Compensation Specialist Work Session July 7, 2011.
For Brought to you by the Faculty Senate Compensation, Benefits and Workload Committee.
Performance Management, Compensation, Benefits, Payroll, and the HRIS
Staff Compensation Update Staff Council Meeting Eduardo Salaz AVP Human Resources May 10, 2016 Saint Mary’s College “Confidential” 5/10/20161.
Discussion on Compensation. Goal To assist in securing and retaining a staff of necessary quality to achieve the goals and objectives of the organization.
Fair Pay for Northern California Nonprofits: The 2016 Compensation & Benefits Survey HIGHLIGHTS AND TRENDS May 12, 2016 Sponsored by CompassPoint Nonprofit.
Is There Hidden Liability in Your Compensation System? Identifying and Eliminating Pay Inequity.
City of Galveston Classification & Compensation Study Discussion Preliminary Findings and Recommendations.
Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) Proposed Changes CALS May 24, 2016 Kelly Delforge, SPHR, SHRM-SCP Director, HR Solutions and Consulting Division of Human.
FY2017 Market Program Overview Staff Meeting. 2 FY17 Market Preview Key Dates & Communication Shared information with Chiefs and Administrators in May.
FY2017 Market Program Overview Manager Sessions. 2 Agenda Market Program Refresher FY2017 Market and New Hire Minimum Overview Key Messages and Next Steps.
2012 COMPENSATION STUDY RESULTS July 18, 2012 Board of Aldermen Worksession.
Compensation and Classification Study for Alachua County BOCC, Sheriff, Property Appraiser, and Supervisor of Elections Offices, FL 1 March 2016 Results.
Compensation Structure and Merit Process
Fox, Lawson & Associates Compensation Study Summary Findings
Staff Compensation Update
Presentation transcript:

Welcome to the Winner’s Circle! Trends in Healthcare Compensation Arkansas Healthcare Human Resources Association April 1, 2016

2 Overview The Secret to Making Compensation Plans: Quick and easy to update Easy to administer Internally equitable Externally competitive Affordable for your hospital

3 Amazing Secrets The Secret to Losing 10 Pounds this Week Without Diet or Exercise!

4 Amazing Secrets The Secret to Feeling Totally Rested & Alert On 3 Hours Sleep a Night!

5 Amazing Secrets The Secret to Leading a Perfectly Organized Life!

6 The Simple Truth There Is No One Secret! No Easy Way!

7 The Simple Truth No Secret Lets You Avoid The Work

8 Simple Truth Takes HARD Work to Be A Winner

9 Compensation Programs Are No Different The Satisfying Work of HR Champions Analyzing Compensation Structures Determining Best Data to Utilize Dissecting Causes of High Turnover

10 Analyzing Compensation Structures Issues That Surface Pay compression Internal Equity Market competitiveness Complexity of compensation programs Perception by employees Turnover

11 Issues Are Not Unique Many healthcare organizations have seen very low pay increases in the last seven years – now we’re seeing some rather aggressively catching up. ACA requiring substantial time from HR departments. Other issues are coming down the road: o FLSA changes ($23,660 threshold to $50, 440) o Minimum wage increases (1/1/17 AR to $8.50)

12 What Can Be Done? A top to bottom review of your compensation program every 3 to 4 years. Market price at least 70 – 75% of your jobs Update pay structure(s) based on market analysis Analyze each employees placement in a pay grade and their position in it

13 Monitor Between Reviews Between comprehensive reviews, actively monitor and take appropriate action in these areas: Hire-On Rates Market Competitiveness Internal Equity Compensation Program Complexity Pay Administration Pay Increases Leadership Communication Transparency Perceptions

14 Hire-On Rates Years of experience How does it fit with current employees? Typically, pay compression is the biggest problem with hiring. Even in a pay freeze, organizations tend to hire at competitive rates. Current employees fall behind.

15 Market Competitiveness Is your organization ahead of the market? Sometimes organizations are paying more competitively than the market Is your organization falling behind? How far? Pay now or pay later

16 Employees Not As Patient “I’ll gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today.” –Wimpy Wellington

17 External Competitiveness Market Median 75th Percentile of Market 25th Percentile of Market Current Salaries

18 External Competitiveness Market Median 75th Percentile of Market 25th Percentile of Market

19 AHA Survey Data Let’s look at the data points and what they mean.

20 AHA Survey Data All of these numbers come from actual pay.

21 AHA Survey Data

22 AHA Survey Data These numbers are guidelines, NOT pay rates.

23 Market Competitiveness Market adjustments Monitoring hot jobs Word on the street Metrics Turnover rates Compa-ratios

24 Turnover Rates Comes from different places: It’s not always market competitiveness. Can see years of experience affect things. It can be the speed at which employees move through the ranges. It can actually be the design or the administration of the plan.

25 Compa-Ratio Overall Compa-Ratio for the position is 102.4% Job TitleCompa-Ratio Radiology Technologist % Radiology Technologist % Radiology Technologist % Radiology Technologist % Radiology Technologist % Radiology Technologist % Radiology Technologist % Radiology Technologist % Radiology Technologist % Radiology Technologist % Radiology Technologist % Radiology Technologist % Radiology Technologist %

26 Complexity of Compensation Program Quick Fixes Create Long-Term Issues Creating a new job level (Pharmacy Tech 1 – 3) Adding a new pay grade Developing a new pay structure for a job family or facility Job offers Fixing trouble-spots on a regular basis creates a reactionary system

27 Pay Administration How quickly are employees moving through the ranges? Are experienced, fully proficient employees close to the range midpoint? How are you handling employees above the range maximum? Are you adjusting your ranges for market movement on annual basis between comprehensive compensation program updates?

28 Typical Range Placement Employee A, hired 2 years ago with 0 years of relevant experience when hired, solid performer Employee B, hired 8 years ago with 0 years of relevant experience when hired, solid performer Employee C, hired 20 years ago with 0 years of relevant experience when hired, solid performer Range MinimumRange Maximum Range Midpoint (Market Median) 95% 100%105% 120% 80% Employee B Base Pay Employee A Base Pay 85% 90% 110% 115% Employee C Base Pay

29 Pay Increases How are they awarded? Across the board Based on years of experience Merit matrix

30 Leadership Communication What you need to be communicating: Market competitiveness of organization Entire organization Potential trouble areas Employees perception of compensation Business case for pay increase budget, market adjustments

31 Transparency How well do your managers and employees understand your compensation program? They do not need to understand all of the details. Employees need to know enough to believe it is fair.

32 Perception Even market competitive salaries are looked at negatively without an annual pay increase. Employees begin to feel like the organization does not value their contribution.

33 Staying on Top of Compensation Difficulties will come and tough decisions will need to be made. Strategically positioning your compensation program will mean your organization is better prepared when difficulties occur and you will not be in a reactionary mode.

34 Questions If you have questions or need to discuss your compensation programs, contact: Theresa M. Worman